logo
NYU researchers developing technology to detect hidden GPS trackers

NYU researchers developing technology to detect hidden GPS trackers

CBS News09-06-2025
Many people use GPS every day, but in the wrong hands, it's a terrifying tool that can help stalkers track their victims. It's been difficult for victims to detect hidden trackers – until now.
CBS News New York investigative reporter Tim McNicholas got a look at a promising development from New York University researchers.
How to know if there's a GPS tracker on you
Mo Satt, a researcher at NYU's Tandon School of Engineering, says there are already ways to detect Bluetooth trackers like Apple AirTags, but solutions are few for GPS trackers.
"If a cyber stalker is looking to track someone, they're not gonna use an AirTag because Apple and Samsung and Android have figured out a way to alert people," he said.
So, Satt started using a device already on the market called a spectrum analyzer to track signals from nearby electronics. He realized, unlike phones and other devices, GPS trackers send out signals like clockwork to save battery, typically every minute on the dot while moving. That allows him to distinguish a GPS tracker from other devices.
Now, he and a team of researchers are working to develop a way for stalking victims to detect those same unique signals.
"They won't have to be looking at spikes [on a spectrum analyzer], right? They're just gonna have an app or something that will Bluetooth to their phone, that will talk to a device like this [spectrum analyzer] and say you, with a high degree of probability, you have a tracker with you," Satt said.
Satt and his team are now trying to secure additional investors and support to turn their plans into reality. They're presenting their findings this summer at a major cybersecurity conference, and victim advocates say their work, so far, sounds very promising.
Man fatally shot in Queens after gunman stuck GPS tracker on car
Their research was inspired by tragedies like the death of Tyrone Jones, who was fatally shot inside his car in St. Albans, Queens. The vehicle was riddled with 11 bullets.
"There were so many spectators," said Donaya McMillan, Jones' cousin. "It was something that, to this day, I still have nightmares about. As much as I try to remember the beautiful, big smile he has, sometimes I also think about how he looked in that moment."
Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz said the shooter, Isaiah Stokes, was hellbent on revenge after Jones asked him to leave a party.
According to prosecutors, Stokes – a well-known actor who appeared on shows including "Law and Order," "The Americans" and "Blue Bloods" – stuck a GPS tracker on the bottom of Jones' car a week before the shooting. A judge sentenced Stokes to 25 years to life in prison for the murder in March.
McMillan thinks if the technology Satt and his team are developing had been available at the time, her cousin might still be alive.
"I think that he would've been able to identify that he was being tracked," she said. "This could've been prevented."
While an external GPS tracker was used in this case, many newer cars have tracking software built into the car. Unfortunately, people can be stalked even without someone sneaking a tracker into the car. CBS News New York has reported on stalking victims whose abusive exes still have access to the car's system.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How tech pinpoints urban heat islands and makes cooling projects easier
How tech pinpoints urban heat islands and makes cooling projects easier

Fast Company

time21 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

How tech pinpoints urban heat islands and makes cooling projects easier

It's summer, and it's been hot, even in northern cities such as Boston. But not everyone is hit with the heat in the same way, even within the same neighborhood. Take two streets in Boston at 4:30 p.m. on a recent day, as an example. Standing in the sun on Lewis Place, the temperature was 94 degrees Fahrenheit (34.6 degrees Celsius). On Dudley Common, it was 103 F. Both streets were hot, but the temperature on one was much more dangerous for people's health and well-being. The kicker is that those two streets are only a few blocks apart. The difference epitomizes the urban heat island effect, created as pavement and buildings absorb and trap heat, making some parts of the city hotter. A closer look at the two streets shows some key differences: Dudley Common is public open space sandwiched between two thoroughfares that create a wide expanse of pavement lined with storefronts. There aren't many trees to be found. Lewis Place is a residential cul-de-sac with two-story homes accompanied by lots of trees. This comparison of two places within a few minutes' walk of each other puts the urban heat island effect under a microscope. It also shows the limits of today's strategies for managing and responding to heat and its effects on public health, which are generally attuned to neighborhood or citywide conditions. Even within the same neighborhood, some places are much hotter than others owing to their design and infrastructure. You could think of these as urban heat islets in the broader landscape of a community. Sensing urban heat islets Emerging technologies are making it easier to find urban heat islets, opening the door to new strategies for improving health in our communities. While the idea of reducing heat across an entire city or neighborhood is daunting, targeting specific blocks that need assistance the most can be faster and a much more efficient use of resources. Doing that starts with making urban heat islets visible. In Boston, I'm part of a team that has installed more than three dozen sensors across the Roxbury neighborhood to measure temperature every minute for a better picture of the community's heat risks, and we're in the process of installing 25 more. The Common SENSES project is a collaboration of community-based organizations, including the Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative and Project Right Inc.; university researchers like me who are affiliated with Northeastern University's Boston Area Research Initiative; and Boston city officials. It was created to pursue data-driven, community-led solutions for improving the local environment. Data from those sensors generate a real-time map of the conditions in the neighborhood, from urban heat islets like Dudley Common to cooler urban oases, such as Lewis Place. These technologies are becoming increasingly affordable and are being deployed in communities around the world to pinpoint heat risks, including Miami, Baltimore, Singapore, and Barcelona. There are also alternatives when long-term installations prove too expensive, such as the U.S.'s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration volunteer science campaign, which has used mobile sensors to generate onetime heat maps for more than 50 cities. Making cooler communities, block by block Although detailed knowledge of urban heat islets is becoming more available, we have barely scratched the surface of how they can be used to enhance people's health and well-being. The sources of urban heat islets are rooted in development—more buildings, more pavement, and fewer trees result in hotter spaces. Many projects using community-based sensors aspire to use the data to counteract these effects by identifying places where it would be most helpful to plant trees for shade or install cool roofs or cool pavement that reflect the heat. However, these current efforts do not fully capitalize on the precision of sensors. For example, Los Angeles's massive investment in cool pavement has focused on the city broadly rather than overheated neighborhoods. New York City's tree planting efforts in some areas failed to anticipate where trees could be successfully planted. Most other efforts compare neighborhood to neighborhood, as if every street within a neighborhood experiences the same temperature. London, for example, uses satellite data to locate heat islands, but the resolution isn't precise enough to see differences block by block. In contrast, data pinpointing the highest-risk areas enables urban planners to strategically place small pocket parks, cool roofs, and street trees to help cool the hottest spaces. Cities could incentivize or require developers to incorporate greenery into their plans to mitigate existing urban heat islets or prevent new ones. These targeted interventions are cost-effective and have the greatest potential to help the most people. But this could go further by using the data to create more sophisticated alert systems. For example, the National Weather Service's Boston office released a heat advisory for July 25, 2025, the day I measured the heat in Dudley Common and Lewis Place, but the advisory showed nearly the entirety of the state of Massachusetts at the same warning level. What if warnings were more locally precise? On certain days, some streets cross a crucial threshold—say, 90 F—whereas others do not. Sensor data capturing these hyperlocal variations could be communicated directly to residents or through local organizations. Advisories could share maps of the hottest streets or suggest cool paths through neighborhoods. There is increasing evidence of urban heat islets in many urban communities and even suburban ones. With data showing these hyperlocal risks, policymakers and project coordinators can collaborate with communities to help address areas that many community members know from experience tend to be much hotter than surrounding areas in summer. As one of my colleagues, Nicole Flynt of Project Right Inc., likes to say, 'Data + Stories = Truth.' If communities act upon both the temperature data and the stories their residents share, they can help their residents keep cool—because it's hot out there.

Pediatric Sleep Screener Boosts Diagnoses, Referrals
Pediatric Sleep Screener Boosts Diagnoses, Referrals

Medscape

time21 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Pediatric Sleep Screener Boosts Diagnoses, Referrals

Children's poor sleep is associated with obesity, academic problems, suicide attempts, and other mental health concerns, but the issue is not consistently addressed in pediatric primary care. A new well-child-visit screening tool for primary care clinicians (PCCs) appears to help boost diagnosis and referrals, according to findings from a study published in JAMA Network Open . Ariel A. Williamson, PhD, with The Ballmer Institute for Children's Behavioral Health, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon, and colleagues tested an electronic, age-based sleep screener that evaluated infant bed sharing, snoring three nights a week, short sleep time, perceived sleep problems, and adolescent daytime sleepiness. The researchers conducted a retrospective, observational case-control study in the Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania primary care network of 31 practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey; 27 in suburban/rural settings and four in metropolitan settings. During implementation, 204,872 patients completed the screening, with adoption in 89.5% of all well-child visits. The screening indicated that 9.7% of patients had frequent snoring, 12.2% had sleep problems, and 34.4% had insufficient sleep. Bed sharing was reported for 6.5% of infants and 14.7% of adolescents reported daytime sleepiness. The identification of sleep problems was followed by provision of family education resources. Sleep Disorder Diagnosis 64% More Likely With Screener Compared with the pre-implementation period, at well-child visits with a completed sleep screener, PCCs were significantly more likely to make a sleep disorder diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.56-1.73), order a polysomnogram (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.32-3.20), and refer to sleep clinics (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 5.03-8.34) or otolaryngology (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 3.95-5.02). Rupali Drewek, MD, a pediatric pulmonologist and co-medical director of the Sleep Medicine Program at Phoenix Children's in Phoenix, who was not involved with the study, told Medscape Medical News the screener is promising and its proactive approach — even in children with no obvious symptoms — allows for earlier intervention and improved quality of life. 'Sleep problems affect up to half of children at some point,' she said, 'yet they are rarely addressed unless parents bring them up. Implementing a standardized screening tool during routine pediatric visits ensures systematic identification of issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. Taking action early can lead to better health, better school performance, and less stress for families and the healthcare system.' Adding a new screening tool should fit easily into a regular checkup without slowing workflow substantially, she said. 'It offers a scalable, low‑cost solution to reach millions of children.' Educating the medical team will be important to successful implementation, she said. 'Everyone on the care team needs to know how to read the results and what to do next if a child's answers show there might be a sleep problem.' Lessening Healthcare Inequities In an accompanying editorial, Sarah M. Honaker, PhD, with the Department of Pediatrics at Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, and Stephen M. Downs, MD, MS, with the Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University in Winston Salem, North Carolina, said the screener, 'offers a refreshing departure from this pattern of asking PCCs to know more and do more. [T]his is an opportune time to study the implementation of systems that will support PCCs in providing evidence-based care.' The editorialists wrote that the broad screening at well-child visits could help lessen healthcare inequities. They noted that children from minoritized backgrounds with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely, for instance, to have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and are less likely to receive timely, evidence-based care. 'For example, Black children are two to four times more likely to have OSA and less likely to receive a [polysomnogram] referral,' they wrote. One of the main unanswered questions, Honaker and Downs wrote, is how much the educational components help once the problems have been identified and whether guidance about sleep duration results in actual improvements in sleep duration. A key strength of the work is replicability in other health systems, with individual adaptations, the editorialists noted. '[T]he system designed by Williamson and colleagues offers an excellent starting point for other healthcare systems seeking to support PCCs in prevention, identification, and management of pediatric sleep disruption,' they wrote. Williamson reported receiving honoraria from the National Sleep Foundation, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and Wesleyan University and an honorarium and travel support from The Pennsylvania State University, outside the submitted work. This study was supported by the Possibilities Project at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Honaker reported receiving consulting fees from Covington LLC; grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; equity ownership of For Dreamers LLC; and grants from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation outside the submitted work. Downs reported that he is the co-creator of the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) software and cofounder of Digital Health Solutions LLC, which licenses CHICA. Drewek reported no relevant financial relationships.

Is Perplexity the next Google?
Is Perplexity the next Google?

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Perplexity the next Google?

Perplexity shocked both Silicon Valley and Wall Street this week after the Wall Street Journal reported on the AI startup's unsolicited $34.5 billion all-cash offer to buy Chrome, the world's most popular web browser. The move comes just weeks after Perplexity launched its own AI-powered Comet browser, and as a federal judge considers whether Google must divest Chrome after the tech giant lost a landmark antitrust case brought by the Department of Justice. Comet, which Perplexity tells Fortune will become available for all Perplexity Pro users starting Wednesday, has several advantages over Chrome. Unlike Google's web browser, where most AI features arrive via add-ons or extensions, Comet's AI assistant is always present, staying in the top-right corner of your browser window. It can summarize content instantly, compare information across tabs (a huge time-saver for shopping), automate workflows (booking meetings, sending emails, etc.), remind you about events, and much more. Chrome only recently added limited AI features like Gemini, the Google Lens sidebar, and 'tab compare,' but these remain add-ons and do not offer end-to-end automation or context tracking like Comet's agentic AI. Comet feels poised to transform browsing as we know it into more of a conversational experience, where you interact with your browser to move as fast as your brain allows. But Perplexity's blockbuster move this week raises an important question: If Perplexity absorbs Chrome, could it become the next Google? Perplexity's play? Going beyond 'search' Thomas Grange, cofounder and chief innovation officer at AI-search optimization platform Botify, says 'There won't be a 'next Google.'' 'The game has changed,' he tells Fortune. 'What's emerging from the blend of AI search and traditional browsers isn't just a faster search engine, it's an entirely new hyper-personalized, context-aware, and conversational way of finding information.' Grange says the promise of AI search engines is having AI agents act on behalf of users, interacting with other agents and transforming web browsing into something much more efficient and automated. Perplexity's Comet browser, which debuted last month and is rolling out to all Pro users starting this week, exemplifies this shift. Unlike traditional browsers, Comet puts an AI answer engine at the heart of its interface, allowing users to ask questions and get direct answers rather than having to wade through a list of links. Above all, the assistant can act on behalf of users—aiming to make browsing less about navigation and more about productivity. Usha Haley, Wichita State University professor and Barton Distinguished Chair in International Business, says Perplexity's bid for Chrome 'looks far less audacious once you try Comet.' 'A persistent AI assistant that can operate on any web page changes the web from a place to navigate to one that works for you. Adding Chrome's massive user base and browser dominance could give Perplexity a once-in-a-generation leap in distribution,' she tells Fortune. But, she notes, 'the next Google presents a very high bar.' But while Perplexity can buy part of Google's ecosystem (Chrome), scaling to Google's level of infrastructure, reach, and trust will be extremely challenging. 'AI-powered browsers do well at some limited tasks. But the road from wow demo to everyday habit is long and winding,' she says. Redefining how we use the internet Joshua McKenty, former NASA architect and CEO of cybersecurity company Polyguard, tells Fortune: 'The acquisition of Chrome by any player, but especially by a major AI player, is extremely significant. 'Chrome represents one of the most powerful sources of new training data in existence—especially if it is decoupled from the Google login experience,' he adds. 'The browser is the only scraping method that can travel behind every log-in and every firewall to index … literally everything.' Of course, not everyone is convinced Perplexity will become the next Google—or that it would even be allowed to have Chrome. Ari Paparo, a former Google executive, tells Fortune, 'We need to understand that the DOJ and the courts are not going to blindly empower a new monopoly just to replace the one they are breaking up. 'AI is both hungry for the data a web browser accesses, but also becomes more useful to the consumer as it has the context of what they are doing,' Paparo says. 'Whether it is Perplexity, OpenAI, or one of the legacy tech giants that ends up as an owner of Chrome, it will be a huge change in the ecosystem.' Haley also highlights privacy and reliability as key challenges as scale, reliability, and user trust are critical for any challenger of Google to move beyond a 'wow demo' moment. But Eric Vaughan, CEO of the AI-focused enterprise-software company IgniteTech, says Perplexity can win by 'eliminating the concept of search entirely.' 'The real disruption here is less about improving search results and more about bypassing websites altogether,' he tells Fortune. For Perplexity, owning Chrome, should regulators allow it to happen, would mean immediate access to billions of daily users, copious behavioral data, and the distribution muscle to push itself to the forefront of the AI race. What happens next? Perplexity, which is backed by Nvidia and SoftBank, among others, says funding is available, but its offer for Chrome undoubtedly faces major regulatory, financial, and technical hurdles. To be blunt, Perplexity's offer for Chrome is a long shot. (For one thing, Google parent Alphabet isn't willingly selling.) The San Francisco–based startup has only a tiny fraction of the number of users that Google has, and an infinitesimal share of its revenue. What's more, rivals in the AI space are working on their own AI web browsers. Microsoft's Edge browser now has Copilot Mode, which, like Perplexity's Comet, can see and analyze open tabs, execute autonomous tasks such as booking reservations, respond to voice commands, summarize content in real time, and more—but notably, it's free and tightly integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem. OpenAI, the leader in AI, is close to releasing its own AI-powered browser, designed to keep user interactions within a ChatGPT-like interface and leveraging its 500 million weekly active users to challenge Chrome's dominance. But Perplexity's original AI-based search tool has already been credited by many in tech with pressuring its rivals like Google to upgrade and rethink their own approach to search. Whether or not a Perplexity-Chrome tie-up actually happens, the emergence of AI-powered browsers has set the stage for profound industry change. Barry Lowenthal, president of AI-powered ads company Inuvo, says, 'Google has been the default search engine for so long it is practically a reflex, but AI-powered search tools like Perplexity are changing that equation. 'If Chrome joins the mix, the potential reach and usability skyrocket,' he tells Fortune. 'But becoming the next Google is not just about technology, it is about winning trust, habit, and scale. That is a long game, and right now Perplexity is just starting to play it.' For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store