logo
By banning the Muslim Brotherhood to placate Trump, Jordan treads a dangerous path

By banning the Muslim Brotherhood to placate Trump, Jordan treads a dangerous path

Middle East Eye01-05-2025

Modern history is littered with acts of tribute that would make imperial Rome proud.
When Vladimir Putin cut the oligarchs down to size by imprisoning Mikhail Khodorkovsky, one of his colleagues presented the Russian state, and by implication the president himself, with a Faberge egg.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer turns out to be a consummate groveller before US President Donald Trump.
First came the announcement of a second state visit for Trump, who has a thing about the British royals. Now Starmer is exploring whether golf bosses could host the 2028 Open championship at Turnberry, which Trump owns. Would Starmer be his caddy? The Guardian asked.
In the same vein, King Abdullah of Jordan could have presented Trump with a carpet or a pair of falcons. But he decided on something far more effective: he banned the Muslim Brotherhood.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The reasons for placating Trump are powerful. Jordan is among the world's largest recipients of US aid, which Trump has already once threatened to cut. Trump also selected Eric Trager, a hawk on Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood, as Middle East adviser on his National Security Council.
In his first term, Trump toyed with the idea of banning the Brotherhood in the US, and he may well do so in this term. Abdullah's move firmly places Jordan in the western camp's push against political Islam.
The move has already paid off. Millions of US dollars for Jordan's largest desalination plant, which dried up when Trump dramatically cut the foreign aid budget, have been restored, Reuters reports.
Domestically, however, this move is more of a gamble. In banning an organisation that has been around officially in the kingdom since 1945, Abdullah has crossed a line that his father, King Hussein, was careful not to transgress in 47 years of rule.
Hussein's balancing act
Hussein's relationship with the Brotherhood was complex, but he was a master of balancing global alliances with the challenges he faced domestically. His son has fewer such gifts.
The Brotherhood stood by Hussein in moments of personal peril, including when a 1957 coup attempt by Nasser-inspired nationalists and leftists failed, or in 1970, when Jordan was on the brink of civil war in its fight with the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). The Brotherhood had a battalion alongside Palestinian forces, but they took no part in the conflict itself.
Former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990 was another crisis for the king. Hussein was an ally of Saddam, but he was against the invasion. As a consequence, Jordan suffered from the pressure the West put on it.
To face this huge challenge, Hussein was keen to keep the unity of his people behind him, so he formed a government in which five ministers were from the Muslim Brotherhood.
Hussein saw the Brotherhood as a safety valve, defusing anger in the nation at a time of big conflicts
But there were conflicts, too. The Brotherhood opposed Jordan joining the Baghdad Pact, one of many ill-fated attempts to start a regional Nato in 1955. It was also against Hussein's best-known foreign policy move, the Wadi Araba peace treaty with Israel.
But Hussein never banned the group, even when he was pressured to do so by Arab leaders like Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser and Syria's Hafez al-Assad. Hussein was no sympathiser and always had his own vision of Palestine. But he realised the Brotherhood was peaceful, reformist, and could play an important role for him.
Hussein saw the Brotherhood as a safety valve, defusing anger in the nation at a time of big conflicts. It also had one asset he cherished: the Brotherhood straddled the Palestinian-Jordanian divide within the kingdom.
Hussein's relationship with Hamas was even more interesting. When Hamas became a power in Palestine during the First Intifada, Hussein was interested in developing a relationship. He allowed Hamas to open offices in Amman. In 1997, Hussein agreed to take Hamas leader Moussa Abu Marzouk after 22 months in prison in the US.
Famously, when Mossad attempted to poison Hamas's Khaled Meshaal on the streets of Amman, Hussein demanded the antidote from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, threatening to sever diplomatic relations and put the Israeli perpetrators on trial.
He even strong-armed Netanyahu into releasing Hamas's spiritual leader, Ahmed Yassin. No other Arab leader has managed to do this with Israel.
Abdullah's mistake
Under Abdullah, relations with the Brotherhood went into steady decline.
Within months of becoming king in 1999, he expelled Hamas and agreed with the Qataris that their political bureau should move to Doha. He later stripped the Brotherhood's charitable status and stopped their work.
He thought he had weakened the Brotherhood to the point where he could contain it. It is a mistake he has made frequently, even though the Brotherhood has never challenged the regime, even when that was happening around the Arab world.
The Brotherhood did not raise the ceiling of its demands and chants during the Arab Spring. It did not call for the overthrow of the regime, unlike its cousins in Egypt and Tunisia.
Jordan: How will Muslim Brotherhood ban affect the nation's future? Read More »
The regime's other tactic was to encourage splits. In 2015, Jordan granted a licence to a splinter group led by Abdul Majid Thuneibat under the name of the Muslim Brotherhood Association, making the original group unlicensed. It has used 'licences' to crack down on the media arm of the affiliated political party, the Islamic Action Front (IAF).
But each time Abdullah thought he had political Islamists licked, they demonstrated their popularity.
The Hamas attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 turbocharged support for al-Qassam Brigades across Jordan, but especially among the tribes and East Bankers. A year later, the IAF secured 31 out of 138 seats, making it the biggest party in parliament, even as Brotherhood members have been targeted for arrest.
In recent days, journalists, commentators and former officials have all called for the Brotherhood to be banned. The Brotherhood's calls to head towards the border and to besiege the Israeli embassy have been special irritants to the regime.
But no media campaign is launched in Jordan without someone planning it. There is nothing spontaneous about such campaigns. Just like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, no writer in Jordan is truly free to say what they want - and if they do, it's not for long.
What we are seeing is not a popular campaign against the Brotherhood, but rather something that has been planned for a long time.
Two currents
There have always been two currents of thinking in the royal court and defence establishment.
The first is to see Israel as Jordan's existential enemy. This has been loudly voiced by Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, who declared that Israel had killed 30 years of effort to convince people that peace is possible.
In the same vein, well-placed sources told Middle East Eye's Peter Oborne that Jordan was 'ready for war' if Israel forcibly expelled Palestinians into its territory. One source said that Trump's proposal to empty Gaza of Palestinians was an 'existential issue' for both Jordan and the Hashemite dynasty, noting that the country is the third-poorest in terms of water in the world.
The same current can be seen in other, less official ways. When Maher al-Jazi, a retired Jordanian soldier, killed three Israelis in September 2024 at the border crossing between Jordan and the Israeli-occupied West Bank, members of the army went to the family's mourning ceremony in uniform.
The second current is to see Iran and political Islam as the kingdom's main enemy - and this has a formidable, if less visible, proponent: Jordan's General Intelligence Department (GID), an organisation so vast that it was described to me by one former foreign minister as Jordan's parallel government.
The Mukhabarat, as it is also known, is essentially a creation of Britain's MI6, and today serves as the CIA's main Arab partner in the region.
The CIA provides undeclared financial assistance to the GID over and above the aid that Jordan gets from the US. The relationship between the two agencies is so close that the CIA has operatives permanently stationed at GID headquarters.
In fact, the GID has been regarded as so essential to the CIA's regional intelligence-gathering on al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group during the 'war on terror', and on Syria and Yemen today, that one former CIA official told The Los Angeles Times he was allowed to roam the halls of the GID unescorted.
In addition, Frank Anderson, a former CIA Middle East division chief, told the newspaper that GID interrogators were the best: 'They're going to get more information [from a terrorism suspect] because they're going to know his language, his culture, his associates - and more about the network he belongs to.'
Another ex-CIA man, Michael Scheuer, who spent four years tracking Osama Bin Laden, told The Times in 2005: 'Jordan is at the top of our list of foreign partners. We have similar agendas, and they are willing to help any way they can.' The GID was as capable and professional as Mossad, Scheuer added.
Clearly with this history and funding, the GID will use the brave defiance of Safadi and others as cover, but it will itself pursue a very different agenda, closer to that of the US and Israel.
Clear dangers
There are clear dangers to Abdullah in following this path. He has not yet gone down the full length of it, as the ban on the Muslim Brotherhood has not extended to the 31 deputies of the IAF - for the moment.
But the ban is significant enough in itself. For one, the timing could not have been worse, coming around the Jewish festival of Passover, a celebration of joy and thanks, which became in the hands of religious Zionists at Al-Aqsa Mosque a crude show of religious conquest and hatred.
More than 6,700 Jews entered the mosque's courtyards to pray, according to the Waqf - more than all the Jewish worshippers who visited during the holidays last year.
Israeli settler incursions at Al-Aqsa Mosque complex have increased by more than 18,000 percent since 2003, when Israeli authorities began allowing settlers to bypass the Islamic Waqf management and enter Islam's third-holiest site.
Jordan ready for war with Israel if Palestinians are expelled into its territory Read More »
This was also a particularly bad year for Palestinian Christians. Reverend Munther Isaac, a Christian pastor and theologian, told MEE Live that this Easter was 'the worst ever'.
Israel in all its forms - military, religious, secular - has left all ideas of living with its Arab neighbours and being part of the region behind. Israel is in full Crusader mode. It is clearly bent on dominating the region, and taking control of the holy sites over which the Hashemite kingdom has legal, international and historical custodianship.
Netanyahu's government is openly flouting the status quo. He boasted about the number of times he had defied former US President Joe Biden's administration during a recent speech at a Jewish News Syndicate conference in Jerusalem.
At Al-Aqsa, which the king in Amman has a duty to protect, Islamists are providing the only defence against a sustained attack by religious Zionists. Abdullah is patently failing to speak out against the blatant erosion of his custodianship of Jerusalem's holy sites, which include Christian churches as well as the mosque.
Banning the Brotherhood, when all Muslims and Christians in the region are under sustained attack, is nothing less than an act of sabotage at a time of war. As a soldier himself, he should realise what he is doing.
In Jordan itself, Abdullah has removed a safety valve that he needs more than ever before.
His father fostered the unity of the nation in moments of peril. Abdullah faces a true moment of peril, and with each move that Netanyahu makes towards the annexation and ethnic cleansing of the West Bank, the anger of Jordanians is mounting.
The presence of the Brotherhood stopped Hamas recruiting in Jordan because of the agreement between them. But now there is a void. There is nothing to stop either Hamas or any other resistance group from using Jordan as a base for attacks on Israel. All bets are off.
Israeli security forces escort Jewish visitors at Al-Aqsa Mosque complex in Jerusalem, on 9 April 2023 (Ahmad Gharabli/AFP)
For Israel, Jordan's ban of the Muslim Brotherhood is proof that the king can be bullied. Israel does not see a strong man in Jordan, as it once did in his father. It sees a shaky man who is under a lot of stress.
If Israel sees that such a king prioritises a ban on the Brotherhood over speaking out against what is happening at Al-Aqsa, it can calculate that it could get away with its next project, which is the annexation of the West Bank.
King Abdullah should be careful not to follow Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's footsteps down the plughole of history. Even in his dying days, Abbas has not for one moment become less stubborn.
He will pathologically not reconcile with Hamas and other resistance groups, nor allow a government of national unity to form in either the West Bank or Gaza - even though it's patently in the interests of Fatah and the PLO to do so.
The result is that Ramallah is crushed, ignored and despised by both Netanyahu and Trump, who now plans to eliminate the US security coordinator's office to further downgrade ties with the Palestinian Authority. Trump's contempt is the reward Abbas has received for prioritising a relationship with Washington over his fellow Palestinians.
Abdullah should beware of Abbas's fate. History will not treat him or the Hashemite kingdom kindly.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's team squandered a chance to end the Gaza war
How Trump's team squandered a chance to end the Gaza war

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

How Trump's team squandered a chance to end the Gaza war

The administration of US President Donald Trump appeared close to securing a ceasefire to end the Gaza war, halt the inhumane blockade imposed on its starving people, and ensure the release of all Israeli captives held by Hamas. Indeed, a preliminary deal was reached in Doha between Hamas and the US administration's interlocutor, Palestinian American Bishara Bahbah. Acting on behalf of Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, Bahbah, who headed an organisation that encouraged Arab Americans to vote for Trump in the last election, had been key to the previous negotiations that secured the release of American Israeli captive Edan Alexander. Alexander's release paved the way for the subsequent talks. According to an interview with Bahbah on Israel's Channel 12, Witkoff initially suggested that Hamas should release Alexander as a 'gesture of goodwill' towards Trump, who could then use 'his influence for a ceasefire and to allow the aid to come into Gaza that is desperately needed by people'. But soon after the preliminary ceasefire deal was struck, Witkoff changed course and came up with a modified plan that was accepted by the Israelis, thus tossing the ball back into Hamas's court. Clearly, Witkoff could not persuade the Israelis to accept what had been agreed with Hamas in Doha, instead adopting as his own Israel's counterproposal - which, to Hamas, seemed nothing short of capitulation. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The Israelis and their US backers might have concluded that after many months of war, Hamas had been severely battered and was too weak to reject the proposal. This is not the first time they've been proven wrong. The Americans took the right step by opting to negotiate directly with Hamas. Earlier this year, the first direct talks were led by Trump's hostage envoy, Adam Boehler, who was so confident about his mandate that he publicly responded to Israeli criticism by saying: 'We're not an agent of Israel.' Talking to 'terrorists' This was all promising. The cliched notion that 'we don't talk to terrorists' has proven to be little more than a pretext to avoid the responsibility to engage fairly and honestly with all parties. Since the time of former President Bill Clinton, all US administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have continued designating Hamas as a terrorist organisation. European nations, including the UK, followed suit. This is despite the fact that Hamas was democratically elected by the Palestinian people in free and fair elections. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Colonial and oppressive powers have always tended to designate those who resist their tyranny and hegemony as terrorists who should not be spoken with. South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) was once designated a terrorist organisation by the US and UK, with former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher vowing never to meet its leader. Just a few years later, ANC leader Nelson Mandela was elected head of state in his country, and was subsequently given a hero's welcome when he visited the UK. War on Gaza: Why forcing Hamas to disarm will not end Israel's genocide Read More » Indeed, the adage that 'terrorists' should not be spoken with has not held up across history. The Viet Cong, considered by the US to be terrorists, eventually sat around the same negotiating table with the Americans in Paris. More recently, the Taliban, who now rule Afghanistan, have held talks with the US in Doha. Interestingly, in both cases, it was not negotiations that ended the conflicts, but the humiliating defeat and withdrawal of American troops. When Trump authorised direct talks with Hamas, it was seen as a step in the right direction. Many observers thought it indicated that Trump was serious about stopping the war. Subsequent developments, however, have dashed these hopes and infuriated some of Washington's regional Arab allies. In short, the Trump administration appears to have wasted a historic opportunity - a chance to play a more constructive and less biased role in the Middle East. Trump himself has stated repeatedly that he wants to end wars. Here was a real chance for his administration to show the world that it would no longer be a party to Israel's genocide in Gaza and its war crimes across occupied Palestine. Instead, Trump's team once again revealed itself to be untrustworthy and incapable of controlling Israel, even as the latter relies almost entirely on US military, financial and diplomatic support. What a missed opportunity. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Daily killings as Hamas and Israel-backed gang engage in battle of attrition in Gaza
Daily killings as Hamas and Israel-backed gang engage in battle of attrition in Gaza

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Daily killings as Hamas and Israel-backed gang engage in battle of attrition in Gaza

The ranks of a shadowy, Israeli-backed gang in southern Gaza are swelling, with its armed members attacking Hamas operatives and their families, as well as gathering intelligence on behalf of Israel 's military. Sources told The National on Monday that Hamas has hit back at the gang, known as the Yasser Abu Shabab Popular Forces, by quietly eliminating its members and supporters. "Hamas is assassinating them in the range of five to seven a day," a source said. "It's the latest chapter in a history of enmity between Hamas and armed gangs and families opposed to its rule in Gaza." The Yasser Abu Shabab gang now has up to 150 members, up from about 75 a little more than a week ago, who are equipped with assault rifles, walkie-talkies and night vision goggles, the sources said. They added that members of the gang are paid, which explains its rapid growth at a time when job opportunities are extremely scarce in an enclave devastated by war since October 2023. Drugs and murder The leader of the gang is Yasser Abu Shabab, 31, the sources said. He has long been viewed with suspicion by residents of Gaza and many of his men have criminal records for drug trafficking and murder. But the gang has been operating in full view of the Israeli military since emerging in Gaza last month, the sources said. The group operates outside the framework of any recognised Palestinian authority and is accused of trying to create an alternative government model amid the leadership vacuum created by the war. Israel has not yet publicly shared its plan for Gaza after the conflict, which it says will not end until Hamas has been eliminated and all hostages held by the group are freed. Israel said on Thursday that it has "activated" Palestinian clans in Gaza as part of its war, confirming long-held suspicions that it is working with anti-Hamas groups. The announcement followed claims by a former Israeli minister, Avigdor Lieberman, leader of the opposition Yisrael Beiteinu party, that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved the transfer of large quantities of arms to organised crime families in Gaza. In a video posted online late on Thursday, Mr Netanyahu offered an explanation for his actions, saying the government was acting on the advice of 'security officials" to save the lives of Israeli soldiers. But the sources said supporting anti-Hamas groups raised the spectre of civil strife in Gaza, pitting Hamas fighters against the groups at a time when the majority of the enclave's 2.3 million population are facing severe shortages of food, water, medicine and other essentials. Targeting Hamas tunnels Israel last month eased a nearly two-month blockade on aid, but only a fraction of the supplies needed has since found its way to Palestinians. The sources said the Yasser Abu Shabab gang, which has a track record of trafficking in drugs and arms, as well as black market profiteering, was also carrying out tasks on behalf of the Israeli military, including blowing up structures suspected of concealing the entrances of Hamas tunnels. The gang has also besieged suspected tunnel entrances, hoping to prevent supplies from reaching Hamas fighters inside, the sources added. The sources could not ascertain the effectiveness of that anti-Hamas activity, but noted the militant group's weakness, estimating that it may have lost more than half of its fighters and a significant amount of its arsenal since the war began. Israel has a record of empowering groups potentially dangerous to its security to weaken major enemies. Taking advantage of Gaza's woeful economy, it is also known to be running an elaborate network of paid spies in the enclave, providing real-time intelligence on the whereabouts of senior Hamas officials and the group's military wing. Hamas dedicates a significant part of its policing capabilities to counter-espionage, hunting down informants and subjecting them to secret trials. It is known to have executed dozens of suspected spies since it took power in Gaza in 2007. The sudden rise of the Yasser Abu Shabab gang is widely seen as an Israeli experiment in government by proxy. Gazan civilians told The National last week that they view such groups not as a protective force, but as collaborators offering people false promises in exchange for political and social submission. The gang claims to be guarding Israeli and US-backed food distribution centres in southern Gaza, but aid workers say it has a long history of looting UN lorries. Gaza's armed groups have ties to powerful clans or extended families and often operate as criminal gangs. Aid workers have said Israel's backing of such groups is part of a wider effort to control all humanitarian operations in the enclave. Israel denies allowing looters to operate in areas it controls. Step up from cigarette smuggling But with Hamas weakened after 20 months of war, gangs have regained the freedom to act. The leadership of several clans – including the one from which the Yasser Abu Shabab group's members hail – have issued statements denouncing looting and co-operation with Israel. The group went public in early May, declaring itself a "nationalist force". It said it was protecting aid, including around food distribution sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a mainly American private contractor that Israel intends to replace the UN-led aid network. Before the war, Yasser Abu Shabab was involved in smuggling cigarettes and drugs from Egypt and Israel into Gaza, according to two members of his extended family, one of whom was once part of his group, according to an AP report. Hamas arrested him, but freed him from prison when the war began in October 2023, they said. The conflict began when Hamas-led fighters attacked Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking about 240 hostage. Israel's relentless military campaign has so far killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, Gaza's health authorities have said. The conflict has displaced the majority of its population and laid to waste much of the enclave's built-up areas.

Oman oil price rises $1.36 per barrel
Oman oil price rises $1.36 per barrel

Zawya

time2 hours ago

  • Zawya

Oman oil price rises $1.36 per barrel

MUSCAT: The official price of Oman oil (for August delivery) reached $65.79 per barrel on Monday The price of Oman oil on Monday increased by $1.36 compared to last Friday's price of $64.43 per barrel. The monthly average price of Omani crude oil for June delivery reached $67.87 per barrel, a decrease of $4.64 compared to the price for May delivery. Meanwhile, international oil prices were little changed on Monday as investors awaited US-China trade talks in London in the hope that a deal could boost the global economic outlook and subsequently fuel demand. Brent crude futures gained 4 cents to $66.51 a barrel by 0940 GMT while US West Texas Intermediate crude lost 1 cent to $64.57. Brent rose 4% last week and WTI 6.2% as the prospect of a US-China trade deal boosted risk appetite for some investors. US President Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping spoke on the telephone on Thursday before US and Chinese officials meet in London on Monday in an effort to calm trade tensions between the two nations. A trade deal between the US and China could support the global economic outlook and in turn boost demand for commodities including oil. Monday's talks could dampen the impact on prices of a slew of Chinese data releases, said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore. Chinese export growth slowed to a three-month low in May as US tariffs curbed shipments while factory gate deflation deepened to its worst in two years, heaping pressure on the world's second-largest economy at home and abroad. "Bad timing for crude oil, which was testing the top of the range and knocking on the door of a technical break above $65," Sycamore said, referring to WTI prices. The data also showed that China's crude oil imports declined in May to the lowest daily rate in four months as state-owned and independent refiners began planned maintenance. The prospect of a potential China-US trade deal outweighed concern over the price impact from increased output by the Opec+ group of oil producers next month. — Agencies 2022 © All right reserved for Oman Establishment for Press, Publication and Advertising (OEPPA) Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store