Final market study being done to determine JB-S'pore RTS Link fares: M'sian transport minister
SINGAPORE - The operator of the upcoming Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link is in the midst of conducting a final market study to determine the fares for the cross-border rail link, and a decision on the price of a ride will be made closer to the start of operations.
Malaysia's Transport Minister Anthony Loke and Singapore's Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow said this to reporters on June 30 after the unveiling of the first of eight trains that will serve the light rail line when it opens at the end of 2026.
Mr Loke said RTS Operations (RTSO) – a joint venture between Singapore transport operator SMRT and Malaysian public transport firm Prasarana – will determine the fares of the 4km rail link.
'Of course, we hope that the right price mechanism is in place to ensure that we can encourage more people to use the RTS Link,' he added.
'The whole idea of this project is to make the modal shift, to ensure that more people use public transport to cross the Causeway. So I think that is one of the important considerations,' Mr Loke said.
Mr Siow said the RTS Link fare has to be determined commercially, and RTSO will need to take into account demand and supply, as well as the alternative transport options , such as cross-border public buses, and how much they cost.
He added: 'We'll have to leave it to (RTSO) to figure it out, and I think they will do that probably closer to the service commencement.'
Regarding what a fair price would be , Mr Loke later said that the fare must be less than what it costs for passengers to use their own means of transport.
'For example, if a worker lives farther away and rides a motorcycle across the Causeway to come to Singapore, he may have to pay for fuel and other costs... If the RTS fare is lower than his expenses, it will definitely encourage him to use the RTS,' Mr Loke added.
'In the end, this is a huge expense, a huge investment for us,' he said. 'Both governments have invested a lot of money in this project, so we must meet that goal.'
Asked whether the RTS Link's operating hours would be adjusted to suit the travel patterns of Malaysians who travel to Singapore for work, Mr Loke said that some leave their homes as early as 5am and this is something that RTSO will need to take into account.
RTSO has said that trains on the line will run from 6am to midnight daily.
Mr Loke also said that Malaysia and Singapore are pushing for an open payment system with multiple ways to pay for an RTS Link ride , adding that this is a trend for public transport operators worldwide.
Meanwhile, Mr Siow was asked whether the opening of the RTS Link will have an impact on other transport modes, including the reduction of cross-border public bus frequencies.
To this, he said the intent of the rail link is to create more mobility, and there are no immediate plans to adjust bus schedules.
The event on June 30 was the first time that Mr Siow in his capacity as Acting Minister had met Mr Loke and Johor Chief Minister Onn Hafiz Ghazi.
Mr Siow said the RTS Link is dear to his heart, as he was part of the joint conceptualisation at the early stages of the project.
'We needed the right opportunity and the leadership to see it through, and we have that today. And it is almost surreal to me to see the RTS Link emerge out of the agreement that we signed eight years ago,' he said.
He added: 'I, and many Singaporeans and Malaysians, look forward to the continued close cooperation between both sides and the successful delivery of the project.'
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 hours ago
- Straits Times
PM Anwar takes flak as Chief Justice role goes vacant
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Malaysian PM Anwar Ibrahim has failed to indicate any successor for the highly regarded Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat who retired on July 1. KUALA LUMPUR – Malaysia's judiciary is leaderless after its highly regarded top judge retired on July 1 amid stinging criticism, including from the prime minister's allies, over the government's failure to extend her tenure and allegations of interference in the judiciary. As she left the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat confirmed that her tenure was not extended by six months – an option allowed under the law. During Federal Court proceedings on the same day, senior lawyers including Malaysian Bar vice-president Anand Raj and former law professor Gurdial Singh Nijar praised Tun Maimun for her integrity and defence of judicial independence. 'Under your leadership, the judiciary's credibility was restored and reached a level on par with the best in the Commonwealth,' said Datuk Gurdial. For weeks prior to Madam Maimun's retirement, questions have grown among legal practitioners and politicians over the lack of an extension for the Chief Justice and an announcement of a success Madam Maimun is one of nine members of the apex court – including the second and third-highest ranked judges – who have left or are due to retire in the seven months from April to November. With only two new appointments to the bench since November 2024 , the Federal Court could soon be left with just six judges – most of whom joined recently. Only Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang has served on the apex court bench since before 2023. This has fuelled speculation that former Attorney General (AG) Tan Sri Terriruddin Salleh – who was appointed directly to the apex court in November while he was still serving as AG – is set to be fast-tracked to lead the judiciary. 'With the vacancies of half the senior judges in the Federal Court, the question arises as to whether this direct appointment is part of a plan to bypass the existing hierarchy and change the leadership of the judicial institution for the next eight years... (given that) he will only retire in 2033,' former economy minister Rafizi Ramli, who resigned from Cabinet in May, said in a June 30 statement. The MP for Pandan, who recently lost his position as deputy leader in Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's Parti Keadilan Rakyat to the latter's daughter, did not name Mr Terriruddin specifically. But the mentions of the direct appointment and retirement date leave little doubt that he was referring to the government's former top lawyer, prosecutor and legal advisor. 'This polemic has worsened due to the double standard in other appointments…that have only increased speculation (of political interference),' added Mr Rafizi, referring to recent moves that have stoked controversy. These included anti-graft chief Azam Baki's third 12-month extension in May , and deputy police chief Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay being passed over for the top job of Inspector General of Police in June. The Democratic Action Party (DAP), which has the most MPs in the Anwar administration, issued a statement just hours before Madam Maimun clocked out for the last time on July 1. It said that the 'importance of public confidence in the judiciary is of paramount importance, and we reiterate our position that the extension' of the tenures 'would be consistent with the reformist agenda of the Madani government'. Madani, an Arabic term that roughly translates as 'civilised', is a catchphrase introduced by Mr Anwar to symbolise his vision of a fair, inclusive and progressive society. In response to the public criticisms, the prime minister on June 30 accused those lobbying for judicial extensions of politicising the judiciary. During the Prime Minister's Department monthly assembly, Mr Anwar claimed that 'there was a campaign that certain people should have their tenure extended, some others should not'. 'This means that an independent institution and its integrity are being politicised,' he said. However, the DAP insisted in its statement that the calls for extension were not 'an attempt to politicise the matter, but is a result of a genuine recognition of (the judges') contributions to the development and reform of the judiciary which is one of the key priorities' of the government. Mr Rafizi also said that extensions were given to four Federal Court judges but not the Chief Justice and President of the Court of Appeal, thus worsening ' the polemic concerning the independence of the judicial institution that has already been spreading'. Besides Tun Maimun, Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Hashim, who is the second-highest ranking judge as President of the Court of Appeal, is also set to retire on July 2. Two other senior judges – Chief Judge of Malaya (CJM), who is the third-highest ranking, and Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak – will see their extensions expire by the end of the year, leaving a gaping void in the leadership of Malaysia's judiciary. The premier's speech on June 30 also prompted the Malaysian Bar to respond, expressing its 'deep concern over the inaction and lack of clarity' on the impending retirement of Madam Maimun as Chief Justice, just a day before her departure. 'This level of silence and indecision on matters concerning the highest level of the Judiciary is indefensible,' Bar president Ezri Abdul Wahab said in a statement on behalf of the statutory body representing over 21,000 lawyers . 'Leaving the post in uncertainty so close to the retirement date reflects a failure in institutional responsibility,' he said, adding that the lack of clarity is unprecedented and threatens judicial independence. 'This vacuum, at the very apex of the Judiciary, is as absurd as it is dangerous. In the absence of clarity, the public begins to speculate. Rumours thrive, confidence erodes. We caution against conflating legitimate institutional concern and public accountability with politicisation,' he said. In January, Madam Maimun had reminded PM Anwar of his past assertions as opposition leader that the premier should not have ultimate discretion in appointing judges. Since taking office in November 2022, Mr Anwar has repeatedly insisted that he would not interfere in the judiciary. However, senior lawyers told ST that a senior judge was summoned by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) chaired by Madam Maimun in May to answer claims of interference in appointments made since 2024. Controversy had swirled in 2024 due to the nearly nine-month-long vacancy for CJM. The delay persisted even though the JAC had recommended at least three candidates to Mr Anwar, legal sources told The Straits Times then. The JAC is made up of the four top-ranking judges, and five other persons selected by the PM. Media reports at that time claimed that Mr Terrirudin would be appointed directly as CJM. He had in September 2023, during his first week as public prosecutor, decided not to appeal against former premier Najib Razak's acquittal in the 1MDB audit tampering case. Mr Terrirudin was eventually made a Federal Court judge in November 2024 at the same time when Datuk Seri Hasnah Hashim was appointed as CJM. The installation of both judges sparked concerns over judicial interference, as the JAC lacked the required quorum at the time to make such appointments, having only four sitting members since September 2024. Legal circles are now speculating that Mr Terrirudin will eventually be promoted to one of the senior positions beneath Madam Hasnah, who will retire in November, making the former attorney general the leading candidate for Chief Justice later in 2025. Mr Rafizi said: 'Anwar Ibrahim, as Prime Minister, cannot ignore the anxiety of legal practitioners by assuming the issue is merely political attacks.'
Singapore Law Watch
15 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore
1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore Source: Straits Times Article Date: 02 Jul 2025 Author: Grace Leong StanChart said it has not yet received the legal claim documents, and emphatically rejects any claims made by these companies. More than US$2.7 billion (S$3.4 billion) in alleged misappropriated funds is being sought from Standard Chartered Singapore (StanChart) in a High Court lawsuit filed by liquidators in the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) saga. The suit, which represents the latest wide-ranging effort to recover funds siphoned from Malaysia's sovereign wealth fund 1MDB – from which US investigators claim about US$4.5 billion was stolen between 2009 and 2014 – was brought by court-appointed liquidators Angela Barkhouse and Toni Shukla from financial services firm Kroll. When asked by The Straits Times why the lawsuit was being brought at this juncture, a Singapore-based lawyer for the liquidators declined to comment. The suit, which was filed on June 30, seeks to hold StanChart accountable for its role in allegedly enabling fraud to be committed against 1MDB and the systematic theft of funds. Three companies in liquidation linked to 1MDB – Alsen Chance Holdings, Blackstone Asia Real Estate Partners and Brightstone Jewellery – alleged that between 2009 and 2013, StanChart permitted over 100 intra-bank transfers that helped conceal the flow of stolen funds and chose to overlook obvious red flags regarding these transfers. The suit claims that in doing so, the bank failed to comply with Singapore's anti-money laundering (AML) regulations and client due diligence rules. StanChart, in a statement on July 1, said: 'Any claims by these companies are without merit and Standard Chartered will vigorously defend any lawsuit commenced by the liquidators.' The suit claims that the three companies lost over US$2.7 billion and $20 million in public funds. StanChart, in response to ST's queries, said it has 'not yet received the legal claim documents, and emphatically rejects any claims made by these companies'. The liquidators who are making these claims have publicly stated that these companies were shell companies with no legitimate business and were linked to fugitives Low Taek Jho and his associate Eric Tan Kim Loong, StanChart said. They operated under false pretences, and acted as a conduit for funds misappropriated from 1MDB to launder monies, the bank said. According to the lawsuit, the transfers demonstrate serious breaches and control failings that ultimately enabled the theft of public funds by people operating at the highest levels of the Malaysian government during that period. The account held by Blackstone Asia Real Estate – a firm owned by Tan – allegedly disbursed US$150 million directly to the personal bank account of Najib Razak, the former prime minister of Malaysia who has since been jailed for corruption and money laundering. Some US$4.7 million was disbursed to jewellery, watch and bag vendors to pay for the luxury goods purchased by Najib's wife Rosmah Mansor. Another US$1 million allegedly went to Red Granite Pictures, a movie production and distribution company controlled by Rosmah's biological son Riza Aziz, to pay for movie development expenses, among other things. An account held by Alsen Chance Holdings disbursed US$53.4 million to jewellery, watch and bag vendors to pay for Rosmah's luxury goods purchases, and another US$38.75 million to Red Granite Capital. The account held by Brightstone Jewellery disbursed US$77.2 million to jewellery, watch and bag vendors to pay for Rosmah's luxury goods purchases. According to the suit, these amounts, along with the nature of the money flows, are evidence of how StanChart had failed to conduct the anti-money laundering safeguards. In 2016, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) imposed financial penalties of $5.2 million on StanChart and required that disciplinary action be taken against its officers who failed to perform their duties, following findings of significant lapses and serious regulatory breaches. A spokesperson for the 1MDB board said on July 1: 'The Malaysian people were the true victims of this global fraud, and all parties are determined to hold every facilitator to account – including financial institutions that failed in their most basic duties of vigilance and responsibility.' StanChart, in its statement, pointed out that the transactions at issue date back to 2010. 'We reported the transaction activities of these companies, both before and at the time we shut their accounts in early 2013, and fully cooperated with the investigating authorities,' it said. 'As set out in the MAS' December 2016 media release on the penalties on StanChart for 1MDB-related AML breaches, MAS concluded their inspection of StanChart in relation to 1MDB-related fund flows. 'While MAS identified regulatory breaches, the inspection did not find pervasive control weaknesses or wilful misconduct at Standard Chartered,' the bank said. 'Standard Chartered takes our responsibility to fight financial crime extremely seriously. We have made significant investments in strengthening our controls and uplifting our AML standards, and will continue to do so,' it added. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Straits Times
20 hours ago
- Straits Times
The US sends lots of plastic trash overseas. Malaysia just said no thanks
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox American scrap brokers sent more than 35,000 tonnes of plastic waste to Malaysia in 2024. KUALA LUMPUR - In the shadow of US President Donald Trump's tariff fights, a different kind of trade war is playing out involving candy wrappers and plastic bottles. On July 1, Malaysia, which received more discarded plastic from rich nations than any other developing country in 2024, effectively banned all shipments of plastic waste from the United States. That might not seem like a big deal. But the United States has increasingly relied on countries like Malaysia to deal with plastic trash. American scrap brokers sent more than 35,000 tonnes of plastic waste to Malaysia in 2024, according to trade data analysed by the Basel Action Network, a non-profit group that tracks plastic waste issues. In 2024, after seizing more than 100 shipping containers of hazardous materials sent from Los Angeles that had been improperly labeled as raw materials, Malaysian environment minister Nik Nazmi told reporters that 'we do not want Malaysia to be the world's rubbish bin'. The country's Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry did not respond to a request for comment July 1. Turmoil in the little-known trade in plastic waste has its roots in a decision by China in 2018, for the same reasons as Malaysia, to ban imports of wastepaper and plastic. Before that, China had for years accepted as much as half of the globe's discarded plastic and paper. Western nations have since struggled with a buildup of plastic trash. The United States recycles less than 10 per cent of the plastic it discards. Food and other contamination in plastic waste hinders recycling, and a significant portion of plastic, like chip bags that contain layers of different plastics and other materials, simply can't be recycled economically. The rest ends up in landfills, is burned or is shipped overseas. And while new overseas destinations have emerged, a growing number of countries are starting to say no to trash. In 2025, Thailand and Indonesia also announced bans on plastic waste imports. The world produces nearly 500 million tonnes of plastic each year, more than double the amount from two decades ago, and a growing amount of plastic waste is turning up on coastlines and riverbanks, as well as in whales, birds and other animals that ingest them. Researchers have estimated that one garbage truck's worth of plastic enters the ocean every minute. China's ban 'sent shock waves through the global plastic waste trade,' said professor Tony R Walker at the School for Resource and Environmental Studies at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, who researches the global flow of plastic waste. The countries that started to accept that discarded plastic 'quickly became overwhelmed,' he said. Much of that plastic trash ends up dumped in landfills or is burned, which releases harmful air pollution, or is simply released into the environment. People in rich countries may assume the plastic they diligently separate is being recycled, he said, something he termed 'wish cycling'. However, instead of going into a recycling stream, 'a lot of it gets redirected to waste,' he said. Malaysia's amended Customs Act bans all plastic waste shipments from countries that have not signed the Basel Convention, a global agreement that regulates hazardous waste, including plastic. That puts the United States, the only major country that is not a party to the agreement, in a particularly tricky spot. The amended law also sets stringent restrictions on plastic waste imports from other countries, saying they must contain only one type of plastic, with at most two per cent contamination, to ensure that the imported plastics are recycled and not discarded. That level would be challenging to meet for any plastic waste collected from consumers. In an email to clients sent June 20 and shared with The New York Times, chief executive Steve Wong of global plastic waste broker Fukutomi said shipments of scrap plastic to Malaysia had already 'come to a virtual standstill'. Ross Eisenberg, president of America's Plastic Makers, an industry group, said the effects of Malaysia's import policy on plastic waste remained unclear. Nevertheless, 'our industry remains focused on scaling up the use of recycled plastics in new products,' he said. 'These efforts support American jobs and drive economic growth, while conserving our natural resources and helping to prevent plastic pollution.' Malaysia's ban on plastic waste imports from the United States was prompted by the discovery of hundreds of containers filled with hazardous electronic and plastic waste that had been falsely declared as raw materials in order to bypass the country's trade control laws, said researcher Wong Pui Yi at the Basel Action Network. But local industry associations have urged the government to lift the ban on clean, recyclable plastic imports, arguing that the imports are necessary to help manufacturers meet their recycled-content targets. Brands like Nestlé, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have committed to using more recycled material in their products, said president CC Cheah of Malaysian Plastics Manufacturers Association, and the Malaysian recycling industry could still play a role. Dr Kate O'Neill, a professor of environmental science, policy and management at the University of California, Berkeley, said Malaysia's ban could mean that plastic waste starts flowing to other countries that are less able to handle the waste. Monitoring will be important, she said. 'The recycling industry still hasn't caught up with the disruption, so these exports are still needed.' That's why experts increasingly say that, on top of investing in recycling infrastructure, policies are needed to help rein in plastic production itself, for example by curbing demand for single-use plastics. Some countries negotiating a new treaty aimed at curbing plastic pollution have also called for caps on plastic production. That could come from packaging designs that cut down on plastic use, measures like plastic bag bans and overall policies that make manufacturers more responsible for the waste their products generate. Those policies have been spreading across the United States as well as globally. On July 1, a law went into effect in Illinois that prohibits large hotels from providing small, single-use plastic bottles for toiletries like shampoo and conditioner. Smaller hotels have until 2026 to comply. Also on July 1, Delaware began prohibiting restaurants from providing foam food containers, plastic beverage stirrers and plastic cocktail and sandwich picks, and requires that single-use plastic straws are only given out at the customer's request. NY TIMES
