logo
Exclusive: EU to delay bank rules as it waits for Trump's deregulation moves, sources say

Exclusive: EU to delay bank rules as it waits for Trump's deregulation moves, sources say

Reuters22-05-2025

FRANKFURT, May 22(Reuters) - The European Union is set to delay new, global rules governing banks' trading again as it waits for more clarity about the U.S. administration's plans to deregulate its financial sector, sources told Reuters.
The Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) is a key part the Basel III package devised in the wake of the global financial crisis but not yet implemented by Britain or the United States, two of the world's key financial centres.
Its adoption in the EU was already pushed back by a year to 2026 last year, when it became clear that the United States would not be able to adopt the rules by its original deadline.
The latest, one-year postponement to January 1, 2027 reflects pressure from European banks fearing they will find themselves at a disadvantage to their U.S. and UK rivals, five senior officials at European and national institutions said.
A senior EU source said European Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque informed the bloc's finance ministers about the delay at a meeting on May 13.
The European Commission had said it would make a decision on whether or not to postpone the FRTB by the end of June after consulting with the industry and its supervisors.
The FRTB governs capital and reporting requirements relating to banks' trading assets, crucially including how risk should be measured using a standard method or banks' own calculations.
The United States has stalled the introduction of the entire Basel III package and U.S. President Donald Trump's administration signalled it might even relax some of the existing rules, in what would mark a U-turn from the push for more controls that followed the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
European banks have urged the EU to refrain from imposing new burdens that their competitors overseas do not face.
"It now looks as if this set of rules will not exist in the U.S. and we know that Brussels is looking at this carefully," Commerzbank's chief executive Bettina Orlopp said at a conference on Monday. "We have to be careful that we maintain the international competitiveness of European banks."
The European Central Bank, the EU's top banking watchdog and for a long time a staunch defender of a timely implementation of Basel III, proposed a compromise earlier this month.
It envisaged a one-year delay to rules applied to banks' internal risk models, while those concerning the one-size-fits-all, "standardised approach" would be phased in over three years starting in 2026.
Some governments have also weighed in, with French President Emmanuel Macron calling for a "synchronisation, opens new tab" on financial rules between the EU, the United States and Britain.
Britain earlier this year pushed back its Basel III implementation to 2027 while Washington has yet to unveil a timeline.
In contrast, the EU has already implemented most of the Basel III package, which took effect this year. China, Japan and Canada have done so long ago.
In March, the European Commission launched a consultation, asking banks and supervisors if they thought the FRTB should go live next year, be delayed by 12 months or tweaked to align it more with draft U.S. and UK rules.
The European Banking Federation, an industry body, said member banks that were exposed to U.S. and British competition favoured a one-year delay.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, a global lobby, said "a clear majority" of its own members also favoured a delay, although a minority preferred that the FRTB took effect next year to avoid running both new and old rules at once.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US aluminium tariffs threaten scrap clash with European Union
US aluminium tariffs threaten scrap clash with European Union

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US aluminium tariffs threaten scrap clash with European Union

LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's move to double tariffs on aluminium imports heightens the risk of a full-blown scrap war with the European Union. Although they are supposed to be blanket tariffs with no exceptions or exemptions, there is one significant gap in the tariff wall. Aluminium scrap is explicitly excluded on the grounds it constitutes a key raw material for U.S. manufacturers. The Trump administration's decision to lift aluminium tariffs to 25% effective the start of March has already caused U.S. imports of recyclable material to rise. This week's doubling of the tariff rate to 50% could turn the import flow into a flood. The European Union, which is mulling export duties on aluminium recyclables to stop what it terms "scrap leakage", is coming under pressure to move sooner rather than later. The U.S. Midwest aluminium premium has rocketed to a record $1,325 per metric ton after Wednesday's doubling-down on import tariffs. That's the price U.S. buyers will pay over and above the international price traded on the London Metal Exchange (LME), currently $2,430 per ton for cash metal. What once reflected the cost of transport to get metal to the U.S. Midwest manufacturing hub is now a tariff premium, capturing the fracture of the global aluminium pricing structure. U.S. consumers of aluminium goods will ultimately foot the bill but mid-stream processors are likely to do well. Fabricators converting raw metal to semi-finished goods such as can sheet were the prime beneficiaries of the first Trump administration's 10% tariffs, according to a report by consultancy Harbor Aluminum commissioned by the Beer Institute. Mid-stream processors passed on the tariff, even if the raw material was domestically sourced scrap, Harbor found. The new tariffs will incentivise fabricators not only to maximise their domestic purchases of scrap but to tap overseas markets, where U.S. buyers can now outbid just about anyone else for available material. U.S. imports of aluminium recyclable materials jumped to over 80,000 tons in March, the highest monthly volume since 2022. There were sharp increases in supply from Canada and Mexico, the two largest and nearest suppliers to the U.S. market. However, the tariff differential has started to draw material out of Europe, according to the European Aluminium association. Exports from EU countries to the United States spiked in the first quarter of the year, it said. They are only going to accelerate as the transatlantic price gap widens after this week's doubling of tariffs. The EU is facing a "full-blown scrap crisis", according to the association. Director General Paul Voss called on the European Commission to immediately impose a corresponding duty on scrap exports to the United States. The Commission has already identified high aluminium scrap exports as a key hurdle in its ambition to meet the bloc's "Circular Economy" targets. A March "Action Plan", opens new tab for both the aluminium and steel sectors promised a decision by the third quarter of this year on suitable trade measures, including reciprocal export tariffs on countries "that apply unfair subsidies" to their recycling industries. There's now a sense of urgency that some sort of defensive trade barrier will be required to stem export flows. Aluminium scrap is a highly globalised marketplace but that looks set to change as Europe figures out how to stop the loss of raw material to the United States. Caught in the middle of this tug-of-war is China, the world's largest aluminium scrap buyer. The country has imported 1.8 million tons in each of the last two years and although it sources much of its material from Asia, it is a significant buyer of both U.S. and European end-of-life scrap. Beijing last year relaxed the purity rules on imports of both copper and aluminium scrap to encourage greater domestic recycling. This is particularly important for China's aluminium sector, where production of primary metal is now close to the government's mandated capacity cap, meaning supply growth will have to come from recycling. Chinese buyers are facing the twin challenge of export restrictions in Europe and competition with U.S. players in their own Asian supply chain. The scrap wars have only just begun. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

South African rand stable ahead of US-China trade talks
South African rand stable ahead of US-China trade talks

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

South African rand stable ahead of US-China trade talks

JOHANNESBURG, June 9 (Reuters) - The South African rand was steady in early trade on Monday, as markets awaited pivotal U.S.-China trade talks set to take place later in the day that could ease tensions between the two nations. At 0621 GMT the rand traded at 17.7450 against the dollar , near Friday's closing level. Three top aides of U.S. President Donald Trump will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London later in the day to discuss the trade dispute between the two countries, a standoff that has kept global markets on edge. Like other risk-sensitive currencies, the rand often takes cues from global drivers like U.S. policy and economic data in addition to local factors. Domestic investors this week will look to manufacturing (ZAMAN=ECI), opens new tab and mining (ZAMNG=ECI), opens new tab data to gauge the health of Africa's most industrialised economy. Attention remains on the country's long-delayed budget after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, in his third attempt at passing it, made only minor adjustments to spending plans and deficit projections. On Wednesday the National Assembly is expected to debate the revised fiscal framework adopted by a key parliamentary committee last week. South Africa's benchmark 2035 government bond was also flat in early deals, with the yield at 10.075%.

The path to cheap power will be very expensive
The path to cheap power will be very expensive

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

The path to cheap power will be very expensive

LONDON, June 9 - Europe's ambition to develop cheap, clean energy has recently received a harsh reality check, as power failures and a string of cancelled renewables projects made it clear that the road to inexpensive power will carry a very high price tag. European investments in renewable energy have risen sharply over the past decade as governments have begun implementing policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – an effort that sped up after Russia's invasion of Ukraine created an energy price shock. The share of renewables in the EU's power sector rose to 47% in 2024 from 34% in 2019, with a record 168 gigawatts (GW) of solar and 44 GW of wind power capacities installed between 2022 and 2024 alone, according to EU data. In Britain, renewable generation exceeded 50% for the first time in 2024, data showed. But investment in grid infrastructure, including pylons, cables, transformers and battery storage technology, has barely kept up with the rapid change in the power generation mix. Between 40% and 55% of low-voltage lines will exceed the age of 40 by 2030, while their length increased only by 0.8% between 2021 and 2022, according to a European Commission report. The Commission last week issued guidance for developing electricity networks in which it estimated the bloc will require 730 billion euro of investments in power distribution and another 477 billion euro in transmission grid developments by 2040. The underinvestment in grid infrastructure has created strain in many systems, a risk that was laid bare on April 28, with the catastrophic blackout in the Iberian Peninsula. Regulators are still investigating exactly what triggered the collapse of the power systems in Spain and Portugal. But what is known for sure is that the outage was preceded by the disconnection of two solar farms in southern Spain. The Spanish system is heavily reliant on renewables, but the issue was not the energy source itself. Rather, the problem was that the grid system had not been updated to account for the fact that solar-powered plants, unlike those using fossil fuels, do not generate inertia – the kinetic energy created by the rotation of spinning generators – which can help stabilize a grid in the event of power disturbances. To overcome this challenge, operators would need to invest in technologies such as synchronous condensers or batteries that kick in within milliseconds in the event of an outage to offer backup. The Iberian debacle puts a spotlight on the fact that more investment is needed in the mundane, but vital, elements of grid infrastructure. Another reality check for Europe has been the realization that offshore wind – once heralded as a potential renewables game changer – simply has lousy economics today. Danish offshore wind giant Orsted on May 7 cancelled a major project off the eastern coast of Britain, Hornsey 4, dealing a blow to the country's ambitions to develop 50 GW of clean power capacity by 2050. The recent rise in material costs forced the cancellation, according to Orsted, which had already sunk 5.5 billion Danish crowns ($840.5 million) into the project. And then on May 16, the Dutch government postponed tenders for two offshore wind farms with a total capacity of 2 GW due to a lack of interest from potential bidders. Several companies said they saw no viable business case for the projects, which offered developers no government subsidies. These two cases suggest that capital-intensive projects like offshore wind simply won't make economic sense without more ambitious government policy initiatives. The challenge is not unique to Europe. While worldwide investment in clean technology has risen, the headline figures mask a less rosy picture. The International Energy Agency (IEA) said in a report published on June 5 that global investment in power grids reached a record $390 billion in 2024 and is set to surpass $400 billion in 2025, 20% higher than a decade ago. But spending on power grid upgrades has not kept up. In 2016, about 60 cents were invested in grids for every dollar spent on new generation capacity. That ratio has dropped to less than 40 cents as the costs of renewables has declined, according to the IEA. This imbalance is unsustainable as ageing Western power systems – especially those in Europe – will increasingly experience problems unless trillions are spent in grid upgrades. The investment shortfall partly reflects a fundamental time horizon mismatch. Governments face public pressure every time energy bills – or taxes – rise, so they will struggle to convey to voters the long-term benefits of spending billions in tax dollars to support building modern, low-carbon power systems. But energy companies and utilities seeking to invest in renewables and grids will need long-term policy certainty, and given the challenging economics for many renewables projects, they will often also require generous subsidies. To be sure, the long-term costs of inaction to mitigate climate change will be far higher, and the EU is already spending over 100 billion euros annually on fossil fuels subsidies. But long-term thinking is not an easy sell for politicians in a time of growing populism, nationalism and polarization. Ultimately, if European governments want their populations to have cheap, green energy, they will need to accept the reality that getting there will be more expensive and more government-driven than previously advertised. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store