Carbon offsets set aside following greenwashing lawsuit
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Fears Australia faces ‘missed opportunity'
Australia could miss out on its next great invention plus significant economic benefits, with one prominent business leader calling for an increase in research and development spending so we no longer lag behind other developed countries. Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black says the Albanese government should help boost public and private spending into research and development from 1.7 per cent of GDP to 3 per cent. As it stands, Australia is dragging behind the other OECD countries which on average invest 2.7 per cent of GDP into funding and developing innovating ideas. Australia was also significantly behind the United States and South Korea which invest 3.59 per cent and 5.21 per cent respectively. As a result, the country was missing out on the economic returns, with Mr Black pointing to analysis from the CSIRO which found that every dollar invested in R&D offered a $3 return to GDP. 'They're doing that because they see that the economic return, the dividend to their economy associated with these types of investment makes it worthwhile,' he said. More and better innovation also had the power to make 'life better' too, said Mr Black, pointing to world-leading Australian inventions such as the cochlear implant, Google Maps, pacemakers and even Wi-Fi. Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black is calling for more investment in R&D. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'If we talk about these types of inventions – being able to hear, being able to see your child, being able to navigate your way through cities and towns with confidence – that is genuinely a reflection of how our society has changed as a consequence of good old Australian R&D,' he said. 'R&D when done right changes the way we live, every single day.' While sectors such as agriculture, health, renewables and the resources sector were areas where Australia had 'existing advantages,' he said there was also 'scope for opportunity' in more left field areas like quantum computing. Figures released by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources tip Australia's technology sector is set to contribute $244bn a year to the economy by 2031, a rapid increase from the current $167bn. Increasing Australia's quantum capabilities is set to amplify the growth of the sector. 'Who would have thought that Australia would be at the absolute forefront of global research with respect to this cutting edge technology, and yet we are,' he said. Speaking to the importance of R&D, Mr Black said analysis from the CSIRO found Australia stood to receive a $3 boost to GDP for every dollar invested in R&D. NewsWire/ Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire The push for a higher spend on R&D comes as Labor seeks to unite union and business leaders for a productivity roundtable which will be held at Parliament House in August. Mr Black said boosting Australian innovation was a key way to expose Australia to new market, create new jobs and develop emerging industries. In addition for a 5 per cent target on increased funding from the public and private sector, the BCA is also calling for a better tax incentives to encourage domestic and international to invest in Australian projects, plus a publicly accessible National Researcher Directory to help connect industry with research expertise. 'Ultimately what that means is that R&D is an excellent way of driving productivity (and) productivity is the main determinant for how we can deliver real wages growth across our economy,' he said. Labor is undertaking a strategic review into its R&D processes, with the government set to receive the recommendations by the end of the year. Former industry and science minister Ed Husic also acknowledged in October last year that R&D funding in Australia was at a 'sorry state,' and said the government was 'very focused on fixing up our languishing national R&D spend'.
7NEWS
6 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Powerball draw 1517: The winning numbers you need for $100m prize
Powerball's $100 million jackpot — the game's richest prize for 2025 — has gone on the line on Thursday night. If you chose not to buy a ticket, chances are you know someone who did because up to half of all Australian adults were tipped to try their luck. The winning numbers for Powerball draw #1517 are: 28, 10, 3, 16, 31, 14 and 21. The Powerball is 6. Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today If a single entrant claims division one honours, they will rocket to equal third in terms of most lucrative individual wins. The last time Powerball reached these $100m heights was in November. Just six Australians know exactly how it feels to win a Powerball prize of $100 million or more. 'From quiet country towns to bustling city streets, we've seen life-changing wins happen to anyone in the most unexpected places. That's the beauty of Powerball,' The Lott spokesperson Anna Hobdell said. 'The next chapter of someone's life could begin this Thursday with $100 million up for grabs. The win could happen to anyone, a teacher, a tradie, a retiree, or a parent. 'The $100 million club is growing, and maybe we'll welcome a new member this Thursday.'
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Pauline Hanson calls for review into salaries of public servants while choosing not to comment on pay rise of federal politicians
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has called for a review into the salaries of public servant workers following the pay rise for federal politicians. Senator Hanson has 'beef about' public servants' salaries and her review calls come after the decision to give federal politicians a 2.4 per cent pay rise, which was confirmed on Wednesday. The One Nation leader joined Sky News host Chris Kenny where she did not comment about the pay rise of federal politicians and instead Hanson turned her attention to a review of the salary of public servants. 'What I do have a beef about is what some of these public servants are paid and I think they're ridiculously paid on $600,000, $700,000 a year,' she said. 'That needs to be reviewed. 'Look at the Postmaster-Generals, they're on $1.3 million plus. End up with nearly $3 million. Look at those people.' All public offices within the tribunal's jurisdiction will receive the 2.4 per cent pay rise, including federal politicians, senior public servants and departmental secretaries. The pay rise comes after the 2025 Review of Remuneration for Holders of Public Office by the Australian government's remuneration tribunal. 'The remuneration increases the tribunal has awarded to offices in its jurisdiction over the past decade have been relatively modest,' the tribunal said in a statement. Prior to her diving into her public servant salary 'beef', Senator Hanson did not comment on the latest federal politician wage boost. 'Well, Chris, my understanding is 2.4 million welfare recipients are also receiving that pay rise. Also, people on tax benefits A and B are receiving that pay rise... and there's been other pay rises right across the board for other people, low-income workers, so everyone's received a pay rise,' she said. 'So, I'm not going to comment on it other than that and you know for the work that we do, so anyway.' Prime Minister Albanese will receive a $15,000 pay rise from July 1, seeing his annual salary bump up to $622,050 from $607,471. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley will receive an additional $10,374 per year, bringing her total salary to $442,634.
