Carbon offsets set aside following greenwashing lawsuit
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
One of Australia's largest energy firms has issued an apology to more than 400,000 customers, acknowledging that carbon offsets "do not prevent or undo harms" caused by burning fossil fuels.
EnergyAustralia issued the statement early on Monday following a lawsuit launched by Parents for Climate that had been scheduled to be heard in the NSW Federal Court on Wednesday last week.
The group, with more than 20,000 members, called EnergyAustralia's acknowledgement a win for Australian consumers but said it could also set a standard for the use of carbon offsets and environmentally friendly marketing by other companies.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2023, claimed the energy generator and retailer misled customers using its Go Neutral products that were marketed as "carbon neutral" due to the purchase of carbon offsets and claimed consumers would have a "positive impact on the environment".
In its statement, EnergyAustralia apologised to customers who felt the marketing claims were unclear and acknowledged carbon offsets did not reverse environmental harm.
"While offsets can help people to invest in worthwhile projects that may reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," the statement said.
"Even with carbon offsetting, the emissions released from burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use still contribute to climate change."
EnergyAustralia withdrew its Go Neutral plans from the market in 2024, and chief customer officer Kate Gibson said the company would focus on direct efforts to reduce emissions in future.
"Carbon offsets should not be used to delay or diminish the important work that needs to be done to actively decarbonise," she said.
The energy giant's acknowledgement should herald a fresh approach to the use of carbon offsets in Australia, Parents for Climate chief executive Nic Seton said, as greenwashing had become too common.
"Parents have spent too long trying to make careful, considered decisions about where their money goes, especially in a cost-of-living crisis, but corporate greenwashing has pushed them off track," he said.
"This isn't just about EnergyAustralia – it's about holding companies to a higher standard across the board."
Australian regulations for corporate environmental claims were not strong enough, Mr Seton said, and the government should consider ending Climate Active carbon neutral certification that had been under review since October 2023.
The outcome of the court case could set a standard for corporate environmental claims in Australia, Equity Generation Lawyers principal lawyer David Hertzberg, who represented the charity, said.
"Today's outcome is a watershed moment in greenwashing litigation in Australia," he said.
EnergyAustralia ranked as Australia's third-largest emitter in 2023-2024, according to statistics from the Clean Energy Regulator, and has more than 1.6 million customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
This airline is facing the ultimate makeover test
Virgin Australia has completed one of the largest corporate makeovers in Australian history. From bankruptcy five years ago, in a few weeks, investors large and small will get an opportunity to punt on its shares – to decide whether this is a quality reno or one with just a lick of paint and floorboard polishing. The vendors, private equity outfit Bain, will be handsomely rewarded, as will a handful of its senior management who could pocket tens of millions of dollars if the airline's hockey stick earnings forecasts are met. But what about the new band of shareholders who have been offered shares in the new public listing, or those who are thinking of buying into Virgin after it lists at the end of the month? Loading Investing in aviation has a long history of being at the riskier end of the spectrum. Airlines are especially sensitive to black swan events such as COVID-19 or 9/11, but they are also susceptible to changing industry dynamics such as new entrants, disruption in market share, or the health of the economy. In the 25 years since its launch as the cheeky disruptor airline funded by Richard Branson, Virgin Blue has had many corporate faces – not all of them attractive in an earnings sense. In a financial sense, the period in which it sought to clone Qantas was a speculator failure. But the common theme has been its position as a challenger to Australia's aviation queen – Qantas. Virgin Blue was born in 2000 as a low-cost airline that carved out a new market, tapping into price-sensitive leisure customers who could not afford to fly Qantas or its then-rival Ansett, which collapsed the following year.
AU Financial Review
4 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Australian firms cash in on Europe's security crisis
Australian defence contractors are flocking to the United Kingdom and Europe for growth opportunities, hoping to grab a slice of billions of pounds and euros being pumped into building up their militaries in the face of Russian aggression and demands from US President Donald Trump. Since January 2022 – a month before Russia re-invaded Ukraine, triggering the Continent's arms race – 55 Australian defence suppliers have been awarded 277 contracts under the Defence Department's Global Supply Chain program, official figures obtained by The Australian Financial Review showed.
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Volkswagen Group's first Australian EV hatch says adios for now
The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from: The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from: The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from: The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from:
