logo
Habba is confident she'll be the top US attorney in New Jersey, but it's chaos in the meantime

Habba is confident she'll be the top US attorney in New Jersey, but it's chaos in the meantime

CNN30-07-2025
Federal criminal cases in New Jersey remain in chaos with judges postponing sentencings, plea hearings and status conferences this week as questions swirl about the authority of former Donald Trump lawyer Alina Habba to serve as the acting US attorney.
It's not clear how long the pause in activity will last.
'Right now in the District of New Jersey there are bail hearings happening and initial appearances, but otherwise the practice of criminal law is at a standstill,' said a criminal defense lawyer who practices in the state. 'You can't have that happen.'
The issue is currently playing out in a drug case, where a lawyer is attempting to have charges dismissed based on the argument that Habba is not serving legally.
A federal judge from Pennsylvania, who was transferred the case to hear the arguments, said Tuesday he will first decide whether the defendants, Julien Giraud Jr. and Julien Giraud III, are entitled to any benefit – including the dismissal of his indictment – even if Habba was appointed illegally. The judge said he will only decide the issue of whether Habba is appointed lawfully if necessary.
Judge Matthew Brann said the Justice Department provided 'persuasive authority' that even if Habba was appointed illegally that the case should proceed. The Justice Department argued the indictment was handed up last year under a Senate-approved US attorney and authority is conferred to prosecutors on the case through the attorney general.
'It may be the case that determining what relief is available to the Girauds is inextricably bound up with the extent of the statutory or constitutional violation, if any, thereby rendering consideration of the merits question necessary in any event,' said Brann, the chief judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, in an order Tuesday.
Habba told CNN, 'I am confident we will win any and all attempts to thwart the well established Article II powers of the Executive Branch and the President of the United States.'
The tug of war over whether Habba is legally the acting US attorney in New Jersey comes as the White House has faced difficulty getting its picks for US attorney positions through Congress or adopted by federal judges. The fallout in New Jersey could foreshadow potential challenges in other districts, which could have broader implications on the criminal justice system.
The broad near-term impact was referenced by the New Jersey judge overseeing the Giruads' case, before it was transferred to Pennsylvania.
'I don't know ultimately how it's going to end up; but that motion, depending on how it's resolved, may affect how this case is going to proceed. And as a result of that, I think you'll soon find out that other judges are going to stay whatever criminal matters there are pending,' Judge Edward Kiel said during a hearing on Monday when he postponed the trial, according to a transcript of the proceeding.
Kiel said decisions made now, such as plea agreements, may need to be redone in the future if the US attorney is invalidated.
Plea hearings scheduled for this week were postponed with no future date, according to several lawyers and court dockets. Sentencing in other cases were also postponed.
The federal public defender's office in New Jersey is urging the judge to rule narrowly on the issues before him in the Giruads' case.
In a letter Tuesday, the defenders' office noted the potential ramifications of the ruling, adding there are other circumstances that could warrant further legal briefing, such as indictments, grand jury subpoenas and other documents that are signed by Habba.
'Because that is a separate question that is not raised by the facts of this case and has not been fully briefed, I respectfully request that the Court not address it at this time,' wrote K. Anthony Thomas, the federal public defender in the state.
It's unclear whether other defendants will challenge Habba's authority.
Habba was first appointed by Trump as interim US attorney in March, a position that expired at 120 days. Habba selected as First Assistant US Attorney Desiree Grace, a well-respected prosecutor in the office. The district court in New Jersey earlier this month declined to appoint Habba US attorney and instead elected Grace to serve as US attorney.
Attorney General Pam Bondi fired Grace and Habba resigned her position. Bondi appointed Habba as a special attorney and designated her as the first assistant US attorney, effectively making her acting US attorney again.
The Justice Department argues Habba's appointment is valid under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act and other executive powers.
'Whether or not Ms. Habba technically qualifies as Acting United States Attorney, the Attorney General has validly delegated to her the authority to supervise all pending prosecutions and other matters in the USAO-NJ, subject in turn to the supervision by the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, both of whom are Senate-confirmed,' the Justice Department wrote in a court filing Tuesday.
'The FVRA therefore permits her to 'perform the functions and duties of the office' of United States Attorney 'in an acting capacity' for as long as she serves as First Assistant, until the statutory time limits expire or a permanent officeholder is nominated and confirmed.'
Lawyers say whether the uncertainty helps or hurts clients is a case-by-case matter but for now it's causing chaos.
One attorney, who did not want to be identified, said everyone is trying to figure out what to do.
'I think right now they're building the plane as they're flying it,' the attorney said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump could meet Putin as soon as next week, White House official says
Trump could meet Putin as soon as next week, White House official says

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump could meet Putin as soon as next week, White House official says

US President Donald Trump could meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week as he seeks to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, a White House official said. The official cautioned that a meeting has not been scheduled yet and no location has been determined. The official was not authorised to speak publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss internal plans. The White House said Mr Trump was also open to a meeting with both Mr Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. A meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Trump would be their first since Mr Trump returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in the three-year-old war, though there is no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. News of a potential meeting with Mr Putin, which was first reported by The New York Times, came hours after Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff met Mr Putin in Moscow. Mr Trump had posted earlier on Truth Social that Mr Witkoff 'had a highly productive meeting' with Mr Putin in which 'great progress was made'. It was not immediately clear if Mr Putin or Mr Zelensky had agreed to any meetings with Mr Trump. Mr Zelensky has been willing to meet face-to-face with Mr Putin to end the conflict, but Russia has repeatedly rejected the idea. Mr Trump has met Mr Zelensky several times this year, including a contentious February meeting in Washington. Though he has not yet met Mr Putin this year, Mr Trump met with him five times during his first term. Mr Trump said earlier on Wednesday that he updated America's allies in Europe and that they will work toward an end to the Russia-Ukraine war 'in the days and weeks to come'. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky.' Her statement did not address the potential timing of any meeting. Mr Witkoff met Mr Putin days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. The meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff lasted about three hours, the Kremlin said. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff had a 'useful and constructive conversation' that focused on the Ukrainian crisis and, in a nod toward improving relations between Washington and Moscow, 'prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation' between the United States and Russia.

Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire
Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire

Donald Trump could meet Vladimir Putin in person as early as next week to discuss a ceasefire in Ukraine, a White House official has said. They said the meeting would be conditional on the Russian president meeting his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Sky News's US partner network NBC News reported. It came days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or face severe economic penalties, which could also target countries buying its oil. Ukraine war latest: Trump could meet with Putin as early as next week Earlier in the day, Mr Putin held talks with Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, with the meeting lasting around three hours. In a post on Truth Social, Mr Trump said Mr Witkoff "had a highly productive meeting" with Mr Putin in which "great progress was made". He said he had updated America's European allies and they will work towards an end to the Russia-Ukraine war "in the days and weeks to come". Mr Zelenskyy later said he and Mr Trump spoke on the phone after the meeting. He said "European leaders also participated in the conversation" and "we discussed what was said in Moscow". He added: "Our common position with our partners is absolutely clear: The war must end. We all need lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it started." He later said: "It seems that Russia is now more inclined to agree to a ceasefire." He added that the pressure on Moscow "is working", without elaborating, and stressed it was important to make sure Russia does not "deceive us or the United States" when it comes to "the details" of a potential agreement. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Capital Jewish Museum shooting suspect indicted on murder and hate crime charges and could face death penalty
Capital Jewish Museum shooting suspect indicted on murder and hate crime charges and could face death penalty

CNN

time4 minutes ago

  • CNN

Capital Jewish Museum shooting suspect indicted on murder and hate crime charges and could face death penalty

Gun violenceFacebookTweetLink Follow Federal prosecutors secured an indictment Wednesday detailing nearly 10 charges connected with the killings of Israeli Embassy staff members Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim earlier this year. The indictment against Elias Rodriguez includes counts of premeditated murder and hate crimes resulting in death. It also includes legal findings that authorize the Justice Department to pursue the death penalty. The step sets the stage for the Justice Department to pursue its first death penalty case out of Washington, DC, in years. It also means that the department cleared a key, and difficult hurdle – convincing a grand jury that Rodriguez's motivation for the murder was antisemitism. Rodriguez has not yet entered a formal plea in court and has been in federal custody since the fatal shooting on May 21. According to prosecutors, Rodriguez was caught on surveillance footage approaching the two victims as they prepared to leave an event at the Capital Jewish Museum. Rodriguez allegedly fired at the two Israeli embassy staffers several times, and then after they had fallen to the ground, leaned over them 'with his arm extended, and firing several more times.' As Milgrim tried to crawl away, Rodriguez allegedly 'followed behind her and fired again.' Rodriguez then appeared to reload his firearm as the woman began to sit up, and, once he reloaded, he allegedly shot at her again. Convincing a trial jury that Rodriguez committed hate crimes may still be a difficult task for the prosecutors assigned to the case, as the evidentiary standard for a conviction is far higher than the one required for an indictment. One hurdle in proving that the murder was motivated by religious bigotry and not vitriol against the state of Israel is that Rodriguez repeatedly denounced Israel over the war in Gaza both at the scene of the crime and in alleged statements online — including his comment to police after his arrest that 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza.' And if a trial jury convicts, prosecutors will then have to prove that capital punishment is warranted, a feat that hasn't been accomplished in the district for many years. While they now have the legal authority to do so, DOJ will still have to inform a judge whether it plans to pursue a death sentence. CNN's Holmes Lybrand contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store