Opposition to Senators: Are you protecting VP Sara or the public interest?
Opposition lawmakers and impeachment complainants from the Makabayan coalition asked this question on Tuesday in response to Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero's statement that the convening of the Senate impeachment court for the trial of impeached Vice President Duterte depends on the plenary vote of the senators, even though the Constitution states that a Senate impeachment trial 'shall forthwith proceed' once a verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the members of the House.
'To the Senate as an institution, malinaw naman iyong mandato nila mula sa Constitution na talagang wala silang choice kundi gampanan iyong kanilang tungkulin na mag proceed roon sa impeachment trial. Habang hindi nila ginagawa iyong kanilang tungkulin, naproproteksiyonan rito iyong may kasalanan sa taumbayan: si Vice President Sara Duterte,' House Deputy Minority Leader France Castro said in a press conference.
(The Senate has a clear mandate in the Constitution: they are required to proceed with the impeachment trial. While they are neglecting their duty, they are protecting someone who wronged the people: Vice President Sara Duterte.)
'Kaya kailangan ituloy 'yun [impeachment]. Kaya hinahamon po yung mga senador. Lalong lalo na 'yung mga nananalo diyan. Talagang patunayan ninyo na gagawin ninyo 'yung inyong obligasyon sa taong bayan,' she added.
(That is why we need to proceed with the impeachment trial. I challenge the senators, especially those who won in the 2025 elections. Prove to us that you will act according to your mandate given by those who voted for you.)
Kabataan party-list Representative Raoul Manuel agreed, saying that turning a blind eye to the Vice President's apparent questionable disbursement of P612 million in confidential funds is tantamount to committing corruption.
'Okay lang ba sa ibang makapangyarihan na iba-iba ang standards pagdating sa pagpapanagot ng mga kurakot kasi pare-pareho lang rin pala sila na mga kurakot na pinoprotektahan ang isa't isa? 'Yan ang tanong natin. Para sa mga senador na humaharang sa impeachment trial, maliit na bagay lang ba ang P612.5 million na confidential funds?' Manuel said.
(Is it okay for some of these powerful public officials that the ways of exacting accountability vary because they are all corrupt just the same? That is our question. To those senators blocking the impeachment trial, is P612.5 million a pittance to you?)
'Nasanay na ba sila sa korapsyon? Kaya parang wala lang sa kanila ang maraming lumabas na ebidensiya ng paglustay ng impeached Vice President sa pera ng bayan? Habang pinoprotektahan nila ang kakayahan ng isa't isa na gamitin ang pera ng bayan para sa sariling interes, lalong na pag-iiwanan ang taong bayan. Kaya ang panawagan po natin, no more delays, no more dribbling. Start the impeachment trial now,' Manuel, one of the over 250 lawmakers who signed the impeachment complaint against the Vice President alongside Castro, said.
(Have they become so used to corruption that is nothing to them that so much evidence has emerged of the Vice President misusing the nation's money? While they are protecting each other's ability to use public money for their own interests, the Filipino people are more and more left behind.)
Escudero said that the Senate plenary vote is supreme, but prior to this, he had said that the Senate impeachment court could not be convened because the House impeached the Vice President on February 5 which is the last session day before Congress adjourned to give way for the campaign period for the May 12 midterm polls.
Over 200 congressmen endorsed the impeachment campaign against the Vice President who is accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes mainly over alleged misuse of around P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and threatening to kill President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza and SpeakerMartin Romualdez.
'Solemn duty'
In a separate statement, Akbayan party-list Representative Perci Cendaña asked the Senate President if he was afraid of the Vice President to begin with due to the delays.
"Natatakot ba siya kay Sara Duterte? Hindi po ito Paris Fashion Week. Convening the Senate as an impeachment court is a solemn constitutional duty, not a seasonal accessory you put on or discard depending on the political weather, or one's personal agenda,' Cendaña said.
(Is he afraid of Vice President Duterte? This is not Paris Fashion Week.)
'It is a uniform of duty worn whenever the Constitution demands it,' he added.
Bayan president Renato Reyes, for his part, said the Senators should think long and hard because being silent on accountability will eventually catch up on them.
Reyes referenced the 2001 impeachment trial of then-President Joseph Estrada, which was upended due to the lack of senator-judges' votes for the opening of the second envelope that would supposedly show strong evidence of Estrada's involvement in corruption.
Since the second envelope was not opened, throngs of people packed EDSA, calling for Estrada's resignation, if not conviction before the Senate impeachment court. The days-long protests were followed by the military and police to withdraw support to Estrada, prompting him to leave Malacañang.
Then Vice President Gloria Arroyo was installed as President.
'We are confident in the evidence that the prosecutors will present. We are confident that if we are able to present the evidence, maiintindihan ito at susuportahan ito ng taong bayan at kikilos ang taong bayan para hilingin ang pananagutan [the Filipino people will understand and support and they will move to seek accountability]. We did not have the numbers to open the second envelope in 2001, but it triggered something more important: it triggered people power,' Reyes said.
Estrada was eventually detained for six years and convicted of plunder by the Sandiganbayan in 2007. Arroyo pardoned him in October 2007 or six weeks after his conviction.
GMA News Online has reached out to the Senate for comment. — BM, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
Hontiveros files reso seeking probe on alleged abuse in Pampanga orphanage
Senator Risa Hontiveros has filed a resolution seeking a Senate inquiry into the alleged child abuse cases in an orphanage located in Mexico, Pampanga. Under Senate Resolution 77, the Senate Committee on Women, Children, Family Relations and Gender Equality is directed to conduct an inquiry into the alleged maltreatment of children in an orphanage, where an American pastor served as director. The Senate inquiry would also look into the abuses committed in other orphanages and childcare facilities. The resolution stated that the Senate inquiry aims to strengthen child protection laws and improve regulations and monitoring of public and private child-caring institutions. 'The reported incident underscores the necessity of a comprehensive review of accreditation, monitoring, and regulation mechanisms for public and private institutions that assume custody of minors to prevent similar abuses from recurring,' the resolution read. Last week, the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) rescued about 160 children alleged to have been maltreated in the orphanage. This alleged maltreatment includes children being restrained, starved, and locked in a bathroom. The pastor is facing charges for violation of the Special Protection of Children against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act. The Bureau of Immigration (BI) will also conduct deportation proceedings against him. Meanwhile, DSWD has issued a cease and desist order against the orphanage. DSWD spokesperson Irene Dumlao said the orphanage's registration could be revoked and blacklisted from the list of social welfare and development facilities if it did not abide by the agency's recommendation for improvement. — BAP, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
P373-billion amendment in 2025 budget questioned
At the start of the deliberations of the House of Representatives on the proposed P6.793 trillion for next year, a lawmaker raised questions on the P373-billion amendment by Congress in the 2025 budget. "To be specific about it, it was cut and diverted to other items, either augmenting existing items or new ones," Caloocan Rep. Edgard Erice said in a "24 Oras" report by Tina Panganiban-Perez. "After reviewing, the President vetoed only P26 billion, a small amount compared to the huge amendment," he added. In response, Finance Secretary Ralph Recto said, "At any given time during budget execution, the President can withhold releases of the budget if it is not consistent with the priorities of this administration." Navotas Rep. Toby Tiangco, meanwhile, raised questions on the small committee, which was created after the budget's passage, to finalize the appropriations bill. "The initiative and errata come from Congress, that's why Secretary Recto seemed to have a hard time responding to our query as to how some items were reduced. It's Congress that knows about that," he said. Tiangco asked the House appropriations committee for records of the two meetings of the small committee last year on the 2025 budget. "The request will be under consideration," House appropriations panel chairperson Rep. Mika Suansing said. However, Tiangco was not satisfied. "This is not acceptable; these are public records, and there were too many violations. There were no records; now you're saying it's not readily available. Is this a secret?" he said. In retort, Suansing said, "The small committee is subsumed within the committee on appropriations. It is not required to render a separate report. The rule you are citing pertained to the standing committees." For the 2026 budget, the small committee will be replaced by a budget amendments subcommittee to be composed of select House members from the majority and the minority blocs. This panel will be organized at the start of the budget deliberations. The House leadership also said the budget deliberations will be open to civil society observers. "The House has opened its doors wider than ever before," Speaker Martin Romualdez said. In their presentation, economic managers discussed addressing inflation, the rise in the per capita gross national income, economic growth, and job creation. Department of Economy, Planning, and Development Secretary Arsenio Balisacan raised hopes that the country would achieve the upper middle income status this year. "Per capita gross national income continues to rise, bringing us closer to World Bank's upper middle income threshold. We are poised to reach this milestone, possibly even this year," Balisacan said. However, he said the government should continue to address the economic challenges to continuously spur growth. "The agriculture industry continues to face structural challenges, which we must address to reinforce our economic drivers and generate higher-quality jobs. Another challenge is the concentration of economic activities in Mega Manila," Balisacan said. "To address this, infrastructure development remains a cornerstone of our strategy," he added. Recto said the Marcos government has inherited a huge national debt from borrowings during the COVID-19 pandemic. To address this, the Finance chief said tax collection must be boosted and idle government assets must be disposed of to generate additional revenues. He also said borrowings will be inevitable. "Let us all together carefully choose projects in the budget that deliver the biggest growth and economic benefits for our people," Recto said. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
DBM: Education, health funding in proposed 2026 budget not ideal
The funding for education, social protection and health programs under the proposed P6.793-trillion budget for 2026 is not ideal, but there are no resources to increase them, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) said Monday. Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman made the response when asked by House Deputy Minority Leader Chel Diokno of Akbayan party-list as to why allocations to these crucial budget items remain insufficient based on international standards while the proposed flood control budget next year stands at P274 billion. 'The proposed 2026 budget allocates just around 3.5% of the GDP [gross domestic product] for education versus the 4% to 6% recommended by 2.2% percent for social protection versus the 5.1% of the GDP recommended by the International Labor Organization, and 1% for health as against the 5% percent GDP recommended by the World Health Organization. Bakit po paulit-ulit na parang ang pamumuhunan ng gobyerno natin para sa tao ay kulang?" Diokno said. (Why is that our investment in our people is always not enough?) 'Kulang tayo sa edukasyon, kulang tayo sa kalusugan, kulang tayo sa social protection kumpara sa pamantayan ng ibang mga bansa,' Diokno added. (We don't invest enough in education, health and social protection based on best practices.) Pangandaman responded that while all government agencies are aware of the ideal level of funding and proposed P10.1 trillion worth of budget items for 2026, the fact remains that the government cannot afford to fund them all. 'Hindi po natin kaya pondohan lahat po itong mga standards na ibinibigay ng mga international at development partners. I think if we will add 5 percent, 4 percent, 3 percent, 2 percent and 1 percent altogether, sosobra na po sa sa budget level po natin. Kasi kailangan po nating i-prioritize din po 'yung mga programang kailangan po natin pondohan,' Pangandaman said. (We cannot fund to the levels set by our international and development would go over budget, so we have to prioritize items that need funding.) 'At 'yan po ay nakapaloob sa Philippine Development Plan at saka sa mga roadmaps ng ating mga departamento. Sa susunod na taon po, ang mga prayoridad po natin, unang-una po ay education. Sinubukan po natin na at least kahit papaano matugunan iyong 4% [of GDP] na kinakailangan para po sa ating basic education at tertiary education. Sinubukan po talaga natin,' Pangandaman added. (We based our proposed budget on the Philippine Development Plan and roadmaps of different departments. Next year, our top priority is education so we tried to meet the 4% . We really tried.) The Budget chief also said that the budget for health, agriculture and social protection items were all increased from their 2025 allocation in accordance with the Philippine Development Plan and medium-term fiscal framework, alongside infrastructure spending which accounted for 5 to 6% of the GDP. Flooding funding for flood control projects? While there is not enough funding for health, education and social protection programs, Diokno then questioned why the proposed 2026 budget still earmarked P274 billion for flood control projects when no less than President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr. said in his State of the Nation Address (SONA) and subsequent announcements that flood control projects are being used by unscrupulous individuals to pocket public funds. 'On the other hand, there's P270 billion for flood control projects despite the statements made by the President that a lot of these projects are essentially pork barrel. What accounts for this seeming disparity?' Diokno asked. Pangandaman said that the P274 billion was provided for by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). 'The DPWH provided the figure based on their priority and the formula that they actually formulated when they prepared their budget proposal to the DBM,' she added. DPWH Secretary Manuel Bonoan has said that he will attend the Senate probe into the flood control projects. — BM, GMA Integrated News
