Exclusive: EU to delay bank rules as it waits for Trump's deregulation moves, sources say
FRANKFURT, May 22(Reuters) - The European Union is set to delay new, global rules governing banks' trading again as it waits for more clarity about the U.S. administration's plans to deregulate its financial sector, sources told Reuters.
The Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) is a key part the Basel III package devised in the wake of the global financial crisis but not yet implemented by Britain or the United States, two of the world's key financial centres.
Its adoption in the EU was already pushed back by a year to 2026 last year, when it became clear that the United States would not be able to adopt the rules by its original deadline.
The latest, one-year postponement to January 1, 2027 reflects pressure from European banks fearing they will find themselves at a disadvantage to their U.S. and UK rivals, five senior officials at European and national institutions said.
A senior EU source said European Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque informed the bloc's finance ministers about the delay at a meeting on May 13.
The European Commission had said it would make a decision on whether or not to postpone the FRTB by the end of June after consulting with the industry and its supervisors.
The FRTB governs capital and reporting requirements relating to banks' trading assets, crucially including how risk should be measured using a standard method or banks' own calculations.
The United States has stalled the introduction of the entire Basel III package and U.S. President Donald Trump's administration signalled it might even relax some of the existing rules, in what would mark a U-turn from the push for more controls that followed the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
European banks have urged the EU to refrain from imposing new burdens that their competitors overseas do not face.
"It now looks as if this set of rules will not exist in the U.S. and we know that Brussels is looking at this carefully," Commerzbank's chief executive Bettina Orlopp said at a conference on Monday. "We have to be careful that we maintain the international competitiveness of European banks."
The European Central Bank, the EU's top banking watchdog and for a long time a staunch defender of a timely implementation of Basel III, proposed a compromise earlier this month.
It envisaged a one-year delay to rules applied to banks' internal risk models, while those concerning the one-size-fits-all, "standardised approach" would be phased in over three years starting in 2026.
Some governments have also weighed in, with French President Emmanuel Macron calling for a "synchronisation, opens new tab" on financial rules between the EU, the United States and Britain.
Britain earlier this year pushed back its Basel III implementation to 2027 while Washington has yet to unveil a timeline.
In contrast, the EU has already implemented most of the Basel III package, which took effect this year. China, Japan and Canada have done so long ago.
In March, the European Commission launched a consultation, asking banks and supervisors if they thought the FRTB should go live next year, be delayed by 12 months or tweaked to align it more with draft U.S. and UK rules.
The European Banking Federation, an industry body, said member banks that were exposed to U.S. and British competition favoured a one-year delay.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, a global lobby, said "a clear majority" of its own members also favoured a delay, although a minority preferred that the FRTB took effect next year to avoid running both new and old rules at once.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Critical minerals give China an edge in trade negotiations
China's dominance over critical minerals in global supply chains was a powerful bargaining chip in trade talks between Beijing and Washington that concluded with both sides saying they have a framework to pursue a deal. China has spent decades building the world's main industrial chain for mining and processing such materials, which are used in many industries such as electronics, advanced manufacturing, defense and health care. Mines and factories in and around Ganzhou, a key production hub for rare earths, underpin China's control over the minerals. Many residents grew up collecting rocks containing the valuable minerals from the forested hills surrounding the southern city and today make a living from mining, trading or processing them. Critical minerals as a trade issue Responding to ever higher tariffs and other controls on advanced technology, China told exporters of certain key rare earths and other critical minerals to obtain licenses for every shipment abroad. Approvals can take weeks, leading to supply chain disruptions in the U.S. and other countries. President Donald Trump said Wednesday that China would make it easier for American industry to obtain much-needed needed magnets and rare earth minerals, clearing the way for talks to continue between the world's two biggest economies. In return, Trump said, the U.S. will stop efforts to revoke the visas of Chinese nationals on U.S. college campuses. But details remain scarce. Beijing has not confirmed what the negotiators agreed to, and Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump himself have yet to sign off on it. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said Saturday it had approved a 'certain number' of export licenses for rare earth products, apparently acknowledging Trump's personal request to Xi during a phone call last week. And on Wednesday, the Ganzhou-based rare-earth conglomerate JL MAG Rare-Earth Co. confirmed it had obtained some export licenses for shipments to destinations including the U.S., Europe and Southeast Asia. Experts say, however, Beijing is unlikely to do away with the permit system enabling it to control access to those valuable resources. The only scenario in which China might deregulate its critical minerals export is if the U.S. first fully removes tariffs imposed on Chinese goods as part of the trade war, said Wang Yiwei, a professor of international affairs at Renmin University, echoing the Chinese government's earlier stance. 'Without that,' he said, 'it will be difficult to blame China for continuing to strengthen its export controls.' An industry built over decades with government support In 1992, Deng Xiaoping, the leader who launched China's ascent as the world's biggest manufacturing power, famously said 'the Middle East has oil, China has rare earths,' signaling a desire to leverage access to the key minerals. Several generations later, Beijing has made its rich reserves of rare earths, a group of 17 minerals that are abundant in the earth's crust but hard, expensive and environmentally polluting to process, a key element of China's economic security. In 2019, during a visit to a rare earth processing plant in Ganzhou, Xi described rare earths as a 'vital strategic resource.' China today has an essential monopoly over 'heavy rare earths,' used for making powerful, heat-resistance magnets used in industries such as defense and electric vehicles. The country also produces around 80% of the world's tungsten, gallium and antimony, and 60% of the world's germanium -– all minerals used in the making of semiconductors, among other advanced technologies. The risks of dependency on Chinese suppliers first came into focus in 2010, when Beijing suspended rare earths exports to Japan due to a territorial dispute. The ban was lifted after about two months, but as a precaution, Japan invested in rare earths processing plants in other countries and began stockpiling the materials. Beijing's across-the-board requirement for export licenses for some critical minerals has put pressure on world electronics manufacturers and automakers. Some auto parts makers in Europe have shut down production lines due to delays in supply deliveries, according to the European Association of Automotive Suppliers. In the U.S., Tesla CEO Elon Musk said a shortage of rare earths is affecting his company's work on humanoid robots. China's critical minerals resources are dwindling In the drab industrial hub of Ganzhou, cradled by the scenic Dayu Mountains, the U.S.-China trade war is still a distant stressor. Miners and small mineral traders interviewed by The Associated Press said they are more concerned about depleting the mountains' once-abundant resources. Zhong, a tungsten factory manager in Ganzhou who would only give his last name, worked his way up to manager from a miner, but he's unsure there is a future for him and others in the industry. 'I find growing difficulties to source tungsten these days,' he said, adding that smaller mines and trading companies are slowly disappearing as the resources are dwindling. Tungsten is an ultra-hard metal used in armor-piercing ammunition, nuclear reactors and semiconductors. At least five tungsten mines have closed in the area in recent years, according to state media. Remaining reserves are deeper and harder to extract and process after decades of exploitation, said Li Shangkui, chairman of the Ganzhou-based Jiangxi Yuean Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Processing factories in Ganzhou now routinely source materials from other provinces or other countries. Zhong's plant imports some raw materials from places like Africa and Cambodia. Major state-owned and private companies in Ganzhou are also ramping up investments abroad. Tungsten producer Ganzhou Haisheng, for instance, announced last year a $25 million investment in a new tungsten plant in Thailand. Whatever the challenges in procuring raw materials, China likely will seek to maintain its dominance in critical minerals, said Fabian Villalobos, an engineer and critical minerals expert at the RAND think tank. The U.S. lags far behind China on critical minerals Between 2020 and 2023, the U.S. imported at least 70% of the rare earth compounds it used from China, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It has diversified its sources in recent years, but still mainly relies on China. Since beginning his second term in office, Trump has made improving access to critical minerals a matter of national security. But the U.S. has an incredibly long way to go to catch up with China, experts say. The sole operational U.S. rare earths mine, in Mountain Pass, California, is unable to separate heavy rare earths. It sends its ore to China for processing. The U.S. Defense Department has provided funding to the mine's owner, MP Materials, to build new separation facilities. It will take months to build and still only produce a fraction of what is needed. Friction over the issue has opened the way for government-backed financing that was unavailable before, said Mark Smith, who ran the Mountain Pass mine in the early 2010s and now leads NioCorp. It's seeking about $780 million in financing through the U.S. Export-Import Bank to build a processing facility in Nebraska for critical minerals including rare earths. The Defense Department has committed $439 million to building domestic rare earth supply chains, but building a complete mining and processing industrial chain like China's could take decades. 'There are going to be some real issues here unless we can figure out how to get along with China for a period of time while we're developing our own resources and our mainstream processing,' Smith said. The spotlight on critical minerals also provides opportunities for smaller miners to invest in extracting and processing some critical minerals, such as tungsten, considered 'niche' because they are needed in relatively small amounts in key industries, said Milo McBride, an expert on sustainability and geopolitics at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'For many of these companies, the business strategy hedges on a scenario where the U.S. and China become more confrontational and where trade relations become more uncomfortable,' McBride said. 'And all of a sudden, what was once an uneconomic project somewhere outside of China starts to make more sense.' ___
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India's equity benchmarks poised for flat open
June 12 (Reuters) - India's benchmark indexes are poised for a muted open on Thursday as investors weigh the U.S.-China trade deal, which lacks details and leaves the door open for potential tariff flare-ups. The Gift Nifty futures were trading at 25,210.5 as of 7:44 a.m. IST, indicating that the Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab will open near its Wednesday's close of 25,141.4. The Nifty rose for the last six consecutive sessions, trading at eight-month highs, buoyed by the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) policy support and signs of progress in global trade negotiations. However, sentiment in Asian markets was subdued on the day, mirroring Wall Street's overnight losses amid fresh geopolitical tensions and ambiguity in the U.S.-China deal. U.S. President Donald Trump said a framework on tariff rates had been reached to revive the fragile trade truce with China. While this lifted investor hopes, the lack of specifics kept markets on edge. Trump also announced a partial evacuation of U.S. personnel from the Middle East, calling the region "a dangerous place," and reiterated that the U.S. would not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, domestic institutional investors extended their buying streak to the 17th session on Wednesday, while foreign portfolio investors ended their three-day purchase run. Investors now await the consumer inflation data for May, due post-market. A Reuters poll projects inflation to have eased to a six-year low of 3% on a favorable base and softening food prices, reinforcing the RBI's recent policy easing. ** Zydus Lifesciences ( opens new tab receives an establishment inspection report from the U.S. drug regulator for its Ankleshwar-based API manufacturing facility, indicating the end of the inspection ** Sterlite Technologies ( opens new tab enters agreement with BSNL for a network project valued at 26.31 billion rupees ($307.9 million) ** Tanla Platforms ( opens new tab announces it will consider buyback of equity shares on June 16 ($1 = 85.4420 Indian rupees)
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Gold rises on weaker dollar, rising Middle East tensions
June 12 (Reuters) - Gold prices rose on Thursday, bolstered by rising tensions in the Middle East and a weaker dollar, while softer-than-expected U.S. inflation data boosted expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts. Spot gold was up 0.6% at $3,372.46 an ounce, as of 0202 GMT. U.S. gold futures gained 1.5% to $3,393. The U.S. dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab fell to a near two-month low, making greenback-priced bullion more attractive to overseas buyers. The weakness in the dollar index serves as a strong catalyst, said Kelvin Wong, a senior market analyst, Asia Pacific at OANDA, adding that gold faced resistance at $3,346, and the bullish breakout triggered technical buying. Rising geopolitical risks aided safe-haven assets, with President Donald Trump announcing on Wednesday that U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East due to heightened security risks amid rising tensions with Iran. Meanwhile, U.S. inflation data showed consumer prices increased less than expected in May, driven by cheaper gasoline, though inflation could accelerate due to import tariffs. The data prompted renewed calls from Trump for significant rate cuts by the Fed. "We could potentially see the Fed moving more quickly than anticipated, given the CPI data, which is not particularly alarming at this juncture," Wong said. Traders now anticipate a 50-basis-point rate cut by year-end and await U.S. producer price index data, due at 1230 GMT, for further clues ahead of the Fed's June 17-18 meeting. USDIRPR Meanwhile, Trump said on Wednesday that Washington and Beijing had agreed on a framework to restore a fragile truce in the U.S.-China trade war, potentially avoiding higher tariffs. Trump added he could extend a July 8 deadline for trade talks with other nations before higher U.S. tariffs take effect but did not foresee such a need. Elsewhere, spot silver was up 0.3% at $36.33 per ounce, platinum rose 0.6% to $1,265.32, still hovering near more than 4-year high, while palladium was down 1% at $1,068.97.
