'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists
Rachel Reeves' spending review has been slammed by leading economists who said it was not a 'serious department analysis'.
The chancellor unveiled her plans to spend an extra £300 billion over the next three years on Wednesday, divvying out huge sums of cash to the NHS, net zero and defence – while also squeezing other Whitehall budgets.
The government has said this is all an investment in Britain's renewal, and insisted that these decisions are fully-financed after Labour hiked taxes in last year's Budget.
However, the director of think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Paul Johnson tore into her announcement on Thursday.
'If you were baffled by the chancellor's speech yesterday, so were we,' he said during the IFS's analysis livestream on YouTube. 'It did not appear to be a serious effort to provide useful information to anybody.'
He also seemed to criticise the premise that the economy is now in better place than it was a year ago, hence Labour's decision to spend again – and reverse some cuts.
'Despite some of the rather odd recent claims, neither the economic forecasts nor the public finances have improved relative to the genuinely difficult situation we knew about a year ago,' Johnson said. 'Rather the reverse. Hence some difficult choices.'
Large council tax hikes have been included in the government expectations for the review, which also 'assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year', according to the IFS chief.
That means bills will rise at their fastest rate 'over any parliament since 2001-05.'
Johnson laid into the cuts Reeves is imposing on other Whitehall departments in order to boost the NHS, defence and net zero, too.
He said: 'Every department is facing the same administrative costs, 10% for all of them over the three years, and then another 5% in 2029-30.
'All of that is irrespective of how much they've grown, irrespective of planned spending increases, irrespective of anything at all.
'That is not the result of a serious department analysis.
'I hesitate to accuse the Treasury of making numbers up but…'
He noted that total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation.
That's lower growth than was recorded over the 2019-2024 parliament, when it increased at 3.6% per year.
'This is a long period during which spending will be growing faster than the economy,' he said.
Johnson even questioned the suggestion that the NHS had fared particularly well, noting: 'Health spending nearly always gets topped up. Growth of 3% a year is below the historic average.'
Mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and the backlash against disability benefit cuts, means Reeves is expected to either introduce more cuts or hike taxes in the autumn Budget to pay for it all.
Johnson noted: 'Nobody should be in any doubt that the chancellor has had some incredibly tough decisions to take.
'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.'
Nick Ferrari Calls Rachel Reeves 'The Klarna Chancellor' After She Splashed The Cash In Spending Review
Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs
Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
What do we know about the Boston Celtics trade talks with other NBA teams?
What do we know about the Boston Celtics trade talks with other NBA teams? What do we know about the Boston Celtics trade talks with other NBA teams so far this offseason? As the 2025 NBA draft draws closer by the day, we are hearing an increasing amount of chatter about what the Celtics front office has been doing on the trade front as they likely look to offload salary ahead of a potentially historic payroll and tax bill. But it is also the time of the league calendar where one can find a lot of rumors about trade plans coming from parties trying to influence the outcome of deals for their own interests, so all things percolating up about Boston's trade plans should be taken with several grains of salt. The folks behind the "NBA Front Office" YouTube channel put together a clip from their show talking over what they have been hearing about the Celtics. Take a look at the clip embedded below to hear what they had to say about what we're hearing about Boston trade plans, and plenty more on that front from around the NBA.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Minister to soften disability benefits shake-up
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is making changes to her package of welfare reforms in an attempt to reassure Labour MPs who are considering rebelling against the plans. Kendall has tried to soften the impact of planned benefits cuts worth £5bn a year by 2030 before MPs vote on the government's welfare changes. The welfare reform bill will include proposals to make it harder for disabled people with less severe conditions to claim personal independence payment (Pip). The BBC has been told anybody who loses Pip will receive the payment for a transitional period of 13 weeks, rather than the usual four weeks, before it is removed. Carer's allowance will continue to be paid during the 13-week transition, but will be ended when Pip is taken away. Benefits recipients with the most severe health conditions will not be reassessed and will receive extra income support through a universal credit payment. A scheme to give disabled people a right to try employment without the risk of losing their benefits will also be introduced at the same time as the welfare reform bill. Kendall has described these additions as "non-negotiable" protections, which will be added to the bill before it is published next week. The protections were proposed in the government's Pathways to Work green paper and consulted on before Kendall decided to add them to the bill. Kendall told the Guardian newspaper: "When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. "I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. "That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. "These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable." The BBC understands the protections had been raised in discussions between ministers, Labour MPs and disability rights groups. Dozens of Labour MPs have expressed concerns about the plans to cut Pip payments and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Many have said they are prepared to vote against the primary legislation the government needs to pass to make the changes to welfare payments. The welfare package as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty, according to the government's impact assessment. Neil Duncan-Jordan is one of 42 Labour MPs who wrote a letter that said the welfare reforms were "impossible to support" if changes were not made. When asked what he made of the protections Kendall had added to the bill, Duncan-Jordan said: "Poverty delayed is still poverty." Another discontented Labour MP, Ian Byrne, said: "After 14 weeks do the disabled and sick affected miraculously end the need for the vital assistance being taken away? An absolute nonsense." And Labour MP Rachael Maskell said Kendall had "just restated the proposals in Pathways to Work with a three-month transition before people lose their support". She added: "It will therefore not change the material facts nor my intention to vote against." Another Labour MP said the added protections will not stop dozens of his colleagues from opposing the bill. "The whips are pushing very hard with MPs but it's not working," the Labour MP said. But one supportive Labour MP said Kendall's protections sounded sensible. Some Labour MPs used the government's U-turn on winter fuel payments to renew their calls for the planned benefit cuts to be reversed. But on Thursday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the government would not row back on the cuts. "We're not going to be changing that," she told the BBC. "It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works." The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) says it expects 3.2 million families – a mixture of current and future recipients - to lose out financially, as a result of the total package of measures, with an average loss of £1,720 per year. This includes 370,000 current Pip recipients who will no longer qualify and 430,000 future claimants who will get less than they would previously have been entitled to. But ministers have stressed the figures do not factor in the government's plans to spend £1bn on helping the long-term sick and disabled back into work, or its efforts to reduce poverty. Ministers hope these efforts will boost employment among benefits recipients, at a time when 2.8 million people are economically inactive due to long-term sickness. If nothing changes, the health and disability benefits bill is forecast to reach £70bn a year by the end of the decade, a level of spending the government says is "unsustainable". The government is planning to put the welfare reforms in place by November 2026 and no one will lose out on benefits payments until that happens. Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn Starmer faces growing rebellion over welfare cuts Jittery Labour MPs divided over benefits cuts
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
GOP Senator Ron Johnson says he's 'trying to force reality' on DC
When it comes to the nation's federal government, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin is "not a fan." He believes that it "causes or exacerbates more problems than it actually solves," telling Fox News Digital during an interview on Wednesday that the bulk of his oversight is "to expose how awful government is" in order to obtain "public support for reducing it, limiting its size, limiting its cost, limiting its influence over our lives." "As our federal government grows, our freedoms recede," he said. "You see what the federal government does, how it wastes money." Trump Ally Stands Firm Against 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Despite Pressure: 'It'll Completely Backfire' The national debt has ballooned to the eye-watering sum of more than $36 trillion, with lawmakers and presidents from both parties presiding over the deficit spending that has led the nation to this point. Johnson said he's "trying to force reality" upon everyone in the nation's capital, regardless of whether they want to face that reality. Read On The Fox News App He said for decades the nation has been suffering a "chronic debt crisis," illustrating the dramatic decline in the value of the U.S. dollar by noting that "the dollar you held back in 1998 is now only worth $0.51 cents," while "a dollar you held in … 2019 is only worth $0.80 cents." The senator referred to inflation as "the silent tax." But he's certainly not staying silent. Johnson indicated that the elected leaders are mortgaging the future of American children, but "don't talk about it." "I'm forcing everybody to look at it," he said, noting that his "primary role" is to force "acknowledgment of our problem." But as keenly as Johnson advocates the idea of slashing the sprawling tentacles of the massive federal bureaucracy, right now he's just pushing to pare spending down to pre-pandemic levels. The conservative fiscal hawk has been making headlines for taking a stand against the Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill Act that cleared the GOP-controlled House of Representatives last month. But Johnson told Fox News Digital that he actually likes a lot of the measure. "I'm really not critical of the bill as far as it goes," Johnson explained, noting that he's a "big supporter" of much of what's in it, though he noted that has not read all of it — the measure is more than 1,000 pages long. Republicans Challenge 'Irrelevant' Budget Office As It Critiques Trump's 'Beautiful Bill' "My main beef is it just doesn't go far enough," he said, noting that after the COVID-19 pandemic Democrats failed to return to pre-COVID spending and deficit levels. The Congressional Budget Office's estimated budgetary impact for the measure indicates that the net effect on the deficit would be a more than $2.4 trillion increase over the fiscal years 2025-2034. But White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought has said the measure would decrease deficits. "The bill REDUCES deficits by $1.4 trillion over ten years when you adjust for CBO's one big gimmick--not using a realistic current policy baseline. It includes $1.7 trillion in mandatory savings, the most in history. If you care about deficits and debt, this bill dramatically improves the fiscal picture," Vought said in a post on X. Us Officials Delayed Warning Public About Heart Inflammation Risk From Covid Shot: Report Johnson also noted during the interview that there has not been a "reckoning" regarding the "abuse" at all levels of government during the COVID-19 pandemic. He noted that he does not refer to the COVID-19 jab as a vaccine. Instead, he referred to it as an "injection," asserting that it is "not a vaccine," and that it caused injuries and death. The senator said that he thinks the shots should have "black box warnings." The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website states that the "CDC recommends a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine for most adults ages 18 and older" and claims that the "vaccine helps protect you from severe illness, hospitalization, and death." Johnson, who has served in the Senate since 2011 and won election to a third term in 2022, said he'd prefer not to seek another term in office. "I don't covet this job," he said, noting that he wants to leverage his post to help save America and aid those who are "ignored by the system." While he's not ruling out another run, Johnson, who turned 70-years-old earlier this year, said he'd "be happy" to return to Oshkosh and "live a nice, peaceful life."Original article source: GOP Senator Ron Johnson says he's 'trying to force reality' on DC
