logo
‘Humiliated' Reeves urged to apologise for putting 9m pensioners through winter fuel misery after screeching U-turn

‘Humiliated' Reeves urged to apologise for putting 9m pensioners through winter fuel misery after screeching U-turn

The Sun6 hours ago

CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves last night faced calls to apologise for putting nine million people through winter fuel misery.
In a screeching U-turn yesterday, she restored the payment to pensioners with an annual income of £35,000 or less.
4
4
She couldn't say how she'll pay, with tax rises feared.
Tories called it a 'humiliation' as she was accused of creating her own financial black hole.
It marked the culmination of one of the biggest political U-turns in modern history following fury at the mass benefit snatching last July.
Handing back the £200-£300 sum to three quarters of pensioners will cost the Treasury £1.25billion, and only saves £450million from when it was universal.
This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter.
Kemi Badenoch
But Ms Reeves could not say yesterday how the U-turn would be funded, saying there was still 'work to do to ensure the sums add up'.
She axed the universal payment last July in a bid to save £1.5billion — after claiming the Tories had left a £22billion financial black hole.
Yesterday Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride hit back: 'Rachel Reeves has created her own black hole and now she's scrambling to fill it with borrowed money or likely tax rises.'
Voters will remember winter fuel debacle for a long time
By Jack Elsom, Political Editor
AS political u-turns go, Rachel Reeves' retreat on winter fuel payments will surely go down as one of the biggest - and messiest - in history.
Her first act as Chancellor to snatch the cold weather cash from 10million pensioners has today been spectacularly dumped.
Nine million OAPs will now get the benefit, meaning all but the richest will claw back the £200-£300 sum.
With a price tag of £1.25billion, this whole palaver has only saved the Treasury £450million.
It's chicken feed in the grand scheme of things, and a tenth of the annual migrant hotel bill.
But the political cost has been devastating.
Labour insiders trace their spanking at last month's local elections back to Ms Reeves' toxic decision in the weeks after the election.
That the winter fuel policy was still coming up on doorsteps 10 months later was a sign it was destined for the shredder.
Yet rather than ripping off the plaster cleanly, the past few weeks have seen an agonising u-turn mired in chaos and confusion.
And the Government is still not clear how it will be funded.
Four years is a long time until the next general election, and Sir Keir Starmer and Ms Reeves will be hoping voters would have since moved on.
But - even with today's backing down - the winter fuel debacle is likely to live long in the memory of the electorate and haunt Labour for a while to come.
Ms Reeves, asked to rule out tax rises, said: 'We will set out all of the policies in the Budget.
'But we wanted to announce today the level at which the winter fuel payment will be paid because that means we can put the processes in place.'
No 10 insisted it is committed not to raise income tax, National Insurance or VAT.
Rachel Reeves responds to new figures from the ONS which shows GDP increased by 0.7% between January and March
The decision to means-test winter fuel payments at just £11,000 was one of the first decisions made by the new Labour Government and proved toxic with voters.
The move led to months of pressure until last month when PM Sir Keir Starmer vowed to revise the threshold.
It followed a Labour drubbing in the local elections.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said yesterday: 'This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter.
"The Prime Minister should apologise for his terrible judgment.'
Ms Reeves was still in the crosshairs last night as experts questioned how the payments would be funded.
Paul Johnson, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned it will lead to additional taxes or possibly welfare cuts.
He rubbished Labour's claims to have acted because the economy has improved, saying it 'flies in the face of reality'.
'Blind panic'
Mr Stride said the about-turn raised more questions than it answers.
He added: 'They already spent the savings from this policy on inflation-busting pay deals for the unions.
'So where is the £1.25billion needed to pay for this U-turn going to come from?'
Reform UK's Nigel Farage said Labour were in a 'blind panic', adding: 'This U-turn would never have happened without Reform UK.'
Yesterday Ms Reeves declined to apologise when she met pensioners at Castlehaven Horticulture hub in Camden, North London.
She insisted: 'The irresponsible thing to have done last year was to allow the public finances to carry on on an unsustainable footing.
'That would have resulted in interest rates going up, costing more in mortgages and rents.
'I'm always going to put stability in our economy first.'
The winter fuel payment will be £200 per household or £300 where someone is over the age of 80. They will receive it automatically.
How do I apply for pension credit?
YOU can start your application up to four months before you reach state pension age.
Applications for pension credit can be made on the government website or by ringing the pension credit claim line on 0800 99 1234.
You can get a friend or family member to ring for you, but you'll need to be with them when they do.
You'll need the following information about you and your partner if you have one:
National Insurance number
Information about any income, savings and investments you have
Information about your income, savings and investments on the date you want to backdate your application to (usually three months ago or the date you reached state pension age)
You can also check your eligibility online by visiting www.gov.uk/pension-credit first.
If you claim after you reach pension age, you can backdate your claim for up to three months.
For those above the threshold it will be clawed back by HMRC.
Around two million of the richest pensioners in England and Wales miss out.
The £450million saved by withholding the payment from the richest is less than ten per cent of the annual spend to keep migrants in hotels and look after them.
Meanwhile, pensions minister Torsten Bell indicated that the Government could end the two-child benefit cap following a review.
He said huge percentages of families are in poverty which can't carry on.
He added: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table.
'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.'
Campaigners say lifting the cap would take 500,000 children out of poverty by the end of the decade but cost £4.5billion.
COOP'S COUP
4
RACHEL Reeves and Yvette Cooper last night finally reached a breakthrough in their budget negotiations.
The Chancellor's review was said to be settled as the Home Secretary agreed to her funding package after weeks of haggling.
Tomorrow, Ms Reeves will reveal how much cash goes to each department.
The Defence and Health departments will receive the biggest boost, with others squeezed.
Ms Cooper was the last to settle in a row over potential cuts to police, who will now get a real-terms increase.
Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman yesterday said: 'The spending review is settled.
'We will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so all working people are better off.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn
Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn

Sky News

time21 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn

The National Trust and RSPB have joined forces with farmers to warn the government that cutting the agricultural budget could be "catastrophic" for nature and rural businesses. In a letter to food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner, exclusively seen by Sky News, a dozen of the biggest rural industry organisations say they are "deeply concerned" about rumoured cuts that will be made to the agricultural budget in Wednesday's spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out budgets for each government department for the rest of this parliament, set to end in 2029. The letter says cutting funding for existing and new environmental farming schemes will be "catastrophic" to the government's aims for the environment. "Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear," the letter says. "This would be a poor legacy for this government." Sir Keir Starmer's government has made getting to net zero by 2050 a key goal, already initiating several policies to restrict carbon emissions and make the UK greener since winning the election last July. However, the government shocked farmers in March when it shut down applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), which rewards farmers for managing their land in environmentally sustainable ways, with just a few hours' notice as they said a cap had been reached for the year. The rural organisations say the Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme payments are "critical to the government's statutory targets on environmental improvement", including the main goal of halting the decline of biodiversity. 3:26 The letter states farmers and landowners are fully committed to environmental schemes, with 77,000 live agri-environment scheme agreements, according to the latest government figures, "with millions of hectares under environmental land management". "So much good has been done by these agreements, the oldest of which has run for decades," the letter says. "The unprecedented engagement in the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is testament to the appetite of farmers and land managers to rise to the challenge and do more." The letter finishes with: "The industry would like to have your assurances that this critical work will continue to be funded at the same level." David Wilson, a farmer for 53 years, told Sky News it took many years for farmers to get on board with the environmental schemes but they are now joined up, and reducing funding could damage years of work and be a backwards step for not just the UK's environment, but the world's. "This is ultimately about sustainability. To produce good food, you need good ecology and reducing this funding could damage the UK's ecology and our food security," he added. A return to intensive farming Alex Robinson, 39, a farmer from Gloucestershire with 424 hectares, said the schemes have been "a lifeline for nature", with birds, bees and wildflowers returning - including 14 red-listed bird species, many that had not been seen in decades. His farm's soil health is improving, which means he can grow more resilient nutrient dense crops for people to eat. If funding is cut he said he "may have no choice but to return to intensive farming methods sooner than the soils are ready for", with wildflowers and field margins becoming "difficult to justify", which will put the UK's climate, biodiversity and long-term food security "in real danger". Government will be abandoning nature Signatory Victoria Vyvyan, farmer and president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), said: "If sustainable farming contracts are cut, government won't just abandon nature - it will abandon its own environmental and legal commitments. "The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working - for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury. It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil. "Take away the funding for nature contracts, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods - forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with." The letter has been signed by the heads of The National Trust, the National Farmers' Union (NFU), the RSPB, the Soil Association, the CLA, the Tenant Farmers Association, the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and the Agricultural Industries Confederation.

Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body
Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body

Legal aid lawyers are facing 'administrative chaos' in the aftermath of a cyber attack amid fears more providers will leave the sector, a representative body has said. The Legal Aid Agency's (LAA) digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, were taken offline following the data breach in April. Payments for the publicly funded work initially stopped and legal aid applications are not able to be formally granted at the moment. This has left legal aid law firms, often small businesses, to decide whether to take on the risk of cases and hope they will be approved and paid retrospectively. Chris Minnoch, chief executive of Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG), said that lawyers have called the representative body 'in tears' having 'sleepless nights' waiting on news and payments coming through from legal aid because of the cyber attack. 'They've been on the verge of collapse because they hadn't had payments for one or two weeks,' he told the PA news agency. 'What a cyber attack like this brings to the front of your mind is that the legal aid scheme is teetering on the precipice of collapse. 'If it goes and if lawyers just say, 'I can't do this anymore', it has profound consequences for almost every aspect of society, because we are talking about the law of everyday life.' Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in care proceedings or at risk of homelessness, as well as people accused of criminal offences. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) previously said a 'significant amount of personal data' of people who applied to the LAA since 2010, including criminal records, was accessed and downloaded in the cyber attack. The Government became aware of the hack on April 23, but realised on May 16 that it was more extensive than originally thought, and took the system offline. Mr Minnoch said it was 'unforgivable' for an organisation of that size to not have a business continuity plan that anticipated this sort of fallout. 'You'll have a number of providers that, by the end of this digital disaster we're dealing with, won't be there anymore because they just couldn't afford to, and a number of others that just say, 'I just I can't take this anymore',' he said. 'Every time there is some sort of crisis that befalls the legal aid scheme, you end up with fewer lawyers willing to do it at the end of it.' An MoJ source had put the breach down to the 'neglect and mismanagement' of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA's systems have been known for many years. The attack happened as the MoJ was working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks. At the end of May, the LAA brought in a scheme for civil legal aid providers to be able to receive payments based on their average billing until the system is back online, when lawyers will then submit specific bills and applications. On June 4, payments were sent to more than 1,700 solicitors and barristers who took up the offer. Payments for criminal legal aid cases separately have also resumed, the MoJ said. Mr Minnoch added that while the civil legal aid payments should have been done two weeks earlier, they were an important step forward, effectively loaning providers cash while they cannot claim money owed to them. 'I think one of the ways they need to mitigate this is by being as flexible as possible with providers, once the situation is restored to some sort of business as usual, because they're going to be punch drunk by the end of this, they're already punch drunk,' he said. There are also concerns the move will create a backlog of providers trying to push through all their cases that need to be claimed in a short period of time when the system is back up and running, to effectively gain the income to repay the loan as quickly as possible. Jenny Beck KC, co-chair of the LAPG, said: 'There's administrative chaos in an already beleaguered and fragile supplier base. 'Nobody does it because it's a very sensible business proposition. People do it because they genuinely care about vulnerable people and they want to help them.' Ms Beck, who runs a family law practice, said her firm's workload is 60% legal aid work helping extremely vulnerable people such as domestic abuse survivors who need protection orders. She told PA a 'good proportion' of clients are reliant on legal aid to access their rights which is a 'massive access to justice issue'. Of the legal aid work, Ms Beck, who is also a member of the Law Society's access to justice committee, added: 'We'll have to supplement it with private income sources, because it's anxiety provoking to be working at risk on cases that we haven't an absolute guarantee that we're going to be paid.' 'I am going to continue to work at risk because I cannot leave my clients vulnerable. 'But I know that many other firms are very concerned about taking that risk.' Nicola Jones-King, Law Society council member for legal aid, said that while taking the risk for certain types of cases is 'okay' when it is known legal aid will be granted, there is more concern for means and merit tested applications for legal aid such as in housing or cases against police action. 'If it's a slightly more challenging or unusual case, or it's a case where you need to assess merits and means, that's more problematic obviously for the solicitor to take that on that risk,' she said. The risk also applies in cases that already have legal aid granted, but then need further approval to continue the funding at different stages in the proceedings. Stuart Nolan, managing director at DPP Law Ltd and chairman of the Law Society's criminal law committee, said his firm's criminal law department is made up of about 95% of legal aid cases and could sustain the current situation 'at a cost' for a couple of months before feeling the pinch. 'The impact is so far reaching, clogged criminal justice system, this is prospect of more delays,' he said. 'The quicker it's sorted out, the better for everyone.' A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'We understand the challenges this situation presents for legal aid providers – we are working as fast as possible to restore our online systems and have put in place contingencies to allow legal aid work to continue safely with confidence. 'These measures include setting up an average payment scheme for civil legal aid cases, resuming payments on criminal legal aid cases, putting in place processes for urgent civil application approvals and confirming that criminal applications made in this time will be backdated.'

Barclays to roll out Microsoft Co-Pilot to 100,000 staff
Barclays to roll out Microsoft Co-Pilot to 100,000 staff

Finextra

time40 minutes ago

  • Finextra

Barclays to roll out Microsoft Co-Pilot to 100,000 staff

Barclays Bank is to extend its delivery of Microsoft Co-Pilot AI agents to 100,000 staff worldwide. 0 Microsoft 365 Copilot will be integrated into the bank's own staff productivity tool, creating a single agent for employee self-service such as booking business travel, checking policy compliance, or finding answers to HR-related questions. An agentic dashboard accessed by Microsoft Viva will be deployed to help staff with 'moments that matter', like booking desks or annual leave, as well as serving personalised news and announcements. Craig Bright, Group CIO and deputy Group co-chief operating officer, Barclays, says: 'At Barclays, we've been leveraging the power of AI, and now GenAI, to drive deeper insights, improve efficiency and create more intuitive experience across the organisation. 'Our roll-out of Copilot, integrated with our colleague productivity tool, is a significant step forward in simplifying the way we work, making it easier to get things done." The agreement follows a successful initial deployment of Microsoft 365 Copilot across 15,000 Barclays employees and builds on the bank's adoption of Microsoft Teams as its preferred collaboration platform, and the deployment of Microsoft Viva Engage as its employee community tool.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store