logo
Canberra developers found to have broken consumer law over light rail, rental yeild advertising in Canberra

Canberra developers found to have broken consumer law over light rail, rental yeild advertising in Canberra

Two companies that made false claims about approvals for light rail stops near a luxury apartment building in Woden have been fined more than $3 million each under consumer laws.
The court found GRE Sales — also known as Geocon — and GZ Developments — ultimately owned by Zapari — had broken the law by suggesting light rail to Woden Town Centre had been approved and would stop near the Grand Central Towers.
And a further claim suggested buyers would obtain a seven per cent gross rental yield.
The claims were advertised on billboards, flyers and a promotional video.

The court found these were misleading and at odds with Australian consumer laws.
The advertising bore the brand names of Geocon and Zapari.
'Disdainful, contemptuous and scornful'
In his judgment Acting Justice Greg Curtin said: "The desire to maximise profit would seem to have won out over commercial ethics and legal obligations".
Although he only fined GRE Sales and GZ Developments, he also took aim at principles in the head companies.
"Mr Nick Georgalis and Mr [Nick] Skepev, via other corporate vehicles utilising the brand names 'Geocon' and 'Zapari', are prominent developers of residential real estate in the Australian Capital Territory,"
Acting Justice Curtin said.
"Mr Nick Georgalis and Mr Skepev were intimately involved with the travel times representations, although it is fair to say Mr Georgalis was more involved than Mr Skepev.
The Woden development Grand Central Towers was completed in 2021.
(
ABC News
)
"They were less involved, although directly so, with the light rail location representation.
"They had less involvement with the rental yield representation, but they knew of its existence.
"Thus, the ultimate owners of GZ and GRE were involved in the representations."
Acting Justice Curtin listed all those involved in the misrepresentations including two senior managers, who the judgment says have both left the companies.
"Taken as a whole, the conduct of GZ, GRE, Messrs Nick Georgalis, Skepev, Stephens and Micalos concerning the representations was cavalier to say the least, and was disdainful, contemptuous and scornful of consumers and the legal requirement of having reasonable grounds for the making of representations as to future matters," he said.
"
The desire to maximise profit would seem to have won out over commercial ethics and legal obligations.
"
Acting Justice Curtin also said on the balance of probabilities some financial loss was suffered by some buyers.
He said he accepted the Fair Trading Commission's case that the misleading representations brought higher prices, than if they hadn't been made.
"The evidence established that GRE and GZ's internal calculations of gross rental return were less than seven persons for most of the units, yet GZ and GRE represented that all units would achieve seven per cent," Acting Justice Curtin said.
Acting Justice Curtin in the end only targeted GZ Developments and GRE Sales, fining them each $3,225,000, and ordering them to pay costs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lithium rout intensifies as UBS urges clients to sell
Lithium rout intensifies as UBS urges clients to sell

AU Financial Review

time3 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

Lithium rout intensifies as UBS urges clients to sell

UBS has warned clients that the brutal sell-off in lithium stocks is far from over, predicting that an oversupply of the battery material will continue to weigh on prices for the rest of this decade. That caused the broker to shift back to an 'underweight' rating on the Australian sharemarket's lithium sector and cut its long-term spodumene, which is what Australian miners typically produce, forecast by 8 per cent to $US1200 a tonne.

Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal

The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.

Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal

The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store