2.9 magnitude earthquake strikes Kitsap County
A small earthquake occurred just north of Bremerton in Kitsap County at approximately 6:15 a.m.
The Pacific Northwest Seismic Network reported a 2.9 magnitude earthquake hit about 15 miles below the surface. It occurred one mile outside of Tracyton, with its epicenter just west of the Illahee Preserve.
Related on MyNorthwest: WA flirts with first 60-degree days of 2025
There are no reports of any damage, as of this reporting.
The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) stated that earthquakes happen in Washington nearly every day, but most of them are too small to be felt by a person. Due to the state's geologic setting, Washington has the second highest risk in the U.S. of experiencing a large and damaging earthquake because of its geologic setting.
This is the third minuscule earthquake to hit western Washington over the past week. A magnitude 3.4 earthquake happened two miles outside of Lake Holm on Feb. 22 near Auburn. Two days later, at approximately 11:15 p.m., a magnitude 2.5 earthquake occurred one mile from Lakeland North.
More on MyNorthwest: Stormy weekend helps shrink rain deficit in Western Washington — But is it enough?
On Feb. 21, a 4.8 magnitude earthquake shook British Columbia.
Check MyNorthwest's Earthquake Tracker to stay informed and up-to-date on any earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest.
Frank Sumrall is a content editor at MyNorthwest and producer of the Seattle Seahawks podcast, The Reset with Gee Scott. You can read his stories here and you can email him here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
31-07-2025
- NBC News
Minimal U.S. effects from tsunami don't mean the forecast was inaccurate
The magnitude-8.8 earthquake off the coast of Russia's Kamchatka peninsula sent a wave of water racing at the speed of a jetliner toward Hawaii, California and Washington state, spurring warnings and alarm overnight on Wednesday. But when the tsunami waves arrived, they didn't cause devastation or deaths in the U.S. and the inundation might not have appeared threatening in some locations where warnings were issued. That doesn't mean the tsunami was a "bust," that it was poorly forecast or that it didn't pose a risk, earthquake and tsunami researchers said. 'You start to hear tsunami warning and everyone immediately thinks of the last Hollywood movie they saw and then it comes in at 3 feet and people are like, 'What's that?'' said Harold Tobin, the director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network and a professor at the University of Washington. 'We should count it as a win that a tsunami occurred, we got a warning and it wasn't the worst-case scenario.' Here's what to know. How strong was the Kamchatka earthquake? And why did it change so much? The initial reports of the Kamchatka earthquake from the United States Geological Survey pegged it as a 8.0-magnitude. Later, it was upgraded to an 8.8 magnitude quake. 'That is not uncommon for very, very large earthquakes in those initial minutes,' Tobin said. 'Our standard algorithms for determining the size of an earthquake quickly saturate. It's like turning up an amp and getting a lot of distortion." One of the first signs the earthquake was stronger than the initial seismic reports was an initial measurement from a buoy about 275 miles southeast of the Kamchatka peninsula. The buoy, which is part of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's DART (Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis) system, is connected to a seafloor pressure sensor about 4 miles below the surface. The sensor registered a 90-centimeter wave, which is eye-popping to tsunami researchers. 'That's the second-largest recording we ever saw in the tsunami world,' said Vasily Titov, a senior tsunami modeler at NOAA's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, adding that it indicated there was 'a catastrophic tsunami propagating in the ocean.' Titov said the only higher reading was from the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which caused nearly 16,000 deaths in Japan. Seismic models later confirmed that Wednesday's earthquake was a magnitude-8.8, which means it released nearly 16 times as much energy as a magnitude-8.0 earthquake, according to a USGS calculation tool. Tōhoku was much bigger. Tobin estimated that earthquake released 2-3 times as much energy as was observed in Kamchatka. Titov said the tsunami in Japan was also about three times larger. Additionally, Tobin said the Tōhoku earthquake 'produced an anomalously large seafloor displacement,' lurching and moving more water than expected, even for an earthquake of its magnitude. At Kamchatka, 'it's likely that there was less seafloor displacement than could have happened in a worst case or more dire scenario for a magnitude 8.8,' Tobin said, though more research will be needed to confirm that theory. How did researchers make a forecast? How good was the forecast? In two hours' time, researchers produced a tsunami forecast for 'pretty much the whole Pacific and for warning points along the U.S. coastlines,' Titov said, with predictions of water levels at coastal tide gauges and also for flood inundation. The tsunami took about eight hours to reach Hawaii and 12 hours to reach the California coast. Titov, who helped build the models used by forecasters who issue warnings from the National Tsunami Warning Centers in Hawaii and Alaska, said the models rely on seismic data and the network of nearly 80 DART buoys in place along the Pacific Rim, which sense pressure changes. The U.S. owns and operates about half of the DART buoys. Titov said the models indicated that north shore areas of Hawaii would receive tsunami waves of about two meters or less. 'Hilo was predicted at about still two meters [6.5 feet] and it materialized at about 150 centimeters,' or 1.5 meters [5 feet], Titov said. 'It's exactly how we want it — a little bit on the conservative side.' The same trend played out in parts of California, Titov said. It will take some time to assess how well the models predicted inundation because reports are still coming in about the extent of flooding. 'We know that the flooding occurred at Hawaii. We don't know exactly the extent, but from the reports that I saw on TV, it looks like exactly what we predicted,' Titov said. Why were people in Hawaii evacuated for a five-foot wave? Yong Wei, a tsunami modeler and senior research scientist at the University of Washington and the NOAA Center for Tsunami Research, said a 1.5 meter [5 foot] tsunami wave can be very dangerous, particularly in shallow waters off Hawaii. Tsunami waves contain far more energy than wind waves, which are far shorter in wavelength, period (time between waves) and slower in speed. Wei said tsunami waves of the size that struck Hawaii can surge inland 'tens of meters,' produce dangerous currents and cause damage to boats and other moveable objects. 'People die. If they stay there and they don't get any warning, two meters can definitely kill people,' Wei said. 'If you're on the beach, strong currents can definitely pull you out into the ocean and people will get drowned.' Tobin said the initial warnings were conservative, but appropriate, in his view. 'I don't want people to think, oh, we had a warning and nothing much happened and poo poo it — 'I can ignore it,'' Tobin said. 'Warnings by nature have to err a bit on the side of caution.' Was this a historic event? No. The Kamchatka peninsula has a long history of earthquakes. 'This was an area that was ready for another earthquake and there had been a lot of earthquakes in that region over the last few weeks,' said Breanyn MacInnes, a professor in the Department of Geological Sciences at Central Washington University, which indicates increased risk. In 1952, before scientists had a strong understanding of plate tectonics, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake struck offshore of the Kamchatka peninsula in much the same region, sending a tsunami into the town of Severo-Kurilsk. 'People in Russia were not really prepared for it. It was very big earthquake, a big tsunami and they were caught off guard,' MacInnes said. MacInnes said the tsunami produced was between 30 and 60 feet in height in southern parts of the peninsula. 'Thousands of people were killed and basically the town was destroyed,' said Joanne Bourgeois, an emeritus professor of sedimentology at the University of Washington, who has been studying the region's earthquake history for about three decades. How would the tsunami warning system perform if the earthquake struck closer to home? The Kamchatka tsunami is a megathrust earthquake produced along large subduction zone fault, when one tectonic plate is forced beneath another. The U.S. west coast features a similar fault, called the Cascadia subduction zone, which runs offshore along the U.S. West Coast from Northern California to northern Vancouver Island. 'This is kind of a mirror image across the Pacific,' Tobin said. 'An 8.8 at a relatively shallow depth in Cascadia is definitely in the realm of scenarios. We could have a similar event here.' In fact, Cascadia has the potential to produce much larger quakes, Tobin said. Modeling suggests Cascadia could produce tsunami waves as tall as 100 feet. Subduction zone earthquakes typically produce tsunamis that reach shore in about 30 minutes to an hour, Titov said, which would strain forecasters' capabilities to predict tsunami effects precisely along the U.S. west coast before inundation happened. Titov said more seafloor sensors, more computer processing and innovation with artificial intelligence algorithms are needed to speed forecasting. Tobin said the successful tsunami warning on Tuesday should spur investment in seafloor sensors and seismic monitoring stations offshore along the subduction zone. 'This shows the value and importance of NOAA and the USGS [U.S. Geological Survey] in these times where some of these government agencies have come into question,' Tobin said. 'We wouldn't have had a tsunami warning if it weren't for NOAA and the next one could be a closer event. They showed their value.'
USA Today
30-07-2025
- USA Today
What makes coastal California's Crescent City so vulnerable to tsunamis?
Crescent City, California, residents are breathing a sigh of relief after its latest tsunami warning was downgraded to an advisory. Crescent City, a redwood-tree lined coastal California community, is known as the tsunami capital of the country. The city has experienced more than three-dozen tsunamis in the last century. Once again, tsunami waves ‒ luckily modest this time ‒ reached the town, peaking as high as 4 feet near city shores before dawn on July 30, according to the National Weather Service. The waves came just hours after an 8.8-magnitude earthquake, one of the strongest tremblors in recorded history, struck off Russia's east coast, prompting tsunami waves in Hawaii and along the West Coast. "It was a long night for all of us. We were fortunate this time," Crescent City Manager Eric Weir said during a morning briefing on July 30. "There was significant tsunami surges. We're still dealing with those now, but it did stay within the banks." The July 29 tsunami warning was initially expected to last as long as 30 hours in Crescent City, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Weir said the waves caused significant damage to a harbor dock as it lifted decking off the pilings, but the rest of the city was spared. "Downtown is at a high enough elevation that it is open," Weir said, about an hour before the tsunami warning was downgraded to an "advisory" for Crescent City, one of the last West Coast communities considered still at risk. City officials still advised locals to stay away from the harbor, beaches and waterways due to continued wave activity. "Conditions have started to improve," city officials said in a Facebook post. "But the ocean is still angry." Coastal calm: Tsunami evacuation orders lifted in Hawaii, threat to West Coast eases Crescent City's deadly tsunami history What makes Crescent City, a town of about 6,700 residents located about 25 miles south of the Oregon border, so tsunami-prone? Crescent City is vulnerable because it is located near the southern end of the Cascadia Subduction Zone, a major fault line capable of producing dangerous tsunamis and intense earthquakes, according to the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network. Several published studies also indicate that a Cascadia Subduction Zone tsunami can cause severe damage and inland flooding. In 2011, the earthquake in Japan spurred waves of more than 8 feet, destroying Crescent City's harbor. "The water went out to a low tide, but each wave was coming back in and it was getting higher and higher," Max Blair, 79, a volunteer at the Del Norte Historical Society located near downtown Crescent City, recalled to USA TODAY on July 30. "The harbor was a whole different story." One man died during the incident as the harbor docks were smashed and dozens of boats sank, causing an estimated $50 million in damage. The harbor was eventually rebuilt as the first "tsunami resistant port" on the West Coast. Another deadly tsunami struck Crescent City in 1964, triggered by a massive earthquake in Alaska, killing 11 people and injuring 35 others. The tsunami destroyed nearly 300 buildings and homes, causing between $11 million and $16 million in damages. The incident is considered one of the most devastating tsunamis in U.S. history. "I've heard and read about it," said Blair who's lived in Crescent City for more than 30 years. "I hope we never get to experience anything like that one."
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Forest fire contained in Leavenworth, second fire in region over last 24 hours
This story was originally published on A forest fire near Leavenworth has been contained after breaking out Tuesday evening. Approximately 15 fire trucks and 40 firefighters arrived at the scene to combat the fire, Chelan County Fire District 3 confirmed. The fire was extinguished at approximately 10 p.m. after first starting three hours prior. State Route 2 was shut down in both directions due to the fire, which was located in Tumwater Canyon, until 10:30 p.m. This wildfire is the second for the area within 24 hours, following the Red Bridge Fire east of Cle Elum on Monday.
