Japanese ESTA Advances to FY '28 Implementation; Target Moves 2 Years Ahead of Previous Plan
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo
The Justice Ministry
The government will introduce an online system for the prescreening of foreign nationals prior to their entry to Japan by fiscal 2028, starting two years earlier than the previous target of 2030, Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki said Wednesday.
The system is a Japanese version of ESTA, or Electronic System for Travel Authorization, currently implemented by the United States and other countries. The planned Japanese system will require potential visitors from countries and regions exempt from needing short-stay visas for tourism to apply online prior to their planned trip. Travelers will submit their name, purpose of entry and other information in an application form.
This is intended to prevent foreigners whose purpose of entry is to stay illegally or commit terrorist acts from entering Japan, as well as reduce the burden of immigration screenings.
The government has set a goal of increasing the number of foreign visitors to 60 million by 2030, and the previous plan was to introduce the Japanese version of ESTA by the same year.
'It is essential to introduce the system as soon as possible to tighten [immigration control] and smoothen the screening processes,' Suzuki said at a meeting of the House of Representatives Judicial Affairs Committee on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
28 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Japan should pass bill on optional separate surnames during current Diet session
Deliberations on bills separately submitted by three opposition parties over selective surnames for married couples are underway in the House of Representatives' Committee on Judicial Affairs. There are people who have had their dignity undermined due to having to change their surnames upon marriage, suffering disadvantages in their lives. It is unacceptable to leave the situation unaddressed. It is necessary to bring about a selective separate surname system for married couples during the current Diet session. The Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP) and the Democratic Party for the People (DPFP) have respectively submitted bills to revise the Civil Code to allow Japanese couples to choose whether to adopt a shared surname or retain their premarital surnames upon marriage. Both bills stipulate that the surname of children will be decided when couples get married if they opt for separate surnames. Under the DPFP bill, couples adopting different surnames will decide which name to list as the head of their family register, and their children will assume that name. There are no big differences between the two bills. The CDP and DPFP should immediately hold consultations to unify their bills for their early enactment. Fellow opposition party Nippon Ishin (the Japan Innovation Party) submitted a bill to expand the use of maiden names in business and on other occasions, though couples would retain a shared surname. Under its proposal, maiden names would be included in family registers to give people using legal grounds for continuing to use them. However, since the real name listed in the family register would still have to change, the problem of people feeling a loss of identity from having to change their surname would remain unresolved. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), meanwhile, is split over the introduction of selective separate surnames, and forwent submitting its own bill to the Diet. There were moves within the party to make the expansion of the use of maiden names its basic stance, but it failed to build consensus due to a strong backlash from party lawmakers in favor of introducing the optional separate surname system. As the points of contention are clearly laid out, the LDP should swiftly agree to putting the bills to a vote. If the party finds it too difficult to achieve internal consensus, it should leave the decision to each LDP lawmaker without compelling them to adhere to party lines. Komeito's response to the issue is also questionable. Although the LDP's junior coalition partner had advocated for the realization of selective separate surnames in its campaign pledge for last year's House of Representatives election, it is currently struggling to align itself with the LDP. In Japan, the majority of those who change their surnames upon marriage are women. The United Nations' Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has repeatedly issued advisories calling for correct of the system forcing Japanese couples to adopt a single surname, calling it discriminatory. The optional separate surname system fulfills the wishes of those wanting to retain their own surnames while not shunning those wishing to adopt a shared surname. No one should be disadvantaged by this system. It has been 29 years since the Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice proposed the introduction of selective separate surnames. Today, fewer and fewer people are bound by traditional family values. There are also many people who believe married couples having different surnames will not affect family bonds. It is the role of politics to keep systems in step with the changing times.
Yomiuri Shimbun
30 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Nikkei Stock Average Rises on Weaker Yen, Easing Worries about Trade Tensions
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo The Tokyo Stock Exchange TOKYO, June 6 (Reuters) – Japan's Nikkei share average rose on Friday, as a weaker yen lifted sentiment, while concerns about trade tensions eased following a phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The Nikkei rose 0.5% to 37,741.61 but fell 1% for the week. The broader Topix climbed 0.47% to 2,769.33 while posting a 1.6% weekly loss. 'The trade talks seemed to have ended peacefully and that sent a positive sign to the market,' said Naoki Fujiwara, senior fund manager at Shinkin Asset Management. On Thursday, Trump held a long-awaited phone call with Xi Jinping, in an effort to resolve trade disputes between the world's two largest economies that have buffeted the global economy, and agreed to hold further discussions. But caution ahead of the U.S. non-farm payrolls report, due later in the day, capped gains, Fujiwara said. The Nikkei got technical support ahead of the fixing of special quotation prices, used to set values on index options and futures, next week, said Seiichi Suzuki, chief equity market analyst at Tokai Tokyo Intelligence Laboratory. 'Foreigners, who shorted the Nikkei futures, bought them back ahead of the fixing day, which also lifted the Nikkei index.' The yen, which last traded down 0.3% at 144 per dollar, also supported local equities, Shigetoshi Kamada, general manager at the research department of Tachibana Securities, said. Chip-related heavyweights Tokyo Electron and Advantest rose 1.28% and 2.23%, respectively. Automakers gained, with Honda Motor and Nissan Motor adding 1.3% and 1.27%, respectively, while Toyota Motor moved 0.06% higher. Panasonic Holdings, which supplies batteries for Tesla, lost 2.37% after Tesla shares plunged 14.3%. ispace tanked 29% to 744 yen, hitting the day's exchange-allowed floor, after the space venture said that its uncrewed moon lander likely crashed onto the lunar surface during its touchdown attempt.
Asahi Shimbun
34 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
High court rules TEPCO execs not responsible for nuclear disaster
Hiroyuki Kawai, center, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, criticizes the ruling in front of the Tokyo High Court in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward on June 6. (Masaaki Kobayashi) The Tokyo High Court on June 6 rescinded a court order for former executives of Tokyo Electric Power Co. to pay the company about 13 trillion yen ($92.6 billion) over the Fukushima nuclear disaster. In absolving the defendants of responsibility for financial damages caused to the company, the court ruled the giant tsunami that smashed into TEPCO's Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant on March 11, 2011, was 'unforeseeable.' The ruling overturned the Tokyo District Court's decision in 2022 to order the former TEPCO executives to pay compensation for failing to take measures that could have prevented the 'foreseeable' tsunami from causing the triple meltdown at the plant. 'This is unbelievable and unforgivable,' Yui Kimura, secretary-general of the plaintiffs' group, said of the high court's ruling. Hiroyuki Kawai, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said: 'This is an extremely unjust and logically contradictory verdict. It allows a recurrence of the nuclear accident, and we will pursue the flaws in this decision at the Supreme Court.' The plaintiffs--42 shareholders of TEPCO—had demanded 23 trillion yen in compensation to the company from five former executives and others over the damage caused by their failure to take tsunami countermeasures. The five defendants were: Tsunehisa Katsumata, a former chairman who died in 2024; Masataka Shimizu, a former president; two former vice presidents, Ichiro Takekuro and Sakae Muto; and a former managing director, Akio Komori. Katsumata's heirs succeeded him in the lawsuit. The major issues in the lawsuit were whether TEPCO management at the time could have foreseen the occurrence of such a giant tsunami and whether they could have prevented the disaster by issuing instructions for tsunami countermeasures. In 2002, the central government released a long-term evaluation of earthquake forecasts that indicated the possibility of a major earthquake followed by a massive tsunami occurring off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture. The Tokyo District Court's ruling in 2022 noted that this long-term assessment was scientifically reliable because it was made by top-level Japanese researchers, among other things. Based on this assessment, the lower court found that TEPCO's management team could have foreseen the 2011 tsunami, and that the accident could have been prevented if the defendants had ordered the construction of a watertight structure to prevent flooding of the reactor buildings and other facilities. The tsunami knocked out power to the plant, leading to three reactors melting down and forcing thousands of residents to evacuate from the area. Based on the decommissioning and decontamination costs incurred and the amount of compensation paid to evacuees, the district court concluded that the former management had caused TEPCO more than 13 trillion yen in damages. At the appeal hearing, the defendants repeated their argument that 'the long-term assessment was unreliable, as it was criticized by seismologists and other experts.'
