Offshore betting thrives in Telangana despite blanket ban: Study
According to the study 'Click. Bet. Repeat', 96% of the respondents, who all indulge in real-money gaming, are aware that such activity is illegal in Telangana. Yet a staggering 87% report betting daily, primarily on offshore sports betting and casino platforms that operate beyond the reach of Indian law.
Based on responses from 2,671 users, the study captures the widespread reliance on foreign operators and the easy circumvention of legal restrictions. Nearly 89% said they face virtually no barriers to accessing these platforms. VPNs, Telegram links, and anonymous wallets have become common workarounds, with 94% of users bypassing real-name KYC protocols and 86% funding their accounts through UPI transfers via agents or friends.
Stake, 1xBet, 1win, Teen Patti 979, and colour-prediction apps emerged as the most frequently used platforms. Users reported being targeted through social media advertisements, influencer promotions, WhatsApp messages, and calls, indicating the depth of digital outreach these operators deploy.
The user base is predominantly young, male, and digitally savvy. Around 62% are under 30, and while men dominate at 78%, women account for a significant 22%. The activity cuts across income brackets, with 60% from households earning below ₹30,000 per month.
Despite frequent losses — 99% have lost money — most respondents still believe they are net gainers. 'The average monthly spends between ₹500–₹5,000 may seem minor, but add up significantly over time, especially for low-income users,' the report said.
Interestingly, while awareness of the ban is nearly universal, 94% of respondents want real-money gaming platforms to be legalised and regulated in the State.
PRAHAR president Abhay Raj Mishra said the findings illustrate a policy failure. 'What was seen as a bold preventive measure in 2017 has only succeeded in driving out domestic operators and inviting offshore syndicates to dominate the market. The result is a thriving grey economy that undermines national security and digital sovereignty,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
31 minutes ago
- NDTV
72 Hours After MNS Workers Slap Mumbai Shopkeeper, Cops To Question Accused
Mumbai: Over 72 hours after a Mumbai shopkeeper was assaulted for not speaking in Marathi - his ordeal filmed and circulated online by the assailants - and over 24 hours after the FIR was filed, the police will finally record the statements of the accused, sources told NDTV Thursday morning. The seven men - members of Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, which has refused to apologise for the assault - will be deposed at the Deputy Commissioner of Police's office. It is unclear if they will be taken into custody after their statements are recorded. Action against the accused - the first concrete step in what has been dubbed the 'MNS slapgate' case - comes after sustained pressure by NDTV, and demands for justice for 48-year-old Babulal Khimji Chaudhary, the owner of the 'Jodhpur Sweet Shop' in Mumbai's Mira Road suburb. The video of the awful assault, which took place past 10.30 pm Sunday and has been widely shared online - showed the MNS goons surrounding Chaudhary and threatening him with worse action, including forcibly shutting down his business, if his staff and he don't speak in Marathi. Bagharam, a migrant worker from Rajasthan, spoke to NDTV after the assault. He said the MNS thugs wanted to buy bottles of water but when he spoke to them in Hindi, they demanded he speak in Marathi. "I said we speak all languages, so they threatened to beat me up..." The thugs then accosted Chaudhary and attacked him. READ | "Said Have To Speak In Marathi": Man Threatened By Raj Thackeray Party Workers As horrific as the assault was, the matter was compounded after the MNS - ironically leading a protest against the 'imposition of Hindi' in the state - refused to apologise to Chaudhary. The party accused Chaudhary of being 'arrogant'. It said he had provoked his attackers by stating that all languages are spoken in Maharashtra, a statement that is correct. Experts have pointed out every Indian has the right to speak the language of their choice, a right primarily protected by Article 19 of the Constitution, which esures freedom of speech and expression. The party has also complained because seven men were named in the FIR names, while the video shows only three hitting Chaudhary. Meanwhile, Babulal Chaudhary, whose business has been flourishing on Mira Road for the past two decades, told NDTV he would fight to ensure the MNS goons are held to account. "Mumbai is my 'karmabhoomi'... but now I am living in fear. I want safety, I want to feel safe," he said. Chaudhary - who intends to hold a protest march despite an ominous 'warning' from the MNS - has been backed by fellow traders, many of whom shut shops for the day to signal their support.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why is Indian coder Soham Parekh being accused of ‘scamming' US startups? Explained
Soham Parekh, an Indian developer, has sparked major controversy in the US tech scene after entrepreneur Suhail Doshi accused him of 'moonlighting across multiple startups and scamming employers.' US entrepreneur Suhail Doshi's post about Soham Parekh triggered a flood of similar experiences shared by founders from startups like Lindy, Fleet AI, and Antimetal.(X) In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), Doshi, the co-founder and ex-CEO of Mixpanel, labelled Parekh a 'scammer' who had tricked several startups, including those backed by the Y Combinator accelerator. Doshi revealed that he had fired Parekh just a week after hiring him, saying it was due to dishonesty. 'He reached out privately and said he regretted it,' Doshi noted. His post prompted a wave of similar accounts from other startup founders, including those from Lindy, Fleet AI, and Antimetal. These employers described being initially impressed by Parekh's skills during interviews, only to later find out he was juggling multiple roles without disclosure. In total, at least five startups have since come forward with allegations against Parekh. Despite the uproar, he has not responded publicly, though he reportedly contacted Doshi in private to express remorse. The situation has ignited debate in tech circles over hiring transparency and remote work ethics. The controversy explained The controversy surrounding Soham Parekh has brought attention to the fine line between moonlighting and founding multiple startups—a distinction that hinges on deception versus disclosure. In Parekh's case, critics say the issue lies in the lack of transparency. He is accused of violating contracts and breaking the trust of companies that believed they were hiring a full-time, fully committed employee. In reality, each employer was unknowingly receiving only a portion of his time and effort. While Parekh's resume lists a bachelor's degree from the University of Mumbai and a master's from the Georgia Institute of Technology, the authenticity of these credentials is now being called into question. As the allegations gained momentum online, they sparked broader discussions about remote hiring practices, weak background verification, and the moral grey area of moonlighting in the tech world. Some questioned how one engineer could manage so many jobs, while others acknowledged his apparent brilliance in interviews. One user on social media, who claimed to have worked with Parekh, said, 'When he works, yes. I saw him taking on a task and finishing in an hour when it'd take at least three for other engineers.' For several Silicon Valley startups, working with Parekh became a cautionary tale. Many described him as smart, engaging, and highly likable during the hiring process. But once hired, issues allegedly began to surface – missed meetings, delayed output, and what appeared to be the fallout of overcommitting to multiple full-time roles. The resume that listed roles at high-profile AI startups has now come under doubt, with Doshi remarking that it was 'probably 90% fake.' The episode has underscored the gaps in vetting remote talent and prompted a reckoning over how startups screen candidates in an increasingly global and remote-first hiring landscape.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Bengaluru stampede: Karnataka HC questions suspension of 5 cops, seeks govt reply
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court on Thursday sought an explanation from the state government over the suspension of five police officers in connection with the June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium, which left 11 people dead, questioning whether a milder action—such as transferring them to other posts—might have been more appropriate. The June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium left 11 people dead. (PTI) A bench of Justices SG Pandit and TM Nadaf said the state will have to 'justify whether it was proper to keep the officers under suspension, or, whether shifting them to another post would have been sufficient?' The court was hearing an appeal filed by the Karnataka government challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) July 1 order quashing Indian police service (IPS) officer Vikash Kumar Vikash's suspension. Terming the state's suspension order 'mechanical' and not supported by sufficient material, the tribunal had directed the state to 'immediately' reinstate Vikash. It had also suggested that the government extend similar relief to the other four officers suspended along with Vikash, including the then commissioner of police B Dayananda. Urging the court to stay the tribunal's order, advocate general Shashikiran Shetty on Thursday said that the tribunal had acted in haste and had also overstepped in suggesting the remaining four officers, who were not even parties before it, also be reinstated. Shetty said the state was ready to show the court that all five officers who had been suspended were guilty of 'dereliction of duty.' 'I will be able to show from the records that the suspension order was justified,' Shetty added. Shetty told the court that the tribunal had granted Vikash relief on July 1 and he had reported to duty in his uniform on July 2 without waiting for any formal order from the state reinstating him. The high court, however, said it will hear the matter further on July 9 and until the next hearing, Vikash must show restraint and not precipitate the matter any further. Also Read: Bengaluru stampede: Karnataka moves HC against quashing of officer's suspension Vikash's counsel, senior advocate Dhyan Chinappa, assured the court that his client will 'not do anything' until the next hearing before the high court. Vikash and the four other officers of Bengaluru police were suspended on June 5, a day after the stampede. Vikash had challenged his suspension before the tribunal, claiming he was not responsible for the tragedy and that the police had no prior notice of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB)'s Indian Premier League (IPL) victory parade, which triggered the stampede. It blamed RCB for unilaterally announcing the event via Instagram without informing the authorities. Also Read: HC allows govt to file reply on stampede plea in sealed cover In its order, the tribunal held that RCB announced free public entry, drawing massive crowds to the stadium, and failed to formally seek police permission or coordinate with authorities for the victory parade and celebrations. The Karnataka government, however, has challenged the tribunal's order claiming that the revocation of suspension of the officers while the magisterial and judicial inquiries into the stampede were ongoing was likely to adversely impact the probes. Vikash's 'presence in service during this period might adversely affect the examination of witnesses' and undermine the process of justice, the state has argued.
