logo
'Deeply unhelpful': Immigration policy impacts on care staff

'Deeply unhelpful': Immigration policy impacts on care staff

Glasgow Times22-05-2025

The Council's City Administration Committee was meeting to discuss an uplift in pay for social care staff and the challenges of securing and holding onto staff was raised.
Chris Cunningham, Convenor for Health, Care and Caring and Older People, highlighted the issues that affect staffing.
READ NEXT: ' We're not finished yet': Campaigners welcome community centre reprieve
He said: 'There are two issues on staff retention. First and most challenging is pay. If pay is not competitive, there are clearly issues.
'The second is terms and conditions, the environment in which staff operate.'
He hinted towards the Prime Minister's recent speech and immigration white paper designed to reduce net migration, which has caused controversy
He added:'Clearly, staffing issues in this area as well are significant in terms of recruitment from overseas and have been the case since Brexit.
'It is disappointing to see the trend and actions relating to immigration in recent years and far more recently.
'It is deeply unhelpful when there are people who wish to work in the UK and we require their skills.'
The meeting heard that funding of £138.1m has been made available for local councils for an increase of the minimum hourly rate for workers providing direct social care, within commissioned services and those funded from Direct Payments, from at least £12.00 to £12.60 per hour from April 2025.
READ NEXT: 'Significant disruption' to city centre buses for a year and a half
The council proposed to again increase Social Care providers in Glasgow Purchased Services by a 5% uplift in line with typical full workforce costs for Social Care.
Pat Togher, HSCP chief officer, also said there was an issue with staff retention.
He said: 'The HSCP wants to minimise the attrition rate in the organisation.'
He said the HSCP has around 17,000 staff and the attrition rate occurs 'more often than not in areas of lower pay, in care homes and care home providers.'
Mr Togher added: We are working very hard on this.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch: 'We will likely need to leave' the ECHR
Badenoch: 'We will likely need to leave' the ECHR

ITV News

timean hour ago

  • ITV News

Badenoch: 'We will likely need to leave' the ECHR

Kemi Badenoch says she believes Britain will "likely need to leave" the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Delivering a speech on Friday, the Conservative leader said she was launching a review into Britain's membership of the treaty, which underpins human rights law. "I have always said, that if we need to leave the convention, we should - and having now considered the question closely, I do believe that we will likely need to leave," she said. But Badenoch insisted she was launching the review to prevent a similar situation to Brexit: "We saw that holding a referendum without a plan to get Brexit done, led to years of wrangling and endless arguments... We cannot go through that again," she told reporters. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Critics of the treaty want to leave it because they believe it has been used to frustrate attempts to deport migrants from Britain. Hitting out at the influence of the treaty on the British legal system, Badenoch said it has become a "sword used to attack democratic decisions and common sense". "This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I am calling lawfare. It isn't just damaging our security, it's also damaging our prosperity", she told reporters. The commission looking into leaving the ECHR will be led by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar, the shadow attorney general. Five 'common sense' questions will be asked by the investigation, branded a series of 'tests' by Mrs Badenoch. These include whether the UK can 'lawfully remove foreign criminals and illegal migrants to their home country or elsewhere — even if they have family here or claim they could be at risk if sent home', and if the Government can stop veterans being 'pursued by vexatious legal attacks'. The Commission will also look at whether British citizens receive preference ahead of migrants for 'scarce public services', if prison sentences 'actually reflect Parliament's intentions', and how to prevent 'endless legal challenges' to planning applications. The Conservative leader will set out whether she plans to leave the ECHR at the Tory conference in October, when the investigation will report back. Elsewhere, the head of the Council of Europe warned that rising migration may result in changes to how the ECHR operates. Alain Berset, the secretary-general of the Council of Europe, told The Times: 'We are witnessing a world where things are changing rapidly. 'It is accelerating. We see this, and it means that it is normal that we must also adapt to this. We need adaptation. We need discussion about the rules that we want to have, and there is no taboo.'

Wales ‘behind curve' on nature loss due to delays
Wales ‘behind curve' on nature loss due to delays

Pembrokeshire Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Pembrokeshire Herald

Wales ‘behind curve' on nature loss due to delays

SENEDD Members warned Wales is playing catch-up after the Welsh Government took more than seven years to bring forward a bill to plug gaps in environmental protections. Delyth Jewell expressed concerns about delays in introducing the environment bill which aims to reverse nature loss, with one in six species now at risk of extinction in Wales. Plaid Cymru's shadow climate secretary said: 'For years, Wales has been behind the curve and we've been an unfortunate exception in terms of environmental governance.' Gaps arising from Brexit left Wales with the weakest environmental governance structures in western Europe, according to the Wales Environment Link charity. The bill would establish the 'long-awaited' Office of Environmental Governance Wales (OEGW) to check public bodies' environmental performance and hold them to account. Similar bodies were set up in Scotland, Northern Ireland and England in 2021. In 2018, then-climate secretary Julie James committed to legislation to address the governance gap at the 'first opportunity'. Ministers declared a climate emergency in 2019 before appointing an interim environmental protection assessor in 2021. Ms Jewell, who represents South Wales East, told the Senedd: 'At last, I welcome the fact that we're now bridging that gap… the need for targets for nature is clear.' She said: 'All of us will want to counter the risk of fine words and good intentions paving the way to a hellscape devoid of those things that make our world diversified, rich and beautiful.' If passed by the Senedd, the bill would establish a framework for targets on biodiversity and enable the public to challenge public authorities on environmental issues. Ms Jewell supported calls for headline targets and timeframes, with much of the detail – which is not included in the bill itself – set to follow in regulations. Giving a statement on June 3 introducing the 'landmark, forward-thinking' bill, Labour's Huw Irranca-Davies said: 'It has never been more important to restore nature, mitigate climate change and preserve the natural environment for future generations. 'This legislation forms a critical part of our future approach to doing just that.' The Deputy First Minister, who is also climate secretary, told Senedd Members: 'We may be behind other UK nations but actually we've been able to learn the lessons from them.' Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies Janet Finch-Saunders, the Conservatives' shadow climate secretary, warned Wales has been lagging on setting biodiversity targets. 'This is, I feel… too little, too late,' she said. She told the Senedd that Wales ranks 224th out of 240 countries on the National History Museum's biodiversity index, saying: 'We're amongst the lowest 10% in the world'. Ms Finch-Saunders called for a sense of urgency from ministers as she expressed concerns about a lack of detail in the 'very vague' environment bill. 'I would like to encourage the cabinet secretary to ensure that this bill is not rushed through because you've left it rather late,' she said. Conservative MS Janet Finch-Saunders Mr Irranca-Davies explained the bill goes further in some areas than in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, citing the example of a power to enforce urgent compliance. 'It's not that we've been doing nothing,' he stressed, pointing to planned changes to farming subsidies, clean air legislation, nature restoration grants, planning and transport reforms. But he accepted: 'We do now need to proceed with urgency… to refine and craft this.' His Labour colleague Jenny Rathbone said: 'We do need to get on with it,' warning Wales has, for example, been without a body to prosecute builders failing to install boxes for swifts. Conservative Samuel Kurtz warned the bill could serve as a 'backdoor' to further obligations on farmers of Wales – even for those who opt out of the sustainable farming scheme. Mr Irranca-Davies replied: 'Yes, the targets will be binding… for a long time, a wide range of stakeholders have called – in fact we heard it from your own benches – [on us] to get on with this… and yes, of course, it's binding.' He said the environmental body would be established two weeks after the bill receives royal assent but cautioned 'it will take time to put in place' due to appointments and logistics. In 2023, the Senedd's climate committee – which Mr Irranca-Davies was then a member of – warned it would be an 'unforgivable failure' if the body was not fully operational in 2026.

‘My hut has no running water but the council charged me double tax'
‘My hut has no running water but the council charged me double tax'

Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Telegraph

‘My hut has no running water but the council charged me double tax'

When Derbyshire Dales district council voted to saddle second home owners with double council tax bills, officials argued it would free up more homes for first-time buyers. Those prospective buyers, however, likely have little appetite for a one-bedroom 1920s hutment with no running water, electricity or mains sewage system. And yet the council saw it fit to slap owners John and Fiona Jeffrey with a double council tax bill, amounting to £3,000 a year. Mr Jeffery, 66, and Mrs Jeffery, 63, whose main residence is in Sheffield, are outraged – not least because you would be hard-pressed to call their hutment habitable. It is inaccessible by road and a 40-minute walk from the nearest village. Had the council wanted to inform the couple in writing about the property's new tax bill, they wouldn't have been able to send a letter because there is no postal service. In fact, it is difficult to think of any council service that reaches their property. There is no bin collection or street lighting let alone libraries or schools. And yet, they are one of around 1,000 second home owners in the Derbyshire Dales who must now pay twice as much for these services.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store