Is Iran planning something dangerous? Nuclear experts have a warning after US strikes
The US struck three key Iranian nuclear facilities last month using bunker buster bombs. These were Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. While US President Donald Trump said the strikes obliterated the country's nuclear program, experts have given a big warning regarding Tehran's nuclear future.
Nuclear proliferation experts, quoted in an ABC News report, believe the strikes could lead to a "fork-in-the-road" moment that results in Tehran taking a more dangerous and secretive path to obtaining nuclear arms if it chooses to do so.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a bill approved last week by the parliament to halt cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. The country is also mulling a withdrawal from the 57-year-old Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT).
"The last country to pull out of the NPT was North Korea," Howard Stoffer, a professor of international affairs at the University of New Haven and former deputy executive director of the UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee, told ABC News.
The NPT, signed by 191 countries in 1968, said countries, other than those certified as nuclear powers, cannot develop nuclear weapons. However, it allows countries to pursue peaceful civilian nuclear programs, like those for energy use.
"They can go right up to the brink, and basically do everything except assemble the weapons in their final form and still be technically in compliance with the treaty. That frightens a lot of countries that are Iran's neighbours, Israel in particular," John Erath, senior policy director for the Centre for Arms and Non-Proliferation, told ABC News.
Iran has made it clear that it would 'act according to its own interest' regarding the NPT. The treaty also requires inspection by the IAEA, so it remains to be seen how Tehran fulfils that obligation in light of the new law if it decides to join it. The Iran-US nuclear deal
Iran signed a nuclear deal with several world powers led by the United States in 2015, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), under the Barack Obama administration. The agreement limited Iran's civilian nuclear program to peaceful purposes in exchange for lifting economic sanctions imposed on the country.
President Donald Trump withdrew from the accord during his first term in 2018, calling it "defective to its core" and reimposed US sanctions on Iran. Since then, multiple attempts have been made to negotiate a new deal with Tehran, including by Trump himself, but it hasn't borne fruit yet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Trump Clueless': Hiroshima Mayor ‘SCHOOLS' U.S. President On Nuclear Bombings, Invites Him To Japan
Hiroshima Mayor Kazumi Matsui blasted U.S. President Donald Trump for comparing recent American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima. Matsui accused Trump of ignoring the true horror of nuclear attacks and invited him to visit Hiroshima to learn the real impact of atomic weapons. The sharp remarks came after Trump defended the Iran strikes at a NATO summit by referencing WWII bombings. Watch Read More


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Won't attack US: Iran says no plans to escalate, but will continue Uranium enrichment; open for talks
Donald Trump (left), Ayotollah Khamenie (AP) Iran has no plans to further retaliate in response to the US strikes on its nuclear program last month, a senior government official told NBC News on Thursday, adding that the country is open to talks with Washington. However, deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi said Iran has no intention of stopping its uranium enrichment, confirming that the country will continue developing its nuclear program despite the recent attack. 'We have already responded to that, as long as there is no act of aggression being perpetrated by the United States against us, we will not respond again,' Takht-Ravanchi said when asked if more was to come. After the US bombing, Iran fired missiles at the American Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. However, Qatari defenses stopped the attack, as Iran had given a warning ahead of time. This warning seemed to show that Iran was trying to ease tensions following a nearly two-week conflict with Israel that led to direct involvement from the US. President Donald Trump posting on Truth Social, responded in a similarly conciliatory after the Iranian strike,to thank Iran for the advance warning and saying that 'they've gotten it all out of their 'system.'' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Takht-Ravanchi voiced dismay over the missile exchanges while Iran was in talks with Trump about its nuclear program. Iran had been limiting its uranium enrichment under the 2015 nuclear agreement with the US, called the joint comprehensive plan of action, but that deal essentially collapsed in 2018 when Trump pulled the US out. 'How can we trust the Americans? We want them to explain as to why they misled us, why they took such an egregious action against our people,' the deputy minister added. But he went on to add that his country would be open to talks. 'We are for diplomacy and we are for dialogue,' Takht-Ravanchi said, adding "but the US government needs to convince us that they are not going to use military force while we are negotiating. That is an essential element for our leadership to be in a position to decide about the future round of talks.' Iran has kept quiet about the real effects of the strikes, raising concerns that the attacks may have pushed its nuclear program deeper into secrecy. 'The damage is serious,' Takht-Ravanchi said about the American attack, without elaborating further. Iran insists it is not seeking to build a nuclear bomb. As a member of the 1970 nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), it has the right to enrich uranium for use in nuclear energy. 'Our policy has not changed on enrichment,' Takht-Ravanchi reiterated to NBC. 'Iran has every right to do enrichment within its territory. The only thing that we have to observe is not to go for militarization.' He also said that Iran is 'ready to engage with others to talk about the scope, the level, the capacity of our enrichment program.'


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill to become law after passing the House of Representatives; critics label it a 'death sentence'
President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is on the verge of becoming law, with it passing its final legislative hurdle in the House of Representatives. With a 218-214 majority with voting largely done along party lines, the immensely ambitious and contentious legislative agenda will likely be signed by the United States president on the 4th of July, per the Republican party's own self-imposed deadline. Donald Trump has pushed aggressively for this centerpiece legislative agenda, which institutes sweeping tax cuts and greatly reduces funding for social safety programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill also provides a massive funding increase to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which has become a lightning rod for controversy in the wake of its high-profile raids. Donald Trump's detractors warn of dark times to come The bill's passage has drawn sharp condemnation from Democratic lawmakers and Donald Trump's critics, who have characterized the legislation as one of the biggest wealth transfers in American history, from the poor to the rich. Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont was scathing in his condemnation of the bill, claiming that 51,000 Americans will die every year as a consequence of the funding cuts in the bill. Republicans are celebrating the passage of the largest Medicaid cut in U.S. history to pay for the largest tax break for billionaires in American history.51,000 Americans will die each year so that the top 1% can get a $1 trillion tax bill is a death sentence. Cenk Uygur, founder of the progressive media network The Young Turks, predicted that the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would be political suicide for the Republican party, claiming that the GOP just cost themselves 6 million votes. Upside and downside of budget bill. Downside is much worse for the country. 12 million people lose their health insurance. They cut a trillion from Medicaid to give a trillion to people making over $500K. Upside is nighty-night GOP. You just cost yourself about 6 million votes. The bill's detractors found some unexpected agreement from Republican politician Derrick Van Orden, who seemed to affirm their claims about millions of Americans being cut off from healthcare, school meals, and food assistance. Leftist media network and highest-rated podcast according to Podscribe, Meidas Touch, seized upon this tweet, saying, 'at least he's being honest'. Derrick's tweet was eventually deleted. Weird thing for a Republican congressman to be celebrating but at least he's being honest Progressive network More Perfect Union claimed that Trump's tax cuts on tips, which were part of his sales pitch to the working class, would only last until 2028, while the tax cuts to billionaires were indefinite. Tax cuts for billionaires are permanent in the big Republican bill. Tax cuts on tips expire in 2028. Donald Trump takes another victory lap, and supporters stand by him VICTORY: The One Big Beautiful Bill Passes U.S. Congress, Heads to President Trump's Desk 🇺🇸🎉 The White House's X account claimed victory upon the bill's passage in the House of Representatives. Despite Trump's critics immediately slamming the legislation in the replies, the President's supporters spoke up too, with one user claiming that she supported the bill out of her belief that illegal immigrants would finally be denied healthcare coverage they didn't deserve. My mom worked 2 jobs her whole life, sometimes 3, and now she has to pay over $100 x month out of her social security check to cover Medicare…She's just one of many I personally why illegals should just have it handed to them when those who have worked for it…