Germany proposes Trump-Putin-Zelenskyy summit be held in Europe
'I think that such a three-way meeting will take place,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in an interview with TV networks NTV and RTL, according to an advance transcript AFP obtained.
'The date and place are still to be worked out. We have proposed that a place could be found in Europe,' he said.
Trump, in the wake of his Friday summit with Putin in Alaska to speak about Ukraine, said he and European leaders wanted to see another summit take place, this time with a seat at the table for Zelenskyy.
After his talk with Putin failed to make headway on a ceasefire in Ukraine, Trump shifted his stance to say was now keen on securing a full peace agreement.
One challenge for Putin to step foot in Europe is that there is an International Criminal Court arrest warrant out for him over the alleged mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the war.
The United States is not a party to the ICC, and Hungary -- an EU country ruled by Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is friendly with both Trump and Putin -- is in the process of withdrawing from the ICC's founding treaty.
Merz suggested that a European venue for the possible summit 'should maybe be a place where discussions might take place on a permanent basis,' but he did not specify any country or city.
'Those are detailed issues. They will only be clarified in coming days, or even coming weeks,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
10 minutes ago
- Arab News
As security tightens, migrants take more risks to reach EU
LONDON: The number of people arriving illegally in Europe has fallen in 2025, but experts warn that irregular migration will persist as conflict and economic hardship intensify and migrants forge new pathways to avoid tougher security measures. Arrivals fell by 20 percent in the first six months of the year, continuing 2024's downward trend, according to the EU's border agency Frontex, which credited the drop to increased cooperation with transit countries. Since 1 million people entered Europe irregularly during the so-called migrant crisis in 2015, the EU has taken an increasingly tough stance on illicit arrivals. However, experts say migrants are adapting to stricter EU measures at borders and becoming more reliant on smugglers and newer, often more dangerous routes. While overall numbers are down, arrivals have not decreased across every route to Europe, and new corridors have emerged as migrants and smugglers adapt. 'As one route declines, others usually surge or re-emerge,' said Jennifer Vallentine, an expert at the Mixed Migration Center, a research organization. Irregular crossings dropped to 240,000 in 2024 after surpassing 300,000 in 2022 and 2023 for the first time since 2016. Amid the downward trend, a new Mediterranean Sea corridor between Libya and Greece has emerged, with more than 7,000 people arriving in Crete this year. The Greek government has proposed a new law to criminalize illegal entry and impose a temporary ban on asylum applications. 'Harsh restrictions won't stop the need and desire to migrate, and with irregular migration the only option for some, smuggler services will stay in demand,' said Vallentine. The main irregular entry points across the Mediterranean and over the Greek-Turkish land border have remained consistent over the last decade. But activity on specific routes has fluctuated as people try to avoid increasing surveillance and border controls, according to experts. The EU has sought to shutter access at key entry points, said Helena Hahn, an expert at the European Policy Center think tank. The bloc has struck deals with Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, key departure points for crossing the Mediterranean, bolstering the countries' border forces with speed boats and surveillance and offering cash in exchange for preventing illegal migration. 'Cooperation with North African countries has certainly played a role in reducing arrivals,' said Hahn. Arrivals across the Central Mediterranean route from North Africa to Italy and Malta decreased by 58 percent from 2023 to 2024, which the International Organization for Migration attributed to more boats being stopped at sea and migrants returned to Libya and Algeria. But the organization also said the EU-North Africa partnerships contribute to increased activity on the Atlantic Ocean route from West Africa to the Canary Islands. The Central Mediterranean route emerged as the sea's busiest after the EU struck a deal with Turkiye in 2016, paying Ankara €6 billion ($6.95 billion) to care for Syrians who had fled their country's civil war. Turkiye also agreed to 'take any necessary measures' to block new illegal routes into the EU. Over the last decade, Europe has spent billions on surveillance systems and detection equipment and has posted Frontex staff at its external and internal borders. The Western Balkan Route that connects arrivals in Greece with Western Europe via an arduous journey through the Balkan states has been a target of these efforts and last year, Frontex reported detections of irregular crossings on the route had dropped by 78 percent from 2023. But the IRC only recorded a 16 percent drop over the same time period, which the organization said suggests people are traveling more covertly to avoid detection. 'There's a lot of deterrence, but it just makes people take more dangerous routes,' said Martha Roussou, a senior advocacy adviser at the International Rescue Committee, a global humanitarian charity. Migrants are paying smugglers higher fees and traveling more quickly by night, stopping less often to seek help, according to the IRC. The EU is set to triple its spending on borders in the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework to €81 billion. '(Europe's) reactive approach fails to acknowledge migration as both inevitable and beneficial,' said Vallentine. 'Until regular and accessible pathways are established, we will continue to see irregular migration — and smuggling networks will continue to adapt to facilitate it.'
Arab News
41 minutes ago
- Arab News
UK to prosecute 60 people for supporting banned pro-Palestine group
LONDON: At least 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support' for the recently proscribed Palestine Action group, in addition to three already charged, London's Metropolitan Police said. 'We have put arrangements in place that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary,' the Met said in a statement. More than 700 people have been arrested since it was banned as a terrorist group in early July, including 522 people arrested at a protest last weekend for displaying placards backing the group — thought to be the highest ever recorded number of detentions at a single protest in the UK capital. 'The decisions that we have announced today are the first significant numbers to come out of the recent protests, and many more can be expected in the next few weeks,' said Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson. 'People should be clear about the real-life consequences for anyone choosing to support Palestine Action,' said Parkinson. The first three people were charged earlier this month with offenses under the Terrorism Act for backing Palestine Action, after they were arrested at a July demonstration. According to police, those charged for such offenses could face up to six months imprisonment, as well as other consequences. 'I am proud of how our police and CPS (prosecution) teams have worked so speedily together to overcome misguided attempts to overwhelm the justice system,' Met Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said. In a statement following the latest mass arrests, Interior Minister Yvette Cooper defended the Labour government's decision, insisting: 'UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority.' 'The assessments are very clear — this is not a nonviolent organization,' she added. The government outlawed Palestine Action on July 7, days after it took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated £7.0 million ($9.3 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to Britain's indirect military support for Israel amid the war in Gaza. Britain's Interior Ministry has insisted that Palestine Action was also suspected of other 'serious attacks' that involved 'violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.' Critics, including the UN, Amnesty International, and Greenpeace, have criticized the proscription as an overreach of the law and warned that the ensuing arrests threaten free speech. The UK's Liberal Democrat party said that it was 'deeply concerned about the use of terrorism powers against peaceful protesters.'
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Right-wing culture warfare comes to Germany
Something just broke in Germany. A highly respected jurist whom the governing Social Democratic Party nominated to sit on the country's constitutional court has withdrawn herself from consideration after a relentless smear campaign by right-wing journalists and politicians. Worse, it was the party's own coalition partner, the center-right Christian Democratic Union, that suddenly shifted from supporting Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf's candidacy to deeming her unacceptable. This sabotage of a hitherto consensual procedure is a test run for bringing US-style culture war politics to Germany. The goal is to peel away ever more members of the center right that former Chancellor Angela Merkel once led and to move toward an arrangement that has already been put in place in some other European democracies: an alliance of the center right and the populist far right. True, Germany's constitutional court, though one of the world's most respected and influential, has not always been above controversy. In the mid-1990s, it drew conservatives' ire when it ruled that Bavarian nondenominational schools may not display crucifixes on their walls. But the process of appointing judges has always been spared from the spectacle that is all too familiar from the US. Rather than holding highly publicized, televised and reliably polarizing hearings, parties meet behind closed doors to propose a balanced ticket of nominees, each of whom then must win supermajority support in the lower house. As with so much else in European politics, this process has been complicated by the success of far-right populists. The Alternative for Germany, now the second-largest group in parliament, has been demanding its 'own judge,' objecting to the fact that smaller German parties — the pro-market Free Democrats and the Greens — hold the right to nominate members of the court. In one federal state, Thuringia, where the Alternative for Germany won the last elections, the party has effectively blocked the appointment of new judges as a protest against what it sees as its unjustified exclusion. As with so much else in European politics, this process has been complicated by the success of far-right populists. Jan-Werner Mueller But it was not primarily the far right that brought down Brosius-Gersdorf. Rather, she faced a wider campaign of criticism that sought to paint her as a left-wing radical who supposedly wants to liberalize abortion completely and introduce mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations. Not only did a fellow law professor alter her Wikipedia entry to make her look like an 'activist,' but the archbishop of Bamberg attacked her in a sermon — only to admit, after a personal conversation with the candidate, that he had been 'misinformed.' Germany has never had the equivalent of Fox News (whereas France now has CNews, one of whose leading journalists even stood as a prominent candidate for the French presidency in 2022). However, relatively small far-right startups — claiming to be 'the voice of the majority' — have increasingly gained influence within the CDU. One CDU member recently declared, in effect, that anyone not subscribing to natural law doctrines cannot serve as a judge. Suddenly, the supposed mainstream is echoing the populist talking point that courts should primarily 'represent the people' (as opposed to upholding the constitution). The CDU has been in an intellectual crisis for some time. Hardly anyone can today articulate the party's core principles. True, like the Conservatives in the UK, German Christian Democrats long prided themselves on their pragmatism, cultivating an image as the competent default party of government. Moreover, natural law thinking was indeed prominent among Christian Democrats in the postwar period. But precisely because they were interested in power, Christian Democrats — like British Tories — carefully adapted to a changing society. The ironic result is that they are now maligning as 'radical' a jurist who actually does seem to represent 'the people' — insofar as she generally holds views that command majority support. The CDU has been in an intellectual crisis for some time. Hardly anyone can today articulate the party's core principles. Jan-Werner Mueller Christian Democrats traditionally pursued a political strategy of seeking to mediate among different groups and interests, pursuing what Catholic social doctrine had long held out as a vision of social harmony. In this sense, Merkel — always eager to balance and compromise — was still practicing the traditional model. But today's right-wing culture warriors are polarization entrepreneurs. Often armed with disinformation, they seek to sharpen conflicts and divide constituencies into friends and enemies, and this has led them to target the center right's weak point. Feeling pressure from the far right, Christian Democrats think they must prove to their constituencies that they are still genuinely conservative — unlike the supposedly uber-liberal Merkel. While the archbishop of Bamberg was willing to speak with the nominee directly, CDU members of parliament apparently refused to do so. Such behavior represents a stark deviation from the culture of compromise and moderation that has prevented the US-style politicization of Germany's highest court. The CDU's norm-breaking is analogous to US Republicans' refusal to even consider Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee in 2016. Despite CDU leaders' claims to be democracy's last defense against the rising far right, the party is falling into the culture war traps the far right has set for them. It is not inevitable that the last major country with a firewall to contain the far right will go the way so many other European democracies have gone already. But that scenario is becoming more realistic. • Jan-Werner Mueller, professor of politics at Princeton University, is the author, most recently, of 'Democracy Rules' (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021). ©Project Syndicate
