logo
‘Humiliated' Reeves urged to apologise for putting 9m pensioners through winter fuel misery after screeching U-turn

‘Humiliated' Reeves urged to apologise for putting 9m pensioners through winter fuel misery after screeching U-turn

The Suna day ago

CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves last night faced calls to apologise for putting nine million people through winter fuel misery.
In a screeching U-turn yesterday, she restored the payment to pensioners with an annual income of £35,000 or less.
4
4
She couldn't say how she'll pay, with tax rises feared.
Tories called it a 'humiliation' as she was accused of creating her own financial black hole.
It marked the culmination of one of the biggest political U-turns in modern history following fury at the mass benefit snatching last July.
Handing back the £200-£300 sum to three quarters of pensioners will cost the Treasury £1.25billion, and only saves £450million from when it was universal.
This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter.
Kemi Badenoch
But Ms Reeves could not say yesterday how the U-turn would be funded, saying there was still 'work to do to ensure the sums add up'.
She axed the universal payment last July in a bid to save £1.5billion — after claiming the Tories had left a £22billion financial black hole.
Yesterday Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride hit back: 'Rachel Reeves has created her own black hole and now she's scrambling to fill it with borrowed money or likely tax rises.'
Voters will remember winter fuel debacle for a long time
By Jack Elsom, Political Editor
AS political u-turns go, Rachel Reeves' retreat on winter fuel payments will surely go down as one of the biggest - and messiest - in history.
Her first act as Chancellor to snatch the cold weather cash from 10million pensioners has today been spectacularly dumped.
Nine million OAPs will now get the benefit, meaning all but the richest will claw back the £200-£300 sum.
With a price tag of £1.25billion, this whole palaver has only saved the Treasury £450million.
It's chicken feed in the grand scheme of things, and a tenth of the annual migrant hotel bill.
But the political cost has been devastating.
Labour insiders trace their spanking at last month's local elections back to Ms Reeves' toxic decision in the weeks after the election.
That the winter fuel policy was still coming up on doorsteps 10 months later was a sign it was destined for the shredder.
Yet rather than ripping off the plaster cleanly, the past few weeks have seen an agonising u-turn mired in chaos and confusion.
And the Government is still not clear how it will be funded.
Four years is a long time until the next general election, and Sir Keir Starmer and Ms Reeves will be hoping voters would have since moved on.
But - even with today's backing down - the winter fuel debacle is likely to live long in the memory of the electorate and haunt Labour for a while to come.
Ms Reeves, asked to rule out tax rises, said: 'We will set out all of the policies in the Budget.
'But we wanted to announce today the level at which the winter fuel payment will be paid because that means we can put the processes in place.'
No 10 insisted it is committed not to raise income tax, National Insurance or VAT.
Rachel Reeves responds to new figures from the ONS which shows GDP increased by 0.7% between January and March
The decision to means-test winter fuel payments at just £11,000 was one of the first decisions made by the new Labour Government and proved toxic with voters.
The move led to months of pressure until last month when PM Sir Keir Starmer vowed to revise the threshold.
It followed a Labour drubbing in the local elections.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said yesterday: 'This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter.
"The Prime Minister should apologise for his terrible judgment.'
Ms Reeves was still in the crosshairs last night as experts questioned how the payments would be funded.
Paul Johnson, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned it will lead to additional taxes or possibly welfare cuts.
He rubbished Labour's claims to have acted because the economy has improved, saying it 'flies in the face of reality'.
'Blind panic'
Mr Stride said the about-turn raised more questions than it answers.
He added: 'They already spent the savings from this policy on inflation-busting pay deals for the unions.
'So where is the £1.25billion needed to pay for this U-turn going to come from?'
Reform UK's Nigel Farage said Labour were in a 'blind panic', adding: 'This U-turn would never have happened without Reform UK.'
Yesterday Ms Reeves declined to apologise when she met pensioners at Castlehaven Horticulture hub in Camden, North London.
She insisted: 'The irresponsible thing to have done last year was to allow the public finances to carry on on an unsustainable footing.
'That would have resulted in interest rates going up, costing more in mortgages and rents.
'I'm always going to put stability in our economy first.'
The winter fuel payment will be £200 per household or £300 where someone is over the age of 80. They will receive it automatically.
How do I apply for pension credit?
YOU can start your application up to four months before you reach state pension age.
Applications for pension credit can be made on the government website or by ringing the pension credit claim line on 0800 99 1234.
You can get a friend or family member to ring for you, but you'll need to be with them when they do.
You'll need the following information about you and your partner if you have one:
National Insurance number
Information about any income, savings and investments you have
Information about your income, savings and investments on the date you want to backdate your application to (usually three months ago or the date you reached state pension age)
You can also check your eligibility online by visiting www.gov.uk/pension-credit first.
If you claim after you reach pension age, you can backdate your claim for up to three months.
For those above the threshold it will be clawed back by HMRC.
Around two million of the richest pensioners in England and Wales miss out.
The £450million saved by withholding the payment from the richest is less than ten per cent of the annual spend to keep migrants in hotels and look after them.
Meanwhile, pensions minister Torsten Bell indicated that the Government could end the two-child benefit cap following a review.
He said huge percentages of families are in poverty which can't carry on.
He added: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table.
'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.'
Campaigners say lifting the cap would take 500,000 children out of poverty by the end of the decade but cost £4.5billion.
COOP'S COUP
4
RACHEL Reeves and Yvette Cooper last night finally reached a breakthrough in their budget negotiations.
The Chancellor's review was said to be settled as the Home Secretary agreed to her funding package after weeks of haggling.
Tomorrow, Ms Reeves will reveal how much cash goes to each department.
The Defence and Health departments will receive the biggest boost, with others squeezed.
Ms Cooper was the last to settle in a row over potential cuts to police, who will now get a real-terms increase.
Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman yesterday said: 'The spending review is settled.
'We will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so all working people are better off.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mobey Forum 25 years: By Bo Harald
Mobey Forum 25 years: By Bo Harald

Finextra

time24 minutes ago

  • Finextra

Mobey Forum 25 years: By Bo Harald

What was the original vision for Mobey Forum, and how has it evolved over time? Driving paradigm shifts: E-banking – the fundamental paradigm shift – started for our part in 1982 New ways of interconnecting customers – not only with payments, trade finance, treasury and capital markets services – but also with e-identification, e-signatures, e-invoicing and e-salary was the next good-for-society-at-large paradigm shift. Taking all traditional banking services and especially the ambition to take the new interconnecting customers to always- there mobiles was the third paradigm shift. Now – when all corporate and private customers (and their AI-agents) will be able to exchange verified data with EUDI-interoperable wallets - the next paradigm change for banking - will happen. Verifiable data from ID-wallets to safely employ and empower wallet-carrying AI-agents will be the next paradigm shift. What role do you think Mobey plays in shaping the (future of) financial services? Very clear: Make sure that banks see to it that all their customers will get the data the need for their business and life events to interoperable identity building wallets. Make sure that banks can lower risks and costs by helping customers to supply the needed Make banks central in the creation of a global Trust Infrastructure (together with Trust over IP, EU and the Open Wallet Foundation) If you were to explain Mobey's relevance today to a new banking innovator, what would you say? The all-important action is to join the wallet-work for customer value, automation and risk management 3.0 and now also making it safe and easy to use verifiable data for employing organisational and private ID-wallet carrying AI-agents (the LLM-initiated fifth paradigm shift). Be ready for the dynamic ID-wallet&AI-agent duo..

Begin with the End in Mind. Crystallised.: By Bo Harald
Begin with the End in Mind. Crystallised.: By Bo Harald

Finextra

time24 minutes ago

  • Finextra

Begin with the End in Mind. Crystallised.: By Bo Harald

This particular End is a Trust Infrastructure where: All citizens can download – and most have - at least one general purpose identity building wallet free of charge in all EU Member states. All public sectors and progressive enterprises have installed organisation wallets and use (only) these to send and receive a wide range of verifiable data to and from each others and citizens and to sign documents. Most enterprises and a many citizens have used their wallets also for employing and empowering ID-wallet carrying AI-agents. Mission completed… But what should I do today ? As an employee in the public sector you will see to it that: a suitable organisation wallet is taken in use from the market without delay, all organisations, citizens and AI-agents are told that wallets will become the sole interfacefor exchanging verfied credentials, that new issuing and verification processes are in place and integration of chosen wallet to own data storage have started If you work in an enterprise you will see to it that: your organisation and business association understands the big improvements in productivity, customer value, security and risk management the organisation wallets will enable, a suitable organisation wallet is taken in use from the market witout delay all suppliers, customers, staff and public sector units are told that wallets will become your sole interface for exchanging verifiablecredentials, that only verifiably identified AI-agents with verifiable tasks will be dealt with As a citizen you will:

Marco Rubio condemns UK sanctions on Israeli ministers
Marco Rubio condemns UK sanctions on Israeli ministers

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Marco Rubio condemns UK sanctions on Israeli ministers

The US Secretary of State has condemned Sir Keir Starmer for imposing sanctions on two Israeli politicians over their government's war in Gaza. Marco Rubio has criticised Britain and other nations who on Tuesday announced they would break with the US and sanction two far-Right Israeli cabinet ministers. The UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway accused Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich of 'inciting violence against the Palestinian people'. Mr Ben-Gvir hit back on Tuesday night, comparing Sir Keir to Neville Chamberlain, the former British Prime Minister who was accused of effectively appeasing the Nazis. Mr Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance US- led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war'. He urged the UK 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. Mr Ben-Gvir, who has called for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, responded to Mr Rubio's post on X, saying: 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' Thank you, Mr. Secretary of State! The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism! History will judge the… — איתמר בן גביר (@itamarbengvir) June 10, 2025 America's ambassador to the UK said he fully supported Mr Rubio's comments and added that the sanctions 'impede constructive dialogue'. Under the sanctions, Mr Ben-Gvir, Israel's national security minister, and Mr Smotrich, the finance minister, will be banned from entering the UK. All of their financial assets in Britain will also be frozen. Israel faces growing international criticism over the conduct of its war with Hamas. Last week the Prime Minister described its actions in Gaza as 'appalling' as aid groups have accused Israeli of blocking food and medicine from entering the territory despite a growing humanitarian crisis. Foreign Office sources told The Telegraph they hoped sanctioning high-profile members of the Israeli government would make clear that the UK was willing to get tough to allow aid into Gaza and to bring about a ceasefire. The sanctions mark a significant break between No 10 and the White House. Donald Trump has lifted sanctions on Israeli settlers and threatened diplomatic action against the International Criminal Court (ICC) as it seeks to investigate Israel for war crimes. The Foreign Office is understood to have informed the US government that the sanctions were coming on Monday night. However, the State Department was not given a chance to object or veto the decision. In a joint statement, the five countries said Mr Ben Gvir and Mr Smotrich 'have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights.' 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account,' they added. Gideon Saar, Israel's foreign minister, slammed the sanctions as 'outrageous'. He added: 'I discussed it earlier today with Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu, and we will hold a special government meeting early next week to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.' Mr Smotrich once described all the Arab population of the West Bank as 'Nazis'. Last month, he said Gaza should be 'totally destroyed' and its population evacuated. He also said he would not let a 'grain of wheat' into the territory. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said the pair had used 'horrendous extremist language' and that he would 'encourage the Israeli government to disavow and condemn that language'. He has also described the conduct of the Israeli army as 'monstrous' and condemned the actions of 'extremist' settlers in the West Bank. New Zealand's foreign minister insisted the measures were not directed against the Israeli people or government. 'Rather, the travel bans are targeted at two individuals who are using their leadership positions to actively undermine peace and security and remove prospects for a two-state solution,' Winston Peters said. On Tuesday, the US dropped its support for an independent Palestine. Mike Huckabee, America's ambassador to Israel, said a two-state solution was no longer White House policy. He said: 'Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store