logo
Kash Patel's podcast persona: Staunch Trump defender and fierce critic of the FBI he could soon lead

Kash Patel's podcast persona: Staunch Trump defender and fierce critic of the FBI he could soon lead

Yahoo28-01-2025
WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI agents who searched Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate found boxes of classified documents in his office and storage room and retrieved sensitive government secrets about nuclear systems and weapons capabilities.
One person unmoved by the gravity of the allegations: Kash Patel.
Days after Trump's June 2023 indictment on charges of hoarding the documents, Patel insisted to listeners of his 'Kash's Corner' podcast that Trump was permitted under a law known as the Presidential Records Act to take classified records with him when he left the White House.
'When you're president and you leave, you can take whatever you want,' Patel said, advancing an argument later adopted by Trump's lawyers but dismissed as meritless by the Justice Department. 'And when you take it, whether it's classified or not, it's yours.'
It's but one example of how Patel positioned himself as a steadfast Trump loyalist well before the president picked him to run the FBI. An Associated Press review of more than 100 podcasts that Patel hosted or on which he was interviewed over the last four years reveals how Patel has habitually denigrated the investigations into Trump, sowed doubt in the criminal justice system, criticized the decision-making of the institution he's been asked to lead and professed sympathy for jailed Jan 6. rioters.
The vast catalog of provocative public statements, sometimes made in the company of like-minded FBI antagonists, provides an unusually extensive record of a nominee's unvarnished and controversial worldviews. At his Senate confirmation hearing Thursday, Democrats are likely to seize on Patel's often explosive — and conspiracy-riddled — commentary, which is unprecedented in volume, tone and substance for a potential FBI leader. While those critics say his views make him unfit for the job, his supporters argue the FBI needs someone as brash as Patel to shake up the agency.
Asked to respond to his comments, Patel spokeswoman Erica Knight said the nominee 'looks forward to his upcoming hearing as an opportunity to highlight his extensive experience and present the truth to the American people in a comprehensive and meaningful way.'
The AP's review found that Patel frequently expressed the same views — or iterations of them — on various podcasts:
'Gangsters'
'Those same criminal gangsters at the FBI and DOJ are running this Mar-a-Lago raid investigation,' Patel said in August 2022 on his show, 'Kash's Corner,' for The Epoch Times, a pro-Trump media company that has been a key online supporter of the president and spreader of conspiracy theories.
"Gangsters' is a favored Patel term for federal investigators he perceives as tainted by anti-Trump bias. It's even part of the title of his 2023 book, 'Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth and the Battle for Our Democracy.'
Patel has sought to distinguish his dim view of the FBI's leadership, direction and decision-making from what he says is his support for the rank-and-file. But his harsh rhetoric about the bureau could nonetheless create an awkward dynamic if he's confirmed to lead the 38,000-person premier federal law enforcement agency.
The name-calling in this instance — he's also called intelligence officials 'bozos' and 'Muppets' — is consistent with Patel's scathingly critical perspective of the investigations into Trump's interference in the 2020 election and his retention of classified documents at his Florida resort after he left office.
Trump faced felony charges in the two cases, but the indictments were abandoned by prosecutors after he won the November election because of Justice Department policy prohibiting the federal prosecution of a sitting president.
Patel's reference to investigators as the 'same criminal gangsters' is part of a persistent effort to draw a straight line between the documents probe and a 2016 investigation into Trump and Russian election interference, notwithstanding significant differences in FBI and Justice Department personnel in the two inquiries.
Patel rocketed to prominence as a House staffer through his criticism of the Russia investigation, which he's dubbed 'one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetuated against a presidential candidate and then president." He's made a name for himself in MAGA circles by seeking to expose what he has described as misconduct in how the probe was pursued. Later reviews by the Justice Department inspector general and a specially appointed prosecutor identified significant flaws with that investigation, though neither presented evidence that partisan bias had guided specific decisions.
'Baseless prosecutions'
'We need to really educate the world on the weaponization of justice that occurred on January 6th,' Patel said in January 2024 on 'The Alec Lace Show," as he called the prosecutions of U.S. Capitol rioters 'baseless."
The FBI arrested more than 1,500 people arising from the Jan. 6, 2021, riot and many of them pleaded guilty to serious crimes. The recently departed FBI director, Christopher Wray, bluntly labeled the violence as 'domestic terrorism' and has called the attack emblematic of a rapidly growing threat of homegrown extremism.
Patel, like Trump, has taken a different view, saying the rioters have been mistreated by the criminal justice system. A former federal public defender and prosecutor, he has called them 'political prisoners' and offered on at least one occasion to represent them for free.
Patel will almost certainly be asked if he supports Trump's sweeping grant of clemency to all Jan. 6 defendants. The pardons, sentence commutations and indictment dismissals upended the largest investigation in Justice Department history, benefiting even those found guilty of violent attacks on police, along with leaders of far-right extremist groups who plotted to keep Trump in power.
Patel's support for the defendants has included more than just rhetoric. He's boasted about having helped produce a song, 'Justice for All,' that was recorded over a prison phone line, sung by a group of Jan. 6 defendants and overlaid with Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
'The powerful thing about it,' he said in a 2023 podcast, 'is the people who have been impacted most are the ones raising awareness.'
He's also talked up a right-wing conspiracy theory that Ray Epps, an Arizona man arrested in connection with Jan. 6, was actually an undercover operative for the FBI — something Epps has adamantly denied and prosecutors have described as false.
And he's been openly skeptical about the FBI's use of confidential informants related to Jan. 6 at a time when conspiracy theorists have suggested, inaccurately, that the bureau helped instigate the violence.
The department's internal watchdog said in a report last month that no undercover FBI agents were in the crowd on Jan. 6, and that though more than two dozen FBI informants were in Washington that day, none was tasked by the FBI with entering the building or breaking the law.
'Hold him in contempt in a jail cell'
'It's up to Congress, who has law enforcement capabilities, to go out there, arrest Chris Wray and hold him in contempt in a jail cell until the document's produced,' Patel said on 'Kash's Corner' in June 2023.
Patel in recent years has mused about the idea of Wray, who stepped down as FBI director on Jan. 19, being arrested for the FBI's failure to promptly turn over records subpoenaed by Congress — an outcome he's acknowledged as extreme but one he contends would befall less prominent people who ignored lawmaker demands for documents.
That position could come back to haunt Patel, particularly if Democrats take back a chamber of Congress in 2026.
He's also suggested that Congress could withhold or restrict 'pockets of money' to induce cooperation with its document demands.
'You ground Chris Wray's private jet that he pays for with taxpayer dollars to hop around the country. You take away the fancy new fleet of cars from DOJ that they're going to use to shuffle around executives,' he said in 2023 on 'Kash's Corner." 'You stop the construction of new buildings.'
What will a Director Patel say if Democrats push to limit funding for his flights on FBI jets?
'There'll be an investigation into members of Congress'
'Once President Trump hopefully gets back in power, there'll be an investigation into members of Congress who destroyed and withheld evidence from law enforcement agencies," Patel said in March 2024 on "In the Litter Box w/ Jewels and Catturd."
Patel's stated desire to rid the government of 'conspirators' has raised alarms he could direct the FBI to target Trump's adversaries, even though long-established FBI guidelines are meant to protect against investigative abuses and require that criminal inquiries be rooted in a legitimate purpose.
Like Trump, Patel has channeled particular ire toward the House committee that investigated the attack on the Capitol. He told Catturd, a right-wing social media personality whose real name is Phillip Buchanan, that a Trump victory could result in investigations of lawmakers who have committed 'federal felonies' and 'covered up the truth from the American people.'
That rhetoric wasn't lost on former President Joe Biden, who on his final day in office preemptively pardoned members of that committee, as well as Dr. Anthony Fauci and retired Gen. Mark Milley.
Fauci and House lawmakers are just some of the targets Patel has excoriated. His book includes a list of people he identifies as 'members of the Executive Branch Deep State,' including former Attorney General William Barr — who disputed Trump's false claims that the 2020 election was stolen — and Andrew McCabe, the former FBI acting director and a top figure in the Russia investigation.
Ahead of Thursday's hearing, Senate Judiciary Democrats circulated a social media post that they said Patel shared in 2022 in which he was depicted as taking a chainsaw to news organizations and high-profile members of Congress.
Democrats will make the prospect of reprisal center stage at Patel's confirmation hearing, something they foreshadowed with pointed questions about him directed at Trump's attorney general pick, Pam Bondi, during her own hearing this month.
When Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, asked Bondi if she would have hired someone who had an 'enemies list' into her office when she was Florida attorney general, she replied: 'Senator, to cut to the chase, you're clearly talking about Kash Patel. I don't believe he has an enemies list.'
'Toilet rag disinformation animal'
A 'toilet rag' is how Patel described Vice Media on a podcast when it declared bankruptcy two years ago. He has frequently attacked media organizations and reporters, accusing them of publishing 'fake news.' He has also threatened reporters with serious consequences for crossing Trump.
'We're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections,' Patel told Steve Bannon, a Trump ally who served four months in prison for defying a congressional subpoena and who has also warned about retribution against Trump adversaries, in December 2023.
Patel later backed off some of his statements about the media, telling NBC News last February that reporters are 'invaluable' and that his threat referred only to those who have broken the law.
But he'll face pressure from his party to go after journalists, as well as election officials and activists that Republicans have accused of crimes.
___
Associated Press Artificial Intelligence Product Manager Ernest Kung contributed to this report.
___
The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP's democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Eric Tucker, Ali Swenson And Aaron Kessler, The Associated Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Red carpet for Putin, trade relief for China, penalties on India: Inside Trump's peculiar policy playbook
Red carpet for Putin, trade relief for China, penalties on India: Inside Trump's peculiar policy playbook

CNBC

timea few seconds ago

  • CNBC

Red carpet for Putin, trade relief for China, penalties on India: Inside Trump's peculiar policy playbook

President Donald Trump is pursuing an unusual strategy — courting Russian President Vladimir Putin, holding fire on Beijing, all the while turning the screws on a close ally: India. Despite India being one of the earliest nations to engage in negotiations with the Trump administration, there is still no sign of it sealing a deal with the U.S. New Delhi is now also staring at a secondary tariff of 25% or a "penalty" for its purchases of Russian oil that is set to come into effect later this month. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday escalated criticism against India, accusing it of profiteering from cheap Russian oil imports and threatening to further raise tariffs on Indian goods. "We have planned to up the tariffs on India — these are secondary tariffs for buying the sanctioned Russian oil," Bessent told CNBC on Tuesday. Earlier this week, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro condemned the Asian giant's dependence on Russian oil as "opportunistic" and undermined international efforts to isolate Russia's war economy. "India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro said in an op-ed for the Financial Times . By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda. Professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore Bert Hofman The sharp rhetoric threatens to unravel years of improving ties between Washington and New Delhi — with India saying the U.S. was targeting it unfairly over its Russian oil purchases. "By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda," said Bert Hofman, professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore. India has emerged as a leading buyer of Russian oil, which has been sold at a discount since some Western nations shunned purchases and imposed restrictions on Russian exports over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was the second-largest purchaser of Russian oil, importing 1.6 million barrels per day in the first half of this year, up from 50,000 bpd in 2020, though still trailing China's 2 million bpd imports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Washington has not placed secondary tariffs on China for its Russian oil purchases. India has reiterated that it was the U.S. administration that had asked it to purchase Russian oil to keep the markets calm, while pointing to the European Union and even the U.S.' existing trade with Moscow. The country has taken aim at Washington, saying U.S. continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for the electric-vehicle industry, as well as fertilizers and chemicals from Russia. U.S. bilateral trade with Russia in 2024 stood at $5.2 billion, down from nearly $36 billion in 2021, government data showed. Bilateral trade between New Delhi and Moscow reached a record $68.7 billion for the year ended March 2025. In comparison, the European Union's trade with Russia stood at 67.5 billion euros ($78.1 billion) in 2024, while its services trade in 2023 was at 17.2 billion euros, according to European Commission data . "India has been victimized by these pressure tactics that that the Trump administration is trying to carry out. Trump is clearly using tariffs as a pressure tactic against Russia," Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at Washington-based think tank Wilson Center, told CNBC's " Squawk Box Asia ." Another factor determining the U.S. approach to India is that Trump feels "aggrieved," over how Modi undercut his bid to claim credit for playing a role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Kugelman emphasized. Adding to Trump's grievances is India's "unwillingness to lower barriers" to exports of American agricultural products such as soybeans and corn, Kevin Chen Xian An, associate research fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies pointed out. Oil trade for ceasefire Trump's true agenda has little to do with Washington's stated goal of curbing Moscow's oil revenues, but extracting leverages from the trading partners, according to several geopolitics experts. "The overarching objective for the Trump administration is to extract concessions from countries to figure out some justification for levying taxes on trade so that the government can fund its tax reductions on American citizens' income," said Drew Thompson, senior fellow at the think-tank RSIS. "It's not based on foreign policy principles [but] on power politics and gaining leverage," Thompson added. Last week, Trump rolled out a red carpet to greet Putin on his first visit to the U.S. in about a decade, sharing a ride with him in the presidential limousine to the venue. While the meeting did not appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in Ukraine — a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit — both leaders described the meeting as "productive." Speaking at the joint news briefing following the talks , Putin reiterated that "for the conflict resolution in Ukraine to be long-term and lasting, all the root causes of the crisis ... must be eliminated; all of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account." Kirill Dmitriev, one of Putin's top negotiators, hailed Monday's talks in Washington as an "important day of diplomacy," emphasizing Moscow's opposition to any short-term ceasefire deal with Ukraine. Trump is trying to "maximize his leverage ... pressuring India, and Russia via India," to get a trade deal with the former and a ceasefire pact with the latter, said Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical and U.S. strategist at BCA Research. These will eventually help boost Republicans' prospects in the upcoming midterm election, Gertken added. Not provoking China While India faces steep tariffs for its purchases of Russian crude, China, which has remained the largest importer of Russian crude, has been spared such levies. Trump said last Friday he was not considering retaliatory tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but might consider it in two or three weeks. China's purchases of Russian oil have risen to 46% of overall exports from Russia in the first half of this year, from 34% in 2022, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, followed by India which imported around 36% of Russia's supplies. When asked about China's role in Russian oil purchases, Bessent suggested that Beijing's imports were less egregious in the eyes of the Trump administration because it had already been a big buyer even before Russia invaded Ukraine. Going soft on China may also reflect Trump's desire not to scuttle a potential high-profile summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the coming months and the conclusion of a lasting trade deal, said Stephen Olson, a senior visiting fellow at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. The secondary tariffs on India may be intended as "a shot across Russia's bow" to show that the U.S. could turn up the pressure by extending similar tariffs to China, if Russia is not more compliant, Olson added. Following weeks of escalating tensions, Beijing and Washington agreed in May to suspend the hefty duties and loosen several punitive measures imposed in April, as both sides continued to work on hammering out a durable deal. Beijing has leveraged its sheer dominance of rare-earth minerals crucial for military and industrial use in its negotiations with Washington, maintaining a tight control on exports of the critical minerals. The relationship with China is complicated, and the Trump administration has not yet come out with "a clear, coherent policy toward China. Sometimes it seems like it wants to compete with China economically. Other times it seems like it wants to reach some type of understanding or a or a detente," Kugelman said.

Trump administration's newest allegation against political foes: Mortgage fraud
Trump administration's newest allegation against political foes: Mortgage fraud

NBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • NBC News

Trump administration's newest allegation against political foes: Mortgage fraud

In recent weeks, President Donald Trump's administration has targeted Democratic officials over allegations of mortgage fraud, a new front in an effort to undermine critics. The latest one came Wednesday, when Trump, who has been sharply critical of the Federal Reserve's interest rate policies, posted to his Truth Social platform that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook 'must resign, now!!!' His post came after William Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, alleged in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi that Cook, who was nominated by President Joe Biden, 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud.' Pulte's letter claimed that Cook falsified her residence statuses for her properties in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Atlanta. The move followed recent efforts targeting Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who was a leading figure in Trump's impeachments, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who successfully sued Trump and his company over what her office said were fraudulent misrepresentations of his wealth and financial statements that he used to get favorable rates on bank loans and insurance policies that he otherwise would not have been able to obtain. (A judge awarded James' office over $300 million in the case, an amount that has since ballooned to over $500 million with interest. Trump has called the case 'a fraud on me' and is appealing the judgment.) This month, NBC News reported that Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a conservative activist and former interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., as a 'special attorney' to probe mortgage fraud allegations against Schiff and James. At the time, a senior law enforcement official told NBC News that a grand jury in Virginia will investigate the allegations against James, while a grand jury in Maryland will take up the Schiff allegations. Trump had called for both officials to be prosecuted over the allegations. Schiff, James and now Cook have all denied any wrongdoing. The White House referred questions to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which declined to comment. Making an allegation of mortgage fraud has long been a common tactic in opposition research on political campaigns. A Republican campaign veteran told NBC News that searching for inconsistencies in where candidates declare their 'primary' residences is among the first tasks for opposition researchers. It is an issue relevant to elected officials who split their time between their home states and Washington. This person said it is a frequent issue in campaigns on both sides, and the penalty tends to be a fine, not jail time. Last year, Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., then a candidate for office, faced a $47,000 bill in Washington, D.C., after it was discovered she wrongly received property tax credits she improperly claimed on a home she had rented out. 'It looks sloppy,' this person said. 'But I don't think we've ever had anyone screw up their life on this. It just looked bad.' Now, the Trump administration is giving such allegations against Democrats special attention. At the same time, The Associated Press reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Trump ally who is running for the Senate, and his wife, Angela, made inaccurate statements on mortgage applications claiming that three separate properties were each their primary residence. The Trump administration has not said whether Paxton is under similar investigation. In a letter to Martin on Monday, James' lawyer, Abbe Lowell, pointed out the potential inconsistency in enforcement actions. 'Notably, absent from your mandate is Kenneth Paxton (Republican Attorney General of Texas). Given that the same news reports raising questions about Ms. James and Mr. Schiff have reported that, somehow, Mr. Paxton has three different properties that he claims to be his 'primary residence,' it seems to indicate your title ought really be, 'Special Assistant for Mortgage Fraud [Alleged Against Democrats Adverse to President Trump],'' he wrote. Pulte said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday that the administration's probes of the allegations of mortgage fraud were free from political considerations. 'We will look at any allegation of mortgage fraud,' he said. 'And we do not care whether you're a Republican, a Democrat. We do not care whether you're wealthy. We don't care whether you're a prosecutor. We don't care whether you're a Fed governor, if you commit mortgage fraud and you present an existential threat to the Federal Home Loan Banks, Fannie or Freddie, we are going to prosecute it, period.' Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's Board of Governors, said in a statement Wednesday that she learned from news reports that Pulte had made a criminal referral against her 'based on a mortgage application from four years ago, before I joined the Federal Reserve.' 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she said. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' Later Wednesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said the episode amounted to the latest example of the Trump administration's trying to pressure the Federal Reserve. 'I've long been an advocate for holding Fed officials accountable,' Warren, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, said in a statement. 'But anyone can see that for months now, President Trump has been scrambling for a pretext to intimidate or fire Chair Powell and Members of the Federal Reserve Board while blaming anyone but himself for how his failed economic policies are hurting Americans. The President and his Administration should not weaponize the Federal government to illegally fire independent Fed Board members.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store