logo
Waukesha County food pantry sees increase in clients, decline in funding

Waukesha County food pantry sees increase in clients, decline in funding

Yahooa day ago

The Brief
The Food Pantry of Waukesha County is coming off a record-breaking year helping people with no signs of slowing down, but funds and food donations aren't keeping up.
Leaders say last year was a record-breaker for the number of people served.
While demand is up, two federally funded food programs are being cut or eliminated altogether.
WAUKESHA, Wis. - Leaders at a food pantry in Waukesha say they're seeing more people in need than ever before.
But while demand is up, federally funded programs that help stock the shelves are drying up.
What we know
The Food Pantry of Waukesha County is coming off a record-breaking year helping people with no signs of slowing down. But funds and food donations aren't keeping up.
Volunteer Julie Huttner is noticing a change at the Food Pantry of Waukesha County.
"We see a lot of repeats, but it's not always the same people," Huttner said.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
Leaders say last year was a record-breaker for the number of people served: nearly 9,000 individuals. So far this year, the need has increased by 11%.
What they're saying
Lyndsay Johnson is the pantry's executive director. While demand is up, two federally funded food programs are being cut or eliminated altogether.
"These changes could leave some pretty large holes for us to fill," she said.
When added up, Johnson expects a reduction of roughly $75,000 worth of food.
The pantry has already decreased the amount of meat it hands out.
"I'm grateful for the support we do receive," Johnson said. "The concern is what this looks like as we move forward."
In a word, Johnson said the future is scary.
Dig deeper
Changes to SNAP benefits, as outlined in President Donald Trump's so-called big beautiful bill that passed the House, could leave more people relying on food pantry shelves.
In addition to grants and donations, Johnson said the pantry also pays out-of-pocket for food. She said last year, the organization paid $381,000 – a 319% increase in just three years.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
"That's a lot of money for an organization like ours to come up with [...] it comes from the community," she said.
Adding to the anxiety, Johnson said summer months tend to be slow for donations, with fewer food drives while people are on vacation.
Specific federal government reductions the pantry was notified about in March include:
$25,000 in Emergency Assistance Program deliveries this summer for milk, eggs and meat.
$50,000 in Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA), which was discontinued. This provided locally grown produce and meat for clients.
The Source
The information in this post was collected and produced by FOX6 News.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bluesky is backfiring. Mark Cuban says the ‘lack of diversity of thought' is actually pushing users back to X
Bluesky is backfiring. Mark Cuban says the ‘lack of diversity of thought' is actually pushing users back to X

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bluesky is backfiring. Mark Cuban says the ‘lack of diversity of thought' is actually pushing users back to X

Billionaire Mark Cuban, who has been an active Bluesky user and supporter for several months now, said this week he thinks the social media platform has gotten 'ruder and more hateful.' Its liberal-heavy user base makes it challenging to raise questions or have debates with other users, even if their political ideologies align, he said. After Elon Musk bought Twitter (now X) in late 2022, the vibes on the platform started changing, and many accounts that were verified lost their status. But the mass exodus from X came in late 2024 following the U.S. presidential election and Musk throwing his support—and millions—behind Donald Trump. By December 2024, the platform had lost about 2.7 million active Apple and Android users in just two months, with competitor Bluesky absorbing nearly all of those users. Colloquially, it became somewhat of a safe haven for liberal users who wanted to drown out the noise of President Trump's reelection. 'It's people wanting to just try something new. It's people finding their community here,' Bluesky CEO Jay Graber told Vox Media's Peter Kafta in a June 4 podcast. 'I think in general it's both people looking for something and people looking to get away from something.' Between November 2024 and this May, Bluesky grew from about 10 million users to 30 million, according to a Pew Research Center analysis. Many news influencers—people who regularly post about current events on the platform—lean left politically, according to the analysis. One such figure was billionaire Mark Cuban, who supported former Vice President Kamala Harris during her presidential run in 2024, although he didn't give her a penny for her campaign, he said. Cuban became a regular Bluesky user, having posted nearly 2,000 times since November 2024. When he first joined the platform, he famously posted: 'Hello Less Hateful World.' But Cuban has changed his tune. In a series of posts this week, Cuban argued Bluesky has become too much of an echo chamber, and is sending more users back to X. 'Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to agree with me or you are a nazi fascist,' Cuban wrote. 'We are forcing posts to X.' The former Shark Tank star and Dallas Mavericks owner also said he thinks Bluesky users have 'grown ruder and more hateful.' 'Even if you agree with 95% of what a person is saying on a topic, if there is one point that you might call out as being more of a grey area, they will call you a fascist etc.,' said Cuban, whose current net worth is about $8.33 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bluesky did not respond to Fortune's request for comment. Cuban also reposted a Washington Post opinion article published Sunday titled 'The Bluesky bubble hurts liberals and their causes.' Author Megan McArdle argued Bluesky's left-leaning user base segregates it into a political silo. Cuban agreed. 'The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage,' Cuban wrote in a separate Bluesky update including the Washington Post article. 'The moderation and block tools on here are so advanced, if you see someone you don't want to see on here, just block them. Don't attack them.' 'There used to be great give and take discussions on politics and news. Not so much any more,' Cuban added. 'Doesn't have to be this way.' This story was originally featured on

Chime IPO: Stock price today as financial services startup makes closely watched Nasdaq debut
Chime IPO: Stock price today as financial services startup makes closely watched Nasdaq debut

Fast Company

time22 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Chime IPO: Stock price today as financial services startup makes closely watched Nasdaq debut

Chime Financial is expected to debut on the Nasdaq today. The fintech company's initial public offering (IPO) is one of the most anticipated of 2025, and investors and market watchers will be eagerly waiting to see how the newly public stock performs on its first day of trading. If it performs well, it could signal positive investor appetite for technology public offerings and the IPO market as a whole. Here's what to know about Chime's IPO. What is Chime? Chime Financial, Inc. is a fintech company. It was founded in 2012 and is based in San Francisco. The company offers banking products without the associated fees that traditional banks tack onto accounts. For example, many of Chime's online banking services don't have a minimum balance, or monthly service or overdraft fees. These fees are major drivers of revenue at traditional banks. So how does Chime generate revenue without them? The company says its business model is primarily based on interchange fees, which are the fees that merchants pay when they accept a card payment. Chime's services can be accessed on the web and also via iPhone and Android apps. Chime is not a bank but rather offers banking services. It has partnerships with Bancorp Bank and Stride Bank. A diminished market cap With Chime's IPO, the company is now valued at approximately $11.6 billion, according to CNBC. However, that is less than half of its peak private valuation of $25 billion in 2021. In that year, Chime received a funding round of $750 million. One reason for Chime's high private valuation in 2021, relative to its valuation today, was the pandemic. As Fast Company previously noted, in the early 2020s, fintech companies experienced a surge in service usage from consumers and garnered significant attention from investors as the pandemic unfolded. Much of that excitement for companies operating in the fintech space has subsided in subsequent years. The market turmoil of 2025 has also made investors more cautious about companies operating in the finance sector and initial public offerings in general. In May, another fintech company, the online brokerage firm eToro Group (Nasdaq: ETOR), went public for $52 per share. As of yesterday's close, ETOR shares are trading at $62.96 per share. Chime by the numbers On May 13, Chime filed a Form F-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the F-1 filing, Chime reported the following metrics as of March 31, 2025: Active Chime members: 8.6 million Active member growth rate since Q1 2022: 82% Purchase volume: $121 billion Average revenue per active member (ARPAM): $251 Gross margin: 88% Transaction margin: 67% When is Chime's IPO? Chime priced its shares on Wednesday and is expected to begin trading today: Thursday, June 12, 2025. What is Chime's stock ticker? Chime's stock ticker is 'CHYM.' What exchange will Chime shares trade on? Chime shares trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. What is the IPO share price of CHYM? Chime's IPO price is $27 per share. That's higher than the expected IPO price of between $24 and $26. The higher IPO price of $27 per share suggests that Chime believes there is a greater appetite for its shares than previously thought. How many CHYM shares are available in its IPO? According to a company press release, a total of 32 million CHYM were made available in its IPO. Of those shares, Chime offered 25,900,765 Class A shares directly to the public. Existing company shareholders put up the remaining 6,099,235 shares. How much did Chime raise in its IPO? Chime raised approximately $700 million in its initial public offering. That consists of the proceeds from the 25.9 million shares the company sold directly. Chime did not benefit from the sale of the 6 million shares sold by its existing shareholders. How much is Chime worth? At its $27 IPO price, Chime's market cap is now valued at approximately $11.6 billion. What else is there to know? Chime is the latest in a number of closely watched tech-focused IPOs this year. In addition to the aforementioned eToro, stablecoin company Circle Internet Group went public earlier this month. Both stocks have performed well since their debut, raising hopes for the IPO market more broadly.

'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists
'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists

Rachel Reeves' spending review has been slammed by leading economists who said it was not a 'serious department analysis'. The chancellor unveiled her plans to spend an extra £300 billion over the next three years on Wednesday, divvying out huge sums of cash to the NHS, net zero and defence – while also squeezing other Whitehall budgets. The government has said this is all an investment in Britain's renewal, and insisted that these decisions are fully-financed after Labour hiked taxes in last year's Budget. However, the director of think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Paul Johnson tore into her announcement on Thursday. 'If you were baffled by the chancellor's speech yesterday, so were we,' he said during the IFS's analysis livestream on YouTube. 'It did not appear to be a serious effort to provide useful information to anybody.' He also seemed to criticise the premise that the economy is now in better place than it was a year ago, hence Labour's decision to spend again – and reverse some cuts. 'Despite some of the rather odd recent claims, neither the economic forecasts nor the public finances have improved relative to the genuinely difficult situation we knew about a year ago,' Johnson said. 'Rather the reverse. Hence some difficult choices.' Large council tax hikes have been included in the government expectations for the review, which also 'assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year', according to the IFS chief. That means bills will rise at their fastest rate 'over any parliament since 2001-05.' Johnson laid into the cuts Reeves is imposing on other Whitehall departments in order to boost the NHS, defence and net zero, too. He said: 'Every department is facing the same administrative costs, 10% for all of them over the three years, and then another 5% in 2029-30. 'All of that is irrespective of how much they've grown, irrespective of planned spending increases, irrespective of anything at all. 'That is not the result of a serious department analysis. 'I hesitate to accuse the Treasury of making numbers up but…' He noted that total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation. That's lower growth than was recorded over the 2019-2024 parliament, when it increased at 3.6% per year. 'This is a long period during which spending will be growing faster than the economy,' he said. Johnson even questioned the suggestion that the NHS had fared particularly well, noting: 'Health spending nearly always gets topped up. Growth of 3% a year is below the historic average.' Mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and the backlash against disability benefit cuts, means Reeves is expected to either introduce more cuts or hike taxes in the autumn Budget to pay for it all. Johnson noted: 'Nobody should be in any doubt that the chancellor has had some incredibly tough decisions to take. 'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.' Nick Ferrari Calls Rachel Reeves 'The Klarna Chancellor' After She Splashed The Cash In Spending Review Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store