Electric vehicle mandate risks being next carbon tax without 'adjustments,' EV industry warns
OTTAWA — The head of a national association representing the electric transportation industry says the federal government, and provinces with a zero-emission vehicle sales mandate, should make 'short-term adjustments' to their programs at the risk of the policy going the way of the now-cancelled consumer carbon tax.
Electric Mobility Canada President Daniel Breton's comments come as auto-makers and others in the industry express a fresh round of concerns about the Liberals' sales mandate, which has set a target of reaching 100-per-cent zero-emission vehicle sales by 2035, beginning with initial targets of hitting 60 per cent by 2030 and at least 20 per cent by 2026.
Article content
'We believe that B.C, Quebec, and the federal government should make short-term adjustments, because between now and 2030 we don't know yet what's going to happen south of the border. We don't know yet what's going to happen between Canada and the U.S.,' Breton told National Post in an interview Thursday.
'Lowering the targets between now and 2030 would be a reasonable path.'
With Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre ratcheting up his efforts in demanding that the mandate be scrapped, arguing it removes 'choice' from consumers, Breton, a former Quebec environment minister, says the risk of not making short-term adjustments at the federal level is that, 'this is going to become a political hot potato.'
'Like the carbon tax was.'
The consumer carbon tax was a signature climate policy of the Liberals until March, when Prime Minister Mark Carney cancelled it, saying it had become 'too divisive.' That followed a years-long campaign by Poilievre, who criss-crossed the country, promising to 'axe the tax,' blaming it for forcing consumers to pay additional costs amid a cost-of-living crisis.
Article content
Breton, whose association represents 180 members in the electric transportation industry, including those who sell electric cars, says 'we have to find a pathway' that will allow people and those in the traditional automotive industry to buy credits and 'ease into this regulation.'
A credit system is at the heart of the federal policy, which the Liberals finalized in 2023 as part of their plan to reduce Canada's overall greenhouse gas emissions, taking aim at the transportation sector, one of the top emitters.
The government says manufacturers can earn credits by either selling or making zero-emission vehicles, which Ottawa defines as either a battery-powered vehicle or a plug-in hybrid, or by purchasing credits from an electric vehicle maker, or putting money towards building out charging infrastructure.
Companies that fail to comply could face penalties under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.
Article content
While manufacturers have long expressed opposition to the government mandating the sale of electric vehicles, Ford Canada CEO Bev Goodman recently called for the regulation to be scrapped in light of falling sales of these vehicles.
Back in March, Statistics Canada reported a nearly 45-per-cent drop in the sale of new zero-emission vehicles from the same month the year before. The agency reported in April that the sales of these vehicles fell to around 7.6 per cent.
Leading automotive associations have pointed to these decreases as evidence that hitting the 20 per cent sales target is unrealistic and creates additional burden on Canada's auto-sector at a time when it is dealing with a trade war with the U.S., which under President Donald Trump has dropped the electrification goals introduced by former president Joe Biden.
A spokesperson for Ontario Economic Development Minister Vic Fedeli called on the federal government to respond to the concerns from automakers.
Article content
'We are meeting regularly with auto companies, industry leaders, and workers as they navigate unprecedented global economic uncertainty,' wrote Jennifer Cunliffe.
'We need the federal government to do the same and address the concerns raised by industry partners about the impact that their net-zero vehicle mandates will have on investment, jobs, and supply chains.'
Breton attributes the 'crash' in electric vehicle sales to the way the federal government suddenly ended the $5,000 rebate program for consumers in January, which it first introduced in 2019.
He said the way Ottawa did so was the 'worst-case scenario' as compared to phasing it out more slowly and decreasing the value over time. What made matters worse, he says, was that at the same time, Quebec, which has its own zero-emission sales mandate, paused its rebate, which it has since reintroduced.
Article content
Since doing so, he says, Quebec dealers have been telling him sales have been going back up. A presentation to industry by B.C.'s Energy Ministry, which was obtained by reporters, also showed the province was considering changes to its own program amid falling sales.
The Liberals campaigned on reintroducing the federal rebate, which Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin's office confirmed it was working on, but has not stipulated when it will be announced.
Breton said people are now waiting to see when the federal rebate will return before purchasing an electric vehicle.
'In the past two weeks, I've been getting phone calls from dealers that I know who told me, 'well, (electric vehicle) sales are stopping again because people are waiting for the federal rebate to come back.''
Breton says if it were up to him, the country would reach its overall target of having 100-per-cent new vehicle sales be zero-emission but 2030, 'but it's not me.'
Article content
He declined to speculate on what lower targets should be, saying he wants to have further discussions with the government and industry.
'We have to make sure that people see a reasonable pathway, meaning some kind of compromise between some traditional automakers' issues or challenges,' he said.
'But also we need enough market certainty so that private companies will see that as more electric cars come to market, we will need more infrastructure, and then those companies want to invest in infrastructure charging.'
In a recent interview, Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturing Association, said the government has the option of either abandoning its mandate or taking a look at the policy to 'have them reflect reality.' He said the government will have to adjust its program.
'Sure, you should have stretch goals, but stretch goals might be 10-per-cent (by 2026) or you can stick to what you think your ultimate goal is, 100-per-cent by 2035, and the first compliance date out to 2028.'
-With files from The Canadian Press
Latest National Stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
'Pierre's riding to lose': Candidates in Alberta byelection met for debate
Pierre Poilievre was greeted with cheers and applause by the hundreds of Albertans who showed up to watch a two-and-a-half-hour political debate on a sunny Tuesday evening in July. The Camrose and District Chamber of Commerce hosted a candidates' forum featuring 10 of the people who are vying to represent Battle River—Crowfoot in the Aug. 18 byelection. "My mission here is to give national leadership to the issues that are of local importance," Poilievre told the sold-out crowd. The Conservative leader is widely expected to win the sprawling eastern Alberta riding, which is considered one of the safest Tory seats in the country. Damien Kurek won more than 82 per cent of the vote in the April election. He resigned to allow Poilievre, who lost his own seat in the Ottawa riding of Carleton, the chance to return to the House of Commons in the fall. A crowd of Poilievre's supporters was outside the venue before things got underway, many carrying signs with his name. Inside, the signs had to be put away. The moderator kept a tight schedule, cutting off the microphones of anyone who ran over their allotted time as the candidates answered a range of questions submitted by the public about the economy, health care privatization, electoral reform and immigration. The candidates seated at a long table on a stage occasionally took aim at Poilievre, particularly for the fact that he does not live in the riding and is running to progress his political career. Liberal candidate Darcy Spady introduced himself by saying, "I'm from Three Hills, and I don't want to be prime minister" — a line that elicited chuckles from the crowd and from Poilievre when he repeated it. Spady said he wanted to bring local issues to the government caucus and give an electorate that has historically voted Conservative the option of voting in a centrist. 'I'd like to grow the culture so the next generation can say, 'Oh, we can choose a Liberal, a Conservative, a moderate, a NDP,' he said in an interview after the debate. 'The stigma of only voting to the right here, in my home, all my life... I don't like that.' Poilievre argued that electing the leader of a political party is a trade-off — leaders are on the road much of the time, he said. "The other side, though, is that leader can bring a very powerful megaphone to the local issues of the community," he added. Independent candidate Bonnie Critchley pointed out in her closing statement that several candidates, including Poilievre, won't be able to vote in the byelection because they don't live in the riding. "I firmly believe that Mr. Poilievre is too busy with his personal ambitions to give a rat's backside about us," Critchley said in her closing statement. She got loud cheers from the crowd earlier in the evening as she argued for local representation. "If you want to run for an area, you need to live here. This longest ballot crap, that's got to stop," she said. More than 200 candidates were signed up to run in the byelection as of Tuesday, most of whom were sponsored by the Longest Ballot Committee protest group. The group says it's trying to get attention for electoral reform, arguing that Canada needs to end the first-past-the-post system. As a result of the protest, Elections Canada has decided that voters will write in the name of their selected candidate on a modified ballot in the byelection, rather than selecting from a list of 200. The longest ballot group signed up 85 people to run in Carleton during the April election, and ran dozens of candidates in byelections last summer. Poilievre called the Longest Ballot Committee "a total scam that must be stopped," and pledged that if he's elected, he will put forward legislative changes to ensure it doesn't happen again. In opening and closing statements, a number of candidates said Ottawa takes advantage of Alberta and pledged to try to end equalization. One candidate expressed sympathy for Alberta's separatist movement. There was broad agreement from candidates that, while immigration has historically been important, Canada needs to pull back on the number of people it is letting in. "We must have more people leaving than coming over the next several years as we bring down our population," Poilievre said. Green Party candidate Ashley MacDonald and the NDP's Katherine Swampy called immigration one of the country's strengths. Critchley and fellow Independent candidate Sarah Spanier made pitches to voters that they would hold a powerful position as Independent MPs in a minority government, and would leverage that to help the riding. The forum also featured candidates from the People's Party of Canada, the Libertarian Party, the Christian Heritage Party and the United Party of Canada. "I think we all know this is Pierre's riding to lose here; he's definitely going to win," MacDonald said in his closing statement. "So please, take a chance." This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
With Ottawa pledging bail reform, what's driving the debate?
Premiers are putting pressure on Ottawa to implement tougher bail rules. With the federal government expected to table bail reform legislation in the fall, critics are expressing worries already about Ottawa's plans. So what's driving the debate on bail reform? What the government has promised During this spring's federal election, the Liberals promised to "move aggressively" to implement stricter bail laws by introducing a reverse onus for a number of offences. A reverse onus moves the burden of proof from the prosecutor to the accused — meaning they would have to justify being granted bail. The Criminal Code already has a reverse onus for bail in place for many serious offences, including murder. The Liberals would add new offences to that list, including car thefts involving violence or those conducted for a criminal organization, and home invasions and some human trafficking and smuggling offences. Justice Minister Sean Fraser told The Canadian Press he plans to bring forward a crime bill in the fall. It's not clear what will be in it — Fraser said the government will consider including additional reforms but "at minimum" it will implement the crime policies the Liberals promised during the election. Didn't the Liberals already reform bail? Yes, through amendments to the Criminal Code in 2023. They expanded reverse onus bail provisions to include more firearms and weapons offences, and more crimes involving intimate partner violence. In 2019, the government established a reverse onus for those charged with a violent offence involving an intimate partner if they have a prior conviction for a similar offence. The 2023 amendments followed calls from provincial premiers and police chiefs for the federal government to bring in stricter bail rules for repeat violent offenders. It followed some high-profile cases — including that of Ontario Provincial Police Const. Greg Pierzchala, who was killed while responding to a vehicle in a ditch. In 2024, Ontario police associations called for further reform, saying there are many cases "of accused persons out on bail who are rearrested shortly after being granted bail," including some that don't make the news. They said the public "expects that in the name of public safety, violent and repeat offenders will not be released on bail unless there is a compelling reason and a sensible plan to ensure that they are not at risk of reoffending while awaiting trial." Pressure from the premiers Premiers said earlier this month they expect the federal government to follow through with its promised reforms. At a press conference following a premiers' meeting in Huntsville, Ont., last week, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the provincial leaders "talked about the need for real bail reform that keeps criminals behind bars and keeps our communities safe." He said the premiers would be holding Prime Minister Mark Carney"accountable" for delivering "full-fledged" and not "half-baked" reform. Ford said he'd "love to see mandatory sentencing so when someone breaks into your home, puts a gun to your head, terrorizes your neighbourhood," that person doesn't "get out on bail after being out on bail … five times." The federal government is responsible for setting bail laws under the Criminal Code, but provincial and territorial governments prosecute most criminal offences, conduct bail hearings and enforce bail conditions. A spokesperson for Fraser said the federal government is "working with provinces and territories to reform bail and sentencing, with a focus on repeat, violent offenders. This was a key topic at the recent First Ministers' Meeting, and minister Fraser has made it a top priority." Why is bail such a hot political issue? The Conservative party has long campaigned on a promise of "jail not bail" and has accused the Liberals of being "soft" on crime and of implementing "catch and release" policies. During the recent federal election, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre campaigned heavily on crime and said he would prohibit those convicted of three serious offences from getting bail. Anthony Doob, professor emeritus at the University of Toronto's Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal studies, said calls to toughen up bail law are based on the false assumption that large numbers of dangerous people are being released. "Of course, the ones we hear about in particular are the ones who committed a serious and a violent offence," he said. "So we are hearing about those cases. But the assumption that we have a lenient system is questioned by the fact that 80 per cent of our prisoners in Ontario, in the provincial prisons … are now awaiting trial." Calls to make bail tougher to get are bad policy but easy politics, he argued, because politicians can always point to someone who committed a crime while on bail. "If you're going to be detaining another hundred people or a few hundred people in order to reduce the likelihood that one person is going to commit another offence, I think we should be a little bit cautious," he said. What are the concerns about tougher bail rules? Shakir Rahim, director of the criminal justice program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said that approximately 70 per cent of those in provincial remand centres are waiting for trial — up from about 20 per cent in 1982. The consequence of tougher bail rules is that they erode "what is a core safeguard of liberty for the innocent," he said. "In an environment where we have record levels of bail being denied, and we have further erosions, whether through reverse onus provisions or otherwise, we really dilute the strength of that protection." Rahim said there is a trend toward "immediately" viewing people who have been arrested "as guilty of it, or talked about in that way," even though only half of cases in Canada result in criminal convictions. "The more people that you deny bail to, it is a foreseen consequence that some of those people will have been factually innocent," he said. Rahim said provincial jails are overcrowded, with conditions that include 23-hour-a-day lockdowns and a lack of medical care. "When you take people and you deny them bail, it can be up to 30 months before they have their day in court," he said. "So one of the issues that we're concerned about is people feeling the pressure to plead guilty to certain offences just to get out of the terrible conditions that they are subject to." Catherine Latimer, executive director of the John Howard Society of Canada, said pretrial detention rates are "way too high." That is "the canary in the coal mine to suggest your system is really seriously flawed … It's not enough to think that the answer is to put more people in there by using more reverse onus provisions." Latimer said "we haven't even analyzed whether the last set of reverse onus provisions have done anything." In 2023, when the federal government introduced the previous bail reform legislation, then-justice minister Arif Virani called on provinces and territories to collect better data on bail and share that with the federal government. Rahim said we don't have any data about the number of people who reoffend while out on bail, or whether they're ultimately found guilty.
Edmonton Journal
3 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Lorne Gunter: Elections Canada put an end to Longest Ballot Committee's trickery
Article content So the Longest Ballot Committee has been thwarted — sort of — in its effort to hijack next month's byelection in Battle River-Crowfoot. Article content The committee's stunt of clogging the ballot in the central Alberta riding with more than 200 names worked. By the close of nominations on Tuesday, the committee had convinced more than 200 of its supporters to let their names stand, even though most of them have never been to the riding and have no intention of campaigning. Article content Article content Article content There is a provision in the federal Elections Act that permits voters to use write-in ballots, rather than the typical list-style ballot. It is usually only used for special electors, such as voters who show up at an Elections Canada office on a day not set up for advance polling. Article content Write-in ballots typically aren't used over a full riding in an official byelection, but Elections Canada decided there was no prohibition against using write-in at every polling station in the ranching, farming and oil-drilling riding. Article content So on election day Aug. 18 and at advance polls, voters will have a list of all the nominees to look at, if they want, Then they will write their preferred candidate's name on a single-line ballot. Perfectly correct spelling is not required, so long as it is obvious to returning officers for whom the ballot was cast. Article content Article content This saves Elections Canada from having to produce a ballot nearly seven feet long. Article content Article content That's a good thing. Such long ballots in the past have led to hours-long counting delays on election night. Article content Write-in balloting, however, discourages turnout. It seems to some voters to be more complicated and less reliable than choosing their candidate from a reasonably short list with party affiliation clearly shown. Article content And write-in balloting favours incumbents or, in the case of Pierre Poilievre, very well-known candidates. Article content Most voters in Battle River–Crowfoot or elsewhere in Canada know Poilievre by name. If you want to vote Conservative, you simply show up at the polls and write in his famous name.
