'60 Minutes' Posts Unedited Transcript Of Kamala Harris Interview, Says It Shows Broadcast Was 'Not Doctored Or Deceitful'
The show turned over the transcript to the FCC on Monday.
More from Deadline
Travis Kelce On Taylor Swift Hater Donald Trump Attending Super Bowl: "It's A Great Honor"
Amber Ruffin Will Headline Next White House Correspondents Association Dinner - Update
Lara Trump, President's Daughter-In-Law, To Host New Fox News Weekend Show
'They show – consistent with 60 Minutes' repeated assurances to the public – that the 60 Minutes broadcast was not doctored or deceitful.'
The show said, 'The issue here concerns one question from 60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris: whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is listening to the Biden-Harris Administration. We broadcast a longer portion of the vice president's answer on Face the Nation and broadcast a shorter excerpt from the same answer on 60 Minutes the next day. Each excerpt reflects the substance of the vice president's answer. As the full transcript shows, we edited the interview to ensure that as much of the vice president's answers to 60 Minutes' many questions were included in our original broadcast while fairly representing those answers. 60 Minutes' hard-hitting questions of the vice president speak for themselves.'
The show also posted audio and video, and the files that it sent to the FCC.
The unedited transcript shows that Whitaker asked Harris, 'But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening. 'The Wall Street Journal' said that he — that your administration has repeatedly been blindsided by Netanyahu, and in fact, he has rebuffed just about all of your administration's entreaties.'
Harris answered, 'Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region. And we're not going to stop doing that. We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.'
The first sentence of the answer ran on Face the Nation on Oct. 6, as part of a promo for the 60 Minutes election special aired. But the next night, on the 60 Minutes broadcast, it was the second sentence that ran when Whitaker asked his question.
'In reporting the news, journalists regularly edit interviews – for time, space or clarity,' the show said. 'In making these edits, 60 Minutes is always guided by the truth and what we believe will be most informative to the viewing public – all while working within the constraints of broadcast television.'
Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the network and called for CBS to lose its broadcast license, claiming that it purposely edited the interview to make Harris look better. Paramount Global is in talks with Trump's team about a settlement. The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Texas, citing the state's Deceptive Trade Practices Act, which is typically used against false advertising.
A conservative group, the Center for American Rights, filed an FCC complaint over the segment, claiming that it violated the FCC's 'news distortion' policy. Broadcasters are subject to enforcement only 'if it can be proven that they have deliberately distorted a factual news report,' per the agency. The FCC also notes that their authority to take action on complaints is narrow and that it is 'prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press.'
Since the broadcast, 60 Minutes has insisted that the edit was made because of time constraints. Last month, FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel dismissed the complaint, warning that the agency 'should not be the president's speech police.'
But after she left the agency at the end of Joe Biden's term, Trump's pick for FCC chair, Brendan Carr, revived it.
Best of Deadline
The 2025 Oscars: Everything We Know So Far About The Nominations, Ceremony, Date & Host
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
'Ginny & Georgia' Season 3: Everything We Know So Far
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
10 minutes ago
Former Israeli ambassador to US weighs in on Israel's plan to occupy Gaza Strip
ABC News' Rhiannon Ally is joined by Michael Oren, former Israeli ambassador to the U.S., to discuss Israel's decision to control Gaza City and how the move is drawing international condemnation.
Epoch Times
40 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Carney Says Israel's Plan to Take Gaza City Is ‘Wrong'
Prime Minister Mark Carney said Israel's plan to take over the largest city in the Gaza Strip will not improve the humanitarian situation and could worsen the fate of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. 'We join others, many others in viewing that this is wrong,' Carney said after a defence-related announcement in Trenton on Aug. 8.
NBC News
40 minutes ago
- NBC News
Questions swirl around 'Arab forces' named in Netanyahu's Gaza plan
Israel's plan to seize Gaza City and hand control of the enclave to unspecified 'Arab forces' has not only drawn condemnation by Western governments and aid agencies — some former officials and experts inside Israel say it would be unworkable. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his security cabinet voted early on Friday for a plan to capture the city in the north of the enclave, one of the few places inside the strip that the Israeli military does not control, while distributing aid to civilians outside combat zones. The five-point plan 'for concluding the war' calls for the disarming of Hamas, the return of all hostages and the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip, which would be under Israeli security control. It also proposes that a government is established in Gaza that involves neither Islamist militants from Hamas, who have ruled the enclave since 2007, or the Palestinian Authority, the more secular governing body that has overseen parts of the occupied West Bank since the mid-1990s and is internationally recognized. The basics of the plan are likely unfeasible because it relies on cooperation from Arab states that have explicitly said they will not do so under these terms, according to Giora Eiland, a retired Israeli major general and former head of the country's National Security Council. 'I don't know whether Netanyahu has any real basis to what he said, whether he has any communication with other countries about the future of Gaza,' Eiland told NBC News in a telephone interview Friday. 'And I'm afraid that his statement' — about Arab nations being given control of Gaza — 'has no real, reliable basis behind it.' Arab states such as Egypt and Jordan have 'clearly indicated time and again' that a precondition for their involvement would be that the Palestinian Authority becomes a 'leading actor' in Gaza's future governance, said Nimrod Goren, president of the Mitvim Institute, an Israeli think tank. Netanyahu had suggested earlier in the war that, rather than the Palestinian Authority or Hamas, he wanted Palestinian 'clans' to take control of the enclave, and indeed he confirmed in June that Israel was arming such groups. But his hopes of these 'clans taking over Gaza haven't materialized, and aren't expected to,' said Goren, who is also an executive board member at Diplomeds, or the Council for Mediterranean Diplomacy, a policy group based in the Netherlands. Ultimately, 'the plan approved by the Israeli cabinet is damaging for Israel's national security and foreign policy. It is also unrealistic in terms of its end game,' Goren added. All of this reinforces the 'common perception in Israel that Netanyahu is acting due to his own political needs, rather than the national good and concern for the Israeli hostages,' he said. NBC News has contacted Netanyahu's office for a response to these criticisms. International outcry Israel's plan has been met with outcry internationally, with the United Nations and some Western governments warning it would lead to further catastrophe for Palestinians in Gaza, more than 61,000 of whom have been killed in the 22 months of war with Israel. Large parts of Gaza's population have been regularly displaced since Israel launched its offensive following the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attacks in which some 1,200 people were killed in Israel and around 250 taken hostage. Crippling aid restrictions in recent months have caused the spiraling hunger crisis in Gaza, the United Nations and aid groups have said. Voices inside Israel have been similarly alarmed by the plan, with the families of hostages and even Israel's own armed forces chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, warning it will lead to the deaths of the remaining captives inside the enclave. Aerial photographs this week showed the utter devastation in the enclave, while Israel's overhauled aid distribution plan has fueled more chaos and hunger. Eiland, the retired Israeli general, supports the war, like the majority of the country's population. Nevertheless, he said he disagreed with Netanyahu's plan because he thinks most of the hostages 'will perish' and the Israeli army would 'suffer many casualties.' Even if Israel managed to somehow execute its plan, 'we will not change anything in the approach of Hamas,' Eiland added. 'On the contrary, it will just give them justification to continuing their guerrilla war against us.'
