Carbon offsets set aside following greenwashing lawsuit
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
25 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘We have a mandate to act': PM throws open doors to bolder agenda
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has thrown open the doors to a more daring economic reform agenda, convening a summit later this year to kickstart Australia's stuttering economy. As he set guard rails for his upcoming negotiation with US President Donald Trump on tariffs, Albanese revealed he would bring union and business bosses together in August to chart a path to a more prosperous society after years of flatlining living standards and productivity. The government did not speak of the roundtable before its election win, the size of which has spurred calls from economists, think tanks and some MPs for Labor to consider broader reform to tackle issues such as reducing the reliance on income taxes. 'The commitments the Australian people voted for in May are the foundation of our mandate, they are not the limits of our responsibilities or our vision,' Albanese said in his first major speech since his generational 94-seat win. 'We want to build the broadest possible base of support for further economic reform … Our government has secured a mandate to act.' Loading Holding the economic summit, as Labor did in its first term on industrial relations policy, could hand Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers more authority to pursue bolder policies than those it took to the election. Chalmers has been emphasising the productivity problem since the election, while Housing Minister Clare O'Neil and assistant minister for productivity Andrew Leigh have both recently taken aim at red tape, suggesting a new focus on growth after facing criticism for allegedly over-regulating and over-spending last term. Labor ministers have stressed their policies on childcare, school funding, green energy and housing were already ambitious, but they have faced calls to examine major issues such as the GST, property taxes and the company tax rate.
The Age
25 minutes ago
- The Age
‘We have a mandate to act': PM throws open doors to bolder agenda
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has thrown open the doors to a more daring economic reform agenda, convening a summit later this year to kickstart Australia's stuttering economy. As he set guard rails for his upcoming negotiation with US President Donald Trump on tariffs, Albanese revealed he would bring union and business bosses together in August to chart a path to a more prosperous society after years of flatlining living standards and productivity. The government did not speak of the roundtable before its election win, the size of which has spurred calls from economists, think tanks and some MPs for Labor to consider broader reform to tackle issues such as reducing the reliance on income taxes. 'The commitments the Australian people voted for in May are the foundation of our mandate, they are not the limits of our responsibilities or our vision,' Albanese said in his first major speech since his generational 94-seat win. 'We want to build the broadest possible base of support for further economic reform … Our government has secured a mandate to act.' Loading Holding the economic summit, as Labor did in its first term on industrial relations policy, could hand Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers more authority to pursue bolder policies than those it took to the election. Chalmers has been emphasising the productivity problem since the election, while Housing Minister Clare O'Neil and assistant minister for productivity Andrew Leigh have both recently taken aim at red tape, suggesting a new focus on growth after facing criticism for allegedly over-regulating and over-spending last term. Labor ministers have stressed their policies on childcare, school funding, green energy and housing were already ambitious, but they have faced calls to examine major issues such as the GST, property taxes and the company tax rate.
Canberra Times
41 minutes ago
- Canberra Times
Average Australian home now costs $1 million
The average price of an Australian home has now reached an eye-watering $1 million. The average price of an Australian home has now reached an eye-watering $1 million. Pic: Shutterstock That is the finding from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, which said the record price for Australian dwellings came in the March quarter of 2025. "The national mean price of residential dwellings passed $1 million for the first time in the March quarter 2025, rising 0.7 per cent to $1,002,500," Dr Misha Tan, ABS head of finance statistics said. "Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland were the main drivers of the rise , with Queensald reaching the second highest mean price in Australia, behind New South Wales." While the national average house costs $1 million, prices vary from state to state. Source: ABS NSW dwelling prices, which include both houses and units, remained in front with an average price of $1.245 million. It is the only state with an above $1 million price tag, despite the national mean now hitting over $1 million. Next in line is Queensland where the average home will set you back $944,700 according to the ABS. The ACT has seen its home prices drop over the last year, in the March quarter 2024 it stood at $951,800 but this year had dropped to $944,700. WA, which has seen strong growth jumped nearly $100k in the same time, with the mean dwelling price of $869,200. Victoria has also seen a drop in prices over the past year. It went from a mean dwelling price of $911,800 in the March quarter of 2024 to $899,700 this March quarter 2025. The rise of the national home price came in a period when the RBA had made its first cut for 2025 in February. Pic: Shutterstock The rise of the national home price came in a period when the RBA had made its first cut for 2025 in February. It cut rates again in May, taking the cash rate to below 4 per cent for the first time in two years. The total value of Australian housing has also jumped. Source: ABS And while there was strong growth in prices in the three months to March, yearly growth in prices were down. Despite the quarterly rise in national dwelling value, annual growth in the March quarter slowed to 5.9 per cent. This was down from 9.5 per cent in March quarter 2024', Dr Tan said. Quarterly growth was seen across all states and territories, and most evident in Queensland (+1.9 per cent) and South Australia (+1.6 per cent). The total value of all Australian homes also rose in the March quarter according to the ABS. It reported that the total value of Australia's residential dwellings rose by $130.7 billion (1.2 per cent) to $11.4 trillion in the March quarter.
