logo
Night joggers followed by Aaron Fahey; convicted and fined in Nelson court for indecent gesture

Night joggers followed by Aaron Fahey; convicted and fined in Nelson court for indecent gesture

NZ Heralda day ago
His behaviour, which included following the girls, frightened them to the extent that the younger girl began to cry.
The 30-year-old understood it was 'disgraceful behaviour' and claimed he mistook one of the girls for someone he knew.
Fahey's lawyer Ian Miller said that did not change what he had done, and the victim impact statements showed the extent to which the girls had been afraid, and the impact on their families.
'He can't say much more than he's very remorseful and apologetic,' Miller said.
Police prosecutor Rebecca Terry said the police wanted to highlight that it happened at a time in the evening when it was dark, the victims were young, alone and vulnerable, and were approached by Fahey, who invited them into his vehicle while gesturing at them.
It was around 6pm on August 10 last year when the two girls set off for a run in the suburb on the outskirts of Nelson City.
The police said they soon noticed a man in a black ute was following them. The older of the two pulled out her phone and began recording him.
Fahey drove past, parked and stared at them. The girls then ran away but Fahey did a U-turn and followed them again, caught up and slowed then made the 'vulgar gesture' towards them, the summary of facts said.
The girls then ran towards home. Fahey followed them again, stopped the vehicle beside them and asked if they would like a ride, and told them they were beautiful.
The younger girl began to cry in fear, before they both ran off in the opposite direction to home, through fear that Fahey would find out where they lived.
Judge Tony Snell noted the charge carried a maximum two-year prison sentence. He said Fahey had tried to have it dismissed through there being no case to answer, but had ultimately accepted responsibility.
Miller had argued earlier that what happened was offensive but not indecent.
Judge Snell acknowledged the victims had been left 'extremely fearful and frightened', but accepted Miller's claim that Fahey, who had no previous convictions, had made an error in that he thought the girls were 'much older'.
Taking into account the legal process around settling on the charge, Judge Snell accepted Fahey had entered a guilty plea early.
He said while 'nothing happened' other than what was in the summary of facts, and Fahey had made no effort to get out of the car, it was important that he was sentenced on what was alleged, Judge Snell said.
He said it was a 'significant error of judgment' unlikely to be repeated, but added that it was 'utterly inappropriate' for a 30-year-old man to behave in the manner he did with an 11- and 13-year-old.
Judge Snell said Fahey's offer to pay the victims emotional harm reparation was the appropriate way to show his remorse.
He was convicted and fined $800 and ordered to pay each victim $600.
Tracy Neal is a Nelson-based Open Justice reporter at NZME. She was previously RNZ's regional reporter in Nelson-Marlborough and has covered general news, including court and local government for the Nelson Mail.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Espionage trial of NZ soldier shrouded in secrecy
Espionage trial of NZ soldier shrouded in secrecy

Otago Daily Times

time2 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Espionage trial of NZ soldier shrouded in secrecy

By Jimmy Ellingham of RNZ A soldier with links to far-right groups and who is accused of spying will face a court martial hearing next week - a first-of-its-kind prosecution shrouded in secrecy for now. The Linton-based soldier's name is suppressed and so is the foreign country at the centre of the espionage case, as well as the names of some prosecution expert witnesses. RNZ is opposing these orders and a suppression hearing is scheduled for Monday morning, before the court martial begins. In late 2020, 17 charges under the Armed Forces Discipline Act were laid against the soldier, including espionage and possessing objectionable material. Since then, the case has wended its way through pre-trial hearings. RNZ has previously reported the soldier, aged 27 at the time of his arrest, was a member of far-right groups the Dominion Movement and Action Zealandia. First of its kind A similar case 50 years ago saw Bill Sutch tried and acquitted in the civilian court of espionage, for passing information to the Russians. Next week's court martial is the first military case. "I think 'unusual' is not the right term," said retired Auckland University law professor Bill Hodge about the prosecution. "I think 'unique' might be the correct term." Hodge said the suppression orders appeared extensive. "I've always been surprised that there could be information held by the armed forces, which absolutely had to be kept top secret. "There maybe information about the citizens of a foreign jurisdiction and what they're doing here, but still, that would be of public interest." Hodge said military courts were historically ahead of civilian ones on matters of justice and fairness, although they might hold concerns about making information public. "Remember, the background of a military court would concern hostilities and [be] in the face of the enemy. In that sort of situation, that sort of context, they would be greatly concerned with information that would aid the enemy. "I don't see an enemy at this moment, so I'm still mystified at what secrecy they'll be pursuing." Military panel to hear the case One difference between courts martial and civilian courts is that, instead of a jury, a panel of senior military officers hears the evidence, and decides on a defendant's guilt or innocence, and - if applicable - their sentence. In his previous career in the military, Hodge sat on these panels. "A military court is concerned with fairness, right to counsel, the insanity defence, for example, the discovery of information," he said. "One thing I could say firmly is the individual will have a fair trial, because in my experience, it's a fair system." David Pawson is an experienced court martial counsel and, in 30 years - firstly with the military police, then as a lawyer - he has never seen a similar case. "When I was a military police special investigator - that was at the end of the Cold War period - and even during that period, I was not aware of any investigation of that sort of nature. I have to say that was a new one to me." The system was robust and transparent, he said. "The court martial, in my experience, has always been very careful not to be seen as a secretive court and generally does apply those principles the same way that they do in the civil court." This meant the starting point for suppression decisions was open justice. Another experienced court martial lawyer, Michael Bott, said talking to a military panel was somewhat different to addressing a jury. "There are military values you have to take into account and also, with a court martial, it's governed by the Armed Forces Discipline Act, as opposed to the Criminal Procedure Act, but the Bill of Rights still applies. "When you're doing an opening and a closing, the processes and techniques are pretty much transferable." He said suppression arguments at courts martial sometimes included matters not applicable to civilian courts, such as national security. Hodge said he didn't think the court martial would reflect badly on New Zealand's reputation. "I think there's the opposite argument that the allies could say, 'New Zealand is alert, New Zealand is sufficiently concerned about this matter and they're looking after whatever information this might be'. "While you could say, 'Is New Zealand a leaky sieve?', no, New Zealand is behaving properly and attending to the disciplinary side of a possible breach." If the soldier is found guilty next week, he won't face the death penalty. This was removed from military law in 1989, but sentences for courts martial range from losing rank to a lengthy term in military prison.

Solider accused of spying to face court martial
Solider accused of spying to face court martial

RNZ News

time4 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Solider accused of spying to face court martial

life and society defence force 18 minutes ago A soldier with links to far right groups and who is accused of spying will face a court martial hearing next week - a first-of-its-kind prosecution that's for now shrouded in secrecy. The Linton-based soldier's name is suppressed and so is the foreign country at the centre of the espionage case. RNZ is opposing these orders and a suppression hearing is set to take place on Monday morning, before the court martial begins. Courts martial are in many ways similar to jury trials in civilian courts. Jimmy Ellingham reports.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store