I raced a 10K with the Garmin Venu X1 vs. Garmin Forerunner 970 and there was a clear winner
However, I didn't anticipate the launch of the Garmin Venu X1, which has surprised me in being one of the best Garmin watches, packing almost all the brand's best sports and navigation features into a slim design with a huge square display.
The Forerunner 970 and Venu X1 are my two favorite sports watches at the moment, so I wanted to put them head-to-head at a race to see how they compared directly.
I raced the Saucony London 10K with both to compare their GPS accuracy on a twisting, city-center course, as well as battery life and their design differences.
The Venu X1 is a departure from Garmin's normal sports watch design, with a slim, square case and a vast AMOLED display. It has the same sports tracking features as the Forerunner 970 aside from multi-band GPS, but is more expensive and its battery life isn't as good.
The Garmin Forerunner 970 has all of Garmin's top sports tracking, training analysis and navigation features in a lightweight watch with a bright AMOLED display. It's not as thin and light as the Venu X1, but some might prefer the 970's more traditional circular, five-button design.
I clocked 32:57 in the 10K race and while both watches were good, there were some notable differences between them on the day.
I'm a sucker for a slim watch, and the Venu X1 is slimmer than most, making even the Forerunner 970 feel quite big on the wrist.
The large square screen sits quite snugly on my thin wrist, and during the recent heatwaves the UK has been experiencing, I have preferred wearing the Venu X1 to the Forerunner 970 and other watches because it is so light and thin.
That large screen is also great for visibility, especially when using maps, but the Forerunner 970 also has a big, bright AMOLED display that's easy to see in all conditions, including the mix of clouds and sun on race day.
One advantage to the Forerunner 970's design is that it has five buttons, which makes navigating its menus and data screens during workouts easier — you're more reliant on the touchscreen on the Venu X1, which can be harder to use with sweaty fingers.
Overall it's hard to say which watch has a better design objectively. Both are sturdy thanks to their sapphire crystal screens and titanium elements on the case, and both have built-in flashlights. It will come down to your preference of slim and square vs the more traditional look of the Forerunner 970.
The key test for me on race day was GPS accuracy, because Garmin opted against having its most accurate multi-band GPS mode on the Venu X1.
It does offer all-systems GPS tracking, which has been reliably accurate for me in most of my testing of the Venu X1, but in city centers multi-band GPS can make a difference, and this was the case during the London 10K race.
I had the Forerunner 970 in multi-band mode and it was not only closer to the official distance for the race, it also was clearly more accurate at certain points on the course when I looked at the GPS tracks afterwards.
There were a couple of places where the Venu X1 swerved off the road and added distance, increasing my pace too, which I noticed in the race, while the Forerunner 970 stuck to the right path.
Overall the Venu X1 is certainly accurate enough, but if you live in a city center or another area where GPS tracking can be more difficult, the upgrade you get from multi-band GPS might be appreciated.
The lack of multi-band GPS is a small downside on the Venu X1, but its short battery life is a bigger drawback for those used to long-lasting Garmin watches.
During the race it drained at a rate of 7.2% per hour, which would amount to just shy of 14 hours of all-systems GPS tracking, which is in line with Garmin's listed stats.
The Forerunner 970 was also in line with Garmin's stats, draining at a rate 4.8% per hour, which adds up to almost 21 hours of more power-intensive multi-band GPS tracking.
With my general use, with their screens set to always-on, the Venu X1 lasts me two days on a charge and the Forerunner 970 four or five days.
Workouts using GPS really hammer the battery life of the Venu X1 — I did around 20 miles of running in total on Sunday because I did the race as part of a longer workout and those runs alone drained around 20% of its battery life.
The Garmin Venu X1 is a great sports watch, but the Forerunner 970 is a better one purely on the basis of its extra GPS accuracy and battery life, and it performed better on race day.
Whether you're happy to trade those in for the sleek design of the Venu X1 is another question, and one I still can't conclusively answer myself, though I would lead towards the Forerunner 970 if you do most of your outdoor activities in a city center.
If you're in less built-up environments like myself the GPS accuracy won't be so noticeable and it is more a question of which design you prefer, with the Forerunner 970 having an edge for battery life and a slightly lower price.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Fitbit Just Made Your Sleep Tracking Scores Worse, For A Good Reason
Fitbit has announced it has improved how sleep tracking works in its wearables. A member of the Fitbit team posted over at the company's community forums about changes made to sleep tracking. And they're already in action. The aim is to make Fitbits' sleep tracking more accurate by noticing more moments of wakefulness overnight. Fitbit's moderator noted owners of Fitbits may already have noticed their sleep score changing a little, and getting worse. 'If you've noticed that your sleep stages, sleep time and awake time have changed recently, you're seeing our latest improvement in action," says the Fitbit spokesperson. 'You may see your awake time increase slightly as we now capture brief awakenings the old system missed.' While Fitbit already had among the better mainstream wearable sleep tracking anyway, I find missing wakeful moments one of the most frustrating elements of sleep tracking. After all, you can't really tell whether you were in a REM or deep sleep stage at a particular time. But you can tell whether you were awake or not. Even now I find high-end Garmin watches often miss these moments, sometimes even when they involve a brief trip to the toilet. Fitbit has not specified which models get this upgrade, suggesting it's a change to the underlying algorithmic system used to translate sensor data into sleep tracking. And therefore the change should apply to all supported models. Some users over at the Fitbit Community forums are complaining about missing sleep data, though, including the loss of historical data. Fitbit is yet to reply to these queries, but I have asked a Fitbit representative for more information on the issue, and if the change does indeed apply to all supported Fitbit wearables. The Future Of Fitbits There's more too. Fitbit says this algorithmic tweak is just the beginning. 'This is the first step in a series of upcoming improvements to improving our sleep tracking,' says Fitbit. We may learn more later this month. On August 20, Fitbit owner Google is holding a Pixel 10 launch event, at which we may also hear about the next Pixel Watch. And it could well benefit from the same sleep tracking changes Fitbit references. Then again, a recent report suggested the Pixel Watch 4, alongside the upcoming Pixel Buds 2a and Pixel 10 Fold Pro, may be delayed until October. Of course, this does not necessarily mean Google won't talk about these devices later this month, though.
CNET
4 hours ago
- CNET
Walmart Deals of the Day: Sneaky $110 Discount on a Garmin Fitness Tracker
Labor Day isn't too far off, but you don't have to wait if you're on the hunt for a good deal You'll find thousands of offers available online now at Walmart, and there are some true bargains to be had if you're willing to sift through quite all of the deals. Fortunately, CNET has done most of the heavy lifting for you, and we've collected some of best daily offers below. For today, August 6, those include an under-the-radar discount that saves you over $100 on a Garmin Vivoactive 5 smartwatch, $25 off a simple Chefman air fryer and a convenient Bissell Little Green carpet cleaner that's on sale for just $88. This Garmin smartwatch features some advanced specs that make it a great choice for serious athletes. It's equipped with more than 30 preset sport modes so you can get detailed information about your workout, plus it gives you insights about your stress levels, sleep patterns and when you should take a rest day. It's also equipped with an 1.2-inch AMOLED display so you can easily read the screen even on sunny days, and boasts an impressive 11-day battery life. It's also got some convenient smart features like a tap-to-pay function and the ability to download playlists from Spotify and Amazon Music. There's no discount listed for the $190 black variant, but you are getting it for $110 less than the usual $300 list price. Other colors are on sale for around $230 as well. This six-quart Chefman air fryer is perfect for fast and easy weeknight dinners. It can hit temperatures of up to 450 degrees Fahrenheit in just minutes, and it has built-in presets for fries, fish, chicken and meat so there's no guesswork. It also features a Hi-Fry function that cranks up the heat during the last two minutes of cooking to help achieve that perfect crisp. Plus, the basket has a viewing window so you can keep an eye on things during cooking. Vacuuming can get the surface-level dirt and dust out, but for stains you'll need a proper carpet cleaner. If you live in a home where accidents and spills are common, it's a lot more cost-effective to have your own than to rent one a few times a year -- especially when you can grab one at a discount. This Bissell Little Green is perfect for spot cleaning carpets and furniture, as well as eliminating odors. It features a 48-ounce water tank and comes with a Febreze cleaning solution for added freshness. It also weighs less than 10 pounds, so it's easy to maneuver.
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
Garmin Vivoactive 6 review: A sleek fitness watch that nails the basics
Garmin is one of the most trusted names in fitness watches, known for pairing industry-best GPS and heart rate tech with an ecosystem designed to help you train smarter, recover better, and live healthier. And while the brand has dipped into the smartwatch space before, the Vivoactive 6, released in April 2025, may finally be the Goldilocks option we've been waiting for. At $300, the Vivoactive 6 is a serious fitness tracker with lifestyle-friendly smart features — and easily one of the best-looking and highly-capable fitness watches I've tested for everyday use. As a health and fitness editor who's tested many, many wearables, from Fitbit to Whoop to other Garmin models, I've been wearing the Vivoactive 6 daily for weeks (and the Vivoactive 5 before that): through strength workouts, airport travel, stressful work days, and everything in between. It's not Garmin's most advanced watch, nor its smartest. But for the price, the look, and the right mix of features, the Vivoactive might be the perfect blend of fitness tracker power and smartwatch convenience — especially if you want more than step counts but don't need triathlon-level data. What I like about the Vivoactive 6 It has top-tier activity and recovery tracking. Garmin arguably has the best GPS and heart rate technology in the industry right now, which means all its watches are incredibly accurate at tracking activities, including the Vivoactive 6. This watch, in particular, has over 80 preloaded GPS and indoor activity profiles, from walking to mountain biking to pickleball to pool swimming, even activities for wheelchair users. You can customize which stats show during activity, but I found that on runs and during strength workouts, the factory display screens delivered the exact info I wanted — heart rate, overall time, pace, distance. The Vivoactive 6 also tracks your daily steps, continuous stress levels (based on heart rate value), and whether you're moving enough throughout the day (with alerts that it's time to get up and stretch every hour). It uses all your activity and physical load data to deliver a daily "body battery" energy score that reports how rested or drained your system is. It has the basic smartwatch features you'll use most. On the wrist, the Vivoactive 6 delivers smart notifications for emails, texts, and alerts, as well as the ability to use Garmin Pay contactless payment and store music for all smartphones. If you have an Android, you can also respond to texts with the on-watch keyboard and view photos. But it's not the most tricked-out smartwatch — the Vivoactive 6 doesn't have a built-in speaker or mic, so no on-wrist capabilities to dictate a reply to a text or take a call like most full-blown smartwatches these days (for those, you'll have to upgrade to the Venu 3). As someone who prioritizes fitness tracking but likes to know if an incoming text is urgent, I found the features of this watch to be perfectly appropriate. It looks sleeker than most fitness trackers. The problem with most fitness trackers is that they stand out on business trips or look a bit too rugged for clean girlies. While many Garmin watches look more sporty and performance-first, the Vivoactive has a very polished aesthetic, with the heritage round watch face, a slim profile, and a minimalist silicone band. I found the watch blended seamlessly from the gym to airport travel to business meetings. The vibrant AMOLED display — which is what our smartphones use — also looks more sleek and lifestyle-friendly than the more traditional OLED. I also appreciate that the watch is very lightweight (just 45 grams), which makes it comfortable to wear 24/7, and that it's water-rated to 5 ATM, which means it's safe for showering, swimming, and general sweaty endeavors. And it has customizable watch faces and widgets, so you can tweak it to suit your aesthetic or info preferences. It has an exceptional battery life. Perhaps the best part of all Garmins: The battery life is incredible. The Vivoactive 6 battery lasts for up to 11 days in smartwatch mode, and up to 21 hours when using continuous GPS tracking. Even with heavy use (daily workouts, regular walks, notifications on, screen brightness medium-high), I only need to change it once a week — if even (and it charges pretty quickly, so you're not missing many steps). That means you can track your sleep without worrying about charging nightly and go on weekend trips without packing a charger. Compared to the one- to two-day lifespan of most smartwatches (especially Apple and Samsung), the Vivoactive 6 easily wins in longevity. The Garmin app has a lot of potential. While I didn't rely heavily on the Garmin Connect app during testing, it's worth calling out how much value it adds for anyone motivated by structure, community, or who is looking for personalized guidance on their fitness goals — and all for free. The app offers detailed breakdowns of your workouts, recovery metrics, and trends over time. It also has a great Garmin Coach tool that can deliver personalized training plans (such as training for your first half-marathon). You can also join challenges with friends or strangers in the broader Garmin community, track your goals, and even earn digital badges for things like walking a 5K in June, or 365 miles in 365 days. For those who thrive on personalized data or need that extra nudge to stay consistent, the Garmin app can be a powerful companion to the watch itself. Where it falls short It's not the best watch for hardcore athletes. The Vivoactive 6 can track a wide range of sports and does a very good job at most of them. But if you're training for a race or a triathlon, or you're a multi-sport athlete and activity data and analytics are your priorities, this isn't the best watch out there. Adventure athletes, backcountry adventurers, and serious runners will certainly miss the barometric altimeter. Without it, the Vivoactive 6 cannot accurately measure elevation or track ascent/descent (look at the Forerunner 265 or Fenix 7 instead). Triathletes and hardcore runners will also want the deeper training analysis — training load, performance condition, guided lactate threshold test — that the Forerunner models offer. If you're a serious athlete, check out "how it compares to other watches" below to see what we recommend for you. It doesn't have full smartwatch functionalities. While it checks the boxes for basic conveniences — notifications, weather, Garmin Pay, and music controls — the Vivoactive 6 stops short of being a full-blown smartwatch. You can't take calls from your wrist or respond to texts (unless you're on Android, and even then, responses are limited to pre-set messages). It also lacks a voice assistant or third-party app ecosystem like Apple's App Store or Google's Wear OS. That trade-off helps the watch stay streamlined and battery-efficient, but if you're hoping for a seamless, phone-free experience or more app integrations, you'll want to look at models like the Garmin Venu 3, Samsung Galaxy Watch, or Apple Watch Series 10. Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs 6 Having tested both models, I can tell you: the Vivoactive 6 is a significant upgrade from the Vivoactive 5. The new features include: 80 activity modes vs. just 30 A lot of on-watch running data, including running dynamics, running power, and pace suggestions Daily recommended workouts at the morning report (i.e., when you wake up, it recommends whether you should get after interval training, LISS, HIIT, or rest today) Smart-wake alarms Physical buttons alongside the touchscreen for better control during workouts Better default data screens during workouts (in my opinion) These may seem like small changes, but they're just enough to remove what was frustrating about the Vivoactive 5 and put the Vivoactive 6 just over the edge to where it feels worth its $300 price tag. How it compares to other watches Our guides to the best fitness trackers and best Garmin watches outline the most noteworthy options in the wearables space. Here are some standouts to consider: Garmin Forerunner 265: The 265 is more expensive and doesn't look as sleek as the Vivoactive 6, but IMO, it is a better pick for multi-sport athletes. It tracks a handful of key activities the Vivoactive 6 doesn't (like triathlon training) and has a barometric altimeter to sense elevation changes. Read my full Garmin Forerunner 265 review. Garmin Venu 3: Essentially the step-up from the Vivoactive line, the Venu 3 has additional smartwatch features like a built-in mic and speaker for calls, a longer battery life, and a higher resolution display. Apple Watch Series 10 or Apple Watch Ultra 2: While the Apple Watch is very comparable to the Vivoactive 6, Garmin's version has a far longer battery life, more accurate GPS, and deeper fitness and training metrics. However, if you're interested in answering calls and texts, Apple Watches have a better ecosystem for iPhone users. Read our Apple Watch 10 review for more. The bottom line The Vivoactive 6 hits the sweet spot for anyone who wants a highly accurate, everyday fitness tracker that looks sleek and polished but doesn't need a full-blown smartwatch. I appreciate that this watch gives you basic notifications and features like music control on-wrist, but still prioritizes Garmin's class-leading heart rate and GPS tracking — and for a very reasonable price of $300. It's not the most advanced or accurate option for serious athletes or full tech heads. But the 11-day battery life and multitude of coaching and data-tracking abilities make it a near-perfect everyday fitness watch for active people who value both accuracy and style.
