logo
Taiwan's government strengthens 'silicon shield,' restricts exports of TSMC's most advanced process technologies

Taiwan's government strengthens 'silicon shield,' restricts exports of TSMC's most advanced process technologies

Yahoo30-04-2025

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Taiwan plans to tighten control over exports of advanced process technologies as well as outbound semiconductor investments, reports Economic Daily. The new legal measures will enforce the 'N-1' technology restriction, essentially barring TSMC from exporting its latest production nodes, and introduce penalties for violations— but there's a major catch for TSMC.
The 'N-1' policy, confirmed by Premier Cho Jung-tai, will apply to TSMC's planned production in the United States. This approach restricts export of the most advanced process technology, allowing only one generation older to be deployed abroad. Before this amendment, Taiwan's regulations did not explicitly require such controls for semiconductor manufacturing processes. These rules are based on Article 22 of the amended Industrial Innovation Act, which is expected to take effect by the end of 2025.
There is a major catch about TSMC's most advanced process technology, though. Today, TSMC has one leading-edge node: N3P manufacturing technology. But by the end of the year, it will start producing chips on its N2 fabrication process, which will become its flagship. Starting from late 2026 and onwards, however, TSMC expects to have two flagship nodes: N2P for client applications that do not need advanced power delivery and A16 with Super Power Rail backside power delivery for HPC applications that consume a lot of power. It remains to be seen which process technology will be considered as 'flagship' by Taiwanese authorities, and therefore export restricted, or if the government will ban exports of both nodes for a year when TSMC introduces successors for N2P and A16, its A14 and A16P nodes.
In addition, the amended law, passed after its third reading in the Taiwan parliament, gives Taiwan's authorities the right to reject or cancel overseas investments if they are found to compromise national security, damage the country's economic development, violate treaty obligations, or result in unresolved major labor disputes. Under the new law, these six conditions are retained, but are now backed by higher-level legislation. The revised Article 22 also includes the possibility of partially or fully rejecting investments or attaching conditions to approval. If a company receives approval but later triggers any of these risks, the central authorities are authorized to demand corrective action or revoke the investment entirely if the issue is serious. The new law elevates existing investment restrictions from sub-regulations to formal legislation and adds legal consequences for non-compliance.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs stated that the law's implementation date will be announced only after the sub-regulations are revised, within six months. This means the earliest enforcement could begin by late 2025. The regulation's rollout comes amid rising geopolitical risks and after TSMC announced plans to increase its investments in its American production capacity from $65 billion over four years to $165 billion over an undisclosed period.
The amendment also introduces penalties that were not present before. Companies that invest abroad without prior approval may face fines ranging from NT$50,000 to NT$1 million ($30,830). If an investment is approved but the company later fails to correct identified violations — such as endangering national security or harming economic development—the authorities can impose repeated fines of NT$500,000 ($15,414) to NT$10 million ($308,286). But given that TSMC plans to invest $165 billion in its U.S. facilities, a $300,000 fine will hardly affect the company's bottom line.Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Apple finally fixing its confusing naming system?
Is Apple finally fixing its confusing naming system?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Is Apple finally fixing its confusing naming system?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. It's that time of the year when rumours about Apple's next operating system updates start flying. True to form, we've seen plenty of speculation about big visionOS-inspired UI design changes in iOS 19 and macOS 16. But is that what the next systems will even be called? It's now being suggested that Apple will overhaul its OS naming conventions and will brand the next generation of software by year rather than release number. That would mean that instead of iOS 19, macOS 16, WatchOS 12 and visionOS 3, we would see the releases of iOS 26, MacOS 26, WatchOS 26 and visionOS 26. If that change sounds familiar, that might be because it's like what Samsung did with its flagship Galaxy S phones back in 2020. It's about time Apple made the same move. Apple's operating systems currently all have different numbers because they were all launched at different times. iPhones are currently on iOS 18, Macs on MacOS 15 and Vision Pro, which was released just last year, is on visionOS 2. The rumour about a change in branding comes from a credible source. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has been right about many Apple rumours in the pasts. He writes: "Apple will use the upcoming year rather than the current one. Though its next operating systems will launch around September 2025, they'll be named for 2026 — not unlike how car companies market their vehicles. If Apple keeps the strategy, the following set of releases will carry the 27 moniker." The move would bring consistency to Apple software branding and make it easier for both customers and developers to know what release each OS is on. There would be no more having to remember each system's number since you would just have to know what year it is. For the moment, it seems Apple isn't considering the same change for its hardware, so the next iPhone will presumably be the iPhone 17 as expected (and iPhone 17 Air if the rumours are true). But why stop at software? I'd say it makes sense to apply the same logic to devices. Gurman compares the move to car manufacturers, but it's hard not to also recall how Samsung made a change like this with its hardware. Apple's rival jumped from the Galaxy S10 in 2019 straight to the S20 in 2020. And it was an ingenious move. Not only did it make it easier for customers to remember what phone they have and identify the current model, but Samsung leap-frogged over Apple in the process. Apple was on iPhone 11 at the time. By turning the Galaxy S11 into the Galaxy S22, it suddenly made it sound like Samsung was ahead. The South Korean tech giant usually releases new Galaxy models in January, while Apple launches iPhones in September. If Apple called the next generation iPhone 26 instead of iPhone 17 it could beat Samsung at its own game and would always be a few months ahead. That might sound petty, but numbers can be powerful in branding. Just remember how Microsoft chose the name Xbox 360 to avoid being seen as a generation behind PlayStation. I'm sure some fans like the iPhone release number tradition, but Apple's already played fast and loose with that by skipping iPhone 9 so it could launch iPhone X on the phone's 10th anniversary, and it would have to repeat that move if it wants to release an iPhone 20 in 2027. Let's just ditch the release numbers and go with the year. You know it makes sense, Apple. You can see the best deals on Apple's current iPhone lineup below. Also see our pick of the best camera phones for other options. What do you think? Should iPhone 17 become iPhone 26? Let us know in the comments section below.

Apple's iPhone rebrand reveals a company in crisis
Apple's iPhone rebrand reveals a company in crisis

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple's iPhone rebrand reveals a company in crisis

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Three years ago we got the iPhone 14, two years ago we got the iPhone 15, and last year we got the iPhone 16. Who knows what we're getting this year? Well, actually, for the first time in a long while, that joke might not be applicable in 2025, with Apple heavily rumoured to be jettisoning its naming conventions for iOS, and potentially the iPhone itself. Somewhat confusingly, Apple has been strongly rumoured to be ditching skipping straight from iOS 18 to iOS 26 when revealing the next generation of its mobile software at WWDC today. After nearly 20 years of consecutive numbers, the company has allegedly decided to name it after the coming year. And some have suggested the same change could hit the iPhone, with the iPhone 16 being followed by the iPhone 26. As one Redditor succinctly puts it, "This both makes a lot of sense and makes no sense at the same time." This potential major rebrand comes at a curious time for Apple, one in which the company is arguably on the defensive. Apple Intelligence, announced to much fanfare at last year's WWDC, is fast approaching 'disaster' status, with several features yet to materialise and the whole debacle allegedly causing tension in the company. And then there are the more existential questions facing the brand. As the iPhone approaches its twentieth birthday, the whole thing feels less and less innovative every year – to the point that the iPhone 16 launch left us unusually underwhelmed. The tech world seems all too aware that the world is ready for the next 'iPhone moment' to come along and transform the landscape, which might explain the ridiculous amount of hype that met the news of Jony Ive joining OpenAI, with a supposedly revolutionary new device imminent. Apple might have hoped the advent of Vision Pro might provide that next 'iPhone moment', but alas, it wasn't to be. The hugely expensive headset has already been declared a flop by several corners of the internet after Apple sharply cut back production at the end of last year. All of which to say is that Apple isn't exactly feeling its freshest in 2025, and the iOS and potential iPhone rebrand seems to confirm that the company knows it. Apple is hardly known for simple naming conventions, but it's notable that it has chosen now to cut the iOS title's ties with the original iPhone launch in 2007, as though the company is eager to show that it's looking forward, not back. Time will tell what Apple is planning to reveal at WWDC tonight, but for my money, it'll take more than a new name and a refreshed design for Apple to get people excited about the future of the iPhone. With its rivals circling and its AI efforts flailing, perhaps the next 'iPhone moment' won't come from Apple at all.

Wow, Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 will look completely different, according to "official" image leak
Wow, Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 will look completely different, according to "official" image leak

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Wow, Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 will look completely different, according to "official" image leak

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Quick Summary Images have leaked showing the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 range – and there's a big change. The case shape looks set to follow the Galaxy Watch Ultra this time out. After months of spec leaks and rumours, we've finally got a good look at the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 range. That's because a series of renders have just been spotted and shared by the team at Android Authority. The next-gen smartwatch has been the subject of the rumour mill in recent weeks, after a Samsung executive confirmed an "innovative" design would be coming on the new models. Now, we know exactly what that will look like – and it's one of my favourites. The models appear to utilise the squircle case shape from the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra. In my humble opinion – and as someone who spends most of my week surrounded by pricier luxury watches – that is the best looking smartwatch on the market right now, so I'm really excited to see more models follow suit. The two models shown are the base model Galaxy Watch 8 and the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. The latter is the more interesting of the two – released every two years, that features a physical rotating bezel for a more traditional feel. It will certainly be interesting to see how that is implemented on the more squared case shape. The report also suggests that the Classic variant could take the Quick Button and stronger vibration from the Ultra, which would make it an appealing prospect. Speaking of the Ultra, it looks as though we might not see a new version of that model this time out. The team found the codename for the original Galaxy Watch Ultra variant, suggesting that it may just receive some new software features. That's no bad thing, though. It's biggest competitor – the Apple Watch Ultra 2 – has moved to a bi-annual release cadence after arriving just 12 months after its successor. That felt like a step to soon for most, who weren't willing to fork out so much cash in such a short period of time. Elsewhere, we also learned that there will be two sizes for the base model. There's no word on the actual sizes for those models, but the code appears to reference a small and a large option for users.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store