logo
Minister to soften disability benefits shake-up

Minister to soften disability benefits shake-up

Yahoo13-06-2025
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is making changes to her package of welfare reforms in an attempt to reassure Labour MPs who are considering rebelling against the plans.
Kendall has tried to soften the impact of planned benefits cuts worth £5bn a year by 2030 before MPs vote on the government's welfare changes.
The welfare reform bill will include proposals to make it harder for disabled people with less severe conditions to claim personal independence payment (Pip).
The BBC has been told anybody who loses Pip will receive the payment for a transitional period of 13 weeks, rather than the usual four weeks, before it is removed.
Carer's allowance will continue to be paid during the 13-week transition, but will be ended when Pip is taken away.
Benefits recipients with the most severe health conditions will not be reassessed and will receive extra income support through a universal credit payment.
A scheme to give disabled people a right to try employment without the risk of losing their benefits will also be introduced at the same time as the welfare reform bill.
Kendall has described these additions as "non-negotiable" protections, which will be added to the bill before it is published next week.
The protections were proposed in the government's Pathways to Work green paper and consulted on before Kendall decided to add them to the bill.
Kendall told the Guardian newspaper: "When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work.
"I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on.
"That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes.
"These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable."
The BBC understands the protections had been raised in discussions between ministers, Labour MPs and disability rights groups.
Dozens of Labour MPs have expressed concerns about the plans to cut Pip payments and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC).
Many have said they are prepared to vote against the primary legislation the government needs to pass to make the changes to welfare payments.
The welfare package as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty, according to the government's impact assessment.
Neil Duncan-Jordan is one of 42 Labour MPs who wrote a letter that said the welfare reforms were "impossible to support" if changes were not made.
When asked what he made of the protections Kendall had added to the bill, Duncan-Jordan said: "Poverty delayed is still poverty."
Another discontented Labour MP, Ian Byrne, said: "After 14 weeks do the disabled and sick affected miraculously end the need for the vital assistance being taken away? An absolute nonsense."
And Labour MP Rachael Maskell said Kendall had "just restated the proposals in Pathways to Work with a three-month transition before people lose their support".
She added: "It will therefore not change the material facts nor my intention to vote against."
Another Labour MP said the added protections will not stop dozens of his colleagues from opposing the bill.
"The whips are pushing very hard with MPs but it's not working," the Labour MP said.
But one supportive Labour MP said Kendall's protections sounded sensible.
Some Labour MPs used the government's U-turn on winter fuel payments to renew their calls for the planned benefit cuts to be reversed.
But on Thursday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the government would not row back on the cuts.
"We're not going to be changing that," she told the BBC. "It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works."
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) says it expects 3.2 million families – a mixture of current and future recipients - to lose out financially, as a result of the total package of measures, with an average loss of £1,720 per year.
This includes 370,000 current Pip recipients who will no longer qualify and 430,000 future claimants who will get less than they would previously have been entitled to.
But ministers have stressed the figures do not factor in the government's plans to spend £1bn on helping the long-term sick and disabled back into work, or its efforts to reduce poverty.
Ministers hope these efforts will boost employment among benefits recipients, at a time when 2.8 million people are economically inactive due to long-term sickness.
If nothing changes, the health and disability benefits bill is forecast to reach £70bn a year by the end of the decade, a level of spending the government says is "unsustainable".
The government is planning to put the welfare reforms in place by November 2026 and no one will lose out on benefits payments until that happens.
Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn
Starmer faces growing rebellion over welfare cuts
Jittery Labour MPs divided over benefits cuts
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inheritance tax changes under consideration amid spending gap concerns
Inheritance tax changes under consideration amid spending gap concerns

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Inheritance tax changes under consideration amid spending gap concerns

The Treasury is reportedly exploring options to raise additional revenue from inheritance tax ahead of the autumn budget. According to The Guardian, officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to fill, amid similarly controversial pushes for a 'wealth tax' by some Labour MPs. Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.' Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. Last week, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr) predicted Rachel Reeves is now set for a £41.2 billion shortfall on her 'stability rule' in 2029-30 and has been left with an 'impossible trilemma' of trying to meet her fiscal rules while fulfilling spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge not to raise taxes. She will need to raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget to plug the gap, Niesr cautioned. In July, some Labour Party figures, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, called for a wealth tax. Ms Reeves has not ruled out the possibility of a new wealth tax but has been eager to highlight that she will stick to her commitment not to hike tax for 'working people'. However, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismissed the idea. 'This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income – the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax,' he told GB News. 'But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy… that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. 'Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. 'There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that.'

Treasury ‘considers inheritance tax reforms' to fill £50bn spending gap in budget
Treasury ‘considers inheritance tax reforms' to fill £50bn spending gap in budget

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Treasury ‘considers inheritance tax reforms' to fill £50bn spending gap in budget

The Treasury is looking to raise more money by tightening the rules around inheritance tax, it's been reported. Amid growing pressure regarding the state of the UK's finances ahead of the autumn budget, the chancellor needs to address a black hole left by Labour U-turns, higher borrowing and sluggish economic growth. Economists have warned that Ms Reeves must raise taxes or tear up her flagship borrowing rules to fill a £50bn shortfall in public finances. According to a report in The Guardian, the Treasury is now looking at options on inheritance tax like changing rules to restrict the gifting of money and assets. Under current rules, unlimited amounts of money and assets can be gifted to relatives and friends which avoids inheritance tax, provided that it is gifted at least seven years before the benefactor dies. Money given less than three years before is taxed at the full inheritance tax rate of 40 per cent, while gifts given between seven and three years has a 'taper relief' tax, which is between eight and 32 per cent. The Guardian reports that the Treasury is considering a lifetime cap to limit the amount of money an individual can donate outside of inheritance tax, as well as reviewing rules around the taper rate. 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more,' a source told the newspaper. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' However, it has been reported that no substantive talks at a senior level have occurred about inheritance tax, and no decisions have been made. Reeves has already ruled out increases to income tax, national insurance and VAT, while inheritance tax brought in a record £6.7bn in 2022-2023. However, recent analysis that showed wealthy investors are leaving the UK because of measures such as the abolition of non-dom status has caused nervousness. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.'

Organizers sue after Tacoma misses ballot deadline for minimum-wage hike
Organizers sue after Tacoma misses ballot deadline for minimum-wage hike

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Organizers sue after Tacoma misses ballot deadline for minimum-wage hike

Local organizers are suing Pierce County, the city of Tacoma and Pierce County Auditor Linda Farmer after Tacoma missed a deadline to get a citizen's initiative to establish a 'workers bill of rights' on the November ballot. Organizers with United Food and Commercial Workers Local 367, Tacoma for All and the Tacoma Democratic Socialists of America filed the suit in Pierce County Superior Court on Aug. 12, alleging that the county and the city did not 'act with the reasonable promptness and diligence required to protect the people's right of initiative.' The lawsuit calls for the court to require the initiative to be placed on the Nov. 4 ballot, stating that local governments should not be allowed to 'slow walk' the processing of an initiative to deter it from appearing on a ballot. The groups in February started collecting thousands of signatures to get the controversial initiative, which would raise Tacoma's minimum wage to $20 per hour, on the November ballot. After the county validated the signatures and the city validated the petition early last month, the city had 30 days to approve it directly and eliminate the need to put it to the voters or call for an election to put it on the ballot. The City Council took the latter action at a special meeting on Aug. 8, calling for an election to get the item on the Nov. 4 ballot this year. But it missed the deadline to do so by three days. County officials rejected the city's resolution calling for an election on Nov. 4 because it missed the deadline, marking it as 'received' on Aug. 8. The lawsuit alleges that the county's rejection of the resolution is the 'direct result of Pierce County's failure to promptly validate the petition.' It states that the organizers submitted the signatures they collected on June 24, but County Auditor Linda Farmer did not begin the process of validating the signatures until July 7. The county's letter stating that it verified the petition states that the pages were submitted to the county on June 26. 'It is fundamentally unfair, and contrary to statutory requirements, for local government to delay the processing of an initiative and to use that delay to deny ballot access,' the complaint reads. Tacoma city spokesperson Dee Paul told The News Tribune that the city does not comment on pending litigation. Pierce County did not immediately return a request for comment. The lawsuit also takes issue with the timing of Tacoma's approval of the resolution to put the initiative on the November ballot. The City Council did so on Aug. 8 at a special meeting, but the lawsuit contends it could have done so at its regular Aug. 5 meeting and met the deadline. The suit states that the city chose a 'questionable path' in pushing the decision to Aug. 8. The initiative can only appear on the November ballot now with judicial intervention, the complaint reads. 'This lawsuit is about more than winning a $20 minimum wage and fair scheduling,' UFCW Local 367 president Michael Hines said in a release. 'It's about protecting the democratic rights of every Tacoma voter. Local leaders cannot be allowed to hide behind technicalities while openly colluding with big business to silence working people. We will fight this in the courts just as we will fight for victory at the ballot box.' The lawsuit comes as a similar effort continues in the city of Olympia where the City Council approved an initiative to appear on the November ballot on July 22. It also isn't the first time these organizers have entered into litigation against the city and county. Tacoma for All and UFCW Local 367 sued the city of Tacoma, Pierce County and Farmer in August 2023, alleging that the city violated its charter when the council put an alternate renters' rights measure on the ballot that year. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store