logo
Pouncing lions, pronking springboks, poison-arrow lessons: Botswana's safari idyll

Pouncing lions, pronking springboks, poison-arrow lessons: Botswana's safari idyll

This story is part of the June 28 edition of Good Weekend. See all 21 stories.
In Botswana, they named their currency, pula, after their most precious commodity. Their diamonds? No – it's the rain. The word means 'blessings', too, and perhaps that's hardly surprising given the Kalahari covers 70 per cent of this parched southern African country. The Kalahari, though, is not the endless expanse of sand that might first appear in your mind's eye. And, after this year's especially plentiful rains, the desert is blooming, covered in sweet-smelling flowers and head-high grasses that provide plenty of grazing for wildlife and domestic cattle alike. Pula indeed.
Botswana reserves 40 per cent of its land for its wildlife. And in a country that's the same size as France (with a population of less than 3 million), well, that's a lot of land. The approach here, though, is not the mass safari tourism you'll find in many places elsewhere on this continent. Here it's high value, low impact. The camps are on a small scale; there are few with capacity for 30 guests, most have between eight and 12.
The atmosphere, then, is an intimate one and, once you're in the bush, it really is just you and the animals. You're not going to be in a crowd of 20, 30, or even 40 other vehicles surrounding a cheetah too distracted by clicking cameras to catch her prey. Over the course of a week's drives, I rarely saw another vehicle except in the distance. In Botswana, you could have travelled back in time to an Africa that Karen Blixen [who wrote Out of Africa ] might have recognised from 100 years ago when she had her farm in Kenya – albeit with guns replaced by camera lenses.
The Ker & Downey camps I visited here conjure a certain nostalgia, too. The 'tents' (in practice, huge rooms with an occasional nod in the direction of canvas) offer luxury and comfort: mosquito-netted four posters, Turkish rugs, indoor and outdoor showers, thatched roofs, deep shady verandas. Early morning tea is brought in a pot covered with a cosy. Dining tables are set with napkins in their holders, classic tableware (Blixen brought her Royal Copenhagen porcelain and crystal with her), fine wines and food.
Guests gather around a huge fire, dinners are served at long tables where guests and guides discuss the day's adventures. The camps are generally unfenced, and animals wander through at night, hence you are always accompanied by a guide after dark. None of the animals wears a tracking device so you follow the signs (footprints, droppings) and the formidable knowledge of your guide. You are on their territory.
The atmosphere is intimate. In the bush, it really is just you and the animals.
Maun is not the capital of Botswana (that's Gabarone) but it is the country's safari capital. It has grown exponentially since I was here 20 years ago, but despite having over 80,000 inhabitants, it's still classed as a village – albeit one with an international airport from which tiny light aircraft or helicopters transport travellers to the camps. After 14 hours in the air flying from London, I felt the need to stop off at Grays Eden, a new colonial-style hotel with a beautiful garden that goes down to the river, and a restaurant featuring what you might call 'bush fine dining' (the kudu carpaccio is a speciality).
From Maun, it's 25 minutes in a 12-seater known as a caravan over the vast, empty Botswanan plains to Dinaka Camp's airstrip on the Central Kalahari's northern edge. I was met by General, my guide for the next couple of days, who ran me through the rhythm of the day: 5.30am wake-up call; 6am breakfast and game drive; 11am brunch; 3.30pm high tea and the second drive with sundowners in the bush around 6pm; 7.30pm dinner.
You can vary this with a bush walk (the only time your guide carries a gun) and they always have a night drive on offer. I spent one afternoon with three bushmen who showed me medicinal plants, how to find water in underground tubers and store it in ostrich eggs, which plants can be spun into rope, and which caterpillars can provide the best poison for arrow tips.
With General, I watched young impalas practise their fighting technique, pronking springboks, dozens of iridescent birds, jackal families, oryx, wildebeest and a lone tsessebe (Botswana's swiftest antelope). A pair of lionesses, as pale as the creamy tufts of feathered grasses around them, stalked past our vehicle, a mother teaching her daughter how to hunt.
From Dinaka, it's a 'van' (a four-seater light aircraft) followed by a helicopter-for-two to reach the new camp of Maxa in the Okavango Delta, one of the few landlocked deltas in the world. Two million years ago, much of Botswana was a lake, but as the earth shifted and rivers were diverted, less water flowed in and the lake disappeared. However, with the rains and the rivers that flow down from Angola, there is still water here all year round and the Okavango experiences Africa's second-biggest annual migration (after the Serengeti).
From the air, what look like fields of grass turn out to be reeds in shallow water. And, sometimes, not-so-shallow water. This didn't stop Shane (guide and co-owner of Maxa) driving through it – though, as the depth changes from day to day, he sometimes gets out, rolls up his trousers and wades through just to check. On my first afternoon, however, he suggested a different form of transport.
The mokoro used to be a traditional wooden dug-out canoe but is now, in order to conserve trees, made of fibreglass. Nevertheless, the principle is unchanged. In your small, narrow punt, the poler stands behind you as you glide through the parting reeds, past exquisite water lilies and thumbnail-sized frogs clinging onto the reeds where minuscule spiders weave even tinier webs. In the water, fish dart just below the surface, watched by kingfishers and herons and, in the branches of tall trees, fish eagles patiently wait. Arriving back on dry land, a table complete with flickering candles and ice buckets awaits for the ultimate sundowner (the sky didn't disappoint, a new moon appearing above a flame-red horizon).
Maxa faces a lagoon where hippos spend all day groaning, honking and blowing water like freshwater whales as they rise and fall lazily in their pool. There's a human pool here, too, with lagoon water filtered by reeds, a fire pit and a kind of treehouse with platforms, hammocks and far-reaching views. The next morning, Shane led four of us on a bushwalk through the early mist, explaining the skittish zebras and families of reproachful baboons – after more than 20 years without a camp, the animals here aren't yet used to humans.
There were signs of elephants but the creatures themselves were elusive – until the next morning. Out on a game drive, we came across a family of females with their young, about 30-strong. This was thrilling enough but as we moved on a young bull elephant appeared. He lowered his head, raised his trunk, flapped his ears ('See how big I am – be very afraid') and approached. Two more arrived in a stately, if rather alarming, parade, coming even closer. Shane was relaxed, telling us, 'You only need to worry if they stop flapping their ears.'
Loading
Kanana camp is even deeper into the delta and teems with wildlife. Within minutes of starting my first drive, I was at a lagoon full of hippos with a couple of crocodiles on the bank. There was a small herd of buffalo, a pair of ostriches, a giraffe with her days-old calf, a family of hyenas, hundreds of impala and a magnificent lion with a lioness who looked suitably fearsome until they rolled onto their backs, paws in the air. But the highlight? A lioness, saintly in her patience, as her three cubs (about two months old) pounced on her and each other, rough-and-tumbled, stalked flying insects and sat up to box each other's ears. I could have watched them for hours (in fact, I did).
It was an intimate moment and one typical of Botswana. There is a freedom here that Blixen would surely recognise. You drive off-road, walk through the bush, sleep on platforms under the stars, fly in aircraft not so very much bigger than Denys Finch Hatton's [Karen Blixen's aristocratic lover]. There are never any crowds – well, except for the impala. It's just you and the wildlife. You could say Botswana is keeping it real. Or you could say it is simply a blessing. Pula.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Africa lodge underpinned by conservation
New Africa lodge underpinned by conservation

West Australian

time2 days ago

  • West Australian

New Africa lodge underpinned by conservation

A new safari lodge has just opened on a 17,800ha private conservancy in Laikipia, in northern Kenya, East Africa. Owned by the Suyian Conservancy Trust, a Kenyan not-for-profit, the conservancy is managed under a plan approved by the Kenya Wildlife Service. Previously a cattle ranch, the land has been rewilded over decades into a biodiversity corridor where elephants, lions, Grevy's zebra, reticulated giraffe, African wild dog, Laikipia hartebeest, elusive black leopards — and herders — now share space. And the travel company andBeyond now holds sole tourism rights on the land. There is no other lodge on the concession. Guests have the place to themselves. andBeyond Suyian Lodge has 14 suites designed in collaboration with Nicholas Plewman Architects, Michaelis Boyd and Fox Browne Creative. A spokesperson for the team says: 'The lodge embodies a raw yet refined aesthetic. Earthy textures, sculptural details and hand-crafted finishes reflect the surrounding terrain.' Each suite has a private plunge pool and views across the escarpment. But the spokesperson says the team looks beyond the buildings themselves: 'What sets Suyian apart is its invitation to slow down and connect. From walking with local herders and horseback safaris to yoga on ancient rock platforms and storytelling around the fire, every moment is designed to evoke presence and wonder.' The lodge was created in partnership with Space for Giants, a global conservation charity, and directly supports rewilding and community development in the region. 'From walking with herders to horseback safaris, from architecture inspired by rock formations to the possibility of seeing a black leopard in its natural range, this is Kenya, reimagined for the traveller who seeks more than a checklist,' says Joss Kent, &Beyond executive chairman and CEO. 'Suyian Conservancy brings the full breadth of Laikipia to life through layered storytelling, meaningful interaction, and a lodge that feels as though it has grown organically from the ground it rests on.' + 'Suyian' means 'wild dog' in the local Samburu language. + Suyian Conservancy is an unfenced wildlife habitat that is part of the wider Laikipia-Ewaso ecosystem. + A spokesperson says it holds the highest diversity of large mammal species of any ecosystem of its size in the world. + It is home to 55 mammal species and over 260 bird species. + Suyian was been managed for decades as a working cattle ranch and as a sanctuary for wildlife, as well as providing support for local communities. + It was created and is overseen by the international conservation non-government organisation Space for Giants. + Space for Giants is an international conservation organisation based in Africa and founded in 2011. + Its mission is to protect the natural ecosystems on which Africa's large wild animals depend. + It currently works in 11 countries across Central, East and Southern Africa. + Its headquarters are in Kenya and are registered as a charity in the UK and an NGO in the US. andBeyond Suyian Lodge Suyian Conservancy

How Oasis ruined the Socceroos' plans for a 20-year anniversary clash with Uruguay
How Oasis ruined the Socceroos' plans for a 20-year anniversary clash with Uruguay

Sydney Morning Herald

time18-07-2025

  • Sydney Morning Herald

How Oasis ruined the Socceroos' plans for a 20-year anniversary clash with Uruguay

Welcome to the complicated world of booking friendlies. It's not as simple as picking up the phone and asking a rival national team if they're up for a game. As Football Australia plots the Socceroos' road to the 2026 World Cup, they must juggle a mix of competing interests - commercial, political, technical and logistical - while navigating domestic hurdles like venue availability and government backing, plus the shifting international landscape, where potential opponents are suddenly ruled in or out, depending on their own qualification campaigns or asking prices. Then there's the pursuit of FIFA ranking points, which could determine whether Australia ends up with a favourable draw or a group of death, and thus presents another dilemma: is it better to face 'easier' nations and chase wins, or go for tougher assignments you might lose, but learn more from? 'We want to experience as much as possible' These are good problems to have. Direct World Cup qualification has plenty of advantages, like enabling Football Australia to get 'ahead of the game', as Popovic put it, with reconnaissance on possible hotels and training venues for the tournament; the federation is sending staff to the three co-host nations, the United States, Canada and Mexico, in the coming weeks. In avoiding the play-offs, it also meant they had five free international windows to fill up: September, October and November 2025, and March and June 2026. It's a situation Australia hasn't faced since the last time they qualified directly, back in 2013 under Holger Osieck. Preliminary talks with other national associations about potential friendlies tend to begin many months in advance, but games can only be booked once there is certainty about their qualification or otherwise. Popovic's ask is simple: 'To try and cover as many different styles and confederations as possible,' he said this week. 'If we can cover, hopefully, an African team, South American team, European team … that will help in terms of preparation and just having the different styles that you come up against. Is it a pressing team, is it a team that sits back? Do they build up, don't build up - so you get a little bit of an understanding of the different countries and how they like to play. We want to experience as much as possible. 'That's what we're trying to do. Then there's the other side of trying to get a Uruguay - can they come, how much do they cost? There are many things that come into that; it's not just about plucking someone out, come to Australia to play us. 'I'm sure the FA is doing everything they can to support us to bring, if it's here, good opposition … [but] it changes daily. One moment you think you've got someone, and they've got another idea and other plans.' Football Australia moved quickly to lock in a two-match home-and-away series in September against New Zealand, who have also qualified through Oceania, for the Soccer Ashes trophy that was re-discovered two years ago. This week, a friendly against the United States on October 14 in Colorado was confirmed, to go with an earlier announcement of a showdown with fellow co-hosts Canada in Montreal four days earlier - both valuable opportunities to experience World Cup conditions and facilities. Football Australia wants to play two games at home in the November window, but finding an opponent is proving tricky. UEFA qualification goes through until the end of that month, which rules out a European team - and the prospect dream of a clash with the likes of Italy, or England, on Aussie soil. It leaves two realistic options: South America or Africa. The issue is that the best nations are very reluctant to travel so far. A big, fat cheque could persuade them, but even with government support and the right venue, that sort of money is beyond FA's current reach. Argentina, according to reports, charge around $7.5 million per match - so a two-game series in Australia would cost $15 million, plus on-the-ground expenses. Brazil, sources say, have asked for a similar fee. Other countries might want less, but would be less commercially appealing, and would still rather not come out all this way. And the trouble with Africa is that the first round of their World Cup qualification campaign ends in October, which leaves a very short runway for matches to be organised involving any of the nine teams that make it through. The likely outcome for November, according to sources, is a clash with a lower-ranked South American team or one of the African qualifiers, with talks ongoing for one of the two games to take place at Sydney's CommBank Stadium. Why ranking points matter so much What happens after that will be dictated to some extent by what happens in December, when the World Cup draw is conducted, and groups are created from the 48 teams split across four pots. The profile of the teams in Australia's group could dictate the kind of opponents Popovic would want in the March window - which will probably take place in Europe - and then in June, when there are tentative plans for a farewell game on home soil before the Socceroos relocate to North America ahead of the World Cup, which kicks off on June 11. But the other element that will factor into things is Australia's FIFA ranking. Currently No.24 in the world, having moved up two places after the June window, the Socceroos sit on the edge of pots two and three. To give themselves the best statistical chance of a softer group, they will most likely need to be inside the top 23 to finish in pot two and thus avoid playing against one of the other teams in it - the likes of Croatia, Morocco and Colombia, as things stand. To do that, they need to win as many matches as they can before the draw. However, the nature of the draw mechanics - this being the first World Cup with 48 teams - means that no matter what they do, there could still be dangerous floaters, such as Italy, Greece and Serbia, in pot four. Former Socceroos boss Graham Arnold was highly strategic when it came to ranking points, but Popovic seems to be taking a more relaxed approach, and said he was not thinking about those permutations, though FA staff certainly are on his behalf. Popovic has his own balancing act to deal with. Most fans would like to see him experiment over the next 12 months, and try players who haven't featured much or at all for the Socceroos in his short reign to date - like Watford-bound Nestory Irankunda, or departed A-League stars Adrian Segecic, Noah Botic and Nicolas Milanovic, who have landed at Portsmouth, Austria Wien and Aberdeen respectively this off-season. Loading He is open to change, suggesting he feels no sense of obligation towards those who have helped them qualify in terms of them making his final squad for the World Cup. But Popovic doesn't want to simply hand out caps. 'When we say trying players for the national team, they still must earn their call,' he said. 'It's not about, okay, I heard some guy scored two goals and yeah, great, we'll just give them a call to the national team. It doesn't go like that. 'Trying players that haven't maybe had an opportunity now that earn the opportunity, that deserve an opportunity to be looked at, I'm all for that. 'I'm pretty open. I don't have a set team or a set squad that's going to the World Cup. This one achieved something special, and the 23 - or I hope it's 26 players - that go to the World Cup, the final squad, I want them all there because they firstly deserve to be there and that they can make an impact at the World Cup.'

How Oasis ruined the Socceroos' plans for a 20-year anniversary clash with Uruguay
How Oasis ruined the Socceroos' plans for a 20-year anniversary clash with Uruguay

The Age

time18-07-2025

  • The Age

How Oasis ruined the Socceroos' plans for a 20-year anniversary clash with Uruguay

Welcome to the complicated world of booking friendlies. It's not as simple as picking up the phone and asking a rival national team if they're up for a game. As Football Australia plots the Socceroos' road to the 2026 World Cup, they must juggle a mix of competing interests - commercial, political, technical and logistical - while navigating domestic hurdles like venue availability and government backing, plus the shifting international landscape, where potential opponents are suddenly ruled in or out, depending on their own qualification campaigns or asking prices. Then there's the pursuit of FIFA ranking points, which could determine whether Australia ends up with a favourable draw or a group of death, and thus presents another dilemma: is it better to face 'easier' nations and chase wins, or go for tougher assignments you might lose, but learn more from? 'We want to experience as much as possible' These are good problems to have. Direct World Cup qualification has plenty of advantages, like enabling Football Australia to get 'ahead of the game', as Popovic put it, with reconnaissance on possible hotels and training venues for the tournament; the federation is sending staff to the three co-host nations, the United States, Canada and Mexico, in the coming weeks. In avoiding the play-offs, it also meant they had five free international windows to fill up: September, October and November 2025, and March and June 2026. It's a situation Australia hasn't faced since the last time they qualified directly, back in 2013 under Holger Osieck. Preliminary talks with other national associations about potential friendlies tend to begin many months in advance, but games can only be booked once there is certainty about their qualification or otherwise. Popovic's ask is simple: 'To try and cover as many different styles and confederations as possible,' he said this week. 'If we can cover, hopefully, an African team, South American team, European team … that will help in terms of preparation and just having the different styles that you come up against. Is it a pressing team, is it a team that sits back? Do they build up, don't build up - so you get a little bit of an understanding of the different countries and how they like to play. We want to experience as much as possible. 'That's what we're trying to do. Then there's the other side of trying to get a Uruguay - can they come, how much do they cost? There are many things that come into that; it's not just about plucking someone out, come to Australia to play us. 'I'm sure the FA is doing everything they can to support us to bring, if it's here, good opposition … [but] it changes daily. One moment you think you've got someone, and they've got another idea and other plans.' Football Australia moved quickly to lock in a two-match home-and-away series in September against New Zealand, who have also qualified through Oceania, for the Soccer Ashes trophy that was re-discovered two years ago. This week, a friendly against the United States on October 14 in Colorado was confirmed, to go with an earlier announcement of a showdown with fellow co-hosts Canada in Montreal four days earlier - both valuable opportunities to experience World Cup conditions and facilities. Football Australia wants to play two games at home in the November window, but finding an opponent is proving tricky. UEFA qualification goes through until the end of that month, which rules out a European team - and the prospect dream of a clash with the likes of Italy, or England, on Aussie soil. It leaves two realistic options: South America or Africa. The issue is that the best nations are very reluctant to travel so far. A big, fat cheque could persuade them, but even with government support and the right venue, that sort of money is beyond FA's current reach. Argentina, according to reports, charge around $7.5 million per match - so a two-game series in Australia would cost $15 million, plus on-the-ground expenses. Brazil, sources say, have asked for a similar fee. Other countries might want less, but would be less commercially appealing, and would still rather not come out all this way. And the trouble with Africa is that the first round of their World Cup qualification campaign ends in October, which leaves a very short runway for matches to be organised involving any of the nine teams that make it through. The likely outcome for November, according to sources, is a clash with a lower-ranked South American team or one of the African qualifiers, with talks ongoing for one of the two games to take place at Sydney's CommBank Stadium. Why ranking points matter so much What happens after that will be dictated to some extent by what happens in December, when the World Cup draw is conducted, and groups are created from the 48 teams split across four pots. The profile of the teams in Australia's group could dictate the kind of opponents Popovic would want in the March window - which will probably take place in Europe - and then in June, when there are tentative plans for a farewell game on home soil before the Socceroos relocate to North America ahead of the World Cup, which kicks off on June 11. But the other element that will factor into things is Australia's FIFA ranking. Currently No.24 in the world, having moved up two places after the June window, the Socceroos sit on the edge of pots two and three. To give themselves the best statistical chance of a softer group, they will most likely need to be inside the top 23 to finish in pot two and thus avoid playing against one of the other teams in it - the likes of Croatia, Morocco and Colombia, as things stand. To do that, they need to win as many matches as they can before the draw. However, the nature of the draw mechanics - this being the first World Cup with 48 teams - means that no matter what they do, there could still be dangerous floaters, such as Italy, Greece and Serbia, in pot four. Former Socceroos boss Graham Arnold was highly strategic when it came to ranking points, but Popovic seems to be taking a more relaxed approach, and said he was not thinking about those permutations, though FA staff certainly are on his behalf. Popovic has his own balancing act to deal with. Most fans would like to see him experiment over the next 12 months, and try players who haven't featured much or at all for the Socceroos in his short reign to date - like Watford-bound Nestory Irankunda, or departed A-League stars Adrian Segecic, Noah Botic and Nicolas Milanovic, who have landed at Portsmouth, Austria Wien and Aberdeen respectively this off-season. Loading He is open to change, suggesting he feels no sense of obligation towards those who have helped them qualify in terms of them making his final squad for the World Cup. But Popovic doesn't want to simply hand out caps. 'When we say trying players for the national team, they still must earn their call,' he said. 'It's not about, okay, I heard some guy scored two goals and yeah, great, we'll just give them a call to the national team. It doesn't go like that. 'Trying players that haven't maybe had an opportunity now that earn the opportunity, that deserve an opportunity to be looked at, I'm all for that. 'I'm pretty open. I don't have a set team or a set squad that's going to the World Cup. This one achieved something special, and the 23 - or I hope it's 26 players - that go to the World Cup, the final squad, I want them all there because they firstly deserve to be there and that they can make an impact at the World Cup.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store