logo
One Big Tax Break: The Top 5 Business Cuts In The Big Beautiful Bill

One Big Tax Break: The Top 5 Business Cuts In The Big Beautiful Bill

Forbes17-07-2025
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 04: U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the ... More One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC. (Photo by)
On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law what he has called the biggest tax cut in U.S. history—the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (OBBBA). The act is poised to serve as a comprehensive effort to stimulate economic growth, minimize regulatory burdens, and foster greater benefits for entrepreneurs. The Bill introduces a range of tax changes benefiting both individuals and business owners. While the legislation is broad in scope, and extends beyond tax matters, one of its key features is the slate of tax cuts targeted at American businesses, particularly those in the small and growing category. These elements are designed to reduce tax liabilities and encourage capital investment for business owners navigating a challenging
post-pandemic economy. Let's take a closer look at the top five business tax cuts in the OBBBA and what they could mean for entrepreneurs in 2025 and beyond.
Permanent Extension of the Qualified Business Income Deduction
The Act makes a major, permanent change to the tax code by securing the Section 199A pass-through deduction—commonly known as the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction—as a permanent feature of U.S. tax law. Originally introduced under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 during President Trump's first term, the QBI deduction allows eligible owners of pass-through entities—such as sole proprietorships, partnerships, S corporations, and certain trusts and estates—to deduct up to 20% of their qualified business income from taxable income. The deduction was a significant tax benefit designed to level the playing field between pass-through businesses and C corporations, which had received a substantial corporate tax rate cut under the same legislation.
Under the original TCJA, however, the QBI deduction was scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025, creating uncertainty for millions of small business owners and entrepreneurs who relied on the deduction to reduce their effective tax rate. The expiration would have effectively raised taxes on pass-through businesses, many of which are the backbone of the American economy. By making the QBI deduction permanent, the OBBBA eliminates that looming uncertainty and ensures long-term tax stability for a wide range of businesses.
In addition to making the deduction permanent, the OBBBA also raises the income thresholds at which the deduction begins to phase out. Joint filers with taxable income up to $494,600 are now eligible to claim the full deduction, an increase of more than $10,000 over previous limits. This change expands access to higher-earning business owners who were previously limited or excluded from the deduction. Notably, these expanded thresholds will be indexed to inflation beginning in 2026, helping the deduction maintain its value and reach over time.
The Act also introduces a minimum deduction safeguard for the smallest businesses. Under the new provision, businesses with at least $1,000 in qualified business income from an active trade or business are guaranteed a minimum deduction of $400, ensuring that even the smallest entrepreneurs benefit. Like the income thresholds, this minimum deduction will also be adjusted for inflation starting in 2026, providing lasting relief to microbusinesses and sole proprietors.
Together, these updates to the QBI deduction reflect the OBBBA's broader goal of supporting small businesses, reducing tax burdens, and encouraging long-term investment in the U.S. economy. By removing the expiration date and enhancing accessibility, the Act strengthens a vital tool for American business owners and brings a new level of predictability to tax planning for years to come.
Increases Research and Development Deductions
The OBBBA introduces a significant change to how businesses handle domestic research and development (R&D) expenses by permanently restoring immediate expensing. This means that companies can now deduct the full cost of their qualified R&D expenditures in the year those expenses are incurred, rather than amortizing them over several years—a requirement that had been in place since 2022 under the TCJA.
For small businesses—defined as those with average annual gross receipts of $31 million or less—the law goes a step further. These businesses are allowed to retroactively apply immediate expensing for domestic R&D costs incurred after December 31, 2021, offering a valuable opportunity to amend past returns and recover tax benefits that were previously deferred under the amortization rules.
For larger businesses, or those with gross receipts above the $31 million threshold, the legislation allows for a transition period. Domestic R&D expenses incurred between December 31, 2021, and January 1, 2025, that were previously amortized can now be accelerated and deducted over a shortened period of one or two years, depending on the company's choice or eligibility criteria. This acceleration provides meaningful near-term tax relief while phasing in the return to full expensing.
Together, these changes are aimed at incentivizing innovation, easing cash flow constraints, and reversing the chilling effect the TCJA's R&D amortization requirement had on business investment in domestic research. The provision is especially beneficial for startups and small tech-driven enterprises, which often rely on R&D investment but lack the capital to wait years for tax benefits to materialize.
Increases Business Interest Deductions
The new legislation permanently reinstates the EBITDA-based limitation on business interest deductions. EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In 2017, TCJA introduced a limit on business interest expense deductions to 30% of adjusted taxable income (ATI). Initially, from 2018 to 2021, ATI was calculated using an EBITDA-based approach. However, for tax years starting after December 31, 2021, the calculation shifted to an EBIT-based approach (earnings before interest and taxes), which excludes depreciation and amortization. This change generally resulted in stricter limitations and increased tax liability for businesses, particularly capital-intensive companies. In short, by permanently restoring the EBITDA-based limitation, the OBBBA provides many business owners with a greater ability to deduct business interest expenses. This is because the EBITDA-based ATI calculation typically yields a higher ATI amount, enabling a larger interest deduction. This will create some relief for capital-intensive businesses that invest a significant amount into long-lived assets like equipment and machinery. The previous EBIT-based limitation had a negative impact on capital-intensive businesses due to their significant depreciation and amortization expenses. The shift back to EBITDA may alleviate some of the tax burden on these companies in industries like farming and manufacturing.
Restores 100 Percent Bonus Depreciation
The OBBBA permanently restores 100% bonus depreciation for short-lived investments. Purchases of business assets, such as equipment and vehicles, are now 100% deductible in the year they are purchased and/or put into service for the business. Congress first introduced 100% bonus depreciation as part of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010. This allowed for a temporary 100% bonus depreciation rate from September 2010 through the end of 2011. More recently, the TCJA of 2017 allowed businesses to deduct 100% of the cost of eligible property placed in service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023. The TCJA required bonus depreciation began phasing out in 2023, resulting in a reduction in the percentage deductible, decreasing to 80% for 2023, 60% for 2024, and now 40% for 2025. With the BBB, the deduction will be restored to 100% for 2025 and remain at 100% permanently.
Plus, for vehicles purchased in your personal name, the law now provides a deduction for auto loan interest of up to $10,000 for purchases of new vehicles that are assembled in the United States. If the vehicle is purchased personally but used in the business, you can take advantage of the deduction for bonus depreciation and the auto loan interest deduction.
Provides 100 percent expensing of new business buildings
The Act includes a targeted incentive aimed at stimulating domestic industrial investment through a special provision for structures classified as qualified production property (QPP). These are buildings and facilities that are primarily used in the manufacturing, production, or refining of tangible personal property within the United States. The goal is to encourage companies to expand or modernize their physical infrastructure to support domestic industrial activity and strengthen U.S. supply chains.
To qualify for the 100% immediate expensing benefit, certain timing and use conditions must be met. Construction of the QPP structures must commence after January 19, 2025, and before January 1, 2029, offering a defined window during which businesses must begin their projects to be eligible. Additionally, the property must be placed in service no later than January 1, 2031, ensuring that the economic benefits are realized within a reasonable timeframe.
However, this tax benefit is not universally available to all types of property within a facility. The provision explicitly excludes parts of a structure that are used for non-production activities, such as office space, administrative functions, employee cafeterias, parking garages, and other ancillary or support areas. Only the portions of the structure that are directly involved in qualifying industrial processes—like assembly lines, fabrication areas, or refining equipment spaces—are eligible for the accelerated deduction.
This distinction is critical, as it ensures the tax benefit is narrowly tailored to incentivize core production investments rather than general corporate expansion. By doing so, the OBBBA aims to maximize the economic impact of the expensing provision, driving capital investment directly into the sectors and activities that are central to domestic manufacturing competitiveness and economic resilience.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act marks a sweeping shift in U.S. tax policy, particularly for the business community. By making key provisions permanent—like the Qualified Business Income deduction, 100% bonus depreciation, and EBITDA-based interest deductions—while expanding incentives for research, innovation, and industrial infrastructure, the Act seeks to reduce financial friction for businesses of all sizes. It delivers targeted relief to small businesses and capital-intensive industries alike, while sending a clear message: the U.S. is doubling down on domestic growth, productivity, and entrepreneurship. As business owners look ahead, these tax cuts are poised to not only lower costs but also fuel reinvestment, expansion, and innovation in an economy still reshaping itself in the post-pandemic years ahead. Whether you're a startup founder, manufacturer, or seasoned entrepreneur, the OBBBA's top five tax breaks represent new opportunities—and new responsibilities—to plan smart and grow strong.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 Reasons Trump's Trade Deal With China Is Bad News for the Middle Class
5 Reasons Trump's Trade Deal With China Is Bad News for the Middle Class

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 Reasons Trump's Trade Deal With China Is Bad News for the Middle Class

President Donald Trump's latest trade deal with China may look like a diplomatic win, but for the American middle class, it comes with hidden costs. Trending Now: Find Out: While tariffs are being reduced in exchange for promises from Beijing, households could still face higher prices, disrupted supply chains and reduced job growth. Here are four reasons Trump's trade deal with China is bad news for the middle class and what families can do to protect their finances. Higher Consumer Prices Despite Tariff Relief Even as the U.S. and China approach an August trade deal deadline, prices on many consumer goods remain elevated, and middle-class households continue to feel the strain. Some experts argue that the new tariffs may not drastically shift average import prices. However, middle-class families are more likely to feel the impact in specific categories, such as electronics, tools and household goods. 'U.S. companies scrambled to import as many goods as possible to stockpile before new tariffs were fully implemented, mitigating the immediate impact of tariffs on prices,' said Bryan Riley, Director of the Free Trade Initiative at the National Taxpayers Union. Riley said that since imports from China account for just 13.2% of total U.S. imports, increases in the price of specific Chinese goods may not push up the overall import average. However, they can still significantly affect middle-class budgets for everyday items. Read More: Erosion of Real Incomes and Job Losses An analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco warned that Trump's trade measures could cut national real income by around 0.4%, while losses in services and agriculture might offset job gains in manufacturing. 'What's pitched as economic growth is actually a slow bleed: Manufacturing jobs won't magically return, and small businesses relying on predictable import costs are about to face more whiplash,' said Patrice Williams Lindo, CEO of Career Nomad. 'Wages stay stagnant while everyday costs climb. And here's the kicker — there's no workforce investment baked into this deal. That means your job security, benefits and opportunities to grow could evaporate, especially if your industry leans heavily on exports or global sourcing.' Volatile Markets and Supply Chain Instability Although the China deal eased recession fears, experts said that uncertainty around ongoing tariffs still disrupts manufacturing and logistics. Businesses may hold back investment or retool supply chains, raising costs for middle-class consumers and slowing hiring. For example, uncertainty remains one of the most significant threats to economic momentum, particularly for businesses making long-term decisions. 'The real issue is that this deal doesn't create clarity. It reinforces an environment of 'wait and see,' Robert Khachatryan, CEO and founder of Freight Right. 'That's not how you build confidence in the economy.' Khachatryan added, 'You can't expect small and midsize businesses, who employ a huge portion of America's middle class, to plan for the future when they're stuck playing defense against the next round of tariffs.' Missed Middle-Class Priorities in the Deal While the latest Trump-China deal touts manufacturing wins, some economists warn it overlooks the broader economic trade-offs that directly affect the middle class. 'We have an experiment,' said Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, in a recent interview on Conversations with Jim Zirin. 'In 2018, President Trump imposed 25% tariffs on steel. Seven years later, we have 1,000 more steelworkers, but 75,000 fewer workers in manufacturing sectors that relied on steel, and a 30% drop in steel sector productivity.' This kind of trade-off may deliver political wins, but it overlooks how tariff-driven policies ripple into everyday life for the middle class. 'Over time, reduced job stability in trade-sensitive sectors and a slowdown in wage growth may exacerbate economic insecurity for families already stretched thin by inflation and debt servicing costs,' said Jean-Baptiste Wautier, a private equity CIO and World Economic Forum speaker. How To Protect Your Budget Middle-class families can shield themselves by using rewards or rebate programs and strategically stockpiling essentials before potential tariff increases. Julian Merrick, founder and CEO of Supertrader, a fintech firm focused on global markets, recommends starting with a small emergency fund, even setting aside $200 to $300, which can help families avoid debt when unexpected expenses arise. 'It also helps to cut back on spending in categories where prices are rising — things like tech, clothes or imported goods,' Merrick said. 'Families should avoid taking on new high-interest debt right now, especially for non-essentials. And for those with investments, make sure the money is spread out across different industries.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on 5 Reasons Trump's Trade Deal With China Is Bad News for the Middle Class Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Union Pacific, Norfolk to merge, create America's first coast-to-coast railroad: What to know
Union Pacific, Norfolk to merge, create America's first coast-to-coast railroad: What to know

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Union Pacific, Norfolk to merge, create America's first coast-to-coast railroad: What to know

The proposed merger on Tuesday of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern would create the first coast-to-coast railroad in the United States that would be controlled by a single entity. The deal, valued at $85 billion, plans to connect 50,000 miles of tracks spanning across 43 states and the District of Columbia. The leaders hailing the project on Tuesday suggested it would dramatically transform the way supplies are transported across the country. 'Railroads have been an integral part of building America since the Industrial Revolution, and this transaction is the next step in advancing the industry,' Jim Vena, Union Pacific's CEO, said in a statement. 'Imagine seamlessly hauling steel from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to Colton, California and moving tomato paste from Huron, California to Fremont, Ohio. Lumber from the Pacific Northwest, plastics from the Gulf Coast, copper from Arizona and Utah, and soda ash from Wyoming,' he added. 'Right now, tens of thousands of railroaders are moving almost everything we use. You name it, and at some point, the railroad hauled it.' What's the timeline? The two companies are planning to submit an application with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in six months. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are ​​tracking a finalized transaction by early 2027, according to a release. Each entity will continue independent management until the deal is closed. Company operations are headquartered in Omaha, Neb., while Atlanta will serve as a long-term project hub. What's the financial breakdown? Union Pacific is expecting to boost its company value to $30 billion while reaping in $2.75 billion annually. The company is offering Norfolk Southern shareholders $88.82 in cash per share and one Union Pacific share to complete the deal. Norfolk Southern shareholders will maintain 27 percent ownership in the combined company. The combined company will be without a voting trust and includes a $2.5 billion reverse termination fee. What will happen to workers? Union Pacific said every union employee who wants a job in the combined company will have one in their Tuesday release. 'Our safety, network, and financial performance is among the best we've had as a company, as is our customer satisfaction. And it is from this position of strength that we embark on this transformational combination,' said Norfolk Southern CEO Mark George. 'We are confident that the power of Norfolk Southern's franchise, diversified solutions, high-quality customers and partners, as well as skilled employees, will contribute meaningfully to America's first transcontinental railroad, and to igniting rail's ability to deliver for the whole American economy today and into the future,' he added.

Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern seek 1st transcontinental railroad through a massive merger
Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern seek 1st transcontinental railroad through a massive merger

Chicago Tribune

time3 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern seek 1st transcontinental railroad through a massive merger

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Union Pacific wants to buy Norfolk Southern in a $85 billion deal that would create the first transcontinental railroad in the U.S, and potentially trigger a final wave of rail mergers across the country. The proposed merger, announced Tuesday, would marry Union Pacific's vast rail network in the West with Norfolk's rails that snake across 22 Eastern states, and the District of Columbia. The nation was first linked by rail in 1869, when a golden railroad spike was driven in Utah to symbolize the connection of East and West Coasts. Yet no single entity has controlled that coast-to-coast passage. The railroads argue a merger would streamline deliveries of raw materials and goods nationwide by eliminating delays when shipments are handed off between railroads. The AP first reported the merger talks earlier this month a week before the railroads confirmed the discussions last week. Any deal would be closely scrutinized by antitrust regulators that have set a very high bar for railroad deals after previous consolidation in the industry led to massive backups and snarled traffic. If the deal is approved, the two remaining major American railroads — BNSF and CSX — will face tremendous pressure to merge to create a second transcontinental railroad so they can compete. The continent's two other major railroads — Canadian National and CPKC — may also get involved. The Canadian rails span all of that nation and feed into America. CPKC rails stretch south into Mexico Some big shippers like chemical plants in the Gulf may be wary of the deal due to fears of a monopoly that could would wield immense influence over rates, but other major rail customers, like Amazon and UPS, may be in favor if it means packages will arrive more quickly and reliably. Those big companies, along with unions and communities across the country that the railroads cross, will have a chance to weigh before the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. Consumers could benefit if the transcontinental rail does reduce shipping rates and delivery times. Union Pacific said that combined, the railroads would improve delivery times. There's speculation that this deal might win approval under the pro-business Trump administration, but the STB is currently evenly split between two Republicans and two Democrats. The board is led by a Republican, and Trump will appoint a fifth member before this deal will be considered. Union Pacific is offering $20 billion cash and one share of its stock to complete the deal. Norfolk Southern shareholders would receive one UP share and $88.82 in cash for each one of their shares as part of the deal that values NS at roughly $320 per share. Norfolk Southern closed at just over $260 a share earlier this month before the first reports speculating about a deal. Union Pacific's stock fell nearly 2% to $224.98 in premarket trading, while Norfolk Southern's stock dipped more than 3% to $277.40. Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena, who has championed a merger, said lumber from the Pacific Northwest and plastics produced on the Gulf Coast and steel made in Pittsburgh will all reach their destinations more seamlessly. 'It builds upon President Abraham Lincoln's vision of a transcontinental railroad from nearly 165 years ago, and will usher in a new era of American innovation,' Vena told investors Tuesday. U.S. railroads have already undergone extensive consolidation. There were more than 30 major freight railroads in the early 1980s. Today, six major railroads handle the majority of shipments nationwide. Western rival BNSF, owned by Berkshire Hathaway, has the war chest to pursue an acquisition of CSX, to the east, if it chooses. CEO Warren Buffett is sitting on more than $348 billion cash and the consummate dealmaker may want to swing for the fences one last time before stepping down as planned at the end of the year. Buffett recently threw cold water on reports that he had enlisted Goldman Sachs to advise him on a potential rail deal in an interview with CNBC, but he rarely uses investment bankers anyway. Buffett reached an agreement to buy the parts of the BNSF railroad he didn't already own for $26.3 billion after a private meeting with its CEO more than a decade ago. Yet there's widespread debate over whether a major rail merger would be approved by the Surface Transportation Board, which has established a high bar for consolidation in the crucial rail industry. That's largely due to the aftermath of a consolidation in the U.S nearly 30 years ago that involved Union Pacific. It merged with Southern Pacific in 1996 and the tie-up led to an extended period of snarled traffic on U.S. rails. Three years later, Conrail was divvied up by Norfolk Southern and CSX, which led to more backups in the East. 'We're committed to making sure that doesn't happen in this case,' said Norfolk CEO Mark George. He added that the railroads will spend the next two years planning for a smooth integration before this deal might get approved. Just two years ago, the STB approved the first major rail merger in more than two decades. In that deal, which was supported by big shippers, Canadian Pacific acquired Kansas City Southern for $31 billion to create the CPKC railroad. There were compelling factors in that deal, however, that combined the two smallest major freight railroads. The combined railroad, regulators reasoned, would benefit trade across North America. The deal announced Tuesday would merge the nation's largest freight railroad, with the smallest. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern said they expect to submit their application for approval within the next six months and hope the deal would get approved by early 2027. They predict that they would be able to eliminate $1 billion in costs annually, but Vena said that every union worker at both railroads should still have a job. The railroads also predict they would be able to boost revenue by at least $1.75 billion each year by winning more business from trucking companies and other railroads. On Tuesday, Norfolk Southern reported a $768 million second-quarter profit, or $3.41 per share, as volume grew 3%. That's up from $737 million, or $3.25 per share, a year ago, but the results were affected by insurance payments from its 2023 East Palestine derailment and restructuring costs. Without the one-time factors, Norfolk Southern made $3.29 per share, which was just below the $3.31 per share that analysts surveyed by FactSet Research predicted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store