Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians.
This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government.
Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it.
The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians.
In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it.
So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia.
Loading
The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians.
Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
2 hours ago
- Herald Sun
Digital nomads: The critical workers seeing the world and getting paid for it
Forget gap years, taking your career on the road as a digital nomad is becoming the preferred way to see the world, with almost one in three Australians having ditched a permanent residency to work remotely. A YouGov survey found 29 per cent of Aussies had been able to travel for an extended period of time while using technology and the internet to work; while 41 per cent of Australians were keen on the idea. Scott Millar from school-based educational provider BOP Industries said the pandemic enlightened employees to the endless possibilities of working remotely. 'Covid really showed us, and particularly showed young people, that you can do just as much work at just as high a quality, but instead of sitting in an office in Brisbane or Sydney, you can be sipping cocktails on a beach in Bali, or in a co-working space in London, or a friend's flat in New York,' he said. 'Young people are finding that they can do the exact same job from anywhere in the world and still earn the same amount of money, and still have the same career progression.' But it's not just Gen Z embracing the work-from-anywhere concept, said demographer Bernard Salt. 'That's a feature coming through in a number of the generations of the workforce right through to the 50s and 60s and maybe even beyond,' he said. 'I think we'll see this more mobile workforce, particularly amongst the professional sector, who can have a laptop and will travel and relocate to a place that suits their needs for a particular time.' IT and computing workers have been leading the trend, representing 30 per cent of digital nomads, followed by those in creative roles like script writing (21 per cent), then financial services industry staffers (18 per cent). Most are chasing lifestyle benefits, with 44 per cent of digital nomads declaring being able to travel without taking time off work was a great plus. Brisbane-bred software engineer Zac Murray, 26, has spent much of the past two years traversing the globe as a digital nomad, visiting and working in more than 50 countries including America, Mexico, Colombia, China, Portugal and Egypt. 'I definitely fell in love with the lifestyle - it just had a magic to it that I can't even explain,' he said. 'It's not glamorous, but it is something that is really special and I felt connected to something in a way that I haven't felt before.' But he revealed it was not all roses, with Visa issues, budgeting, lack of stability and loneliness the biggest challenges. 'One of the downsides that people often don't talk about is it can get lonely because you're away from all your friends, your family, you're constantly changing locations,' he said. 'And something I also struggled with initially is that it's not a holiday, it's about living your life the way you normally would but adding on an extra travelling component, because you still have expectations at work and you don't want to let your job performance suffer.' With the proliferation of AI in the workplace, the trend is only set to grow, with Mr Millar declaring some employers were already offering employees the option to work nine months in the office and three months from abroad each year. 'I've seen some companies that have started offering that flexibility for their staff … and they're setting up links with accommodation providers and co-working space providers in different cities around the world,' he said, naming Shopify and WeWork as leading examples. TOP TIPS FOR LIVING AS A DIGITAL NOMAD 1. Have a plan and a budget for each destination to avoid overspending 2. Set up regular routines in each destination like you would at home to ensure you get your work done, such as going to the gym and having a separate work space 3. Choose destinations that run on similar time zones to your employer to make communicating with work easier 4. Consider staying in hostels, which can not only help you save money, but can also assist with making friends 5. Don't treat the experience as a holiday. Work your usual hours and explore after hours . Originally published as Digital nomads: The critical workers seeing the world and getting paid for it
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
EU threatens US with counter-tariffs in steel stand-off
The European Union has spoken out against US President Donald Trump's latest tariff announcement on steel imports and has threatened countermeasures. "We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent," said a spokesman for the European Commission in Brussels, which is responsible for EU trade policy. "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." The EU is ready to take countermeasures, the statement continued. This could also happen earlier than July 14. As things currently stand, EU counter-tariffs already planned due to Trump's initial tariff decisions would automatically come into force on this date. The bloc had wanted the measures to come into force on April 14, but held back after Trump granted many countries and the EU a 90-day pause from certain tariffs. This window of opportunity had been intended to be used for negotiations. The EU has repeatedly emphasised that it will introduce decisive measures against US tariffs if the talks fail. Early last week, European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed some optimism about sorting out the trade dispute, following a phone call with Trump. But now it appears all bets could be off. Speaking at a rally at a US steel plant near Pittsburgh on Friday, the US president said the additional import fees would strengthen the national steel industry. He added that tariffs were his absolute favourite word. Trump's administration has justified the existing steel tariffs as a measure to protect national security. He has already announced, threatened or implemented numerous other tariffs. In addition to a new penalty tariff of 10 per cent of the value of goods on almost all imports, he has announced specific, higher tariffs on imports, including from major trading partners such as China and the European Union. Unlike the EU, Australia will not retaliate against Trump's "wrong" tariff hike decision on steel imports. Trade Minister Don Farrell is calling on the Trump administration to reverse the decision and drop all tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. "We don't believe that retaliation is the right way to go here," he said. "We're going to cooly and calmly argue our case for the removal of these tariffs." The European Union has spoken out against US President Donald Trump's latest tariff announcement on steel imports and has threatened countermeasures. "We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent," said a spokesman for the European Commission in Brussels, which is responsible for EU trade policy. "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." The EU is ready to take countermeasures, the statement continued. This could also happen earlier than July 14. As things currently stand, EU counter-tariffs already planned due to Trump's initial tariff decisions would automatically come into force on this date. The bloc had wanted the measures to come into force on April 14, but held back after Trump granted many countries and the EU a 90-day pause from certain tariffs. This window of opportunity had been intended to be used for negotiations. The EU has repeatedly emphasised that it will introduce decisive measures against US tariffs if the talks fail. Early last week, European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed some optimism about sorting out the trade dispute, following a phone call with Trump. But now it appears all bets could be off. Speaking at a rally at a US steel plant near Pittsburgh on Friday, the US president said the additional import fees would strengthen the national steel industry. He added that tariffs were his absolute favourite word. Trump's administration has justified the existing steel tariffs as a measure to protect national security. He has already announced, threatened or implemented numerous other tariffs. In addition to a new penalty tariff of 10 per cent of the value of goods on almost all imports, he has announced specific, higher tariffs on imports, including from major trading partners such as China and the European Union. Unlike the EU, Australia will not retaliate against Trump's "wrong" tariff hike decision on steel imports. Trade Minister Don Farrell is calling on the Trump administration to reverse the decision and drop all tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. "We don't believe that retaliation is the right way to go here," he said. "We're going to cooly and calmly argue our case for the removal of these tariffs." The European Union has spoken out against US President Donald Trump's latest tariff announcement on steel imports and has threatened countermeasures. "We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent," said a spokesman for the European Commission in Brussels, which is responsible for EU trade policy. "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." The EU is ready to take countermeasures, the statement continued. This could also happen earlier than July 14. As things currently stand, EU counter-tariffs already planned due to Trump's initial tariff decisions would automatically come into force on this date. The bloc had wanted the measures to come into force on April 14, but held back after Trump granted many countries and the EU a 90-day pause from certain tariffs. This window of opportunity had been intended to be used for negotiations. The EU has repeatedly emphasised that it will introduce decisive measures against US tariffs if the talks fail. Early last week, European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed some optimism about sorting out the trade dispute, following a phone call with Trump. But now it appears all bets could be off. Speaking at a rally at a US steel plant near Pittsburgh on Friday, the US president said the additional import fees would strengthen the national steel industry. He added that tariffs were his absolute favourite word. Trump's administration has justified the existing steel tariffs as a measure to protect national security. He has already announced, threatened or implemented numerous other tariffs. In addition to a new penalty tariff of 10 per cent of the value of goods on almost all imports, he has announced specific, higher tariffs on imports, including from major trading partners such as China and the European Union. Unlike the EU, Australia will not retaliate against Trump's "wrong" tariff hike decision on steel imports. Trade Minister Don Farrell is calling on the Trump administration to reverse the decision and drop all tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. "We don't believe that retaliation is the right way to go here," he said. "We're going to cooly and calmly argue our case for the removal of these tariffs." The European Union has spoken out against US President Donald Trump's latest tariff announcement on steel imports and has threatened countermeasures. "We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent," said a spokesman for the European Commission in Brussels, which is responsible for EU trade policy. "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." The EU is ready to take countermeasures, the statement continued. This could also happen earlier than July 14. As things currently stand, EU counter-tariffs already planned due to Trump's initial tariff decisions would automatically come into force on this date. The bloc had wanted the measures to come into force on April 14, but held back after Trump granted many countries and the EU a 90-day pause from certain tariffs. This window of opportunity had been intended to be used for negotiations. The EU has repeatedly emphasised that it will introduce decisive measures against US tariffs if the talks fail. Early last week, European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed some optimism about sorting out the trade dispute, following a phone call with Trump. But now it appears all bets could be off. Speaking at a rally at a US steel plant near Pittsburgh on Friday, the US president said the additional import fees would strengthen the national steel industry. He added that tariffs were his absolute favourite word. Trump's administration has justified the existing steel tariffs as a measure to protect national security. He has already announced, threatened or implemented numerous other tariffs. In addition to a new penalty tariff of 10 per cent of the value of goods on almost all imports, he has announced specific, higher tariffs on imports, including from major trading partners such as China and the European Union. Unlike the EU, Australia will not retaliate against Trump's "wrong" tariff hike decision on steel imports. Trade Minister Don Farrell is calling on the Trump administration to reverse the decision and drop all tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. "We don't believe that retaliation is the right way to go here," he said. "We're going to cooly and calmly argue our case for the removal of these tariffs."
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
EU threatens US with counter-tariffs in steel stand-off
The European Union has spoken out against US President Donald Trump's latest tariff announcement on steel imports and has threatened countermeasures. "We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent," said a spokesman for the European Commission in Brussels, which is responsible for EU trade policy. "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." The EU is ready to take countermeasures, the statement continued. This could also happen earlier than July 14. As things currently stand, EU counter-tariffs already planned due to Trump's initial tariff decisions would automatically come into force on this date. The bloc had wanted the measures to come into force on April 14, but held back after Trump granted many countries and the EU a 90-day pause from certain tariffs. This window of opportunity had been intended to be used for negotiations. The EU has repeatedly emphasised that it will introduce decisive measures against US tariffs if the talks fail. Early last week, European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed some optimism about sorting out the trade dispute, following a phone call with Trump. But now it appears all bets could be off. Speaking at a rally at a US steel plant near Pittsburgh on Friday, the US president said the additional import fees would strengthen the national steel industry. He added that tariffs were his absolute favourite word. Trump's administration has justified the existing steel tariffs as a measure to protect national security. He has already announced, threatened or implemented numerous other tariffs. In addition to a new penalty tariff of 10 per cent of the value of goods on almost all imports, he has announced specific, higher tariffs on imports, including from major trading partners such as China and the European Union. Unlike the EU, Australia will not retaliate against Trump's "wrong" tariff hike decision on steel imports. Trade Minister Don Farrell is calling on the Trump administration to reverse the decision and drop all tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. "We don't believe that retaliation is the right way to go here," he said. "We're going to cooly and calmly argue our case for the removal of these tariffs."
