Haryana government backs HC order to act against unauthorised construction in DLF areas
GURUGRAM
: The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard the ongoing case filed over
illegal constructions
and commercial activities in residential properties across DLF 1 to 5 in New Gurgaon.
SC took up multiple pleas in the matter, during which solicitor general Tushar Mehta appeared on behalf of the
Haryana
govt and strongly defended a Feb 13, 2024 order of
Punjab and Haryana high court
.
SC is likely to deliver a ruling next week in the case. The verdict is likely to have far-reaching consequences for thousands of residents and commercial establishments in one of the city's most prominent residential areas.
Mehta backed HC's direction to take action against unauthorised construction and commercial operations in residential zones, including in Economically Weaker Section (EWS) housing areas.
He contended that the order was justified and necessary to maintain urban planning norms. The court has now listed the matter for further hearing next week.
The case has seen nearly 16 special leave petitions (SLPs) filed by different parties, including RWAs of DLF Qutub Enclave, DLF 3 . On April 6, SC directed a status quo on HC decision putting brakes on sealing action.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress favouring Andhra Pradesh govt, says Harish
1 2 Hyderabad: Senior BRS leader and former irrigation minister T Harish Rao alleged that chief minister A Revanth Reddy and minister Uttam Kumar Reddy had failed to protect Telangana's water interests while favouring the Andhra Pradesh govt. He criticised irrigation minister Uttam Kumar Reddy for allegedly misleading the public on key irrigation projects and cooperating with the TDP govt in Andhra Pradesh, thereby compromising the interests of Telangana. "Why did the Telangana cabinet not discuss the Godavari-Banakacherla link scheme on Thursday? Was there any issue more important than that? Though the AP govt was going ahead with the project without any approvals, the Telangana govt, on the other hand, is making no effort to halt it," Harish Rao said while addressing the media at Dubbak on Friday. Harish Rao vowed that BRS would take the fight to New Delhi and even approach the Supreme Court to protect the water rights if the state govt continued to neglect the issue. "Even in temporary allocations of Krishna waters, Telangana utilised 65 TMC less water than its share, leaving 6.5 lakh acres parched in Nalgonda, Mahabubnagar and other districts. Why did the state govt remain silent while Andhra Pradesh allegedly diverted 400 TMC of Godavari water illegally," the former minister questioned. He also criticised the BJP leaders from Telangana for not raising their voices against the AP's 'water theft' and reiterated that the BRS would approach the Supreme Court if the state govt failed to act. Harish Rao alsodismissed chief minister A Revanth Reddy's claim that Kaleshwaram was collapsing, arguing that key projects such as Gandhamalla, Mallannasagar, and Ranganayak Sagar depend on it. He challenged the chief minister to explain how water would reach Gandhamalla if Kaleshwaram were truly defunct. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Decoding Flexi Cap vs Multi Cap Funds: Strategy, risk and suitability
Flexi Cap vs Multi Cap Fund: Despite ongoing volatility in the equity markets, investor interest in mutual funds remains robust. However, a clear shift in investment preferences is emerging. Following significant corrections in the small-cap and mid-cap segments, a growing number of investors are reallocating their portfolios towards large-cap, Flexi Cap and Multi Cap funds—categories that predominantly invest in companies with larger market capitalisations. Market analysts suggest that in times of heightened uncertainty, Flexi Cap and Multi Cap Funds may offer more stability and strategic advantage. Yet, a key question persists among investors: Which is the better choice—Flexi Cap or Multi Cap Funds? While both fund types provide broad diversification, they differ notably in terms of investment structure and portfolio strategy. Key Differences in Fund Structure Flexi Cap mutual funds are frequently compared to Multi Cap funds, given that both invest in equities and equity-related instruments across various market capitalisations. However, a key structural distinction sets the two categories apart. Flexi Cap Funds mandate a minimum allocation of 65 per cent of their total assets to equities and equity-related instruments. In comparison, Multi Cap Funds are required to allocate at least 75 per cent of their corpus to equities. Another significant difference lies in the portfolio allocation strategy. Flexi Cap fund managers have complete discretion to invest across large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap stocks, allowing for a dynamic and flexible asset allocation approach. Conversely, Multi Cap fund managers must maintain a minimum investment of 25 per cent each in large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap segments, resulting in a more regimented and rule-based allocation structure. Flexibility Reduces Risk Flexi Cap funds are generally considered to be less risky compared to Multi Cap funds. Umeshkumar Mehta, CIO at Samco Mutual Fund, explains that Flexi Cap funds offer a dynamic approach, allowing fund managers to reduce exposure to large-cap, mid-cap or small-cap stocks when valuations become expensive. Unlike Multi Cap funds, Flexi Cap funds are not required to maintain a strict 25 per cent allocation in each market cap category (large, mid, small). This gives fund managers greater flexibility to adjust allocations based on market conditions. He further added that due to this flexibility, fund managers can shift towards safer market cap segments when valuations are high or during a market correction. This is one of the reasons why the overall risk level in Flexi Cap funds tends to be slightly lower. Choosing Based on Stability According to Mehta, in the current global market environment marked by heightened uncertainty, portfolios with a greater allocation to large-cap and mid-cap stocks are better positioned to deliver stability. Large-cap stocks offer resilience and consistency, while mid-cap stocks provide moderate growth potential. Given this backdrop, Flexi Cap Funds may be more appropriate for new investors, as they allow fund managers to tilt the portfolio towards relatively stable segments. Conversely, investors seeking uniform exposure across all market capitalisations may find Multi Cap Funds more suitable, as these funds mandate a minimum allocation to each of the large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap segments, ensuring balanced diversification. Time Horizon Matters A.K. Nigam, Director at BPN Fincap, notes that Flexi Cap Funds are well-suited for investors with a short- to medium-term investment horizon, typically ranging from zero to five years. These funds offer portfolio flexibility to navigate market volatility and are generally structured to deliver moderate returns. While the core allocation tends to favour large-cap stocks, they also include selective exposure to mid-cap and small-cap segments. Nigam further highlights that Multi Cap Funds are more appropriate for long-term investors, with an investment horizon of at least five to seven years. Owing to their mandated exposure to mid-cap and small-cap stocks, these funds carry higher risk but also present the potential for enhanced returns. They are most suitable for investors with a higher risk tolerance who seek long-term capital appreciation. Aligning Risk and Goals For investors with a high risk appetite but limited exposure to equities, Multi Cap Funds may present a more suitable option, as they offer diversified exposure across all market capitalisations regardless of prevailing market conditions. Conversely, investors with moderate risk tolerance seeking equity participation may find Flexi Cap Funds more aligned with their investment objectives. Mehta recommends that individuals with a higher risk appetite consider diversified equity funds such as Flexi Cap or Multi Cap Funds, which invest across a broad spectrum of stocks, including large-cap companies. These funds actively rotate allocations among sectors and market segments in response to changing market dynamics. As such, Mehta emphasises the importance of remaining invested for at least one full market cycle to realise the potential benefits. Given their structure and investment approach, these funds are generally more appropriate for long-term investment horizons.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to pause mass layoffs at Education Department
President Donald Trump's administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to pause a court order to reinstate Education Department employees who were fired in mass layoffs as part of his plan to dismantle the agency. The Justice Department's emergency appeal to the high court said U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston exceeded his authority last month when he issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs of nearly 1,400 people and putting the broader plan on hold. Joun's order has blocked one of the Republican president's biggest campaign promises and effectively stalled the effort to wind down the department. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed. The judge wrote that the layoffs 'will likely cripple the department.' But Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote on Friday that Joun was substituting his policy preferences for those of the Trump administration. The layoffs help put in the place the 'policy of streamlining the department and eliminating discretionary functions that, in the administration's view, are better left to the states,' Sauer wrote. He also pointed out that the Supreme Court in April voted 5-4 to block Joun's earlier order seeking to keep in place Education Department teacher-training grants. The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Trump's plan amounted to an illegal closure of the Education Department. One suit was filed by the Somerville and Easthampton school districts in Massachusetts along with the American Federation of Teachers and other education groups. The other suit was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general. The suits argued that layoffs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required by Congress, including duties to support special education, distribute financial aid and enforce civil rights laws. Trump has made it a priority to shut down the Education Department, though he has acknowledged that only Congress has the authority to do that. In the meantime, Trump issued a March order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to wind it down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.' Trump later said the department's functions will be parceled to other agencies, suggesting that federal student loans should be managed by the Small Business Administration and programs involving students with disabilities would be absorbed by the Department of Health and Human Services. Those changes have not yet happened. The president argues that the Education Department has been overtaken by liberals and has failed to spur improvements to the nation's lagging academic scores. He has promised to 'return education to the states.' Opponents note that K-12 education is already mostly overseen by states and cities. Democrats have blasted the Trump administration's Education Department budget, which seeks a 15% budget cut including a $4.5 billion cut in K-12 funding as part of the agency's downsizing.
