logo
Prediction: Investors Are Unlikely to Win With SoundHound AI Stock, and Here's Why

Prediction: Investors Are Unlikely to Win With SoundHound AI Stock, and Here's Why

Globe and Mail3 days ago

As SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN) has developed voice-recognition technology driven by artificial intelligence (AI) that has attracted high-profile clients, more investors have taken an interest in the company. Between that technology and rapid revenue growth, it may look like a stock poised to drive outsize returns.
Unfortunately, SoundHound AI continues to deal with challenges that may call its investment case into question. Unless the company can mitigate those challenges, the stock is unlikely to succeed, and here's why.
Why investors are tuning into SoundHound AI stock
In many respects, SoundHound AI appears to be punching far above its weight. It has developed AI-based voice recognition technology, promoting it as "next-generation AI." With that, its technology can help customers perform tasks via voice prompts.
This has drawn the interest of numerous corporate clients, particularly in the automotive industry. Moreover, the company has attracted restaurants, financial services businesses, telecom companies, and others to its platform.
Despite its market cap of $4.1 billion, SoundHound AI has successfully earned business while competing with much larger players. It generated $29 million in revenue in the first quarter of 2025, a 151% increase from year-ago levels.
And the company turned a profit in the first quarter, a goal that might have appeared out of reach a year ago quarter. During the quarter, it earned more than $129 million, up from a $33 million loss in the first quarter of 2024.
That likely helped boost the stock. After a sell-off at the beginning of the year, it turned higher following the release of the report. Consequently, shares are up by about 115% over the previous 12 months.
SoundHound AI's daunting challenges
However, investors are likely to find some serious concerns as they look at the stock's financials more closely.
The most obvious oddity is that net income was more than four times its revenue. And that occurred at a time when operating expenses for the first quarter were $99 million, which was more than three times the company's revenue in that quarter.
It also reported a change in the fair value of contingent acquisition liabilities. This amounted to a $176 million noncash benefit that turned SoundHound AI profitable for the quarter. Hence, when examining the negative free cash flow of $19 million, the "profit" is not as promising as it appears.
Currently, the company has almost $246 million in liquidity. This means it can sustain the current pace of negative cash flow for approximately three more years before having to add debt or issue more shares.
Furthermore, it competes with numerous companies, including tech heavyweights Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft. All of those companies hold cash positions that far surpass SoundHound's market cap, meaning if one of these companies wants to compete directly, it is in a strong position to take market share from SoundHound AI.
Also, even though the business may look like a buyout candidate, Nvidia recently sold its SoundHound AI stock, and no other tech giant has taken a position in the company. Knowing that, the case for the stock may rely too much on hope, which does not put its shareholders in a strong position.
Think twice about buying SoundHound AI stock
Under current conditions, investors are unlikely to succeed with this stock as a long-term investment.
Admittedly, SoundHound AI has developed some compelling voice-driven technology with AI, and that has attracted some of the world's best-known enterprises as clients.
Nonetheless, its first-quarter profit came from a one-time benefit, and with operating expenses far outpacing revenue, long-term profitability appears out of reach.
Moreover, the company has to compete with some of the world's largest companies, which have plenty of resources. Unless the rapid revenue growth starts to translate into a dramatically improved financial performance, investing in SoundHound AI is unlikely to pay off for investors in the long term.
Should you invest $1,000 in SoundHound AI right now?
Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Will Healy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Unsafe': Popeyes accused of using supplier that stored chicken in residential garages
‘Unsafe': Popeyes accused of using supplier that stored chicken in residential garages

CTV News

time8 minutes ago

  • CTV News

‘Unsafe': Popeyes accused of using supplier that stored chicken in residential garages

A lawsuit alleges Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen of purchasing meat unsafe for human consumption, that was stored and packaged in residential garages. A lawsuit filed against Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is accusing the fried chicken chain of buying 'unsafe' meat from an unauthorized seller that was allegedly storing and packaging raw chicken in residential garages in Ontario. The lawsuit was filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on May 26 by ADP, a former raw chicken supplier to Popeyes. The company alleges they lost their contract with Popeyes after bringing forward its concerns about the 'unsafe supply' of products. Popeyes, Restaurant Brands International (RBI)—the Toronto-based company that owns the fast-food chain—and Restaurant Services Canada Inc. (RSCI), the supply chain manager, are all named in the lawsuit. Popeyes, for its part, said in a statement to CTV News that the claims from ADP Direct Poultry Ltd. are unfounded and that it found 'no evidence' to support them following an investigation. The lawsuit also names another company as the unauthorized supplier that allegedly provided, at times, 'rotten or expired' chicken deemed 'unfit for human consumption' to various franchisees across Ontario. The documents continue to say this chicken created a public health risk because it was delivered in vehicles that did not have the proper refrigeration to prevent it from spoiling. The statement of claim alleges that these tainted products were bought by various franchisees—both known to ADP and not, all named in the suit—due to their lower prices. The lawsuit also alleges the franchisees continued to sell the chicken to customers, even after ADP brought forward its concerns that the products did not adhere to food health and safety standards. The allegations have not been tested in court. As laid out in the documents, Popeyes had a system of authorized suppliers and distributors who adhered to the company's specifications and standards, meaning franchisees were required to purchase from within their approved list of vendors. Any restaurant looking to purchase ingredients outside of the company's list of vendors had to write a formal request, after which the supplier in question would have to submit to an inspection to ensure it meets the requirements as well as health and safety standards. ADP claims the chicken sold by the unauthorized company was not inspected by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) or any other inspector. CTV News Toronto contacted the CFIA for comment. The supplier claims RSCI, meanwhile, did not investigate the unsafe supply of chicken as they promised and instead conspired to 'manufacture a rationale for removing ADP' from their authorized vendors list. In turn, the filings further allege franchisees were 'upset about the reporting of the unsafe supply' and worked with the RSCI to lodge 'false or misleading' complaints about the quality of their products. CTV News has reached out to Restaurant Services Inc., parent company to RSCI, for comment but has not yet heard back. 'We believe this former supplier is lashing out after losing our business for a variety of legitimate reasons,' Emily Ciantra, Popeye's director communications, told CTV News Toronto in a statement. 'We have always been committed to rigorous safety standards, including regular inspections by third party auditors who verify our strict standards are being followed.' ADP seeks $35 million in damages from Popeyes, RBI and RSCI, citing breach of contract and breaches of the Competition Act. The documents state that $30 million is to cover ADP's loss of profits after their contract—which was expected to continue until 2027—was prematurely terminated. An additional $5 million is to cover the costs the supplier incurred after boosting its production facilities to meet Popeyes' increased production demand, the documents state. ADP also seeks $1 million in punitive damages. The supplier adds it also lost out on business opportunities, such as providing products to other fast-food chains like Wendy's. Additionally, the raw chicken supplier is seeking at least $10 million in damages from the unauthorized company, who it deems liable for 'unlawfully interfering' with ADP's economic relationship with Popeyes, as well as $500,000 in aggravated damages. ADP also seeks $150,000 from each franchisee and an account detailing the quantity of 'unsafe supply' they bought from the company as well as how much they profited from the unauthorized products. 'The defendants' conduct was malicious, high handed, intended to cause harm to ADP, endangered the public, and warrants aggravated and punitive damages,' the filings state.

Quebec government invokes closure to force through sweeping energy bill
Quebec government invokes closure to force through sweeping energy bill

CBC

time15 minutes ago

  • CBC

Quebec government invokes closure to force through sweeping energy bill

The Quebec government has invoked closure to speed up the adoption of a bill that will give Hydro-Québec free rein to increase its electricity production. This parliamentary procedure limits the time devoted to debate on a motion or bill and fast-tracks its adoption. Christine Fréchette, Quebec's economy and energy minister, said adopting Bill 69 before the end of the legislative session would save $6 billion on the government's $30 billion wind power strategy. The bill makes sweeping changes to the operations of Hydro-Québec and how electricity rates are fixed. The government has promised to cap increases in residential electricity rates to three per cent. The bill will also allow a private company to sell its electricity to another and aims to simplify partnerships with Indigenous communities. Opposition parties are highly critical of the bill, deeming it poorly crafted. Quebec's former "super minister" of economy and energy Pierre Fitzgibbon tabled the bill in June 2024 — highlighting the purpose of accelerating the production of green energy. After he stepped down, Fréchette took over, but the bill's legislative process was weeks ago, she tabled 52 amendments to modify the bill.

While Bitcoin Hits a New Price Record, Critics Still Have These Warnings for Crypto Investors
While Bitcoin Hits a New Price Record, Critics Still Have These Warnings for Crypto Investors

Globe and Mail

time18 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

While Bitcoin Hits a New Price Record, Critics Still Have These Warnings for Crypto Investors

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) may have hit a new all-time high of $112,000 in May, but it's not out of the woods quite yet. Already, Bitcoin has retreated back down to the $105,000 level, and there are some critics warning about a further decline in price. While the long-term outlook for Bitcoin might be bullish, there could be quite a bit of uncertainty and volatility over the second half of 2025. Here are three key factors keeping the Bitcoin skeptics up at night. Tariff and trade uncertainty As long as tariffs continue to dominate the headlines, they will continue to have a direct impact on how investors view the crypto market. As a result, it's been a see-saw year for Bitcoin. After hitting an all-time high in January, Bitcoin dropped as low as $75,000 after President Donald Trump announced the new Liberation Day tariffs on April 2. Bitcoin has subsequently recovered, but every week seems to bring some new twist or turn in the tariff debate. The newest factor is the worsening state of the trade negotiations involving the U.S. and China. At one time, it looked like some kind of trade deal might be worked out by mid-summer. Now, it looks like the two sides are further apart than ever. So how will Bitcoin investors react? If they view Bitcoin as a safe haven asset, they might move even more money into Bitcoin, thereby boosting its price. However, if they view Bitcoin as a risky and volatile digital asset, then they might sell off, just as they did in April. Unfinished business in Washington When President Trump came into office in January, the future looked very bright indeed for Bitcoin. New crypto legislation looked like it would be ready to sign soon, and crypto enthusiasts were excited about upcoming Bitcoin initiatives from the Trump White House. However, five months into the presidency, and there's still a lot of unfinished business. Take the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, for example. Yes, Trump signed an executive order for its creation in March, but it delivered much less punch than many people expected. Most importantly, the executive order failed to outline how the government planned to buy Bitcoin in the future. As a result, investors are still waiting on some form of legislation, such as the BITCOIN Act proposed by Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), that will precisely outline a mechanism for buying more Bitcoin. On top of all that, there are now questions swirling around the Trump family's connections to Bitcoin. At the very least, there appear to be potential conflicts of interest. For example, Donald Trump's media company -- Trump Media & Technology Group -- recently divulged plans to buy $2.5 billion worth of Bitcoin. And members of the Trump family now have interests in a variety of Bitcoin-related projects. The four-year Bitcoin cycle Historically, Bitcoin has followed a fairly predictable pattern of boom and bust. The four-year Bitcoin cycle starts with a period of quiet accumulation, followed by a period of rapid growth. This leads to a Bitcoin bubble filled with hype and speculation. After that comes the crash. For example, the 2020-2021 rally that saw Bitcoin hit a (then) all-time high of $69,000 was quickly followed by a disastrous market crash that saw it lose 65% of its value in 2022. And the same pattern may be happening again. If history is any guide, then the final phase of the Bitcoin cycle could be arriving soon. Thus, even if Bitcoin soars to $150,000 this year, it might have a hard time holding on to those gains heading into 2026. If you'd have waited until now to buy Bitcoin, you might be buying at or close to the top of the market. By the end of 2025, it might already be too late. Only a 22% chance of failure? The good news is that most Bitcoin investors are remarkably bullish these days. According to online prediction markets, Bitcoin only has a 22% chance of falling below the $70,000 price level, and only a 16% chance of falling below the $60,000 price level. Long gone are the days when people regularly prognosticated that Bitcoin could fall all the way to zero. That being said, investors still need to be aware of the risks of investing in Bitcoin. The price of Bitcoin never goes straight up. It is highly volatile, filled with many peaks and valleys. If you don't have firm convictions about Bitcoin, it's remarkably easy to buy high and sell low. When it comes to Bitcoin, it's best to keep a long-term perspective. Bitcoin has never been a tariff-proof, inflation-proof, or recession-proof asset. But over a long enough time horizon, it continues to be the top-performing asset in the world. The only catch is that you have to be willing to hold on to it, through good times and bad. Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin right now? Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store