‘Russia lies every day about its desire for peace': One dead as massive strike hits Ukraine hospital
Ukraine and Russia have to prisoner exchanges, not a ceasefire.
Russia launched a record 479 explosive drones at Ukraine on Sunday.
Russia carried out 'massive' drone attacks on Ukraine's capital Kyiv and port city of Odesa early on Tuesday, killing one person and hitting a maternity hospital, Ukrainian officials said, calling for further sanctions.
Moscow has kept up its attacks on Ukraine, which has hit back with strikes deep inside Russian territory, while peace talks held over the weekend failed to yield a breakthrough towards ending the three-year war.
Aside from an agreement to exchange prisoners, progress has stalled and Russia has repeatedly rejected calls for an unconditional ceasefire.
'Russia lies every day about its desire for peace and attacks people every day. Time to impose sanctions. Time to support Ukraine with weapons. Time to prove that democracy has power,' Andriy Yermak, head of the Ukrainian presidential office, said on Telegram.
READ | 'A real coup': NATO must learn from Ukraine strategic strike on Russia - admiral
A 59-year-old man was killed in the Russian strikes on residential buildings in Odesa on Tuesday, and at least four others were wounded, said Governor Oleg Kiper.
'The enemy massively attacked Odesa with strike drones. There is damage to civilian infrastructure and fires,' Kiper wrote on Telegram.
The Russians hit a maternity hospital, an emergency medical ward and residential buildings.
Oleg Kiper
He added that the maternity hospital had been evacuated in time.
In central Kiev, an AFP journalist heard at least a dozen explosions, anti-aircraft fire and the buzzing of drones.
'Stay in shelters! The massive attack on the capital continues,' Mayor Vitali Klitschko said on Telegram, adding in a separate post around 03:00 (00:00 GMT) that 'a new batch of UAVs (drones) is flying to the capital.'
Four people were wounded in the attacks that hit at least seven districts, he said, with buildings and cars on fire.
Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine triggered the biggest European conflict since World War II, forcing millions to flee their homes and decimating much of eastern and southern Ukraine.
Ukrainian cities are targeted by Russian air strikes almost daily. On Sunday, Russia launched a record 479 explosive drones at Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian Air Force.
Kyiv has also carried out attacks on Russian territory, targeting transport and weapons production infrastructure. Russia's transport agency Rosaviatsia said on Tuesday that flight operations were temporarily restricted at Saint Petersburg's Pulkovo airport.
Similar restrictions were imposed on at least 13 other airports overnight, with four in Moscow reopening on Tuesday.
Despite efforts by US President Donald Trump to reach a ceasefire agreement, a second round of peace talks in Turkey are at a standstill.
The only concrete agreement reached at the talks over the weekend was for release all seriously wounded or sick prisoners of war and those under the age of 25 - a deal that did not specify the number of soldiers involved.
While welcoming POW exchanges, Zelensky said last week said it was 'pointless' to hold further talks with the current Russian delegation - who he previously dismissed as 'empty heads' - since they could not agree to a ceasefire.
On Sunday, the Russian army also claimed to have attacked the Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk, which borders the regions of Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia, already partially under Russian control, a first in more than three years of conflict.
Jose Colon/Anadolu via Getty Images
'Time for everyone to finally accept the fact that Russia understands only strikes, not rational words,' Ukraine's Yermak said on Tuesday, in a thinly veiled criticism of the Trump administration.
As a condition for halting its invasion, Russia has demanded that Ukraine cede the territories Moscow claims to have annexed and forswear joining NATO.
It has also rejected a proposed 30-day unconditional ceasefire sought by Kyiv and the European Union, arguing that it would allow Ukrainian forces to rearm with Western deliveries.
Ukraine is demanding a complete Russian withdrawal of from its territory and security guarantees from the West, describing Moscow's demands as 'ultimatums'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
11 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
The EU AI Act aims to create a level playing field for AI innovation. Here's what it is.
The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, known as the EU AI Act, has been described by the European Commission as 'the world's first comprehensive AI law.' After years in the making, it is progressively becoming a part of reality for the 450 million people living in the 27 countries that comprise the EU. The EU AI Act, however, is more than a European affair. It applies to companies both local and foreign, and it can affect both providers and deployers of AI systems; the European Commission cites examples of how it would apply to a developer of a CV screening tool, and to a bank that buys that tool. Now, all of these parties have a legal framework that sets the stage for their use of AI. Why does the EU AI Act exist? As usual with EU legislation, the EU AI Act exists to make sure there is a uniform legal framework applying to a certain topic across EU countries — the topic this time being AI. Now that the regulation is in place, it should 'ensure the free movement, cross-border, of AI-based goods and services' without diverging local restrictions. With timely regulation, the EU seeks to create a level playing field across the region and foster trust, which could also create opportunities for emerging companies. However, the common framework that it has adopted is not exactly permissive: Despite the relatively early stage of widespread AI adoption in most sectors, the EU AI Act sets a high bar for what AI should and shouldn't do for society more broadly. What is the purpose of the EU AI Act? According to European lawmakers, the framework's main goal is to 'promote the uptake of human centric and trustworthy AI while ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection, to protect against the harmful effects of AI systems in the Union, and to support innovation.' Yes, that's quite a mouthful, but it's worth parsing carefully. First, because a lot will depend on how you define 'human centric' and 'trustworthy' AI. And second, because it gives a good sense of the precarious balance to maintain between diverging goals: innovation vs. harm prevention, as well as uptake of AI vs. environmental protection. As usual with EU legislation, again, the devil will be in the details. How does the EU AI Act balance its different goals? To balance harm prevention against the potential benefits of AI, the EU AI Act adopted a risk-based approach: banning a handful of 'unacceptable risk' use cases; flagging a set of 'high-risk' uses calling for tight regulation; and applying lighter obligations to 'limited risk' scenarios. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise on August 7. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Has the EU AI Act come into effect? Yes and no. The EU AI Act rollout started on August 1, 2024, but it will only come into force through a series of staggered compliance deadlines. In most cases, it will also apply sooner to new entrants than to companies that already offer AI products and services in the EU. The first deadline came into effect on February 2, 2025, and focused on enforcing bans on a small number of prohibited uses of AI, such as untargeted scraping of internet or CCTV for facial images to build up or expand databases. Many others will follow, but unless the schedule changes, most provisions will apply by mid-2026. What changed on August 2, 2025? Since August 2, 2025, the EU AI Act applies to 'general-purpose AI models with systemic risk.' GPAI models are AI models trained with a large amount of data, and that can be used for a wide range of tasks. That's where the risk element comes in. According to the EU AI Act, GPAI models can come with systemic risks; 'for example, through the lowering of barriers for chemical or biological weapons development, or unintended issues of control over autonomous [GPAI] models.' Ahead of the deadline, the EU published guidelines for providers of GPAI models, which include both European companies and non-European players such as Anthropic, Google, Meta, and OpenAI. But since these companies already have models on the market, they will also have until August 2, 2027, to comply, unlike new entrants. Does the EU AI Act have teeth? The EU AI Act comes with penalties that lawmakers wanted to be simultaneously 'effective, proportionate and dissuasive' — even for large global players. Details will be laid down by EU countries, but the regulation sets out the overall spirit — that penalties will vary depending on the deemed risk level — as well as thresholds for each level. Infringement on prohibited AI applications leads to the highest penalty of 'up to €35 million or 7% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year (whichever is higher).' The European Commission can also inflict fines of up to €15 million or 3% of annual turnover on providers of GPAI models. How fast do existing players intend to comply? The voluntary GPAI code of practice, including commitments such as not training models on pirated content, is a good indicator of how companies may engage with the framework law until forced to do so. In July 2025, Meta announced it wouldn't sign the voluntary GPAI code of practice meant to help such providers comply with the EU AI Act. However, Google soon after confirmed it would sign, despite reservations. Signatories so far include Aleph Alpha, Amazon, Anthropic, Cohere, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Mistral AI, and OpenAI, among others. But as we have seen with Google's example, signing does not equal a full-on endorsement. Why have (some) tech companies been fighting these rules? While stating in a blog post that Google would sign the voluntary GPAI code of practice, its president of global affairs, Kent Walker, still had reservations. 'We remain concerned that the AI Act and Code risk slowing Europe's development and deployment of AI,' he wrote. Meta was more radical, with its chief global affairs officer Joel Kaplan stating in a post on LinkedIn that 'Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI.' Calling the EU's implementation of the AI Act 'overreach,' he stated that the code of practice 'introduces a number of legal uncertainties for model developers, as well as measures which go far beyond the scope of the AI Act.' European companies have expressed concerns as well. Arthur Mensch, the CEO of French AI champion Mistral AI, was part of a group of European CEOs who signed an open letter in July 2025 urging Brussels to 'stop the clock' for two years before key obligations of the EU AI Act came into force. Will the schedule change? In early July 2025, the European Union responded negatively to lobbying efforts calling for a pause, saying it would still stick to its timeline for implementing the EU AI Act. It went ahead with the August 2, 2025, deadline as planned, and we will update this story if anything changes.
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Holds Call With Zelenskiy as Truce Deadline to Putin Looms
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he had a 'productive' phone call with Donald Trump as Russia ramped up its attacks, despite a deadline set by the US leader for Moscow to end its full-scale invasion. Zelenskiy raised Russia's increasingly intense attacks on Ukraine during the call, he said in a post on X on Tuesday, referring to a barrage last Thursday which killed 31 in the capital of Kyiv.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Social Democrat joins calls for Germany to take in Gaza children
A senior member of Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD) on Tuesday joined calls for Berlin to temporarily take in injured children from the Gaza Strip. "We can see that there are a number of initiatives in our European partner countries to fly out children and care for the seriously injured," SPD parliamentary secretary Derya Türk-Nachbaur told broadcaster RTL/ntv. She named Norway and Italy as examples. "There are many other countries that have joined the initiative," she added, calling on the government to follow suit and take in children from Gaza. Germany has admitted Ukrainian children amid Russia's ongoing invasion, Türk-Nachbaur noted, arguing the country was therefore well-prepared to provide care. Calls on Berlin for more decisive action have been growing amid international outrage over the humanitarian situation in the embattled Gaza Strip, which experts say is on the brink of famine following nearly 22 months of Israel's military campaign, which was launched in the wake of the October 7, 2023 attacks. Three German cities - Hanover, Dusseldorf and Bonn - announced earlier this week that they plan to take in children from Gaza and Israel who are particularly traumatized or vulnerable. The Chancellery and the Interior Ministry have responded cautiously, however, expressing concerns over the feasibility of such evacuations. In a letter addressed to Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt and Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul seen by dpa, the mayors of the three cities asked the federal government for support in implementing their plans. "What is needed now is an organized procedure at federal level that makes this humanitarian aid possible. We urge you to create the legal and organizational conditions for such a reception as quickly as possible," states the letter, which was also signed by the mayors of Kiel and Leipzig. Türk-Nachbaur conceded that some issues need to be resolved with Israel before children can be evacuated from Gaza. "We need safe corridors, we need to get the ambulance transport organized and we first need the go-ahead from the Israeli side," the Social Democrat said. "We're not talking about hundreds or thousands of children," she said, noting that Italy has taken in "20, 30, 40, 50 children." "I think we can manage to take care" of a similar number, she added. Solve the daily Crossword
