'Global March to Gaza': SA delegate head shares details of alleged harassment in Egypt
The GMTG, was part of a global solidarity movement where on June 13, 2025, thousands of citizens from over 50 countries mobilised in a peaceful, civic-led demonstration to 'demand justice, humanity, and an end to the ongoing genocide in Gaza'.
Image: Jimi Matthews/Facebook
Many South African delegates who formed part of the Global March to Gaza (GMTG), have returned home, with several others still arriving Monday evening and Tuesday, claiming they faced intimidation, detention, and roadblocks by Egyptian authorities.
The GMTG, was part of a global solidarity movement where on Friday, thousands of citizens from over 50 countries mobilised in a peaceful, civic-led demonstration to 'demand justice, humanity, and an end to the ongoing genocide in Gaza'.
However, several South African delegates were among those who claimed they were intimidated and had their passports confiscated by Egyptian authorities at various checkpoints during their journey.
In a social media post over the weekend, former member of Parliament, and Nelson Mandela's grandson, Mandla Mandela, who was among the SA delegation in attendance, explained that they were not allowed to proceed and were held for over six hours.
Head of SA delegation, Basheerah Soomar, said in an interview on Monday that roughly 50 South Africans were part of their GMTC, and that their experience in Egypt had been an 'unwelcoming one, as some had already found themselves being detained upon arrival at the airport'.
'They tried to detain as many people coming in, but they couldn't prove why.'
Sommar said that as soon as the embassy opened, she spoke to the secretaries and the ambassador, so that they would be aware that people were coming.
The International Relations Department's spokesperson, Chrispin Phiri, said: 'Our embassy advised South African march participants that the area (near the crossing) was restricted and queried whether they had confirmation of authorisation from the authorities.
'This was not clear to the embassy during the initial engagements, and the participation proceeded.'
Phiri confirmed that full consular services were being rendered to citizens who came to Egypt.
Soomar said people were questioned at their hotels.
'Searching our phones and explicitly asking if we're joining the march. So that obviously, there was leaked info about which countries were staying where. They didn't take any South Africans into detention because they didn't have any evidence. We all prepared for that and cleared all our phones.'
Soomar said claimed were followed by Egyptian forces.
'We couldn't go ahead with the plan of getting fetched by buses because we knew we were being surveilled. Every time we exited the hotel, we saw police. A lot of us were followed by people in plain clothing, but we knew that they were intelligence.'
Soomar claimed that passports had been confiscated.
"There were three checkpoints along the route where we all got stopped. Some people made it to the third gate - those who had left earlier - and they ended up blocking 300 people there.
'I ended up at the second checkpoint, the same one that Mandla Mandela was at. That's where most of us got stopped.'
"Some people did try to not hand over their passports, but when people started saying no, they actually started getting aggressive'.
'They kept us there for like five or six hours, and we didn't have access to water or food.'
Thereafter, after more police forces arrived, an official told them they would not receive a permit for their march.
'There was no negotiation. It was very clear that it was a no. That was the first time we received an answer in two months. And then they were like, you have an ultimatum.'
She said people were put onto buses where they were driven around and dropped off at various spots in Cairo.
'We obviously didn't stay at the same hotel because we... were still clearly being surveilled.
'We're just encouraging our people to leave as soon as possible because as a global committee, we decided that no further activity will take place in Cairo… All South Africans are accounted for. So, we don't have anyone missing. But we're just trying to get everyone home safe as soon as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Helen Zille claps back at claims she's 'too old' to be Jozi mayor
Former Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille has clapped back at criticism that she is 'too old' to campaign for the position of Joburg's next mayor. The 74-year-old has expressed her interest in 'saving' South Africa's financial hub after a string of leaders have left the city poorer. In 2008, the woman dubbed 'Godzille' won the World Mayor of the Year award for governing the city of Cape Town. On her X account, Helen Zille responded to concerns and criticism from the public over her mayoral endeavour. One was if her bid to govern Joburg was confirmed. Another was that she was 'too old' and belonged in a 'retirement village.' She responded: 'There are many young competitors for Mayor of Joburg who will be interviewed. The Selection Panel will fairly consider us all. DA has many young mayors and some not-so-young'. When one X user claimed her 'white privilege' influenced her decision, Helen Zille clapped back: 'I'm from Joburg, sweetie. I was born in Hillbrow, grew up in Joburg, and lived in Hillbrow again as a young professional.' Last week, Zille told eNCA: 'Joburg is my hometown. I was born in Hillbrow, which looks very different than what it does today. Joburg was a functional city that I love and believe is the powerhouse of South Africa. Its health and its functionality is make or break for South Africa.' She added: 'If Joburg doesn't succeed, South Africa does not succeed.' Speaking to the media, Helen Zille revealed she was capable of taking on the monstrous task of being Joburg mayor. The no-nonsense woman claimed that other DA candidates had been deterred by the prospect of low pay, long hours, and intense public scrutiny. Helen Zille is considering running for Joburg mayor. Images via X: @helenzille She told the Citizen: 'Whatever happens, this is the last roll of the dice for me and the very last roll of the dice for Johannesburg. So Johannesburg must just make damn sure that they make up their minds what they want.' Zille added that she was still consulting her family about possibly making the move to Johannesburg. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Cabinet won't be influenced when it decides to shut down Israeli embassy
CAPE TOWN - International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola says Cabinet won't be influenced by external forces when it decides to shut down the Israeli embassy. He says the final decision to close down the embassy is still being processed by Cabinet and all factors are being considered objectively. Lamola was responding to oral questions in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) as part of the peace and security cluster. Lamola was asked about the closure of the Israeli embassy after the National Assembly took a resolution to close it during the sixth administration. He was asked by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)'s Virgill Gericke what was behind the delay. 'What outside forces are exerting pressure on individuals, Cabinet or the government to renege on its initial resolution to close the Israeli embassy?' Lamola says the closure is being processed in line with the Constitution. 'It will be processed objectively in line with the Constitution with no external pressure to be exerted on the South African government by any forces or anyone.' He says the embassy has been downgraded and a final decision on its closure will happen before the end of the year.
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Want a decision from the SA government? Don't hold your breath
There are plenty of cases where the government just takes a long time to make decisions. Even decisions that need to be made by one person can take forever. In some cases, the process is just too technical, with too many steps. And while it can be frustrating, it is also really expensive for our economy. One of the great and terrible certainties about South African life is that you know any kind of government process is just going to take forever. And while it can be frustrating and taxing, in the end it is also hugely expensive for our economy. On Tuesday, 17 June 2025, BusinessLIVE reported on the CEO of Afrimat, who had told shareholders in the annual report that a delay by the Competition Tribunal over its deal with Lafarge SA might have cost the company about R185-million. That's because while the tribunal was considering the case, the equipment, including kilns, fell into disrepair. By the time the tribunal allowed the deal, it was exactly a year since it was first announced. And remember, all the tribunal had to do was consider the recommendations of the Competition Commission — it wasn't as if they were starting the entire case from scratch. Something similar has happened with the Vodacom-Maziv deal, where the two want to work together to roll out fibre. This is something that should greatly benefit our economy. That case took three years before the Competition Tribunal eventually ruled that the merger could not go ahead. And even then, the parties had to wait for months before the final reasons were actually published. Considering how the fibre market has changed in the past three years, this might well have a material impact on whether the deal still has the same value as it did when it was announced. It's easy to pick on the Competition Tribunal. And we should. But there are plenty of other cases where the government just takes a long time to make decisions. In some cases, the process is just too technical, with too many steps. There are also, arguably, too many different forums. For example, Vodacom now has to appeal against the Competition Tribunal ruling in the Competition Appeal Court. It is even possible that if it fails there, it could go to the Constitutional Court. That would mean the whole thing will probably take more than five years. But it is not just our judicial and legal processes that take a long time. Even decisions that need to be made by one person can take forever. Jacob Zuma once took nearly two years just to appoint a new head of the Special Investigating Unit. That was clearly political; he didn't want anyone in the job for reasons that became pretty obvious. But President Cyril Ramaphosa sometimes isn't much better. The head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Shamila Batohi, has asked him to suspend the head of prosecutions in Joburg, Andrew Chauke. He is accused of a litany of sins, including sabotaging prosecutions during the State Capture era. Her request was made nearly two years ago. And Ramaphosa has still not made a decision. Considering that he has claimed to want to support our independent institutions, and the NPA, what could his motive possibly be? Two weeks ago, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu withdrew an advert for a new head of the Hawks, after Godfrey Lebeya retired. The process to find a new head will now start again, meaning they will be without a boss for four months. At least. And I'll bet you the cost of a double ticket to see the Springboks at Ellis Park that it will take longer than that. There are many other examples. Former Department of Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Ebrahim Patel was accused by the current head of the National Lotteries Commission, Professor Barney Pityana, of delaying the appointment of the agents who formally assign money to groups that are supposed to benefit from it. The current Health Minister, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, appeared to take forever to publish regulations around the digital nomad visa when he was at Home Affairs. In the end the new minister, Leon Schreiber, had to do it. And was able to claim something for the DA in the process. I think sometimes when there is a long delay we have to ask who is really responsible. In the case of the Competition Tribunal, it is not just that they make decisions businesspeople don't like. It's that the delay is caused because they don't have enough members. As columnist Michael Avery has pointed out, it appears to be seriously understaffed. By the way, they're not the only ones. Mbekezeli Benjamin from Judges Matter once pointed out that the Electoral Court had been without a full complement of staff for a full five years. That's astonishing, no matter how you look at it. And it's only because of the politicians; they are the ones who are ultimately in charge. When there are delays like this, I think we're entitled to ask why. And this is the risk to the politicians. When Ramaphosa can't make up his mind about Andrew Chauke for two years, it looks like he's defending him, even if he's not. When tribunals and courts are left without their full complement of judges and commissioners, it must make them weaker. But sometimes it can be something else. DM
