Dutch government recommends children under 15 stay off TikTok, Instagram
The
Dutch government
advised parents on Tuesday not to have children under 15 use social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram, citing psychological and physical problems among children using them, including panic attacks, depression and difficulties sleeping.
The Ministry of Health also encouraged parents to limit how long their children spend using electronic devices, keep phones and laptops out of bedrooms, and have 20 minutes of screentime followed by two hours of outside play.
The advisory "gives children the time to further develop digital resilience and media literacy," Vincent Karremans, caretaker deputy minister for youth and sport, said in a letter to parliament. Karremans is one of several ministers who remained on after the Dutch government collapsed earlier this month pending October elections.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Top 25 Most Beautiful Women In The World
Car Novels
Undo
Both TikTok and Instagram require users to be at least 13 years of age.
The guidelines, which are not legally binding, distinguish between "social media" sites like TikTok and Instagram and "social interaction platforms" such as messaging services WhatsApp and Signal. The social media sites have "significantly more additive design features" that have a negative impact on children, the government said.
Live Events
Children can use the messaging services from age 13, the year most Dutch children start secondary school, according to the recommendations.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
Last year, Australia became the first country in the world to ban children under 16 from using social media. Denmark and France are considering similar legislation and Sweden issued recommendations about limiting screentime for kids last year.
A group of experts, put together at the request of the Dutch parliament, found that intense screentime and social media usage can result in physical and psychological problems in children.
Dutch schools have banned students from using tablets, cell phones and smart watches, with some exceptions, such as classes on media literacy.
In May, some 1,400 doctors and child welfare experts in the Netherlands signed a public letter, calling on the government to ban children under 14 from having cell phones and restricting social media usage until age 16.
In February, Dutch Queen Maxima said that her youngest daughter, Princess Ariane, had eyesight problems from spending too much time on mobile devices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-UK FTA: Piyush Goyal in London to discuss trade expansion, investment roadmap
Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal is in London on a two-day official visit to discuss issues related to the implementation of the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and explore ways to boost trade and investment between the two countries, an official statement said on Wednesday. During the visit, Goyal will hold a bilateral meeting with the UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade Jonathan Reynolds. "Both leaders will review the progress made in the ongoing FTA negotiations and chart out a clear, time-bound roadmap for its finalisation and implementation," the commerce ministry said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Also Read: Earmark dedicated zones for MSMEs, startups in industrial corridors: Goyal to officials India and the UK had announced the conclusion of the FTA on May 6. The pact aims to eliminate duties on labour-intensive Indian exports such as leather, footwear and clothing, while easing imports of UK products like whisky and cars. Live Events It targets to double trade between the two economies to USD 120 billion by 2030. The agreement is yet to be formally signed and implemented. The minister will also meet the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves, to discuss macroeconomic priorities, financial cooperation, and investment facilitation between the two countries. He is also scheduled to meet the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Lisa Nandy to explore avenues of collaboration in creative industries and innovation-driven sectors. "These engagements will bring together global business leaders, investors, and policy experts to deliberate on the strategic contours of the India-UK economic corridor and the transformative impact of the proposed FTA," it said. The minister is expected to interact with leading CEOs and industry stakeholders from key sectors, including shipping, fintech, logistics, and advanced manufacturing, with a view to deepening commercial linkages and promoting cross-border investments. The bilateral trade between India and the UK increased to USD 21.34 billion in 2023-24 from USD 20.36 billion in 2022-23.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Everything on the table…': India eyes duty cuts on both sides; seeks assurance Donald Trump-led US won't impose additional tariffs after trade deal
For India, a primary concern revolves around the process by which the US will reduce duties. (AI image) India-US trade deal: With the Narendra Modi government and Donald Trump administration working to seal the first phase of the bilateral trade agreement at the earliest, India wants assurance that no further tariffs will be imposed. On April 2, the US President Donald Trump declared a reciprocal 26% tariff on Indian goods imports as part of global trade measures. These tariffs were suspended for 90 days until July 9, whilst maintaining the 10% baseline tariff. Both nations are working towards finalising the BTA before the deadline expires. Trade Deal: India Seeks Guarantee From US India has sought guarantees from the US against future tariff impositions by the Trump administration following the completion of the bilateral trade agreement (BTA). The negotiations are nearing completion, with both nations optimistic about swift resolution. India has requested benefits for sectors requiring substantial workforce, particularly leather and textiles. "We have put everything on the table," a source told ET, emphasising India's desire for tariff stability post-agreement. Standard trade agreements incorporate provisions for renegotiation or compensation when partners increase tariffs, and India aims to include similar safeguards. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Alfreton: If You Were Born Between 1940-1975 You Could Be Eligible For This Life Cover Reassured Get Quote Undo "This would ensure the agreement is ringfenced from prospective changes," another source stated. Also Read | 'Dramatic decline…watch out…': China's exports to US dip sharply amid Trump trade war; why India needs to be on the guard Trade specialists unanimously support the inclusion of such a provision. "The BTA should be timebound and not in perpetuity," a trade policy specialist said. "India must insist on a clawback provision — that it will withdraw benefits if the US raises tariffs or goes back on any of its commitments." Government representatives indicated that the United States needs to devise a strategy for tariff reduction, as India has requested concessions for industries including textiles and leather. Whilst the Trump administration presently needs US Congress approval to reduce duties below most favoured nation (MFN) rates, it possesses the authority to eliminate reciprocal tariffs. "We want preferential and sustained trade advantages and have left it to the US to decide the route it takes to reduce its tariff barriers—whether through the Trade Promotion Authority or by seeking Congressional approval," an official said. India's concerns on Trade Deal With US For India, a primary concern revolves around the process by which the US will reduce duties, as the absence of US Fast Track Trade Authority could potentially delay the proposed trade agreement. The US Fast Track Trade Authority serves as a specialised provision enabling the American President to negotiate trade agreements and submit them to Congress for a straightforward vote, without modifications or procedural holdups. A government official indicated that the responsibility lies with US authorities to determine how to address their domestic regulations. Officials said that both countries were examining a distinct combination of products under the proposed agreement, with India seeking reduced-duty access for its labour-intensive goods whilst offering concessions on American automobiles and select agricultural products. Both nations aim to finalise a bilateral trade agreement by September-October. The administration is also assessing the consequences of the 50% duties on steel and aluminium, alongside the 25% duties on automobiles. Although the automotive parts industry anticipates minimal immediate effects, prolonged tariffs could potentially influence the sector. The official mentioned that India intends to seek concessions if they are granted to other nations. India-US trade deal: Early deal on the cards? The government, aiming to secure the first tranche of the bilateral trade agreement with the US before July 9, has said that it seeks "preferential and sustained advantage" through mutual duty reductions. Also Read | Magnet mayhem! Number of Indian companies awaiting licences from China for rare earths doubles; industry supplies hit hard "If trade has to be doubled to $500 billion, both sides have to reduce tariffs for better market access. It should be the endeavour of both countries to lower the tariffs. To what extent they have the legal authority to do so, that will depend upon their outlook towards trade," a senior official told TOI. "We are working on the early tranche and as you are aware that there is a date (July 9), before that we would like to conclude this early tranche,' Commerce secretary Sunil Barthwa said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Man charged with killing prominent lawmaker could face rarity for Minnesota: Death penalty
AI- Generated Image MINNEAPOLIS: The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the US courthouse in St Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ilkeston: If You Were Born Between 1940-1975 You Could Be Eligible For This Life Cover Reassured Get Quote Undo John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history. The federal case Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. "Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options," Acting US Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets, including officials in other states. Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison. Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions, more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The state's case The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd. At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged "there's a tension" and said federal officials "can speak for themselves." Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. "Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts," said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. "Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here." Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant US attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. "There's no doubt that it's complicated," Osler said. "And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling." What's next If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: "a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas." After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case "does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere." Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court. "There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is," Osler said.
