
‘Humiliated' Reeves urged to apologise for putting 9m pensioners through winter fuel misery after screeching U-turn
CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves last night faced calls to apologise for putting nine million people through winter fuel misery.
In a screeching U-turn yesterday, she restored the payment to pensioners with an annual income of £35,000 or less.
4
4
She couldn't say how she'll pay, with tax rises feared.
Tories called it a 'humiliation' as she was accused of creating her own financial black hole.
It marked the culmination of one of the biggest political U-turns in modern history following fury at the mass benefit snatching last July.
Handing back the £200-£300 sum to three quarters of pensioners will cost the Treasury £1.25billion, and only saves £450million from when it was universal.
This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter.
Kemi Badenoch
But Ms Reeves could not say yesterday how the U-turn would be funded, saying there was still 'work to do to ensure the sums add up'.
She axed the universal payment last July in a bid to save £1.5billion — after claiming the Tories had left a £22billion financial black hole.
Yesterday Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride hit back: 'Rachel Reeves has created her own black hole and now she's scrambling to fill it with borrowed money or likely tax rises.'
Voters will remember winter fuel debacle for a long time
By Jack Elsom, Political Editor
AS political u-turns go, Rachel Reeves' retreat on winter fuel payments will surely go down as one of the biggest - and messiest - in history.
Her first act as Chancellor to snatch the cold weather cash from 10million pensioners has today been spectacularly dumped.
Nine million OAPs will now get the benefit, meaning all but the richest will claw back the £200-£300 sum.
With a price tag of £1.25billion, this whole palaver has only saved the Treasury £450million.
It's chicken feed in the grand scheme of things, and a tenth of the annual migrant hotel bill.
But the political cost has been devastating.
Labour insiders trace their spanking at last month's local elections back to Ms Reeves' toxic decision in the weeks after the election.
That the winter fuel policy was still coming up on doorsteps 10 months later was a sign it was destined for the shredder.
Yet rather than ripping off the plaster cleanly, the past few weeks have seen an agonising u-turn mired in chaos and confusion.
And the Government is still not clear how it will be funded.
Four years is a long time until the next general election, and Sir Keir Starmer and Ms Reeves will be hoping voters would have since moved on.
But - even with today's backing down - the winter fuel debacle is likely to live long in the memory of the electorate and haunt Labour for a while to come.
Ms Reeves, asked to rule out tax rises, said: 'We will set out all of the policies in the Budget.
'But we wanted to announce today the level at which the winter fuel payment will be paid because that means we can put the processes in place.'
No 10 insisted it is committed not to raise income tax, National Insurance or VAT.
Rachel Reeves responds to new figures from the ONS which shows GDP increased by 0.7% between January and March
The decision to means-test winter fuel payments at just £11,000 was one of the first decisions made by the new Labour Government and proved toxic with voters.
The move led to months of pressure until last month when PM Sir Keir Starmer vowed to revise the threshold.
It followed a Labour drubbing in the local elections.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said yesterday: 'This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter.
"The Prime Minister should apologise for his terrible judgment.'
Ms Reeves was still in the crosshairs last night as experts questioned how the payments would be funded.
Paul Johnson, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned it will lead to additional taxes or possibly welfare cuts.
He rubbished Labour's claims to have acted because the economy has improved, saying it 'flies in the face of reality'.
'Blind panic'
Mr Stride said the about-turn raised more questions than it answers.
He added: 'They already spent the savings from this policy on inflation-busting pay deals for the unions.
'So where is the £1.25billion needed to pay for this U-turn going to come from?'
Reform UK's Nigel Farage said Labour were in a 'blind panic', adding: 'This U-turn would never have happened without Reform UK.'
Yesterday Ms Reeves declined to apologise when she met pensioners at Castlehaven Horticulture hub in Camden, North London.
She insisted: 'The irresponsible thing to have done last year was to allow the public finances to carry on on an unsustainable footing.
'That would have resulted in interest rates going up, costing more in mortgages and rents.
'I'm always going to put stability in our economy first.'
The winter fuel payment will be £200 per household or £300 where someone is over the age of 80. They will receive it automatically.
How do I apply for pension credit?
YOU can start your application up to four months before you reach state pension age.
Applications for pension credit can be made on the government website or by ringing the pension credit claim line on 0800 99 1234.
You can get a friend or family member to ring for you, but you'll need to be with them when they do.
You'll need the following information about you and your partner if you have one:
National Insurance number
Information about any income, savings and investments you have
Information about your income, savings and investments on the date you want to backdate your application to (usually three months ago or the date you reached state pension age)
You can also check your eligibility online by visiting www.gov.uk/pension-credit first.
If you claim after you reach pension age, you can backdate your claim for up to three months.
For those above the threshold it will be clawed back by HMRC.
Around two million of the richest pensioners in England and Wales miss out.
The £450million saved by withholding the payment from the richest is less than ten per cent of the annual spend to keep migrants in hotels and look after them.
Meanwhile, pensions minister Torsten Bell indicated that the Government could end the two-child benefit cap following a review.
He said huge percentages of families are in poverty which can't carry on.
He added: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table.
'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.'
Campaigners say lifting the cap would take 500,000 children out of poverty by the end of the decade but cost £4.5billion.
COOP'S COUP
4
RACHEL Reeves and Yvette Cooper last night finally reached a breakthrough in their budget negotiations.
The Chancellor's review was said to be settled as the Home Secretary agreed to her funding package after weeks of haggling.
Tomorrow, Ms Reeves will reveal how much cash goes to each department.
The Defence and Health departments will receive the biggest boost, with others squeezed.
Ms Cooper was the last to settle in a row over potential cuts to police, who will now get a real-terms increase.
Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman yesterday said: 'The spending review is settled.
'We will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so all working people are better off.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
How the assisted dying debate is dividing doctors as politicians prepare to vote on bill
There are few issues more controversial, more divisive. Assisted dying polarises opinion. But it's a difficult conversation that needs to be had because ultimately death affects us all. Even if you are fortunate enough to never be directly impacted by an assisted death you will almost certainly be indirectly affected if the End of Life Bill passes into law. It would be the biggest social change to British society many of us would ever see in our lifetimes. And after patients and their immediate families, it's the country's doctors who will be the most affected by any change in the law. Like society, the medical community is divided on the issue. One senior doctor said: "It's like Brexit, but worse." Another told me: "Emotions are running high". These are the milder, reportable comments. There is bitterness and mistrust. The deep-rooted anger leads to each side accusing the other of deliberately spreading misinformation, "what-iffery" and "shenanigans" in the lead-up to the final vote next week. We asked two senior doctors to share their views on assisted dying with us and each other. Dr Mark Lee is a consultant in palliative care. "I have worked in this field for 25 years and looked after thousands of patients at the end of their lives. I am against the assisted dying bill because I believe it poses risks to patients, to families, to doctors and to palliative care." 'We can get this right' Dr Jacky Davis is a consultant radiologist and a campaigner for assisted dying legislation in this country. One of the arguments put forward by opponents of assisted dying is that Britain ranks highest among countries in its delivery of palliative care. And there is no need for such a radical change in end of life care. It is not an argument Dr Davis accepts. She said: "The status quo at the moment means a number of people are dying bad deaths every day. 300 million people around the world have access to assisted dying and more legislation is in the pipeline and no place that has taken up a law on assisted dying has ever reversed it. So we can learn from other places, we can get this right, we can offer people a compassionate choice at the end of life." Most deaths in palliative care 'peaceful' Dr Lee accepts palliative care has its limitations but this is a result of underfunding. This national conversation, he argues, is an opportunity to address some of those failings and improve end of life care. "I think the NHS currently is not resourcing the situation enough to be able to provide the patients with the choice that they need to get the care that they needed and that is because they are not getting the choice and because palliative care is patchy. But in my day-to-day work, and I've worked in palliative care for 25 years, normal death is peaceful, comfortable, and does not involve people dying in pain." "I absolutely agree with Mark," Dr Davis responded. "The vast majority of people will die a peaceful death and do not have the need for an assisted death. And I absolutely am with him that palliative care in this country has been treated abysmally. Nobody should have to hold a jumble sale in order to fund a hospice. That's terrible. "What I didn't hear from Mark is, while the vast majority of people will die a peaceful death and have got nothing to fear facing death, there are people who have diagnoses where they know that they are likely to face a difficult death and will face a difficult death. "What are you offering to the people who aren't going to die a peaceful death? And what are you offering to people who are so afraid that that's going to happen that they will take their own lives or will go abroad to seek an assisted death?" Concerns about pressure on NHS One important voice that has been missing from the national assisted dying debate is that of the NHS. Senior leaders will not speak on the issue until the fate of the bill is decided. And its understandable why. It is not clear what role the health service would have if the bill passes. 0:32 Dr Lee warned that his NHS colleagues were "extremely worried", going further to say assisted dying would "break the NHS". He added, that the country's already under-pressure hospice sector would struggle to cope with staff "walking away from the job if they are forced to be involved in any way". Dr Davis refuses to accept these warnings, arguing that the challenge to the health service is being overstated. "I think it's really important to take a step back and say this would be a very small number of deaths. And this is very small in terms of the other things that are coming through big drug discoveries, big new surgeries, all the rest of it this would be very small in terms in terms of money." The two doctors did agree on one thing. That every patient is entitled to a pain free and dignified death. 1:12 Dr Lee said: "I look at the whites of the eyes of people every day with that. I stand in that place every day. And that is shameful that anyone in this day and age should die in that position. Jacky and I can agree on that. That is unacceptable. But it still doesn't justify the response that we meet suffering with killing someone, rather than addressing the needs that are in front of us." Dr Davis responded by saying: "You say you've looked in the whites of patients' eyes at the end, and I'd say looking into the whites of patients eyes and listening to what they're asking for when they've been offered everything that you can offer them and they're still saying, 'I've had enough', then we should follow the example of other countries and say, 'we will help you'." These are the two very divided opinions of two NHS doctors, but these are the same arguments that will be taking place in hospitals, hospices, offices, factories and living rooms across the country. In about a week's time, it will be down to the politicians to decide.


Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ballymena riots: Families flee 'locals' venting their feelings
Here we go again. It was not long after 8pm when a police announcement over a tannoy mounted on their armoured vehicles reverberated around for all to hear. "Force is about to be used against violent individuals," blasted from the speakers as locals, some masked, stood waiting for action. "You better be filming this," one man said as we captured the scenes for Sky News amid a growing sense from locals that the police were being heavy handed in their tactics. And then officers, holding their shields, surged forward as people edged back. The move seemed to further anger the residents who had gathered, almost goading them as tensions ran high. The pace of clashes was slower on this, the third night of conflict. But it was nevertheless just as ugly and messy. Eyewitness: It is hard to see where the violence will end Soon came the baton rounds, the firebombs, the water cannon. Those pelting the police seemed unfazed as they were battered with plastic bullets in return. The watching crowd cheered the rioters on. Police chiefs earlier defended their operation. A senior officer insisted he did have "a grip" on the unravelling situation when questioned by Sky News. The increased presence of officers was felt on the ground and was clear to see. The soundtrack of sirens swirled around this town once again as police lurched from incident to incident as pockets of violence flared up. Officers are on their way from Scotland, England and Wales to help bolster resources. And they won't be short of work. A leisure centre 25 minutes away in Larne came under attack on Wednesday evening after it emerged some of the foreign families fleeing the Ballymena chaos were being temporarily held there. A short drive around Ballymena's one way road system takes you on a journey through housing estates where people have flooded the streets with union jack flags and stuck yellow A4 sheets to their windows with the words, "LOCALS LIVE HERE". These colourful displays are being seen as a public noticeboard of the nationality of the occupants inside each home. A deterrent to make the angry mob to look elsewhere. And those failing to advertise whether they are a 'native' or not seem to be paying a price. I witnessed an upper floor flat with a window smashed, the guttering on fire and the ground outside ablaze. An older neighbour fled her home downstairs in her dressing gown. Earlier in the day two Romanian women were frantically examining their phones down an alleyway as their kids played on the trampoline in the garden. They were terrified and were bundling their belongings in the car and leaving for good. A sizeable chunk of people born in Ballymena are angry. They do not like the talk from police and politicians that taking to the streets following an alleged sex attack on a teenage girl equates to them being "racist thugs". They see this as an act of venting their feelings. And they are hellbent on continuing this campaign of carnage across Northern Ireland to ensure they prove their point.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NHS, houses, nuclear submarines: Labour sets out its spending plans
The last few weeks have proved difficult for Rachel Reeves. In public, the news has been dominated by Labour's U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. In private, the Treasury has been caught up in wrangle after wrangle with ministers, all negotiating what their departments would receive in the spending review. Reeves' speech to parliament on Wednesday announcing the review was a chance to tell a more positive story – particularly for a government accused of lacking direction and ambition. As economics editor Heather Stewart reports, there were some big winners: health, defence, and housing. Yet at the same time, day-to-day spending for some departments – such as local government or the environment – seems very tight. So, asks Helen Pidd, will Labour allow those services to come under even more pressure, or will Reeves have to eventually raise taxes to fund them too?