&w=3840&q=100)
No need for slum-dwellers' consent in Dharavi redevelopment project: CEO
Despite persistent resistance from a section of Dharavi residents to the redevelopment project, more than half of the slum's dwellers have given their consent to the redevelopment plan, according to SVR Srinivas, chief executive officer of the Dharavi Redevelopment Project. However, he clarified that such consent was not mandatory under the current framework, since the project developer was appointed directly by the state government.
'Under the Slum Rehabilitation Authority [SRA] rules, the building society appoints the developer. For that, 50 per cent consent is required. But here, the govt has appointed the developer. In this case, there is no need for consent,' Srinivas told The Times of India.
The Dharavi redevelopment is being spearheaded by Nav Bharat Mega Developers Pvt Ltd, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) in which the Adani Group holds an 80 per cent stake, with the Maharashtra government retaining the remaining 20 per cent. The land in question is publicly owned, held by the state government and the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC).
How is eligibility for rehab determined?
Srinivas said nearly 100,000 residents had already taken part in the house-to-house survey being conducted to determine eligibility for rehabilitation. With just 20,000 households left to be surveyed, he noted that even by conventional parameters, the 50 per cent threshold had already been crossed.
Srinivas emphasised that participation in the survey equates to consent. 'They have given their documents voluntarily. There is a line in the survey which says they are willing to participate in the redevelopment. So, when they sign, it is consent,' he was quoted as saying by The Times of India.
Despite consent not being a statutory requirement, Srinivas said the government had made several efforts to involve the residents. 'We don't want to ride roughshod on anybody. We have already given four opportunities. We put it in the newspaper and then we also put it on their doors,' he added.
What concerns surround the land allocation?
The scale of the project is massive, requiring an estimated 500,000 eligible tenements to be given free housing within Dharavi, while another 500,000 ineligible tenements will be relocated to rental housing outside the area.
However, the allocation of 541 acres of land across Mumbai for rental housing and the free-sale component to the Adani-led SPV has drawn criticism from opposition leaders. Many have labelled the redevelopment as a 'land-grab' that could potentially open up prime real estate for private profit.
The 541 acres earmarked for this purpose include locations such as Deonar, Kurla, Aksa, Malvani, and salt pan lands in Bhandup, Mulund, and Kanjurmarg. So far, only 63.5 acres — in Kurla and Mulund — have been handed over.
What explains the land allocation delays?
Addressing these concerns, Srinivas clarified that the land meant for rental housing is in the possession of the Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP) and not with the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV).
'The problem is that there is a shortage of land in Mumbai. We had written to many different agencies including from the central government for these lands. In some cases, there were rejections. So, we did not know which lands would come and we started applying to different places,' he said.
What happens to unused land parcels?
'Now these lands are coming but they will be with the DRP. Unless people are rehabilitated, the land will not be given to the SPV,' he further stated, adding that rental units would be constructed in phases. If the entire 541 acres isn't used, the remainder will revert to the government.
'Our mandate is limited to Dharavi. The land that is not used, will revert to the govt,' Srinivas said.
When asked how planning was done despite the ongoing survey, he said that the project relied on a combination of a drone survey, LIDAR survey, and now, the physical house-to-house verification. 'Based on these three, we did a comparison and an extrapolation of data, which is how it works. In projects of this size, some things can go on simultaneously,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
'Derogatory' Remarks Against Amaravati: Journalist Who Hosted Show Arrested
Amaravati: Senior Telugu journalist Kommineni Srinivas Rao was arrested in Hyderabad on Monday for hosting a programme on a vernacular channel where a scribe allegedly made derogatory remarks against the greenfield capital city Amaravati, said a police official. Guntur district Superintendent of Police S Satish confirmed that Thullur police from Amaravati have arrested the journalist. "Thullur police have arrested Kommineni Srinivas Rao from Hyderabad over the derogatory remarks against Amaravati," Satish told PTI, adding that the journalist is being brought to Andhra Pradesh from Telangana. VVR Krishna Raju, the journalist, who was also part of the programme, was accused of spewing venom against Amaravati and its women. According to information shared by a source close to the TDP-led NDA government, the duo were booked under BNS Sections 79, 196 (1), 353 (2), 299, 356 (2) and 61 (1) and Section 67 of the IT Act, including Section (1) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. Meanwhile, YSRCP said that an FIR was registered against Rao four days ago in Thullur police station, accusing him of "failing to intervene during the broadcast", which featured those alleged vitriolic remarks. "Immediately after his arrest, Rao was transferred to Vijayawada. Rao, a senior citizen, questioned the legality of the arrest without explanation," said a note from the YSRCP. Condemning the arrest, YSRCP chief Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy, called it a "political vendetta". "In any discussion, diverse opinions are natural. Punishing an anchor for guests' statements is not only unjust, it's dangerous," Reddy said in a post on 'X'. The former chief minister questioned the rationale behind punishing a moderator for remarks made by panelists during a televised debate, warning such actions endanger democratic discourse and press freedom. He accused the TDP-led NDA government of suppressing dissent, using fear and intimidation tactics to silence intellectuals, journalists, and opposition voices across the southern state. He alleged that Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu was "weaponising the state apparatus" to divert public attention from failures, corruption, and broken electoral promises. "You (Naidu) were given five years-one has already passed. The day will come when the people will demand answers for your abuses and injustices," Reddy warned.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why Is The Congress Reluctant To Endorse Tejashwi Yadav As Bihar Poll Nears?
New Delhi: The 2025 Bihar Assembly election is just months away and the main opposition alliance - the Mahagathbandan, which is basically the Congress and the RJD - has its work cut out to defeat the ruling pair of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar 's JDU and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP. With that in mind, the Congress' apparent continuing reluctance to back senior RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav - the son of party patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav and a two-time former Deputy Chief Minister - as the Mahagathbandan chief ministerial candidate has raised eyebrows. Bihar's 'grand alliance' was formed in 2015, more, possibly, out of necessity than claims to ideological unity. In its current avatar - post Nitish Kumar's January 2024 flip-flop, when he dumped the alliance and returned to the BJP's side - the RJD has been the dominant force. That fact has been underlined by the results of the two most recent elections in the state - the 2024 federal election, in which Tejashwi Yadav's party won four seats to the Congress' three, and the 2020 state poll, in which the RJD was the single-largest party with 71 of 243 seats. The Congress - reeling from a string of losses to the BJP in state and federal elections over the past decade - has been relegated to the role of a junior partner, much like in Tamil Nadu, where the party has played second fiddle to Chief Minister MK Stalin's DMK in the past three elections. However, unlike in Tamil Nadu, in Bihar the Congress is trying to break free from the 'junior partner' tag, boosted by senior leader Rahul Gandhi's sustained campaigns across the state. The RJD has made its position clear - Tejashwi Yadav is the party's chief ministerial candidate. Tejashwi Yadav will be the RJD' chief ministerial face in the Bihar election (File). The Congress, the subtext therefore says, can either get with the programme or leave. Does Congress Have Votes To Go Solo? Not really. In the 2020 state election the party contested 70 seats and won just 19. The RJD contested 144 and won 75. The alliance lost the election by 12 seats. The hugely disparate conversion rates - 27 per cent to 52 per cent - have often been red-flagged by the state party as a big reason for that narrow loss. The Congress, though, has argued its candidates were "set up to fail" and blamed the RJD for not extending grassroots support and allotting 'difficult-to-win' seats to the larger party. And it wants 'respectable and winnable' seats this time to remain allied, sources said. The situation, i.e., the disparity in performance between the two parties, was evident in last year's federal election too, in which 40 parliamentary seats were in play. The Mahagathbandan was trounced - it won nine seats, campaigning as the INDIA bloc, to the BJP-led NDA's 30. The RJD won four and polled over 22 per cent of the votes. The Congress got three and only nine per cent of the votes. This has led to RJD expressing frustration at the Congress' 'overestimation' of its strength. Nevertheless, the Congress reportedly remains insistent it can contest this election on its own, and its unwillingness, at this time, to back the RJD, indicates it wants to do just that. As an aside, the Congress' inability to play nicely with state/regional parties has made headlines over the past few years, and has often played its part in a big BJP win. A good example of this is the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Assembly election and the spat with Akhilesh Yadav's Samajwadi Party over six of the state's 230 seats. The Congress' subsequent defeat provoked caustic comments from other allies about not working with friendly parties. Can Congress Win Without RJD? The Congress reportedly has reservations over what it sees as a 'one-dimensional' campaign of the RJD, which is based on caste factors and, particularly, the Muslim-Yadav base. It wants to broaden the Mahagathbandan's appeal and project a more modern and inclusive image, which is why Rahul Gandhi has made frequent trips - seven in the last six months - to Bihar, with the focus on Dalits and issues of importance to the community. The Congress believes Rahul Gandhi's visits to Bihar will help it get more votes (File). But this has made the RJD anxious, since it is seen as poaching its voter base. Congress leaders in Bihar have also argued they need to contest on issues important to the party as a whole, such as employment, education, and secularism, and so attract urban voters who feel alienated from both the RJD's caste politics and BJP's Hindutva focus. A Mahjong Effect? The Congress, meanwhile, is also aware that it cannot be seen as too accepting of a junior role, of scraps in seats and at the decision-making table, since this weakens its position when negotiating with other state allies, including the DMK in Tamil Nadu. The refusal, so far, to endorse Tejashwi Yadav may therefore also be a strategic signal to allies - that the Congress is unwilling to play an increasingly weak second fiddle. So, what can the Congress do now? Either agree, again, to be the RJD's junior partner or bargain hard, knowing that this might leave the opposition alliance in tatters, and give the JDU-BJP a big boost, months before voting. And all of this does not factor in the role of Left parties that are part of the Mahagathbandan alliance. These have, so far, remained silent. They are not seen as having any objection to Tejashwi Yadav as the Chief Minister, but they are watching the Congress' moves closely. If the Congress decides to break free from the RDJ's 'shackles', it might find support from smaller parties, including the Left, unhappy with both the RJD and the BJP (and JDU).
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
LDF, UDF continue blame game over boy's tragic death
The tragic electrocution of 15-year-old Ananthu from an illegal electric trap set for wild boars at Vazhikkadavu dominated the Nilambur Assembly byelection campaign for the second consecutive day on Monday with the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the Opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) taking out protest marches to different centres. In a bid to gain political mileage from the tragedy, both of them blamed each other for the tragic accident. The LDF staged a protest outside the Vazhikkadavu panchayat office, while the UDF organised a march to the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) office at Vazhikkadavu, each trying to pin the responsibility on the other. The UDF pointed fingers at the KSEB, arguing that it was its responsibility to prevent power theft for illegal activities such as electric trapping of wild boars. The LDF countered that the onus lay with the local body. The blame game intensified with the UDF targeting the LDF-led State government and its agencies while the LDF targeted the UDF-ruled local body. CPI(M) Polit Bureau member A. Vijayaraghavan, inaugurating the LDF march, attributed the incident to the failure of the Vazhikkadavu panchayat administration, stating that it had not implemented the existing protocol to cull wild animals causing crop damage. Mr. Vijayaraghavan accused the panchayat of colluding with those involved in illegally hunting wild boars. He said the UDF's efforts to make political capital out of the tragedy had boomeranged. K. Radhakrishnan, MP, CPI leader Satyan Mokeri, Alice Mathew, M.M. Varghese, V.P. Sanu, E. Jayan, T.M. Siddique, Jamsheer K., and M.T. Ali spoke. Inaugurating the UDF march, Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan said the incident exposed the negligence of government departments. 'Ananthu's family and several other local residents had complained to the KSEB and the Forest department about the electricity theft for hunting wild animals, but no action was taken. It is a clear case of government negligence,' he said. Mr. Satheesan lashed out at the government for its inaction. 'The LDF's march to the panchayat office is a farce. The government does not provide funds for culling wild boars. Instead of blaming the panchayat, the LDF should protest outside the offices of the Forest and Electricity Ministers,' he said. UDF panchayat chairman Saidalavi Valassery presided over the function. A.K.M. Ashraf, Anvar Sadath, MLAs, Congress district president V.S. Joy and Muslim League leader K.M. Shaji spoke.
