Growing calls for Pakistan to rescind Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination
The Pakistani government's support for Donald Trump's personal quest to win a Nobel Peace Prize has caused a political firestorm in the country, with many calling on prime minister Shehbaz Sharif to rescind the nomination in the wake of the US bombing of Iran.
Opposition leaders, activists, and civil society members have denounced the nomination of the American president for the prestigious peace award as an act of 'crass flattery' and national humiliation.
Just hours before the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites, Pakistan had nominated Mr Trump for his 'legacy of pragmatic diplomacy' and 'pivotal leadership' that led to the de-escalation of the India - Pakistan military confrontation in May.
Less than 24 hours later Islamabad condemned the US for attacking Iran, calling it a 'serious violation of international law' and the statutes of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Mr Sharif even called Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian to express his concern over the US bombing that targeted facilities safeguarded by the UN atomic watchdog.
Its nomination of the US president for the peace award has put Pakistan in an awkward diplomatic position. Islamabad has staunchly and consistently supported the Palestinian cause and stayed firmly on the side of its neighbour Tehran throughout its conflict with Israel.
Pakistan declared its 'unequivocal and unambiguous' support to Iran, which was the first to recognise its new neighbouring nation after it was formed in 1947.
Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, criticised the support to Mr Trump as "unfortunate", saying it undermines the country's dignity.
"A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and called Israel's attack on Iran as 'excellent'," she wrote on X. "It compromises our national dignity.'
She later said the Pakistani government should be 'ashamed of this ill-conceived move' and should now have the 'decency to revoke that decision'.
Maulana Fazlur Rehman, a senator from the conservative Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party, condemned the nomination as morally indefensible.
"Mr Trump has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace?' he asked.
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam senator Kamran Murtaza on Monday submitted a resolution in the Senate to demand the withdrawal of the nomination.
'The Senate of Pakistan urges the Federal Government to rescind and withdraw its decision recommending US President … after bombing Iran by the USA on the orders of its President in violation of international law, interfering in the sovereignty of Iran, resulting several casualties also, as one of the concern of human rights, disturbing the peace in the region,' the motion read, according to Dawn.
Former senator Mushahid Hussain echoed the criticism on social media, writing that Mr Trump had 'willfully unleashed an illegal war' and 'fallen under the influence of Israel's PM Benjamin Netanyahu'.
He urged Pakistani authorities to 'review, rescind and revoke' the nomination while accusing Mr Trump of 'presiding over the decline of America'.
Mr Trump 'engaged in deception and betrayed his own promise not to start new wars', Mr Mushahid said in another post, strongly condemning the US attack on Iran.
Another former senator, Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar, called the nomination 'crass flattery'.
'Since Trump was already appreciative of Pakistan's role in India and Pakistan conflict, I don't know what was the need for nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize,' he said.
Civil society figures weighed in, with activist Noor-e-Maryam Kanwer, saying: 'Duality has been Pakistan's long term policy.'
'At a time when the US is supporting the genocide of Palestinian people and Israel's bombing of Iran, Pakistan is nominating Trump for Nobel Peace. Pakistan, hence proven once again will remain a rentier state,' she added.
Pakistan's nomination of Mr Trump came shortly after its powerful army chief Asim Munir met the US president for lunch at the White House.
The meeting lasted more than two hours and was also attended by US secretary of state Marco Rubio and US special representative for Middle Eastern Affairs Steve Witkoff.
The meeting was seen as a diplomatic victory for Islamabad as the military chief had been invited soon after Pakistan fought a limited military engagement with India. The four-day conflict began after India launched airstrikes on Pakistan, blaming it for a terror attack in the restive Himalayan region of Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists, in late April.
Mr Trump later claimed he had mediated a ceasefire between the two rivals to end hostilities. India denies the US played a role in the ceasefire talks.
Pakistan, however, continued to thank Mr Trump for the ceasefire, saying he demonstrated 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' to engage with Islamabad and New Delhi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘You cheer against Trump so hard': Hegseth scolds Iran nuclear strike reporting with no proof of ‘devastation'
The former Fox News weekend presenter who now serves as the head of the massive American defense establishment baselessly accused the Pentagon press corps — including one of his former colleagues — of deliberately trying to cast doubt on the success of last weekend's U.S. airstrikes against Iranian nuclear sites out of a desire to undermine the Trump administration in a bizarre rant-filled press conference aimed at the Pentagon on Thursday. Speaking alongside the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Pentagon briefing room, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth laid into the assembled reporters from the start by grousing about how news outlets hadn't given President Donald Trump enough credit for NATO members' decision to increase defense spending to an annual five percent of GDP at this week's summit in The Hague. He also accused them of missing 'historic moments' while trying to 'find wedges and spin stories' before claiming the airstrikes aimed at Iran's Esfahan, Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites on Saturday had been 'the most complex and secretive military operation in history' and 'a resounding success.' The airstrikes, which were conducted by seven B-2 Spirit bomber aircraft with the aid of numerous fighters and an Ohio-class guided missile submarine that fired dozens of Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles at one of the target sites, appear to have inflicted significant damage on the sites. But Hegseth and President Donald Trump have become increasingly irate over press coverage of the action because of reporting in the last few days which cited a preliminary report stating that the damage to the underground Fordow site wasn't enough to match their claims to have 'obliterated' the facilities. Hegseth complained that the press had reported on the preliminary document and cited other more recent statements from some of Trump's political appointees which assessed that the strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear program before returning to attacking journalists and accusing them of wanting the military to fail because it would look bad for Trump. 'You cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump,' he said. 'Because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.' 'You have to hope maybe they weren't effective, maybe the way the Trump administration is representing them isn't true. So let's take half truths, spun information, leaked information, and then spin it, spin it in every way we can, to try to cause doubt and manipulate the mind, the public mind over whether or not our brave pilots were successful,' he added. The ex-Fox News host's combative demeanor at the early-morning press conference matched the performative outrage he displayed alongside Trump less than a day before, when he called the bombing mission 'flawless' and said the 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator weapons dropped onto the hardened Fordow site had created 'devastation underneath' before attacking the motives of the Defense Intelligence Agency analysts who'd written the intelligence assessment and accusing news outlets that have reported on it of 'trying to spin it to make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success.'
Times
18 minutes ago
- Times
Pete Hegseth live: Trump team slams press over strikes coverage
Asked whether he believes highly enriched uranium was moved out of the nuclear sites before Saturday's strikes, Hegseth said there was 'nothing to suggest' anything was moved out by the Iranians ahead of time. Dan Caine says that the 30,000lb bunker-busters behaved as the military expected, but that it will not provide a damage assessment due to it being a job for the intelligence community. 'We don't mark our own homework,' he said. Dan Caine, the air force general, says that two intelligence officials were investigating the Iranian nuclear site at Fordow for 15 years. They knew it 'wasn't being built for any peaceful purposes … they realised we didn't have a weapon [to take out the plant],' he said. 'Operation Midnight Hammer was the culmination of their work. 'The weapons were designed, planned and delivered to achieve the effects in the mission space.' President Trump has said on Truth Social that there is rumour that the New York Times and CNN will fire reporters 'who made up the fake stories on the Iran nuclear sites'. Dan Caine, the air force general and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, is now talking about the Iranian attacks on the US base in Qatar on Monday. Caine described the deployment of Patriot missiles to defend the base as 'the largest single Patriot engagement in US military history'. He would not say how many rounds were fired, saying it is classified. Hegseth says the press relied too much on a US preliminary intelligence report, which suggested little damage had been done to the sites. 'Specifically you the press corps to cheer against Trump so much, you have to hope the strikes weren't effective … [you think] 'let's take leaked information and spin it to cause doubt and manipulate the public mind'.' Pete Hegseth has started by attacking the press over its coverage of the damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear sites facilities at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. 'Searching for scandals you miss historic moments,' he said. Iran had retaliated on Monday with a missile attack on a US base in nearby Qatar, but caused no casualties. In an apparent reference to the attack, Ayatollah Khamenei said 'such an action can be repeated in the future, too,' adding that Iran had 'access to key US centres in the region and can take action whenever it deems necessary'. 'Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price,' he said. Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, will hold a news conference shortly to offer a fresh assessment of strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. President Trump said that Hegseth, whom he dubbed the 'war' secretary, would hold a news conference to 'fight for the dignity of our great American pilots'. Ayatollah Khamenei, 86, hasn't been seen in public since taking shelter in a secret location after the outbreak of the war on June 13, when Israel attacked Iranian nuclear facilities and targeted top military commanders and scientists. After an American attack on June 22, that hit the nuclear sites with bunker-buster bombs, President Trump helped negotiate a ceasefire that came into effect on Tuesday. In his appearance on Thursday, Ayatollah Khamenei sat in front of plain brown curtains to give his address, similar to his June 19 message. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, has said his country delivered a 'hand slap to the face of America' in his first televised address since the fragile ceasefire was declared in the war with Israel. Claiming victory over Israel, Ayatollah Khamenei said the US had only intervened because 'it felt that if it did not intervene, the Zionist regime would be utterly destroyed.' He warned the US 'will definitely pay a heavy price' should it attack Iran again. His comments came in the wake of an attack on Sunday in which American forces hit three Iranian nuclear facilities with bunker-buster bombs and cruise missiles.
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Iran nuclear capability set back ‘years' fresh US intel claims
Donald Trump 's administration released new intelligence claiming Iran 's nuclear program has been set back 'years' due to recent strikes. This new information contradicts an earlier, widely reported, leaked assessment that suggested military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities only set the program back by mere months. CIA Director John Ratcliffe has now claimed that credible intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged, requiring years to rebuild key facilities. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard also asserted the destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities, criticizing 'propaganda media' for selectively leaking classified information. Following the leak of the initial assessment, the Trump administration reportedly plans to limit the sharing of classified intelligence with Congress.
