Plans for 380 homes at garden village refused
The properties near York were proposed as part of a site set to feature about 845 homes, but were turned down.
Committee chair Jonny Crawshaw said Taylor Wimpey's application for the homes off Stockton Lane in Heworth Without was not up to scratch.
He said: "I cannot emphasise enough how bad this application is and how poor the evidence base for it seems to be as well."
Planning officers recommended councillors reject the proposals because they did not stand out as a garden village or comply with development policies, said the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Heworth Without councillor Nigel Ayre said the developers had failed to properly plan infrastructure, community facilities and school places.
He said: "There's concerns about education with the nearest schools over an hour's walk away.
"The rush to get these plans submitted before December was not the correct approach.
"It's so important that we get a site with almost 850 homes that has the necessary infrastructure and community facilities."
Taylor Wimpey agent Jennie Hanbidge said they were blindsided by council planning officers' recommendation to block the plans and asked for more time to address the issues raised.
She said: "The developer is currently in deep and collaborative dialogue on highways, drainage and heritage, a decision to refuse the plans would be massively premature."
The outline plans were discussed at a meeting of York Council's Planning Committee A on Thursday, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
The housebuilder's plans for their part of the site, which were lodged in December, include a 400 sq m (4,305 sq ft) community facility, with a suggestion that it could be used for child care.
A total of 27 objections were lodged against the plans claiming development would fuel congestion, lacked services for future residents and did not provide safe cycle routes.
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Homes on 'noisy road' must be sound proofed before first residents can move in
A DEVELOPER will have to show five new homes to be built beside a 'noisy' road have been sound proofed before anyone can move in. Wayne Gregory has been granted planning permission for the five homes on the site of a derelict former workshop which as well as being on what has been officially designated as a 'noisy road' is next door to a tyre fitters. As a result council planners have made it a condition of the permission that none of the homes can be occupied until post construction noise readings have been submitted to and approved in writing by the council. The readings will have to meet the recommendations of a noise impact report that was submitted as part of the application and demonstrated how 'desirable' noise levels could be achieved including a requirement for the building fabric to be upgraded. The report was required by the council as Snatchwood Road in Abersychan, Pontypool is defined as a 'noisy' road within a Welsh Government Noise Action Plan Priority Area and the former Artisan Precision Engineering site is next door to the Sam's Tyres fitting garage. Planning officer Justin Jones said residential homes shouldn't be approved if they are likely to lead to complaints, such as noise nuisance, that would force an existing commercial use to stop. However the planned homes will be oriented away from the garage. He said the assessment had shown road noise from the properties would be 'high' which has required action to achieve 'acceptable internal noise levels' including a mechanical ventilation system as upper floor windows will have to be shut. Read more: Plea to allow giant shed to be used for holiday lets rejected on appeal New flats development can support town centre, say planners It was also found there wouldn't be an unacceptable level of noise from the tyre fitters impacting the back gardens. There would be two parking spaces, as well as two garages provided for plots one and five, for each home which is below the council's guidelines but Mr Jones said as the site is in a sustainable location close to shops and with bus links the parking is considered acceptable. Other conditions relate to potential land contamination and details related to access and road markings.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What Nottingham Forest need to complete Douglas Luiz deal with Juventus
Recent reports claim that Nottingham Forest have an agreement on personal terms with midfielder Douglas Luiz, but the Premier League side still need to increase their offer to Juventus in order to close the deal. Juventus are looking to offload Douglas Luiz just one year on from his €50m arrival from Aston Villa, following what has been an underwhelming start to life in Italy for the Brazilian, which included just three Serie A starts in 2024-25. Several Premier League sides have expressed an interest in signing the Brazilian this window, but Football Italia understands that Nottingham Forest have been leading the race for several weeks. Forest have Douglas Luiz agreement, but no Juventus deal LEWISBURG, WEST VIRGINIA – JUNE 14: Douglas Luiz #26 of Juventus arrives at the airport prior to the official FIFA Club World Cup 2025 on June 14, 2025 in Lewisburg, West Virginia. (Photo by) According to recent updates from Fabrizio Romano and Forest have an agreement in place over a long-term contract with Douglas Luiz himself, but have not yet settled the deal with Juventus. Forest's opening offer reportedly stood at €30m, which the Bianconeri deemed too low. Calciomercato explains that Juventus require a fee in the region of €39m if they are to avoid making a capital loss on Douglas Luiz after only one year, given the €50m fee they spent last summer. Sunday's report suggests that an increase of a couple of million from Forest's original offer with the inclusion of performance-related bonuses, some easily achievable, could be enough to convince Juventus into selling.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Angela Rayner warned thousands of new homes at risk of dangerous lead pollution
A housing project in Kent that could provide 3,500 homes to support Angela Rayner's housebuilding drive has been paused amid claims that dangerous lead pollution from a neighbouring refinery could put future residents at risk. The project, which comes amid government plans to fast-track new developments and build 1.5m homes, would see thousands of homes built next to one of Europe's leading lead refineries on brownfield land in Gravesham, Kent. Planning permission was initially granted by Gravesham Borough Council following a planning application in October 2022, but the project is now under review amid fears its location would make it dangerous for residents, with Britannia Refined Metals (BRM), the owner of the refinery, itself saying the area is 'a lead pollution hotspot'. The developers have pointed to the government's drive for new housing, saying that a 'radical response is required, including by approving development that may be controversial'. The scheme includes up to 3,500 homes, commercial space, a new hotel and a new stadium for Ebbsfleet United Football Club. A planning inquiry opened in May and ran for four weeks before being adjourned. It is expected to resume next month. Once it delivers its findings, the Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government will take a decision on whether the project can proceed. While the refinery has operated safely for decades under strict controls, BRM has warned that anyone living on the proposed residential site would have a high exposure to lead. 'It is a lead pollution hotspot - you could put residential development anywhere else in the South East of England and the concentration of lead would be lower than on the application site,' BRM said in its opening submissions to the inquiry. 'And people coming to live on the site would have a far higher exposure to lead here than where they have come from.' They warned that there is 'no safe level for exposure to lead', adding: 'The health and neurotoxic effects of lead have no identified threshold, and children are among the most vulnerable to its effects even at low levels. 'Exposure to lead is harmful and preventable by not bringing residents close to a lead pollution hotspot.' The World Health Organisation says exposure to lead, which was attributed to more than 1.5 million deaths globally in 2021, can affect the development of the central nervous system in children, while in adults it can cause 'increased risk of high blood pressure, cardiovascular problems and kidney damage'. The development plan includes community orchards and allotments near the refinery, an idea BRM brands as irresponsible. 'Imagine the scene, kids foraging fruit within a few metres of people working on the BRM premises wearing full protective clothing including helmets with filtered air units. It's hard to think of a more irresponsible idea', the refinery said. But the developers, Northfleet Harbourside, have dismissed BRM's warnings as merely 'a cluster of technical and operational points'. 'The BRM operation and the scheme would be able to co-exist without the latter imposing unreasonable requirements on the former', they said in their submission to the inquiry. The submission continues: 'The secretary of state has made it as clear as anything in the world of planning the scale of the national housing crisis, of which this Gravesham situation forms a part, is so great that a radical response is required, including by approving development that may be controversial. 'Trying to deliver many more homes is the fundamental aim of the government's national planning reforms but its application has to be local and involves keeping a beady eye on what matters most. 'Against that background, it is clear that 3,500 homes would be a tremendous stride forward in housing delivery for the borough, delivered on sustainably located, previously-developed land. The scheme would make an important contribution to pressing local and national needs.' The government's updated national planning policy framework (NPPF) commits to a 'brownfield first' strategy, with disused sites that have already been developed in the past prioritised for new buildings. The default answer when a developer seeks to build on brownfield sites will be 'yes', but the government says these sites will not be enough for the number of homes needed. Meanwhile, the forthcoming Planning and Infrastructure Bill is intended to rip up red tape and make it faster for projects to be approved. But there are concerns a drive to hit housing targets could force social housing onto unsuitable sites, without proper safeguards. The Northfleet Harbourside project would include 350 affordable housing units, 10 per cent of the overall residential space. Once the inquiry has closed the inspector will prepare a report and recommendation for Ministers in MHCLG to consider. Upon receipt of the report, it is understood ministers will then have 13 weeks to issue a decision. Speaking in December, Sir Keir Starmer said the government is 'determined to do what's necessary' to build enough homes. 'For years, we have had not enough houses being built. That means that individuals and families don't have the security that they want', he said. 'Of course we want to get the balance right with nature and the environment, but if it comes to a human being wanting to have a house for them and their family, that has to be the top priority'. MHCLG, BRM and Northfleet Harbourside have been contacted for comment.
