‘You cheer against Trump so hard': Hegseth scolds Iran nuclear strike reporting with no proof of ‘devastation'
The former Fox News weekend presenter who now serves as the head of the massive American defense establishment baselessly accused the Pentagon press corps — including one of his former colleagues — of deliberately trying to cast doubt on the success of last weekend's U.S. airstrikes against Iranian nuclear sites out of a desire to undermine the Trump administration in a bizarre rant-filled press conference aimed at the Pentagon on Thursday.
Speaking alongside the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Pentagon briefing room, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth laid into the assembled reporters from the start by grousing about how news outlets hadn't given President Donald Trump enough credit for NATO members' decision to increase defense spending to an annual five percent of GDP at this week's summit in The Hague.
He also accused them of missing 'historic moments' while trying to 'find wedges and spin stories' before claiming the airstrikes aimed at Iran's Esfahan, Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites on Saturday had been 'the most complex and secretive military operation in history' and 'a resounding success.'
The airstrikes, which were conducted by seven B-2 Spirit bomber aircraft with the aid of numerous fighters and an Ohio-class guided missile submarine that fired dozens of Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles at one of the target sites, appear to have inflicted significant damage on the sites. But Hegseth and President Donald Trump have become increasingly irate over press coverage of the action because of reporting in the last few days which cited a preliminary report stating that the damage to the underground Fordow site wasn't enough to match their claims to have 'obliterated' the facilities.
Hegseth complained that the press had reported on the preliminary document and cited other more recent statements from some of Trump's political appointees which assessed that the strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear program before returning to attacking journalists and accusing them of wanting the military to fail because it would look bad for Trump.
'You cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump,' he said. 'Because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.'
'You have to hope maybe they weren't effective, maybe the way the Trump administration is representing them isn't true. So let's take half truths, spun information, leaked information, and then spin it, spin it in every way we can, to try to cause doubt and manipulate the mind, the public mind over whether or not our brave pilots were successful,' he added.
The ex-Fox News host's combative demeanor at the early-morning press conference matched the performative outrage he displayed alongside Trump less than a day before, when he called the bombing mission 'flawless' and said the 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator weapons dropped onto the hardened Fordow site had created 'devastation underneath' before attacking the motives of the Defense Intelligence Agency analysts who'd written the intelligence assessment and accusing news outlets that have reported on it of 'trying to spin it to make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
24 minutes ago
- Metro
I've lived in fear of nuclear war all my life - this is how I'm prepping
The world has gone to bed each night lately wondering whether World War Three will break out by the time we wake up. The fighting over Iran's nuclear ambitions made people feel awfully unsafe, particularly with all the bloodcurdling rhetoric from leaders in Israel, Iran, and the US. Then when President Donald Trump announced strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, global fears escalated. I know that worry well because I first felt it as a child. I've been living under a (mushroom) cloud ever since. Now, after a lifetime of prepping, I'm doing so again – but this time I'm not putting aside bottles of water, wind up radios and loo roll. I'm mentally prepping – for the fact I might die. And after 40 years of living in fear, I finally feel a sense of peace. As an 11-year-old in 1984, I settled down one September evening to watch a BBC film called Threads about a nuclear attack on Sheffield. I can't remember what I was expecting to see but I'll never forget it: 112 minutes of the most graphic, grim, and horrifying television imaginable. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In the agonisingly tense first half of the film, it shows the build-up to nuclear war in the background of the lives of ordinary families. Then the bombs drop and the film shows the mushroom clouds, the firestorm, and what these monstrous demons do to Sheffield, its people, and its pets. Threads then follows the bleak horror of the nuclear winter and beyond, showing the brutality of what's left of life over more than a decade after the attack. Watching this film was quite an experience for a boy of 11. It blew my mind with all the grace and clemency of a nuclear bomb. I went to bed terrified that night and the boy who emerged the next morning was changed forever. That next day, I tried to unscrew the living room door to build a nuclear shelter in our cellar. I then marched to the library to try and find information about gas masks, bunkers, and any medicine that might help with radiation sickness. In the days after, I remembered that we had friends who lived in an isolated house in Cornwall and I asked my parents to ask them whether we could go and stay there when it looked like the bomb might drop. When we were moving house and it came down to a choice between two options, I begged my parents to put every other factor aside and choose the one that had a bunker in its back garden. We didn't move to that house, but for a lot of my teenage years I had that bunker mentality in mind. I was mistrustful, angry and terrified. Wherever I was, I looked out for places to duck and cover. I'd become a nuclear paranoiac overnight and the metaphorical mushroom cloud that Threads cast over my life would hang in the sky for decades. Are you scared of nuclear war? No, I've made peace like Chas I have a secret bunker so I'll be fine Ever since, I've been convinced that the outbreak of nuclear war was nigh. I even joined the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and marched for the cause. And if I heard about any global tensions on the news, I'd remember how Threads showed the characters ignoring reports about growing global tensions at first. 'You won't catch me looking the other way,' I'd think. The nuclear war in Threads broke out because of international tensions over a conflict in Iran. So if you'd asked me as a kid how I would feel if there was a real-life flare-up over a nuclear arms programme in Iran in 2025, I'd have said two things. One, I can't believe the world hasn't nuked itself to pieces by 2025, and two, this is where World War Three is about to start. But actually, over the past few weeks I've probably been less worried than a lot of people. Having spent so much of my life fretting about nuclear war, I've ended up finding a sense of peace. I've already done all my trembling about the bomb and I've concluded that if there were a nuclear war, the best outcome for me would also be the most likely one: Instant death. Having come to terms with how dramatically Threads changed my life, I've also resolved to try and not be swayed again by propaganda. So when the Government warned this week that Britain needs to prepare for the possibility of being attacked on its own soil, and when Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, warned recently that without a major increase in defence spending, British people 'better learn to speak Russian', I declined the invitation to return to the dread of my teenage years. I've concluded that if there were a nuclear war, the best outcome for me would also be the most likely one: Instant death. I now know that worrying gets me nowhere. I've accepted that this may end in my death and so freaking about what could happen next is pointless. You won't catch me prepping. I won't be taking doors off their hinges for shelter. I won't fantasise about that bunker. More Trending I've lived with this fear for too long. I feel compassion for people who are still worried about the bomb, but I want them to take it from me: After over 40 years of nuclear war anxiety, fretting about it won't make it go away – and neither will marching about it. We can't uninvent nuclear weapons, we have to purge mankind of the consciousness that made us want them in the first place, and that's a deeper, longer battle that can only be fought in each of our hearts. For now, we have to find a way to live with the threat they pose to us – and seek the peace that comes with accepting that they may destroy us. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I was punished for not telling my boss about my disability MORE: Denis Villeneuve threatens to overshadow the new James Bond – whoever he is MORE: Trump and his defence boss have created a 'cult of personality'
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israel says Iran's Supreme Leader avoided assassination by going underground
June 26 (Reuters) - Israel would have killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei were it possible during the countries' 12-day war, Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday. "I estimate that if Khamenei had been in our sights, we would have taken him out," Katz said in the interview with Israel's Kan public television. "But Khamenei understood this, went underground to very great depths, and broke off contacts with the commanders who replaced those commanders who were eliminated, so it wasn't realistic in the end," he said. Israel killed several top Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists on June 13 at the start of the war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump had both suggested at various times during the air war that Khamenei's life could be in danger as regime change could be a result of the war that ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire on Tuesday.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Federal lawsuit adds to allegations of child sexual abuse in Maryland youth detention centers
A federal lawsuit could open a new chapter in an escalating legal battle in Maryland, where officials are struggling to address an unexpected onslaught of claims alleging child sexual abuse in state-run juvenile detention facilities. With thousands of similar claims already pending in state court, the litigation has raised questions about how Maryland will handle the potential financial liability. The new federal suit, filed Wednesday on behalf of three plaintiffs, seeks $300 million in damages — an amount that far exceeds caps imposed on claims filed in state court. It alleges Maryland juvenile justice leaders knew about a culture of abuse inside youth detention facilities and failed to address it, violating the plaintiffs' civil rights. Messages seeking comment were left Thursday with the state's Department of Juvenile Services and the Maryland Office of the Attorney General. The department generally doesn't comment on pending litigation. An estimated 11,000 plaintiffs have sued in state court, according to the attorneys involved. Maryland Senate President Bill Ferguson said Wednesday that he believes negotiations for a potential settlement are ongoing between attorneys for the plaintiffs and the attorney general's office. Officials have said the state is facing a potential liability between $3 billion and $4 billion. Lawsuits started pouring in after a state law passed in 2023 eliminated the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse claims in Maryland. The change came in the immediate aftermath of a scathing investigative report that revealed widespread abuse within the Archdiocese of Baltimore. It prompted the archdiocese to file for bankruptcy to protect its assets. But Maryland leaders didn't anticipate they'd be facing similar budgetary concerns because of claims against the state's juvenile justice system. Facing a potentially enormous payout, lawmakers recently passed an amendment to limit future liabilities. The new law reduces caps on settlements from $890,000 to $400,000 for cases filed after May 31 against state institutions, and from $1.5 million to $700,000 for private institutions. It allows each claimant to receive only one payment, instead of being able to collect for each act of abuse. Suing in federal court allows plaintiffs to sidestep those limits. 'Despite Maryland's recent unconstitutional legislative efforts to insulate itself from liability for the horrific sexual brutalization of children in its custody, Maryland cannot run from liability under Federal law,' plaintiffs' attorney Corey Stern said in a statement. 'The United States Constitution was created for all of us, knowing that some would need protection from the tyranny of their political leaders.' The three plaintiffs in the federal case allege they were sexually abused by staff at two juvenile detention centers. While other lawsuits have mainly presented allegations of abuse occurring decades ago, the federal complaint focuses on events alleged to have happened in 2019 and 2020. The plaintiffs were 14 and 15 years old. The victims feared their sentences would be extended if they spoke out, according to the complaint. They accuse state officials of turning a blind eye to a 'culture of sexual brutalization and abuse.' Stern said he anticipates more federal claims will be forthcoming.
