Power in decline
EDITORIAL: Just as the government prepares to repackage power sector subsidies in a new structure discussed with the World Bank, its own projections for future electricity costs have triggered alarm across the industrial landscape. The textile sector, already battered by erratic supply and steep bills, is warning of a retreat back to captive generation – an outcome that exposes the widening gap between policy claims and operational reality.
At the heart of the dispute lies the Power Division's submission to Nepra of power purchase price (PPP) projections for FY2025-26. Despite years of renegotiations with Independent Power Producers (IPPs) and claims of trillions saved, the projected tariffs for next year remain strikingly similar to the old ones.
In scenario after scenario presented by the Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA-G), the cost of power hovers between Rs24.75 and Rs26.70 per unit. Not only do these projections fail to reflect any tangible benefit from reforms, they also disregard the lived experience of industrial users grappling with frequent supply disruptions and declining competitiveness.
From Karachi to Lahore, the industrial sector is demanding clarity: where are the savings, and why are they not translating into reduced tariffs? The fact that power rates may actually rise by Rs5-6 per unit in July, as time-bound fuel and quarterly adjustments expire, only deepens the frustration.
Already, grid power has become synonymous with unreliability, causing production losses of up to 10 percent compared to captive generation. If prices rise further, many manufacturers see little choice but to revert to their own plants – despite the inefficiencies – just to keep operations stable.
Nepra's hearing last week laid bare the disconnect between official optimism and industrial reality. Industry representatives criticised the flawed assumptions underpinning the CPPA's scenarios: overestimated GDP growth, inflation pegged at 8.65 percent despite a clear downward trend, and Kibor set at 11.9 percent even as interest rates are expected to fall into single digits. They also pointed to the absence of any discernible impact from IPP renegotiations, especially with the expensive Jamshoro coal plant and other legacy capacity charges still weighing heavily on the system.
Meanwhile, the new subsidy restructuring proposal is being sold as progressive and targeted—but details reveal more of the same. Instead of genuine cost rationalisation or structural reform, the plan reshuffles consumer categories and discounts under a new label, seeking to placate lenders rather than fix the sector's fundamentals.
For large-scale industry, the implications are dire. A distorted pricing structure, unreformed distribution companies (Discos), and unreliable supply chains are combining to undermine export potential at a time when Pakistan can least afford it.
The sharpest warning came from the textile sector, which signalled that if quality and pricing are not addressed, it will abandon the grid altogether. Such a shift would not just undo years of policy work but also widen the inefficiency loop: as more high-volume users exit the system, the cost burden will shift further onto a shrinking base, deepening the circular debt crisis and exposing the sector to yet more political patchwork.
Nepra's call for more realistic planning and transparency is timely, but insufficient. The Power Division's defence that projections are based on assumptions from IFIs and government agencies only underscores how deeply these exercises have lost touch with economic reality. What industry is demanding is not perfect foresight, but coherence and accountability. That these remain elusive after decades of reform is telling.
With consumption already falling and energy affordability now front and centre in export decisions, the warning signs are flashing red. Policymakers may have convinced external lenders of their good intentions, but they are rapidly losing the confidence of the very users who keep the system afloat. Unless corrected, these flawed assumptions and misplaced priorities will not just cripple industry – they will power Pakistan straight into stagnation.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punjab power relief funded by profits of two power companies
LAHORE: After the reduction in electricity tariffs of two power companies - Quaid-e-Azam Thermal Power Private Limited and the Punjab Thermal Power Private Limited - there will be cut in power tariff for the consumers but its impact would not be too significant, it has been learnt. 'There will be definitely reduction in power tariff of electricity consumers in Punjab and the relief will be financed with profits earned by said two government-owned power companies,' sources in the energy department said, adding: 'In light of the Punjab cabinet decision, the provincial government would approach Nepra for a reduction in power tariffs for these two plants so that these price reductions get permanence and are reflected in the new tariff.' It may be noted that the Punjab government had established a special purpose vehicle company by the name of Quaid-e-Azam Thermal Power (Pvt) Limited (QATPL) in March 2015 under section 32 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 in Independent Power Producer (IPP) mode with the mandate to build, own and operate a 1180 MW RLNG based power plant at Bhikki, Shiekhupura on fast track. Punjab CM announces up to 40pc relief in power tariffs The Punjab Thermal Power (Private) Limited (PTPL) is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2017. It is wholly owned by the government of Punjab through the energy department. The main objective of the company is to establish and operate a 1263 MW thermal power plant based on RLNG at Haveli Bahadur Shah near Trimmu Barrage, District Jhang in Punjab. It may be recalled that the provincial cabinet in its meeting had given nod to cut the power tariffs of these two plants by 30-40 per cent to reduce electricity bills. This move is similar to the federal government's which recently renegotiated contracts with independent power plants (IPPs) to reduce tariffs, the sources added. 'Both the companies had curtailed its profits as well as reduced non-developmental expenditures to materialize this move.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Power tariff hike: Govt reaches ‘understanding' with IMF
ISLAMABAD: The government and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have reportedly reached an understanding that electricity tariffs will be increased through annual rebasing from July 2025 if the power sector's revenue requirements exceed the allocated subsidy envelope of Rs 1.036 trillion for fiscal year 2025–26, well-informed sources in the Finance Ministry told Business Recorder. This understanding was reached during discussions between Pakistani authorities and the visiting IMF mission held from May 14 to 24, 2025. 'Within the Rs 1.036 trillion envelope, sufficient subsidy will be allocated to ensure zero circular debt flow in FY26. The Petroleum Development Levy (PDL)-financed Prime Minister's package—amounting to Rs 182 billion—will be counted toward the FY26 subsidy,' the sources added. Reduced hydropower, costly fuels: Govt warns of potential hike in power bills Both sides also agreed that any additional financial needs will be met through tariff adjustments during the July rebasing exercise while maintaining a progressive power tariff structure, the sources maintained. According to sources, the IMF emphasized the importance of fiscal discipline, with subsidy levels expected to remain within 0.8% of GDP. These subsidies will be linked to credible targets for stock clearance and loss reduction. The Power Division has been directed to take all necessary steps to implement the measures agreed upon with the IMF. The government had earmarked Rs 1.190 trillion for the power sector for FY2024–26. However, the Power Division has also secured approval for additional subsidies to keep the circular debt flow within the limit agreed with the Fund. The Finance Division has revised and communicated provisional Indicative Budget Ceilings (IBCs), allocating Rs 636.136 billion for sector subsidies under the recurrent budget for FY2025–26, up from the earlier allocation of Rs 400 billion. As the detailed breakdown of the revised subsidy for FY2024–25 is not available, it remains unclear whether the full allocation has been utilized by the Power Division or if deviations occurred. Sources within the Power Division believe that subsidies for FY2025 may exceed Rs 1.2 trillion, driven by growing support for residential consumers and persistent circular debt obligations. 'A sharp increase in protected consumer categories—those consuming less than 200 units per month—is driving higher subsidy needs, as more consumers adjust their consumption or install solar panels to stay within the protected threshold,' the sources said. Cross-subsidy pressures are also rising, as declining industrial and commercial consumption reduces the contribution of higher-paying users to the overall system. The government also plans to clear up to Rs 541 billion in circular debt stock during FY2025, as part of a broader six-year debt reduction strategy. 'Subsidy allocations remain a contentious issue, particularly concerning the treatment of PDL proceeds and their role in budget financing,' the sources continued. Tariff rebasing and further adjustments remain under government consideration to close the subsidy gap. However, political sensitivities and lobbying from industrial stakeholders are limiting policy flexibility. The successful implementation of the Circular Debt Workout and Action Plan (CDWAP) and the ongoing restructuring of Pakistan Holding Limited's (PHL) debt are seen as critical to reducing future interest costs and stabilizing circular debt flows. Additionally, the Finance Division has directed the Power Division to strictly follow mandatory instructions issued to all Principal Accounting Officers (PAOs), heads of departments, and related entities when preparing budget estimates for each cost center and account head. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
WB readjusts poverty line in Pakistan at 44.7%
Listen to article The World Bank has adjusted upward the income levels in an effort to measure global poverty, which has also pushed the percentage of Pakistanis living in poverty by to 44.7% — an outcome that may not still be fully reflecting the harsh ground realities due to the use of seven years old survey data. The Washington-based lender on Thursday released its new international poverty line to reflect changes in the prices of goods and services and their implications on the global population. The new poverty line for Pakistan, which is a lower middle-income country, is set at $4.20 per person per day, up from $3.65, said Christina Wieser, the senior poverty economist of the World Bank while briefing the media persons here. She said that due to the upward revision, for the lower middle income level, the poverty ratio has jumped from 39.8% of the old level to 44.7% on the threshold of $4.20 per day income. The World Bank has also updated the extreme poverty line from $2.15 to $3 per person per day. Because of the revision in the threshold, 16.5% of the Pakistani population lives in extreme poverty, up from 4.9% under the previous $2.15 threshold, said Christina. She said that one of the reasons for such a high jump was that the majority of the people were clustered around $2.15 to $3 per day income level, which resulted into a significant surge. About 82% of this increase in extreme poverty is due to the higher value of the new international poverty line reflecting increases in the national poverty lines of comparator countries, with the rest explained by price increases in Pakistan between 2017 and 2021, according to the World Bank. The World Bank has not used the latest population census data and instead relied on the United Nations population dataset. Christina also added that the underlying Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2018/19 data has been used for both national and international estimates. While international poverty lines are essential for tracking global progress and comparisons, national lines remain more appropriate for informing country-specific policy decisions, said the senior economist. Anything that has affected since 2019 is not included in either Covid-19 or 2022 floods, as the baseline remains the same, said Christina while responding to a question. We are desperately looking forward to the new household integrated economic survey to update our baseline, she added. The local economists had estimated a sharp rise in poverty after the 2022 floods, which inundated one-fourth of the country and adversely impacted populations in three provinces. These updates to the international poverty lines ensure that poverty estimates remain accurate and comparable across countries. The methodology remains consistent with past updates, continuing a practice that began with the introduction of the dollar-a-day line in 1990, according to the World Bank economist. "The revisions help position Pakistan's poverty levels in a global context and underscore the importance of continued efforts to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience," said Najy Benhassine, the outgoing World Bank Country Director for Pakistan. For domestic policy and programme targeting, the national poverty line remains unchanged and continues to serve as the primary benchmark for assessing poverty within Pakistan, Christina said. The forthcoming World Bank Poverty, Equity, and Resilience Assessment for Pakistan will provide critical context for interpreting these updated poverty estimates, she added. The report would offer a detailed update on poverty, inequality, and non-monetary outcomes, will investigate key drivers of poverty, and outline a forward-looking agenda to enhance prosperity and resilience for all Pakistanis. According to the government's last official available numbers, which are based on the 2018-19 survey, 21.9% of the population was living below the national poverty line. However, because national poverty lines differ widely, the resulting poverty rates are not comparable internationally. The need for new international poverty lines arises from the evolving price levels and cost of basic needs across the world and within income groups, according to Christina Wieser. To maintain accurate global comparisons, the World Bank periodically updates these poverty lines. International poverty estimates are based on the headcount of people with consumption below the international poverty line, defined in purchasing power parities (PPPs). Pakistan is among the countries experiencing the largest changes in poverty when transitioning to the 2021 PPPs based on the Low-Income International Poverty Line, according to the World Bank. The World Bank said that the international poverty line should be used only for cross-country comparison and analysis; for evaluating poverty in a particular country (Pakistan), the national poverty line remains the appropriate standard. The revisions help position Pakistan's poverty levels in a global context and underscore the importance of continued efforts to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience, The new figures reflect updated international thresholds and improved data from other countries, not deterioration in living standards, according to Christina.
