"Led by UAE Projects" .. Arab Investments in Egypt Reach USD 40 Billion
Arab Investments in Egypt Reach USD 40 Billion Led by UAE Projects
Foreign direct investments in Egypt from Arab nations reached USD 39.5 billion by the end of the fiscal year 2023-24, with the UAE leading in investments, according to data from the Central Bank of Egypt. The bulk of these investments, approximately USD 37.5 billion, was directed towards Egypt's construction sector.
The contribution stems largely from Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund ADQ, which announced a USD 35 billion investment plan in February 2024. This includes a USD 24 billion project in Ras El Hekma, aimed at transforming the Mediterranean region into a prime holiday destination with a free economic zone. Additionally, USD 11 billion of UAE deposits will be converted into investments for key projects across the country.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have also increased their financial stakes in Egypt, with Saudi investments rising to USD 585.5 million and Qatari inflows reaching USD 447 million during the same fiscal period.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yemen Online
a day ago
- Yemen Online
Yemen bans use of foreign currency in local trade
Yemen's internationally-recognized government announced on Tuesday that all commercial transactions within areas under its control must be conducted using the Yemeni rial, prohibiting the use of foreign currencies for domestic trade and services. According to the state-run Saba news agency, the decision prohibits foreign currency use in transactions like tuition fees, medical expenses, rent and travel tickets, where foreign payment is not inherently required, reports citing foreign media. Ministers and provincial governors are tasked with enforcing the ban and reporting progress to the prime minister on a regular basis, Saba reported. This measure aims to strengthen the rial's sovereignty and stability. Currency traders in Aden told Xinhua that the rial surged to 1,617 per US dollar in government-controlled areas on Monday, a 40-percent recovery from nearly 2,900 weeks earlier. Yemen faces an unprecedented financial crisis after more than two years without oil revenue, which constitutes 70 percent of government income. The crisis deepened following Houthi attacks on oil export facilities in southern Yemen in late 2022, and amid the prolonged conflict since 2014. The war-torn Arab nation remains divided between the internationally-recognised government based in Aden and the Houthis that control the capital Sanaa and northern regions.
Saba Yemen
a day ago
- Saba Yemen
Foreign Affairs: Decision to announce termination of UN envoy to Yemen possible if agenda of aggressor countries continues to be implemented
Sana'a - Saba: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates expressed on Tuesday regret over the contents of the briefing of Special Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations Hans Grundberg before the Security Council session held Tuesday. In a statement received by the Yemeni News Agency (Saba), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates affirmed that it followed, as usual, the briefing of the UN envoy to Yemen before the Security Council on August 12, 2025 AD. Unfortunately, his briefing continues to revolve around a vicious circle and steers clear of the root causes of the crisis in Yemen. The Ministry indicated that talk of peace and stability remains incomplete without a clear reference to the ongoing Saudi-Emirati military aggression, the American, British, and Israeli aggression, as well as the comprehensive and unjust blockade imposed on the Yemeni people for years. The statement noted that the briefing did not provide an accurate and impartial description of the reality on the ground, which undermines its credibility and makes it appear as if it is settling the victim and the perpetrator. Regarding the UN envoy's reference to escalation on the front lines, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs affirmed that any military actions by the Yemeni armed forces are part of a legitimate response to the ongoing violations by the mercenary side, which has not committed to a genuine and comprehensive ceasefire. The Ministry also emphasized that strengthening defensive positions in areas in Hodeida is a natural measure and a sovereign right to protect Yemeni territory and vital infrastructure, especially with the ongoing threats of aggression. It expressed surprise that Sana'a was held responsible for the fragmentation of the Yemeni economy, when the real cause lies in the unilateral decisions taken by the "Central Bank in Aden," affiliated with the coalition's mercenary government. The statement emphasized that these decisions, which led to the collapse of the currency, were made under the direction and direct support of the aggressor states. The statement explained that the measures taken by the Government of Change and Construction, including the issuance of currency, are necessary measures aimed at protecting the national economy and maintaining currency stability in areas controlled by the Supreme Political Council, ensuring the continued provision of services to citizens. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs called on the UN envoy to assume his responsibility impartially and speak frankly about the unilateral measures taken by mercenaries that threaten the unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of the Republic of Yemen. These measures include the issuance of new identity cards, a move aimed at perpetuating political separation and undermining the Yemeni social fabric. These measures also include unilateral measures aimed at restricting citizens by obstructing the process of authenticating educational documents, criminal records, and medical professional licenses, among other things. The statement reiterated that the support and backup operations for the Yemeni armed forces in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab are in solidarity with the oppressed Palestinian people in Gaza, and are not part of the internal conflict, as the UN envoy is promoting. The statement pointed out that these operations will not cease until the aggression stops and the blockade on the Gaza Strip is lifted. It noted the UN envoy's attempts to link the operations to the aggression and blockade on Yemen and to discuss the damage to ports, while deliberately ignoring the direct attacks carried out by the aggression on Yemeni ports and airports since the beginning of the war. The statement also ignores its responsibility to alleviate the suffering of special humanitarian cases requiring travel for medical treatment, which has resulted in the deaths of some of them. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates also renewed its call for the UN envoy and the Security Council to adopt a more neutral and objective position, based on serious efforts to halt the aggression and fully lift the blockade, and to stop using humanitarian and economic issues as a tool of political pressure. The Ministry's statement emphasized that the decision to announce the termination of the UN envoy's mandate is possible if he continues to represent one party and implement the agenda of the countries aggressing against the Yemeni people. Whatsapp Telegram Email Print
Saba Yemen
06-08-2025
- Saba Yemen
Manifestations of Arab Complicity in Aggression on Gaza in Light of Firm Yemeni Position
Sana'a - Saba: The Israeli enemy is waging a complex aggression against the Gaza Strip, going beyond bombing and starvation to unprecedented political complexity. Regional parties are participating in this indirect role, varying between directed silence, field facilitation, political cover, and economic engagement, this makes the situation go beyond the concept of absence to the level of complicity in the crime and its repercussions. The official Arab response to the massacres in Gaza has been characterized by a complete disconnect from the necessary humanitarian and political stance. Narrow strategic calculations have been present, while the imperatives of belonging and position have been absent. Palestine has transformed from a central issue into a negotiable matter, and the priorities of some capitals have shifted from supporting the victim to securing the interests of the aggressor partner. Arab support for the enemy emerged through multiple channels, most notably the supply of fuel to Israeli fighter jets, this provided them with additional capacity to continue their strikes on the Gaza Strip without relying entirely on Western supplies, thus enhancing the efficiency of the aggression and reducing its operational costs. On the financial side, some Arab countries maintained the pace of funding the US administration, knowing in advance that this money was included in the annual military aid allocations to the Israeli entity, this made this funding a direct factor in sustaining the aggression, perpetuating the perpetration of crimes, and starving Gaza and its people. The opening of Arab airspace to Israeli aircraft, whether for the transport of equipment or diplomatic travel, expanded the enemy's operational margin and granted it undeclared regional coverage, which contributed to reducing the logistical barriers that previously limited its freedom of movement. Trade relations between some regimes and the Israeli enemy continued during the aggression, with shipments of food, medicine, and essential goods continuing to arrive at the occupied ports, while the besieged Gaza Strip suffered from a shortage of vital supplies due to the joint blockade. On the political front, no serious Arab steps were taken to reduce representation, freeze relations, or review bilateral agreements. Rather, official meetings were held at various levels, and some capitals maintained direct communication channels with the occupation government. This coincided with continued Arab-Israeli security cooperation on sensitive issues, including data exchange, tracking of activists, and restrictions on resistance support activities, including preventing donations, closing accounts, and banning some Islamic entities active in this field. The Palestinian Authority has emerged as one of the fundamental weaknesses on the internal front, through its continued security coordination, pursuit of resistance cadres, and the extradition of some of them, this has weakened the environment for field action and dismantled the Popular Front in the West Bank. On the religious and media levels, major voices in the Arab world have failed to cover the massacres in the Gaza Strip, the official positions of religious institutions have declined, with some outlets issuing limited statements. Meanwhile, some platforms have maintained a discourse of criminalization of the resistance and warnings against escalation. In the popular sphere, the imposed security and legislative restrictions have limited the space for expression and demonstrations, and have prevented marches and solidarity protests, this has led to the complete disruption of popular pressure tools, despite the clarity of the bloody scene and the scale of the massacres. This was paralleled by the deliberate marginalization of educational and media platforms from their awareness-raising role. Resistance discourse was excluded from curricula, universities were emptied of their political content, and official and private media outlets were subject to controls that prevented the narrative of the Palestinian victim from being conveyed as it is. Some media platforms became tools of justification, focusing on rhetoric of "calm," "peace," and "restraint." This gave the enemy additional cover in its battle and contributed to reshaping public opinion toward accepting normalization as a rational option. The negative classification of the resistance increased, with major factions being placed on terrorist lists, their leaders demonized, and their supporters accused of threatening security and stability. Meanwhile, Zionist delegations remained welcomed in a number of Arab capitals. In this context, Sayyed Abdulmalik Badr al-Din al-Houthi affirms that granting the Israeli enemy Arab cover under any pretext does not express neutrality. Rather, it establishes a position on the front line of aggression and places the regimes involved in a political path that paves the way for comprehensive Zionist hegemony over Arab decision-making, beginning with Palestine and not stopping there. The Leader believes that classifying Gaza's defenders as terrorists and treating them as a threat represents a reversal of principles and exposes the profound imbalance in the political compass of some regimes, this paves the way for the liquidation of the cause and drags the nation toward an existential cost that goes beyond the current battle. In this climate, the Yemeni position has emerged as a firm and clear one, not subjecting its support for Palestine to any circumstantial considerations. Rather, it has maintained its principled compass and strengthened its media, political, and field presence through official positions, major demonstrations, popular mobilization, and armed forces operations deep within the enemy's territory. Sana'a has adopted an approach that links the Palestinian cause with religious identity, classifies the confrontation with the Israeli enemy as part of the nation's central battle, and views the continuation of the aggression as a primary cause of destabilizing Arab national security and a constant source of existential threat. The Yemeni position was not limited to condemnation, but rather constituted a strategic support element in the battle, in terms of strikes supporting Gaza and in terms of political clarity, public presence, and media and mobilization engagement, at a time when many countries were shrinking and retreating from their previous positions. This cohesion affirms that strengthening the position does not come from a balance of interests, but rather from clarity of principles. Supporting Palestine is not tied to momentary calculations, but rather is built on a comprehensive vision that considers the Israeli enemy a direct threat to all Arab and Islamic peoples. The developments in the aggression on Gaza reveal an unprecedented level of official Arab complicity, matched by continued Palestinian steadfastness and a steadfast Yemeni position, this position redefines the map of alignment in the region and forces peoples to reconsider who governs them, who stands with them, and who sells them out. Observers believe that Sana'a is advancing a position rooted in the values of faith and the responsibility of belonging, this position reflects the identity of the nation and the conscience of its peoples. It embodies a state of strategic vigilance based on insight, not self-interest, and on self-sacrifice, not bargaining, this makes its political and military presence more consistent with the requirements of the current stage. The facts of the Gaza massacre demonstrate that the moment no longer allows for ambiguity, the lines of alignment have crystallized with extreme clarity: one side is writing its positions in blood, waging its battle with dignity, and offering its martyrs with a cohesive ideological awareness, the other side is signing off on facilitating the situation, participating in supplying weapons, and securing the enemy's back with fuel, transit, and normalization. M.M
