
Expanded high-speed rail network part of vision for Europe, says EU's transport chief
Apostolos Tzitzikostas, the EU's transport commissioner, said the project would involve the 'coordinated planning, financing and implementation' of high-speed rail infrastructure and of rolling stock that could operate across national borders.
The EU is determined to build genuine 'passenger-centred, attractive and affordable rail services', he said, with faster lines and smoother cross-border rail travel considered crucial to the bloc's competitiveness and climate goals.
'Ultimately, people will choose the train not just because it is more sustainable but because it is the more comfortable, faster and more affordable option for long-distance travel in Europe,' Tzitzikostas said. 'That is our direction of travel.'
Long-distance rail travel in Europe has long suffered from poor coordination and connectivity, with different line gauges, rolling stock specifications, operating technologies and signalling systems hampering cross-border links.
A survey published last month suggested that three in four EU citizens would prefer to take a high-speed train instead of a plane if connections between capitals and major urban areas were fast and reliable. But according to a 2021 report by the commission, rail accounted for less than 10% of cross-border EU travel.
With a 90% fall in transport emissions part of the blueprint for the bloc's pledge of climate neutrality by 2050, getting more people on to trains is vital: Amsterdam to London by train, for example, saves 93% of carbon dioxide over the same journey by plane.
But cash-strapped national operators tend to prioritise domestic services. New infrastructure – and trains capable of operating across borders – are expensive. While new routes have opened and others are on the way, for most Europeans, the plane is faster on most journeys.
The commission has previously set a goal of doubling high-speed rail traffic from 2015 levels by 2030, and trebling it by 2050, via a proposed 49,400km, €546bn (£476bn) high-speed rail network connecting all EU capitals and major cities at speeds of 250km/h (155mph) or more.
Tzitzikostas said his new plan would help achieve that goal, which was attainable if 'we address systemic bottlenecks'. The issue was not just more EU money, he said, although rail would be a major beneficiary of a 100% boost to the transport infrastructure budget.
'We need a coordinated financing approach, combining the best use of EU funding, national support and private investment,' he said. But new high-speed lines – and improved existing ones – would not be enough on their own.
'It's also about ensuring that infrastructure is used effectively,' Tzitzikostas said. 'Making sure new operators can access the market, that new standardised rolling stock is available, and that the network is managed as a single system, with similar operating rules and conditions.'
Connectivity is not the only issue. As well as being faster, air travel is often cheaper – and easier to book. A 2023 Greenpeace report which assessed 112 European routes found that trains were, on average, twice as expensive as planes.
T&E, a transport and clean energy advocacy group, says air travel is artificially cheap mainly because all parts of the sector – from airports through plane manufacturers through to airlines – are subsidised by local, regional, national and EU authorities, while airlines are exempt from paying tax on their fuel and VAT on their tickets.
Cross-border train passengers dream of the seamless through tickets available to flyers. European train operators share little ticket information with each other or with booking platforms, forcing passengers to buy multiple separate tickets.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
While EU plans for a single booking system met with resistance, Tzitzikostas said the EU was now working to make ticket-buying easier by ensuring all operators and vendors could access ticket sales platform and improving passenger rights.
Without smoother rail connections, lower prices and one-stop ticketing, air travel still has the edge. But if rail can deliver a 'comfortable, affordable, easy-to book service', passengers will respond, Tzitzikostas insisted. 'More are choosing high-speed rail already – not just because it's more sustainable, but because it's better.'
At present, though, national priorities 'do not always align with European ambitions', due in part to domestic pressure on resources, he said. Interoperability was also a real challenge: 'Trains still face too many 'borders' within Europe. All this will close collaboration, and funding.'
The substantial investment needed to complete a European high-speed network by 2040, the commission's target, would necessarily involve 'innovative funding and financing mechanisms', he said: 'After all, return on investment here is entirely predictable.'
Referring to the airline sector, Tzitzikostas said the commission's goal was to 'build a fairer and more sustainable level playing field – allowing people to make climate-friendly choices, but also keeping mobility accessible and affordable for all'.
Next year's launch of a direct 11-hour Prague-Berlin-Copenhagen service, however, showed just how strong the demand for high-speed rail travel now was, he said – and would only increase as assorted lines under construction would almost halve the journey time.
'I am naturally an optimist, and I'm also a train guy,' he said. 'I'm already picturing the day when someone can have lunch in Vesterbro in Copenhagen, step on a train, and arrive for dinner in Wenceslas Square, next door to Prague central station.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
16 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
The new rules British tourists in the EU will have to follow
The changes include proof of medical insurance and a return ticket, and are part of a new digital system made from arrivals being introduced by the European Union. The system, which will begin on October 12, will see all non-EU passport holders have their fingerprints and photograph taken the first time they use it. Plus, all passengers will be asked a series of questions to confirm proof of accommodation and sufficient funds. The new system, called the entry and exit system (EES), will come into place for airports, ferry ports and all other border crossings. EES has been designed to track border crossing digitally using fingerprints and facial recognition. The system will replace passport stamping at border control when arriving or leaving a country. EES will mean all travellers from outside of the EU will be known as third-country nationals and will have to register passport details and biometric data when entering an EU country. Borders will have self-service style kiosks where passengers will be able to share the information. The data will be kept for future visits, which means that all future visits only require verification of the biometric data. Visitors will still be asked questions by border officials relating to proof of accommodation, money, insurance and a return ticket. Children are not exempt from the new changes; children under 12 will be required to have their faces scanned, but they will not need to give fingerprints. Recommended Reading Why are passports different colours and what do they mean? Who can get a new passport for free? Travel criteria How to contact UK Passport Office for passports and advice The new system will be in place across 25 EU countries as well as members of the Schengen. The countries which will have EES are: EES will begin to be rolled out from Sunday, October 12 and is expected to have a full launch by April 10, 2026.


Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says both sides in Ukraine war will need to cede territory
WASHINGTON/KYIV/BRUSSELS, Aug 11 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that Kyiv and Moscow will both have to cede land to end the war in Ukraine and talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin this week will instantly show whether the Kremlin leader is willing to make a deal. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump this week ahead of his summit with Putin in Alaska on Friday, amid fears Washington may dictate unfavorable peace terms to Ukraine. Trump has hardened his stance towards Moscow by agreeing to allow additional U.S. weapons to reach Ukraine and threatening tariffs against buyers of Russian oil but fears persisted in Europe that he might agree to a deal that forces big concessions from Kyiv. European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday that "transatlantic unity, support to Ukraine and pressure on Russia" were needed to end the war and "prevent future Russian aggression in Europe." Trump told a White House press conference of his talks with Putin, "This is really a feel-out meeting." He said he would know "probably in the first two minutes" of his meeting with Putin whether progress was possible. "I'm going to be telling him, 'You've got to end this war,'" he said. "I'm going to go and see the parameters now. I may leave and say, 'Good luck.' And that'll be the end. I may say, 'This, this is not going to be settled.'" Trump said a future meeting could include Zelenskiy and the U.S. goal is a speedy ceasefire in the bloody 3-1/2-year-old conflict. He plans to talk to European leaders soon after his talks with Putin. Trump has in the past talked about land swaps but neither Russia nor Ukraine has been open to ceding land as part of a peace deal. Speaking to reporters, Trump said: "There'll be some land swapping going on." "I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody, to the good of Ukraine," he said. He said Russia had occupied some "very prime territory" but "we're going to try to get some of that territory back." Kallas said in a post on X that the EU would work to increase sanctions against Russia, military support for Ukraine and assistance for Ukraine's budget needs and accession to the EU. Zelenskiy warned on Monday that any concessions to Russia would not persuade it to stop fighting and more pressure needed to be exerted on the Kremlin. He urged countries to keep their sanctions against Russia in place until Ukraine receives security guarantees. "Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits," he wrote on X. "Concessions do not persuade a killer." Ukraine has sought to push back Russian invaders ever since the largest and deadliest war in Europe since World War Two began in February 2022. Putin launched the invasion to take over Ukraine and expand Russia's sphere of influence. Zelenskiy spoke to the leaders of India and Saudi Arabia on Monday, in an effort to mobilize support for Kyiv beyond Europe ahead of Trump's meeting with Putin. Putin has also made a flurry of calls in recent days, speaking to the leaders of China, India, Brazil and three ex-Soviet states to brief them on his contacts with the United States. Germany will convene a virtual meeting of European leaders on Wednesday to discuss how to pressure Russia ahead of a European call with Trump. Zelenskiy and EU and NATO officials are expected to join the meeting. Trump's mention of exchanging land reiterated his comment last week that a possible deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both sides." The Trump administration has not disclosed its proposed territorial exchanges or any mechanism to ensure that Putin complies with a ceasefire and does not try to overrun more of Ukraine. Trump's special envoy to Ukraine, retired U.S. Army General Keith Kellogg, earlier this year proposed a "resiliency force" of European NATO troops to secure the frontlines, as well as creating an 18-mile-wide demilitarized zone in eastern Ukraine. No U.S. troops would be involved. Britain and France in July convened a "coalition of the willing" of more than 30 nations and agreed to pursue operational plans for a European air, sea and land "reassurance force" and to "regenerate" Ukraine's military. Kellogg also said that Ukraine would not be admitted to NATO, meeting one of Putin's demands.


The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Frustrated Crystal Palace count cost after Cas upholds Europa League ban
The news Steve Parish was dreading arrived less than 24 hours after he basked in the glory of watching Crystal Palace win their second trophy in three months. Parish had been confident the club's appeal against their demotion from the Europa League would succeed as he discussed their prospects in the bowels of Wembley stadium after the Community Shield victory against Liverpool on Sunday. 'I really am, even more after Friday,' the club chair said. 'I don't understand that we cannot be in the competition. I really can't. But it's up to the judges to decide. We trust them and that they listened to everything we said so let's see.' Confirmation from the court of arbitration for sport that it had upheld the decision made by Uefa's club financial control body to punish Palace for breaching its multi-club ownership rules has brought Parish and the team's supporters back to earth. The Cas statement made clear the role of John Textor, the American businessman who last month sold his 43% stake in Palace to the New York Jets owner, Woody Johnson, was decisive. Textor has admitted that seconds after Palace's victory against Manchester City in May's FA Cup final that he feared for the worst regarding participation in the Europa League, given that he owns Lyon, who also qualified. The Cas panel – consisting of a Dutch former striker, a Swiss former fencer who competed in the 1984 Olympics and an Italian professor – backed Uefa's findings that Textor 'was a board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of Uefa's assessment date'. It also dismissed Palace's argument that they had received unfair treatment compared to Nottingham Forest and Lyon, and said missing the 1 March deadline for Textor to place his shares into a blind trust had been crucial. Textor has been the target of most Palace fans' frustration, although several have also taken aim at the Nottingham Forest owner, Evangelos Marinakis. Forest, who are poised to take Palace's Europa League place, wrote to Uefa a few weeks after the FA Cup final expressing concern that Palace may have contravened multi-club ownership regulations. Parish suggested last month in an interview with Gary Lineker that their Premier League rivals had played a role in the decision to ban them. 'We were told that and I think it's been made public,' he said. 'These things seem to be played out in public. There doesn't seem to be a lot of confidentiality that comes out of certain organisations. But we're led to believe that that's the issue – if there wasn't somebody that wanted to get in as a consequence, then there wouldn't be a problem. 'People have got to look at themselves. Some people will say it's fine, some people will say it's not. I don't really have control of that. I only have control of the arguments that we put forward to Uefa.' Forest declined to comment on Parish's remarks at the time. Palace's case is believed to have included evidence that only members of the European Club Association were informed Uefa's 1 March deadline for complying with multi-club rules could be extended until 31 May – a fact that enabled Marinakis to place Forest into a blind trust when it seemed they might qualify for the Champions League along with his Greek club, Olympiakos. Palace are also understood to have highlighted the burgeoning friendship between Marinakis and Textor. The American denies that had any bearing on his conduct and described as untrue reports he is planning to incorporate his Brazilian club Botafogo into the Greek shipping magnate's network of clubs. Forest sent a legal delegation to the Cas hearing to argue their case and they have been silent since Palace were demoted by Uefa last month. Marinakis has resumed control of shares in the two-time European champions after they finished seventh in the Premier League. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Their supporters can look forward to the Europa League's league stage while Palace prepare for a Conference League playoff against the losers of the Europa League qualifier between Norway's Fredrikstad and Midtjylland of Denmark. Midtjylland lead 3-1 going into their home leg on Thursday. It is estimated demotion will cost Palace up to £20m in lost revenue, given the Conference League's league stage has two fewer games than the Europa League's, although Oliver Glasner will fancy his chances of winning a competition that has had two English winners in its first four editions. The chance for Palace to play in Europe for the first time since a short-lived Intertoto Cup experience in 1998, when they qualified after being the only English team to apply for entry, will be consolation for a club that also missed out in 1991 when they finished third in the old First Division. Only the top two went into Europe via league position.