California Apartment Association and Corporate Landlord Investigated for Shady Campaign Contributions to Kill Prop 33 and Pass Prop 34, Says Housing Is A Human Right
The California Fair Political Practices Commission is now investigating the California Apartment Association (CAA) and a corporate landlord for shady campaign contributions used to kill Prop 33 and pass Prop 34. AIDS Healthcare Foundation and its housing advocacy division, Housing Is A Human Right, filed a complaint about the contributions this past fall, and were recently informed by the FPPC of its decision to move forward. The real estate industry's slick handling of campaign cash comes as no surprise.
'AIDS Healthcare Foundation and Housing Is A Human Right have battled corporate landlords for years,' says Housing Is A Human Right Policy Director Susie Shannon, 'and we know all too well that Californians can never trust Big Real Estate. Corporate landlords and their front group, the California Apartment Association, will do anything to keep charging outrageous rents and grow outsized profits – no matter the consequences to the poor and middle and working class.'
In 2024, AHF and Housing Is A Human Right sponsored Proposition 33, which aimed to repeal statewide rent control restrictions and urgently address California's housing affordability and homelessness crises. Prop 33 would have allowed cities to pass updated rent control policies and finally rein in predatory landlords – widespread rent gouging after the L.A. wildfires, for example, would have been largely prevented with new rent regulations.
But corporate landlords and the California Apartment Association raised $135.8 million to not only kill Prop 33, but to also pass Prop 34. The latter initiative sought to stop AHF from using certain money for its housing advocacy work. In November 2024, Big Real Estate successfully defeated Prop 33 and barely passed Prop 34.
Both the CAA's No on Prop 33 and Yes on Prop 34 campaigns were funded by the California Apartment Association Issues Committee, and that's where the shady contributions were delivered.
Between 2023 and 2024, Housing Is A Human Right found that 13 separate contributions were made to the California Apartment Association Issues Committee by corporate entities that were controlled by the same company, Rafanelli & Nahas, a corporate landlord based in Lafayette, California. Those contributions added up to a significant total: $177,150.
By delivering campaign cash that way, Rafanelli & Nahas were essentially trying to pull a fast one over the public – rather than have Rafanelli & Nahas' name attached to the 13 contributions, the names of its corporate entities were linked. For example, Amador Lakes III, LP, operated by Rafanelli & Nahas, sent three contributions totaling $50,250 to the California Apartment Association Issues Committee. State law says the corporate landlord can't do that – the public should know exactly who's delivering campaign cash and how much is coming from that single contributor.
In addition, Housing Is A Human Right and AHF made the case that the California Apartment Association should have been aware that Rafanelli & Nahas was trying to pull a fast one and not allowed the corporate landlord to file its campaign contributions in such an underhanded way.
On February 4, the California Fair Political Practices Commission informed AHF and Housing Is A Human Right that it will be investigating the matter further.
'AHF and Housing Is A Human Right have always been about holding the California Apartment Association and corporate landlords accountable,' says Susie Shannon. 'We're very pleased that the FPPC has decided to look into this serious abuse of voter trust.'
323.791.5526
SOURCE: Housing Is A Human Right
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 02/04/2025 08:39 PM/DISC: 02/04/2025 08:40 PM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
California Democrats pass Newsom's redistricting plan
California's Democrat-controlled legislature on Thursday formally approved a plan to redraw the state's congressional lines, teeing up a special election this fall that will let Californians weigh in on mid-decade redistricting in response to a plan pushed by Texas Republicans. Both the state Assembly and Senate approved three pieces of the 'Election Rigging Response Act' legislative package, which include a proposed constitutional amendment and two separate bills that lay out the logistics for the special election and map proposal. Those bills now head to Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) desk for approval. Democrats in the Golden State have been racing against the clock to get the package through by Friday in order to set up a Nov. 4 special election. Unlike in Texas, where the GOP-controlled legislature and the governor's approval will be enough to make the Lone Star State maps official, California ultimately has to put the question before voters. Californians will be asked to greenlight plan that could give Democrats five additional House seats, effectively cancelling out the five would-be Republican gains in Texas, by going around the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade. 'This proposal would give Californians a choice to fight back — and bring much needed accountability and oversight to the Trump Administration,' Newsom said in a statement this week. Newsom has pitched the plan as a way to 'fight fire with fire' after President Trump pushed Texas to find five new GOP seats. He's also underscored that the plan would be temporary, reverting back to the independent commission's regular post-census redistricting schedule after the 2030 cycle. Republicans, on the other hand, argue that the plan goes against the will of the voters, who approved the commission in 2008 and 2010. During hours of proceedings on Thursday, they also raised questions about who drew the maps and concerns about the cost of a special election. California GOP legislators earlier this week filed suit with a petition asking the state Supreme Court to block action on the legislation, arguing that the sprint to vote on the legislation package violated the state constitution. The state court rejected that petition on Wednesday, allowing the efforts to move forward in the Legislature. California's plan comes after talk of new maps in Texas kicked off a national redistricting tit-for-tat in the run-up to next year's high-stakes midterms. Republicans hold a slim 219-212 majority in the House, and control of Congress could come down to just a few seats. The GOP currently controls just nine of California's 52 House slots. The Republican incumbents affected by the new map are Reps. Kevin Kiley (R), Doug LaMalfa (R), Darrell Issa (R), Ken Calvert (R) and David Valadao (R). Redistricting has also been floated in the red states of Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri — and in Democratic strongholds such as Maryland and Illinois. Meanwhile, the Texas House advanced its redistricting plan on Wednesday. Now, both Houses have to reconcile the legislation before it kicks over to Gov. Greg Abbott (R) for approval.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
California to take on Newsom-backed redistricting plan today
California's contentious new congressional maps, championed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, easily advanced in the state Assembly on Thursday, setting up for final passage in the Senate before landing on Newsom's desk. The new map would shift five of California's Republican U.S. House seats to be more favorable to Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. The measure passed the Assembly on Thursday with 57 legislators voting in favor and 20 against, and now heads to the state Senate. If the measure is successful, Californians would then vote on a constitutional amendment for the new boundaries during a special election on Nov. 4. That election is likely to be expensive and unpredictable given how quickly the effort has come together and how little time there is between the legislature's actions and voters starting to have their say. California's legislative votes are happening just one day after Texas state representatives passed a GOP-backed congressional map on Wednesday at the request of President Trump, following a weekslong standoff in which Democratic lawmakers left Texas to delay a vote. These new Texas maps could help secure five additional GOP-leaning seats during the upcoming midterm elections. Republicans in the state have been adamant the Texas changes are fair, while Texas Democrats have already signaled the maps will be challenged in court. Shortly after the Texas House passed the maps, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom posted "It's on" on social media. When Texas first launched its redistricting effort, Newsom had vowed to redraw the Golden State's congressional districts to counter the Lone Star State's plan and neutralize any potential GOP gains. Newsom — who is widely seen as a possible 2028 presidential contender — sarcastically congratulated Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott on X, saying, "you will now go down in history as one of Donald Trump's most loyal lapdogs. Shredding our nation's founding principles. What a legacy." Although California Republicans have denounced the redistricting plan as a "tit-for-tat strategy," the state's Democrats on Thursday touted that the effort is different from Texas since it will be ultimately approved by the state's voters. "In California, we will do whatever it takes to ensure that voters, not Donald Trump, will decide the direction of this country," said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. "This is a proud moment in the history of this assembly. Californians, we believe in freedom. We will not let our political system be hijacked by authoritarianism, and today, we give every Californian the power to say no. To say no to Donald Trump's power grab and yes to our people, to our state and to our democracy." Although Newsom and California Democrats had previously insisted redistricting would only move forward if GOP-led states such as Texas, Florida, Indiana or others continued with their maps, that language was struck from Thursday's measure shortly before the Assembly voted on it. President Trump late Wednesday congratulated Texas Republicans for advancing the new maps, writing on social media that "Everything Passed, on our way to FIVE more Congressional seats and saving your Rights, your Freedoms, and your Country, itself." He also encouraged GOP-led Indiana and Florida to take on redistricting. The relatively rare mid-decade redistricting gambit comes as both parties prepare to face off in 2026 and has major implications nationwide. Republicans have a narrow majority at the moment, and Democrats winning back three seats in the 2026 midterms could be enough to flip control of the chamber if the lines used in the 2024 election were still in place. Redistricting in red states could change that dynamic significantly however, and with it the impact of the final two years on Mr. Trump's second term in office. Texas and California are the two biggest redistricting battlegrounds, but Mr. Trump has pushed similar efforts in GOP-led Indiana and Florida, and New York Democrats have floated redrawing their House map. The Republican-led state of Missouri could also try and redraw a Democratic district in the coming weeks, and new maps are also expected in Ohio, where a redraw brought about by state law could impact some of the red state's Democratic members of Congress. Earlier this week, former President Barack Obama acknowledged that he was not a fan of partisan gerrymandering but he backed Newsom's redistricting plan anyway at a fundraiser in Martha's Vineyard and on social media, calling it a "smart, measured approach." Less than 24 hours before California's scheduled vote, Newsom joined a press call with Democratic party leaders, urging support for his state's redistricting effort. "This is about taking back our country," Newsom told reporters. "This is about the Democratic Party now punching back forcefully and very intentionally. A draft congressional map unveiled by California Democrats late last week would heavily impact five of the state's nine Republican U.S. House members. It would redraw Reps. Doug LaMalfa and Kevin Kiley's Northern California districts, tweak Rep. David Valadao's district in the Central Valley and rearrange parts of densely populated Southern California, impacting Reps. Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa. And some more competitive Democrat-held districts could be tilted further from the GOP. There's no guarantee that Democrats will win in all five newly recast districts. Democrats hold large majorities in both chambers of California's state legislature. But some legal hurdles still lie ahead, and Republicans in the state have pushed back against the redistricting plans. Unlike Texas, California has an independent redistricting commission that was created by voters earlier this century. To overhaul the current congressional map, a constitutional amendment would need to be passed by a two-thirds vote in California's Assembly and Senate and be approved by voters in the fast-moving fall election. On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court denied a GOP attempt to stop the mid-cycle redistricting. California Republicans had legally challenged Democrats' efforts, claiming the state's constitution gives Californians the right to review new legislation for 30 days. But Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said they "failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time." The GOP legislators who filed the legal challenge told CBS News the ruling is "not the end of this fight," vowing to keep fighting the redistricting plan in the courts. In a phone interview with CBS News on Wednesday, California Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, a Republican, condemned Newsom's redistricting efforts. "This whole process is illegal from the beginning and violates the current California Constitution," Jones said. "The voters spoke with a loud voice in 2008 and 2010 that they were taking this process out of the politicians' hands and putting the responsibility into an independent commission." Democrats faced a flurry of questions from Republican lawmakers during hearings this week on the alleged lack of transparency in the drafting of these maps and the financial implications of the Nov. 4 special election. "If we're talking about the cost of a special election versus the cost of our democracy or the cost that Californians are already paying to subsidize this corrupt administration, those costs seem well worth paying at this moment," said Democratic state Assemblyman Isaac G. Bryan. Democratic lawmakers and Newsom have repeatedly emphasized that these redistricting efforts would not get rid of the independent commission and that the new maps he's hoping to put in place will be the lines used through the 2030 election. The commission would go back to drawing the state's congressional maps after the 2030 census, according to Newsom, who says this is only being done as a response to Mr. Trump and Texas' redistricting. That notion was rejected by Jones, who said: "Growing up, I was taught two wrongs don't make a right, so no, it is not justified." Unsealed video shows TikTok employees' concerns about its impact on teens Hurricane Erin bringing coastal flooding to New York as it churns off East Coast Energy prices climbing twice as fast as inflation in U.S.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats across US rip Texas House passage of new congressional lines
Democratic leaders from coast to coast ripped Texas state Republicans on Wednesday for approving a new Congressional map that gives the GOP an opportunity to net five additional House seats in next year's midterm elections. The map passed in the state House along party lines in an 88-52 vote. State senators are expected to consider the measure Thursday for final approval before it heads to Gov. Greg Abbott's (R) desk. 'Tonight, Texas Republicans delivered Donald Trump the rigged map he demanded,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said after the measure passed. 'Trump, Greg Abbott and their allies know they can't win on their record of stripping health care, tanking the economy and making families pay more with less.' 'This is a last gasp of a desperate party clinging to power,' she added. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) echoed her disdain, saying the mid-decade redistricting effort signaled a sign of weakness for Republicans and an attempt to regain strength ahead of the midterms. 'You only try changing the rules if you think you're losing — and that's exactly what Texas Republicans are attempting to do,' Newsom shared in a post on social platform X. 'We want to give Californians the power this November to counter redistricting power grabs and stand for independently drawn maps in every state,' he added. In a subsequent video message, Newsom offered the Texas GOP an 'off-ramp.' 'If they don't move. If Republicans stand back — they have an off-ramp — this initiative, our efforts, don't go forward. We're doing this only in response to what he's doing,' he said. 'So if he doesn't want us to move forward, he has some capacity to influence that.' The governor added later, 'we should let voters choose their representatives.' The criticism comes after Texas Democrats, who fled the state to delay the vote, returned home following threats of arrest or involvement by the FBI, and as the state lawmakers racked up fines. Newsom and Hochul have both vowed to fight Texas's effort with similar proposals to restructure district lines in their respective states. Democrats in California released a proposed new map last week to offset the five seats the Lone Star State is poised to net and has called for a special session in November to vote on the measure. Golden State Republicans pushed back on the effort, filing a petition to the state Supreme Court to halt the move, though their petition was rejected. Newsom has pressed his Democratic counterparts in New York and Illinois to move quickly on their redistricting efforts. 'In New York, we'll confront Trump's legal insurrection head on,' Hochul said Wednesday. 'We'll meet him on the same field and beat him at his own game.' Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff (D) also weighed in on the effort, lauding his counterparts for creating plans to ensure what he called an equal balance of power. 'Democrats need to strike back,' Ossoff said during an appearance on MSNBC's 'The Weeknight.' 'We have no time or luxury for high-minded hesitation, because Trump and MAGA are going to do everything within their power to hold on and to lock in one party rule in America,' he continued. 'That's the reality that we face.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
