Opposition to Senators: Are you protecting VP Sara or the public interest?
Are the Senators protecting the Vice President Sara Duterte instead of the public interest?
Opposition lawmakers and impeachment complainants from the Makabayan coalition asked this question on Tuesday in response to Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero's statement that the convening of the Senate impeachment court for the trial of impeached Vice President Duterte depends on the plenary vote of the senators, even though the Constitution states that a Senate impeachment trial 'shall forthwith proceed' once a verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the members of the House.
'To the Senate as an institution, malinaw naman iyong mandato nila mula sa Constitution na talagang wala silang choice kundi gampanan iyong kanilang tungkulin na mag proceed roon sa impeachment trial. Habang hindi nila ginagawa iyong kanilang tungkulin, naproproteksiyonan rito iyong may kasalanan sa taumbayan: si Vice President Sara Duterte,' House Deputy Minority Leader France Castro said in a press conference.
(The Senate has a clear mandate in the Constitution: they are required to proceed with the impeachment trial. While they are neglecting their duty, they are protecting someone who wronged the people: Vice President Sara Duterte.)
'Kaya kailangan ituloy 'yun [impeachment]. Kaya hinahamon po yung mga senador. Lalong lalo na 'yung mga nananalo diyan. Talagang patunayan ninyo na gagawin ninyo 'yung inyong obligasyon sa taong bayan,' she added.
(That is why we need to proceed with the impeachment trial. I challenge the senators, especially those who won in the 2025 elections. Prove to us that you will act according to your mandate given by those who voted for you.)
Kabataan party-list Representative Raoul Manuel agreed, saying that turning a blind eye to the Vice President's apparent questionable disbursement of P612 million in confidential funds is tantamount to committing corruption.
'Okay lang ba sa ibang makapangyarihan na iba-iba ang standards pagdating sa pagpapanagot ng mga kurakot kasi pare-pareho lang rin pala sila na mga kurakot na pinoprotektahan ang isa't isa? 'Yan ang tanong natin. Para sa mga senador na humaharang sa impeachment trial, maliit na bagay lang ba ang P612.5 million na confidential funds?' Manuel said.
(Is it okay for some of these powerful public officials that the ways of exacting accountability vary because they are all corrupt just the same? That is our question. To those senators blocking the impeachment trial, is P612.5 million a pittance to you?)
'Nasanay na ba sila sa korapsyon? Kaya parang wala lang sa kanila ang maraming lumabas na ebidensiya ng paglustay ng impeached Vice President sa pera ng bayan? Habang pinoprotektahan nila ang kakayahan ng isa't isa na gamitin ang pera ng bayan para sa sariling interes, lalong na pag-iiwanan ang taong bayan. Kaya ang panawagan po natin, no more delays, no more dribbling. Start the impeachment trial now,' Manuel, one of the over 250 lawmakers who signed the impeachment complaint against the Vice President alongside Castro, said.
(Have they become so used to corruption that is nothing to them that so much evidence has emerged of the Vice President misusing the nation's money? While they are protecting each other's ability to use public money for their own interests, the Filipino people are more and more left behind.)
Escudero said that the Senate plenary vote is supreme, but prior to this, he had said that the Senate impeachment court could not be convened because the House impeached the Vice President on February 5 which is the last session day before Congress adjourned to give way for the campaign period for the May 12 midterm polls.
Over 200 congressmen endorsed the impeachment campaign against the Vice President who is accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes mainly over alleged misuse of around P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and threatening to kill President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza and SpeakerMartin Romualdez.
'Solemn duty'
In a separate statement, Akbayan party-list Representative Perci Cendaña asked the Senate President if he was afraid of the Vice President to begin with due to the delays.
"Natatakot ba siya kay Sara Duterte? Hindi po ito Paris Fashion Week. Convening the Senate as an impeachment court is a solemn constitutional duty, not a seasonal accessory you put on or discard depending on the political weather, or one's personal agenda,' Cendaña said.
(Is he afraid of Vice President Duterte? This is not Paris Fashion Week.)
'It is a uniform of duty worn whenever the Constitution demands it,' he added.
Bayan president Renato Reyes, for his part, said the Senators should think long and hard because being silent on accountability will eventually catch up on them.
Reyes referenced the 2001 impeachment trial of then-President Joseph Estrada, which was upended due to the lack of senator-judges' votes for the opening of the second envelope that would supposedly show strong evidence of Estrada's involvement in corruption.
Since the second envelope was not opened, throngs of people packed EDSA, calling for Estrada's resignation, if not conviction before the Senate impeachment court. The days-long protests were followed by the military and police to withdraw support to Estrada, prompting him to leave Malacañang.
Then Vice President Gloria Arroyo was installed as President.
'We are confident in the evidence that the prosecutors will present. We are confident that if we are able to present the evidence, maiintindihan ito at susuportahan ito ng taong bayan at kikilos ang taong bayan para hilingin ang pananagutan [the Filipino people will understand and support and they will move to seek accountability]. We did not have the numbers to open the second envelope in 2001, but it triggered something more important: it triggered people power,' Reyes said.
Estrada was eventually detained for six years and convicted of plunder by the Sandiganbayan in 2007. Arroyo pardoned him in October 2007 or six weeks after his conviction.
GMA News Online has reached out to the Senate for comment. — BM, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
5 hours ago
- GMA Network
Villanueva concerned P200 wage hike bill might get vetoed
Senator Joel Villanueva has expressed concern regarding the House of Representatives' approval of the bill granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers, as it might get vetoed by President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. if adopted by the Senate. The House version of the legislated wage hike offers a higher increase than the P100 approved by the Senate. For Villanueva, chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor, Employment and Human Resources Development, the Senate's proposal is more convenient and practical. 'Parang ang tingin natin 'pag nangyari 'yan, diretsong veto. 'Yan ang kailangan din natin pagtuunan ng pansin kung ia-adopt natin 'yan kasi baka 'yan din 'yung dahilan ng iba na nandun sa Kamara para masiguro na ma-veto 'yan,' he told reporters. (I think that it may be directly vetoed by the President. That's what we also need to look at, if we are going to adopt that because some House members may just use that to ensure that the bill will get vetoed.) 'That's another way of looking at it. For us, we still believe [that the] P100 is the most convenient and practical. But 'yung [but for] P200, medyo, as much as we wanted to, we don't know,' he added. The House of Representatives on Wednesday's plenary session approved the bill granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers in the private sector on its third and final reading. Villanueva said he wants to see the House's basis for the proposed P200 wage increase. 'Of course, that would be interesting… Kung sabihin ng Malacañang na it's okay for us to, na napag-aralan rin nila, mas malaki 'yung resources nila to study all these measures, so why not. But, at the same time I'm also thinking, baka way din 'yan para immediately shutdown 'yung P100 dahil ibe-veto rin 'yung P200,' he said. (If the Malacañang says it's okay for us to adopt that because it's already been studied, why not. But, at the same time I'm also thinking that it may be a way to immediately shutdown the P100 because the P200 will be vetoed.) The House and the Senate will have to reconcile the differences in a bicameral conference committee before transmitting the enrolled bill to Malacañang for Marco' signature to become a law. The House and the Senate have until June 13 or the last session day of the 19th Congress to reconcile their differing versions of the wage hike measure and ratify the reconciled version for the bill to be ready for the President's signature. Otherwise, the bill has to be refiled next Congress. Malacañang said that Marcos will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage hike. ''Nais ng Pangulo na maibigay kung ano ang makakabuti sa manggagawang Pilipino,'' Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said during a briefing Thursday. (The President wants to give the best for the Filipino workers.) — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
5 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate dismissal of Sara impeachment without trial unconstitutional — Monsod
The Senate cannot legally dismiss the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte without a trial, one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution said Thursday. Interviewed on Dobol B TV, constitutionalist Atty. Christian Monson said dismissing the Duterte impeachment would violate the Charter. "Hindi (No). That's because under the Constitution, it is the duty of the Senate to hear the case. So that's not hearing the case when you entertain a motion to dismiss," Monsoda said. Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa on Wednesday said he and other senators are working on their drafts of a Senate resolution seeking to dismiss the impeachment case against Duterte. Asked if senators can make a vote on such a resolution, Monsod said, "In other words, the majority of the Senate can stop the impeachment proceedings—Hindi puwede 'yun (This is not allowed) because they have a duty to conduct the hearing under the Constitution. They are violating the Constitution." 20th Congress Last Monday, Senator Francis Tolentino said the impeachment case against Duterte would be considered "functionally dismissed" if the Senate impeachment court is unable to finish the trial before June 30, which is the end of the 19th Congress. Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero on Wednesday said the senators will vote if Duterte's impeachment trial is already considered dead by that time or will be carried over to the 20th Congress. However, Monsod said Duterte's impeachment case can continue in the 20th Congress because the Senate is a continuing body. "Wala namang issue 'yun, continuing body naman 'yung Senate (That is not an issue. The Senate is a continuing body). What technicality are they talking about?" Monsod said. "If they want technicality, you know, on the noon of June 30 when the outgoing senators leave, at that exact moment, the incoming 12 assume office. So actually if you look at technicalities, there is no time at which there are no 24 senators," he added. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint against her. On the same day, the impeachment complaint, which constitutes the Articles of Impeachment, was transmitted to the Senate. The upper chamber, however, adjourned without addressing the case. On February 25, Escudero said the processes related to Duterte's impeachment trial would start on June 2. Last week, however, Escudero said the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment before the Senate was moved to June 11 to prioritize the passage of the items in the administration's legislative agenda before the end of 19th Congress. Redress with Supreme Court Monsod warned that concerned parties would seek redress with the Supreme Court should senators commit abuse of discretion. "If there is really, on the part of the senators, abuse of discretion, then we'll go to the Supreme Court," Monsod said. "Kapag hininto nila o dinismiss nila 'yun, may abuse of discretion 'yun. Abangan natin kung anong gagawin nila kasi si Senate President Escudero, he's a smooth talker. Nagshi-shift siya ng position. Let's see what happens," he added. (When they stopped or dismissed it, it was an abuse of discretion. Let's see what they will do because Senate President Escudero, he's a smooth talker. He has been shifting his position. Let's see what happens.) Conflict of interest? Meanwhile, Monsod said Escudero and Tolentino should consider recusing themselves from Duterte's impeachment case due to probable bias and conflict of interest. "Senator Bato and Tolentino, they should think about recusing themselves. What is recusing? We're not participating on the ground of probable bias or conflict of interest," Monsod said. "When they act as a judge, the source of legitimacy is independence. If they're incapable of independent thinking, I think they should withdraw and say we're not participating," he added. Duterte is accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Vice President has denied the allegations. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
7 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos to look into economic implications of wage hike — Palace
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage hike for workers, Malacañang said Thursday. According to Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro, Marcos wants to provide what's best for the Filipino workers. ''Nais ng Pangulo na maibigay kung ano ang makakabuti sa manggagawang Pilipino,'' Castro said during a briefing. (The President wants to give the best for the Filipino workers.) With 171 yes votes, zero no votes, and one abstention, the House of Representatives approved on third and final reading the proposed measure granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers in the private sector. The House version of the legislated wage hike offers a higher increase than the P100 approved by the Senate. The House and the Senate will have to reconcile the differences at the bicameral conference committee before transmitting the enrolled bill to Malacañang for President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s signature to become a law. Congress has until June 13 or the last session day to reconcile their differing versions of the wage hike measure and ratify the reconciled version for the bill to be ready for the President's signature. Otherwise, the measure has to be refiled in the next Congress. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
