Killer of British backpacker Peter Falconio in Australia dies
Bradley John Murdoch, who was convicted in 2005 of murdering Mr Falconio, 28, and assaulting his girlfriend Joanne Lees at gunpoint, died after being moved to palliative care last month.
Mr Falconio and Ms Lees, both from Yorkshire, were travelling across the country in a camper van when they were ambushed by Murdoch on the Stuart Highway, an isolated road that runs through the centre of Australia, on July 14 2001.
Murdoch was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for at least 28 years.
Murdoch, 67, was diagnosed with terminal throat cancer in 2019 and was moved to palliative care from Alice Springs Correctional Centre last month, according to local media reports.
The Northern Territory Government Department of Corrections said on Tuesday that there had been a death in custody and the coroner would be informed.
Mr Falconio and Ms Lees had been driving near the tiny settlement of Barrow Creek, around 188 miles north of Alice Springs, when Murdoch pulled up beside them claiming to have seen sparks coming from their van.
He shot Mr Falconio in the head as he inspected the vehicle, before forcing Ms Lees into his vehicle and binding her wrists with cable ties.
She managed to escape, hiding in the Outback for hours before flagging down a passing truck.
During the trial, prosecutors argued that Murdoch was likely to have disposed of the backpacker's body somewhere in the vast, remote expanse of desert between Alice Springs and Broome, covering more than 1,200 miles.
Despite repeated searches, Mr Falconio's body has never been found.
Ms Lees, who returned to the UK, told Australian current affairs programme 60 Minutes in 2017 that she still wanted to 'bring him home'.
' Pete lost his life on that night, but I lost mine too,' she said at the time.
'I'll never be fully at peace if Pete's not found, but I accept that that is a possibility.'
Murdoch lodged several unsuccessful appeals over the years, with Australia's highest court refusing to hear his case in 2007.
Last month police announced a new 500,000 Australian dollar (about £240,000) reward for information leading to the discovery of Mr Falconio's remains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Anita Rose murder: Fears prevail one year on from Brantham attack
When a mother-of-six was murdered while walking her dog exactly one year ago, it left many people in a small Suffolk community living in fear. Earlier this month, the killer of Anita Rose was found guilty following a trial, but how do the residents of Brantham now feel?Fifty-seven-year-old Anita was walking in the early morning of 24 July 2024 before she was discovered with severe injuries near Rectory Lane in Brantham, about eight miles (13km) south of died in hospital four days later, leaving her family distraught and villagers event sparked a murder inquiry, and three months later police announced they had charged Roy Barclay - a 55-year-old man already wanted by officers - over her death. Marti Mower, 77, has lived in Brantham for more than 40 years and said she would never have imagined an attack like this to happen."It was scary... my daughter has a dog and we used to walk him in the same place," she recalled."We don't walk down there any more - you just never know what's going to happen."Ms Mower said she believed the community had pulled together, but felt many people were aware "these things can happen even in a small village". Simon Barrett, 51, had moved to the village just months before the attack, which he said had led to a lot of "unease"."When I went out I was turning around, looking if I heard something behind me, because we didn't know what had happened and what the outcome was going to be," he Barrett said tensions had since relaxed, with "a lot more going on" in the village."It's a quiet area anyway with country lanes and there's always people dog walking, jogging, whereas before there was nothing for quite a while," he said. Jane Frame, 59, is from nearby East Bergholt, but comes to Brantham weekly to walk her dog."A place like Brantham, it's quiet around here so you just don't expect it," she said."I didn't walk around here for a while. I didn't want to come around here."Mrs Frame said she would not walk in the village early in the morning any more."It does make you think twice about the whole area and who's here," she added. Jane Carrington, 69, said she had previously interacted with Ms Rose."I used to see her out with her dog quite often when I had a dog as well," she said."I have seen her [Ms Rose's] partner out with the dog and had a chat with him, they seem to be doing OK."I think it took a lot out of him, especially the court case."She felt the community was pleased to have seen Barclay found guilty of her murder. Roy Plowright, 73, is from East End, but regularly comes into Brantham."It was terrible, attacking a poor lady and just leaving her there, it's disgusting," he said."I've only been here six years... where we live there is no street lighting, it's so quiet, there's no police or fire engines every night, it's a lovely place to live."[Everyone] was relieved that they got him [Barclay] and he had been charged." Barclay was on the run from police for two years, living in a makeshift camp in Brantham when he attacked Ms Rose. He had also been jailed in 2015 for the violent, unprovoked assault on an elderly man in an Essex seaside town, and was released on parole in was arrested and charged three months after the Brantham attack, with his DNA discovered on a jacket and headphones she was wearing at the time. Barclay is due to be sentenced on 6 August at Ipswich Crown Court. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
How a junior trader paid for the banking crisis – while the big bosses never joined him in the dock
The wheels of British justice are appallingly slow. Back in 2016, I wrote that the conviction of Tom Hayes, the bank trader jailed for conspiring to manipulate the Libor interest rate, was unsafe. Today, finally, the Supreme Court has agreed to quash his conviction. The case of Carlo Palombo, the other trader who had his conviction quashed today, was not linked to Hayes. Palombo received four years in 2019. When ex-Citi and UBS banker Hayes was found guilty in 2015, he was sentenced to 14 years, an astonishing long term for a white-collar criminal in this country. That was reduced to 11 years on appeal, but as I remarked at the time, you get less for killing someone. There is no doubt he was being made an example of. There was considerable public anger at the way bankers had walked scot-free from the financial crisis – still is – and Hayes was seen as discouraging others. He was portrayed as being at the centre of a web, setting the benchmark rate used for millions of personal loans; he was therefore the worst of the worst, an arch-villain who profited from ordinary folks; he, everyone seemed to agree, deserved every moment spent inside. But in his case, there literally were no others. A year later, in a blow to the Serious Fraud Office, which brought the prosecutions, six brokers were acquitted of conspiring with him to fix the interbank rate. On their acquittals, in his cell at HMP Lowdham Grange, Hayes could be forgiven for raging against the iniquity of a system that saw his life ruined. Particularly, as in the professional hierarchy, Hayes was a junior. We were supposed to believe that others never condoned what he did. It simply never rang true that he was able to act without anyone above him at the bank knowing and agreeing. That unease only increased with details emerging about his personality. He was a bit of a geek, as many are in his area of work. He learned by heart the Highway Code from cover to cover when he was learning to drive. It was one of the traits that earned him his nicknames of 'Rain Man' and 'Kid Asperger's'. But, as he explained, it also meant he was ideally suited to futures trading. 'The success of getting it right, the success of finding market inefficiencies, the success of identifying opportunities and then when you get it right, it's like solving that equation,' Hayes said in court. 'It's make money, lose money, and it's just so pure.' Symptomatic of an underlying condition, he was also open and personable, not sophisticated at keeping something secret. Indeed, that was his defence, that what he did was common; he was encouraged to do what he did and he did not believe he was acting dishonestly. It would have been more reassuring if his bank bosses had joined him in the dock. But they never did. Nevertheless, the promise of the subsequent trial of his alleged co-conspirators did provide some comfort. Then they were acquitted. Hayes said he was delighted with the outcome. He was 'thrilled that the brokers can return to their families and their lives' but was 'bewildered' that he was left 'in a situation where he [was] convicted of conspiring with nobody'. Originally, there were 22 names on the draft indictment, including the six found innocent. At Hayes' trial, most of the evidence presented against him was in relation to those six – hence the Serious Fraud Office's decision to pursue only them. Most of the other names were thought to be peripheral. Hayes said he had never met or even spoken to them; there were some he'd been in touch with via email or other messaging, but just a few times. Ahead of Hayes' trial, the judge, Mr Justice Cooke, decided to separate his hearing from that of the brokers and his alleged co-conspirators. Their statements were not allowed to be submitted in Hayes' trial. Presumably, if they had been, given the jury's conclusion in their trial, this may have assisted his defence. Critically, his jury was unaware of evidence relating to whether or not an agreement between the co-defendants was ever reached. After their acquittals, David Green, then head of the SFO, said: 'The key issue in this trial was whether these defendants were party to a dishonest agreement with Tom Hayes. By their verdicts, the jury have said that they could not be sure that this was the case.' It was an odd use of words from Green. He was trying to justify the prosecution by saying that in the end, the jury could not be certain, so therefore they acquitted. Where, though, does the jury say that? Equally, the jury could surely have been certain there was no agreement – Green simply did not know. In Hayes' earlier trial, however, without the evidence from his alleged co-conspirators, the jury was certain there was a conspiracy. Later, with those not guilty verdicts, that did not seem right or fair. During his closing speech to the jury at Hayes' trial, Mukul Chawla QC for the prosecution was keen to point out that Hayes was the first but would not be the last. Again this was a reference to the six. But look what happened. In light of their acquittals and the non-submission of their statements in his trial, Hayes deserved a fair hearing. Shamefully, it took nine further years for that day to arrive.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Uber driver allegedly kicks woman to the ground during collection in Perth: 'I was terrified'
Distressing footage has surfaced of a rideshare driver appearing to kick a female supermarket worker to the ground, prompting calls for stronger worker protections. The woman, aged in her 20s, was left 'terrified' by the incident, which unfolded in the carpark of a Coles supermarket in Inglewood, in Perth 's inner-city, on Tuesday last week. CCTV footage obtained by ABC News captured the moment the man appeared to walk past her nonchalantly before allegedly kicking her to the ground. She remained on the asphalt for a few moments before the man appeared to chase her out of view of the camera. Police allege the rideshare driver, a 27-year-old man from Beckenham, made verbal threats against the worker before physically assaulting her and driving away. He was charged with assaulting a retail worker who was performing their duties and making a threat to unlawfully do an act. The worker, who did not wish to be named, told the broadcaster the man kicked her after she asked him to separate the delivery orders. 'I was so scared, like, terrified,' she said. She said her employer contacted the rideshare platform and asked them to ban the 27-year-old from driving for them until an investigation into the incident was concluded. Her mother described the incident as 'shocking' and said it posed 'a real concern' for female safety. 'To be in that situation was quite clearly terrifying,' she said. She also raised concerns about information sharing between rideshare platforms, asking whether the driver in question could feasibly work for another service. It cast doubts on recent efforts to crack down on retail worker violence across the state, including a new 'assault retail worker' offence imposed in WA in July last year. Since, then 329 people have been charged with the new offence which increased the maximum penalty to seven years imprisonment, or three years and a fine of $36,000. 'Just like other Western Australians, retail workers have every right to feel safe in their workplace,' Police Minister Paul Papalia said at the time. 'These tougher penalties send a strong message that violent behaviour towards staff simply doing their job won't be tolerated.' The 27-year-old man is due to appear in Perth Magistrates Court next month.
