Carbon offsets set aside following greenwashing lawsuit
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
26 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Most Australian houses are designed for bigger families. But that's not who's in them
Sixty-one per cent of households are singles or couples, but housing is dominated by three to four-bedroom homes. Economists propose reforms like land taxes and scrapping stamp duty to encourage downsizing. Older Australians hold much of the larger housing stock, leaving scope to free homes for younger families. Australian households are mostly one or two people, but analysis shows the housing stock is dominated by three-and four-bedroom properties. Couples without kids and people living alone make up 61 per cent of households, raising the question of how well a housing market focused on bigger families is serving real demand. A comparison between the number of people in a household and data on housing by number of bedrooms shows a stark mismatch, according to the latest analysis from property research firm Cotality. Research head Eliza Owen said a potential solution could lie in government housing reform. Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than needed, and cheaper for those who opt to live in smaller properties. Abolishing taxes such as stamp duty could make it cheaper for those to move across different housing, and the introduction of a broad-based land tax would raise costs for those who own more land. "It's politically unpopular but has broad consensus among economists that it would help us achieve a more efficient housing market," she told the Australian Associated Press. The data also highlights the high number of empty-nest households of people aged 65 and over. "There's a lot of scope for older Australians to leave their homes to free up homes for younger generations," Owen added. "But it's really hard to implement taxes to encourage people to downsize. "Things like broad-based land taxes are an incentive for income-poor but asset-rich Australians to downsize." Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in larger cities to accommodate smaller households, but shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these homes. "It's a tough transition to make," Owen said. "But it's also a really hard ask to young families to pay a million dollars to own a house in one of our major cities."
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Canberra mulls critical minerals price support to combat China: Rudd
Washington | Australia is in discussions with like-minded nations and trading partners as it considers ways to support prices for domestically processed critical minerals, which former prime minister Kevin Rudd says is a crucial step to breaking China's worrying hold on the sector. Rudd, who is now Australia's ambassador to the US, said Australian mining expertise and a burgeoning critical minerals processing industry, backed by billions in government subsidies, put the country in a good position to support President Donald Trump's bid to ensure the US has a stable supply of minerals needed for defence and technology uses.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
ASX to edge up, S&P 500 pares early losses
Australian shares are set for a modest opening advance. In contrast, tech selling persisted on Wall Street and the S&P 500 initially tumbled led by the sector that's propelled the rally from early April. Still, the tide turned during the session and Wall Street significantly pared its losses with the Dow turning mildly positive late. Nerves are fraying in part because of a renewed attack on the Federal Reserve by President Donald Trump and his allies, as well as uncertainty before a key speech by Fed chairman Jerome Powell on Friday (Saturday AEST). Most Federal Reserve officials highlighted the risk to inflation as outweighing concerns over the labour market at their meeting last month, as tariffs fuelled a growing divide within the central bank's rate-setting committee, Bloomberg reported. Officials acknowledged worries over higher inflation and weaker employment, but 'a majority of participants judged the upside risk to inflation as the greater of these two risks,' the minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee's July 29-30 meeting said. Market highlights ASX 200 futures are pointing up 22 points or 0.3 per cent to 8901. All US prices near 3.55pm New York time. Today's agenda NZ will release July trade data at 8.45am AEST, while August PMIs are expected from Australia at 9.30am AEST, then through the day Japan, the UK, Eurozone and the US. Australian August consumer inflation expectations are set for release at 11am AEST. Late Thursday, weekly US jobless claims will be released and the Fed's Jackson Hole, Wyoming three-day gathering of global central bankers begins. The full agenda of the Fed gathering, sponsored by the Kansas City Fed, will be available at on Thursday at 8pm Eastern US time (10am AEST Friday) Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's remarks will be streamed on the Kansas City Fed's YouTube channel, on Friday, August 22, at 10am Eastern US time (12am AEST Saturday). Top stories Children with mild autism removed from NDIS to fix the budget | The government is taking budget repair seriously, announcing plans to rein in the ballooning costs of the NDIS and tackling the pension deeming rate. Push to give 2m office workers a WFH 'bias' | In a major test case that will set the standard for white-collar workers, unions want to extend Commonwealth WFH rights to the private sector. | Treasurer Jim Chalmers has said he will consider adjusting the test to remove barriers for long-term investments in housing and clean energy.
