Democrat Jennifer Konfrst launches 3rd Congressional District campaign
House Minority Leader Jennifer Konfrst spoke during floor debate in the Iowa House March 18, 2025. She launched her campaign for Iowa's 3rd Congressional District seat May 8, 2025. (Photo by Robin Opsahl/Iowa Capital Dispatch)
Iowa House Minority Leader Jennifer Konfrst said Iowans in the state's 3rd Congressional District want a representative who will hear their concerns and speak up against President Donald Trump — actions she committed to take if elected representative in 2026.
Konfrst, a Windsor Heights Democrat, announced her campaign for Iowa's 3rd Congressional District Thursday. The seat, representing most of the Des Moines metro and large parts central and southern Iowa, is currently held by Republican U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn.
Speaking with the Iowa Capital Dispatch, Konfrst said she decided to run for Congress after having conversations with Iowans in communities like Ottumwa, Red Oak, Atlantic and Jefferson, who told her they felt unheard by Nunn as they expressed frustrations about actions being taken by President Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress.
'They want someone who's going to go out there and stand up for them,' Konfrst said. 'Again, when Donald Trump says he's going to cut 83,000 jobs for veterans, and Congressman Nunn says nothing, that is unacceptable to these folks. … When tariff policy is so confusing that farmers are concerned about what's going to happen next, they don't expect their congressmen to just nod along and say, 'Okay, that sounds great' — they expect their congressman to stand up and say, 'Wait a minute, this isn't okay. What are we going to do for these folks?''
Democrats have accused Nunn of not holding public town halls in the months since Trump's election, a criticism Nunn has disputed. Town halls and other public events have become an issue of contention as the House GOP's campaign arm advised its members to not hold town halls in March. This guidance came as some GOP federal lawmakers face fiery crowds, upset with actions taken by Trump, Congress and Elon Musk's DOGE at these events. Some of Iowa's federal delegation, including U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley and U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson, were met with jeers and heckling about immigration, federal government cuts and the future of programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid at recent town halls.
Konfrst said across Iowa's 3rd District, she has heard two major asks from Iowans: 'People want to be heard and they need a fighter.' She said she has talked to many voters who felt Nunn was not listening to what they are concerned about or advocating for them at the U.S. Capitol.
'A lot of promises happen during the campaign, but at the end of the day, are you listening when bad things happen?' Konfrst said. 'And are you fighting for us? Are you coming back to my community and listening? Are you in Wapello County listening, you know, to what voters here have to say — or are you not showing up?'
She said her experience, abilities and 'fighting spirit' make her the best choice to meet these voters' wants in 2026. Konfrst has served as House minority leader since 2021, having first been elected to the Iowa House in the 2018 midterm election. Many of the issues she has focused on in the Iowa Legislature are topics she wants to focus on in Congress, Konfrst said — economic, 'kitchen table' issues like the costs of health care and housing.
She also said preserving Social Security and Medicaid funding would be major priorities if elected.
'Right now there are so many unknowns, and I think that's what's causing so much concern,' Konfrst said. 'Folks are getting laid off, right? Layoffs are increasing in the state. You know, there are threats to Social Security every day. There are threats to Medicaid every day. People deserve to know that when they go to their mailbox, their Social Security checks going to show up. And with all of this uncertainty at every level, that every generation is facing right now, it's just not a good time to have confidence in the economy. And we need to do better.'
Konfrst is not the only Democrat running for the position — state Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott, D-West Des Moines, launched her campaign on Monday. Others, including Rep. Austin Baeth, D-Des Moines, have also expressed interest in joining the race.
While Nunn has not officially announced he will seek reelection in 2026, he is expected to run again. Konfrst said her campaign focus will be on Nunn, not primary competitors.
Nunn first won election in 2022 against former U.S. Rep. Cindy Axne, a Democrat, and won reelection in 2024 against Democratic challenger Lanon Baccam. But Iowa's 3rd Congressional District is rated as a 'tossup' by some political forecasters, including Sabato's Crystal Ball, and has been highlighted as a focus by U.S. House Democrats' campaign arm heading into the 2026 midterms.
While Republicans earned major victories in recent elections in Iowa, Konfrst said there is 'dissatisfaction' among many Iowa voters who elected Republicans to state and federal office.
'Republicans are in charge nationally, and they're in charge in Iowa,' Konfrst said. 'And if things aren't going well, it's time to bring some balance back. … It's not about Democrats and Republicans. It's about are we having every voice at the table that's going to work together to actually get something accomplished?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
14 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Fulbright board resigns over alleged Trump administration interference
The entire 12-person board tasked with overseeing the State Department's Fulbright Program resigned Wednesday, claiming political interference from the Trump administration. In a statement posted on the board's Substack, the congressionally mandated Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board said its members voted 'overwhelmingly' to resign from the board 'rather than endorse unprecedented actions that we believe are impermissible under the law, compromise U.S. national interests and integrity, and undermine the mission and mandates Congress established for the Fulbright program nearly 80 years ago.'
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nancy Mace said 'due process is for citizens.' Here's who it's really for
In early June 2025, Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina wrote an X post (archived) that read: "Due process is for citizens." Her comment had been viewed more than 2.4 million times as of this writing and had amassed more than 6,500 likes. The same claim has appeared in multiple X posts. In a similar tone, in May 2025, another X user wrote: "Due process is for citizens, not invaders." (X user @NancyMace) In short, due process is the legal principle that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty or property. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary actions by the state, ensuring that people are treated justly under the law. For a more detailed explanation, see our full breakdown in this article on former President Bill Clinton's 1996 immigration law. While Mace's post did not explicitly say that due process protections are, or should be, limited to only U.S. citizens, her replies below the post reinforced that interpretation. However, the U.S. Constitution protects all "persons," not just citizens, under the due-process clauses of the Fifth and 14th amendments. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that these protections apply to anyone physically present in the United States regardless of citizenship or immigration status. An MSNBC article on the topic similarly concluded that Mace's "implication … that noncitizens don't get that protection" was "incorrect." The South Carolina representative doubled down on her stance in the replies below her post, suggesting that noncitizens should not be entitled to due-process protections in the U.S. For example, when one X user wrote, "The Constitution doesn't say 'only citizens.' Due process applies to persons — that includes non-citizens. That's settled law," Mace replied by saying: "Skip due process coming in, don't expect it going out. Citizens first!" Other replies further suggested she believed only U.S. citizens should be entitled to such protections (archived, archived, archived). (X users @FJBIDEN_22 and @NancyMace) These exchanges were not the first time Mace commented on due process. In late May 2025, she weighed in on the principle in response to a federal judge's decision to block the deportation of eight noncitizens convicted of violent crimes. The day before U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a 17-page order in which he emphasized that "the Court recognizes that the class members at issue here have criminal histories. But that does not change due process," Mace criticized the ruling, telling Fox News (archived): "They didn't want due process on their way in illegally, they shouldn't get due process on their way out." However, the representative's comments about due process contradicted remarks she made about the principle in the past. In February 2023, Mace wrote on X (archived): "Everyone deserves the right to due process. Even those we vehemently oppose." (X user @NancyMace) Snopes has reached out to Mace for comment on whether she maintains that due-process protections should apply only to U.S. citizens and how she reconciles that view with her 2023 statement. We will update this article if we receive a response. The U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process appears in the Fifth and 14th amendments, both of which state that no person should be deprived "of life, liberty or property, without due process of law." As shown, the language uses "person," not "citizen," with regard to due-process protections. Further, the Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted that due-process protections apply to everyone within U.S. borders regardless of citizenship or immigration status. In Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel Mezei (1953) the Court emphasized (Page 212) that "aliens who have once passed through [U.S.] gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness-encompassed in due process of law." Similarly, in cases such as Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) and earlier decisions dating back more than a century, the Supreme Court made clear that the government cannot detain or deport people arbitrarily. In the 2001 case, the Court underscored that "the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent." In simple words, noncitizens must be given fair procedures, such as notice or a "credible fear interview," before being deprived of their liberty. The Supreme Court expressed the same view in the case of Reno v. Flores (1993), stating: "It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings." This was not the first time Snopes addressed a claim regarding Mace. For instance, in late May 2025, we investigated a rumor that she ordered staffers to create burner accounts to promote her online. Meanwhile, earlier in June 2025, we also fact-checked a rumor about whether the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, signed by Clinton, allowed deportation without due process. "327K Views · 15K Reactions | Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments That Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Heinous Crimes Deserve Due Process after a Judge Blocks a Deportation Flight to South Sudan | 'They Didn't Want Due Process on Their Way in Illegally, They Shouldn't Get Due Process on Their Way Out.' Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments... | by Fox News | Facebook." 2022, Accessed 6 June 2025. "U.S. Constitution - Fifth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." 15 Dec. 1791, Constitution Annotated. "U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." 9 July 1868, Deng, Grace. "Did Nancy Mace Order Staffers to Create Burner Accounts to Promote Her Online? Here's What We Know." Snopes, 30 May 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Dunbar, Marina. "Court Halts Trump Administration's Effort to Send Eight Men to South Sudan." The Guardian, The Guardian, 23 May 2025, Gabbatt, Adam. "Group Stranded with Ice in Djibouti Shipping Container after Removal from US." The Guardian, The Guardian, 6 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. " 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)." Justia Law, Rubin, Jordan. "Due Process Is Not Limited to Citizens, Contrary to Nancy Mace's Claim." MSNBC, 4 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Wrona, Aleksandra. "Bill Clinton Did Not Sign Law in 1996 Allowing Deportation without Due Process." Snopes, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)." Justia Law,
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress
Most Democrats disapprove of how their party's lawmakers in Congress are handling their jobs, according to a new national poll. Fifty-three percent of Democrats questioned in a Quinnipiac University survey released Wednesday gave their party's congressional members a thumbs-down, while 41% approved of their performance. According to the poll, conducted June 5-8, just 21% of all voters approved of the way Democrats in Congress were handing their jobs, with seven in ten disapproving. Head Here For The Latest Fox News Polling The 21% approval is the same as in Quinnipiac's February national poll, matching "an all-time low since Quinnipiac University first asked this question of registered voters in March 2009." The survey indicates 79% of GOP voters approve of the way congressional Republicans are handling their job, with 13% disapproving. Read On The Fox News App Where Trump Stands In Fox News Polling 100 Days Into His Second Term Among all voters, 32% approved of how GOP congressional members were performing their duties, while just over six in ten disapproved. Overall approval for Republicans in Congress has dropped eight points since Quinnipiac's February poll, with disapproval jumping nine points. The Democratic Party has been in the political wilderness since November's elections, when Republicans won back control of the White House and the Senate and defended their fragile House majority. And Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party's base. Since President Donald Trump's return to power earlier this year, an increasingly energized base of Democrats is urging party leaders to take a stronger stand in pushing back against the president's sweeping and controversial agenda during the opening months of his second administration. And their anger is directed not only at Republicans, but at Democrats they feel aren't vocal enough in their opposition to Trump. And that's fueled a plunge in the Democratic Party's favorable ratings, which have hit historic lows in several surveys the past couple of months. The new poll from Quinnipiac also indicates a decline in Trump's approval ratings among voters nationwide. Thirty-eight percent of those questioned in the survey said they approve of the way the president is handling his duties, down three points from Quinnipiac's early April poll. Fifty-four percent in the new poll gave Trump a thumbs-down for his handling of his job as president, down one point from the April survey. Trump's approval ratings were mostly above water as he returned to the White House in late January, but his numbers soon slid underwater in many national surveys and remain in negative territory nearly five months into his second article source: Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress
