logo
What Are You Really Getting For That 1% Advisory Fee?

What Are You Really Getting For That 1% Advisory Fee?

Forbes20-05-2025

Aaron Cirksena is the founder and CEO of MDRN Capital.
A lot of people pay their financial advisory fee—0.75%, 1%, 1.25%—without stopping to ask, 'Am I getting value for this?' It's widely accepted as the industry standard. But if all you're receiving from that fee is basic investment management and an annual performance review, it's fair to ask if you are gaining or losing value.
I often see someone paying 1%, even on a $3 million or $4 million portfolio, who's been dropped into a cookie-cutter 60/40 allocation after answering a five-question risk tolerance form. That portfolio might be just a blend of ETFs or mutual funds, with no customization, proactive planning or communication.
I've seen portfolios from major firms where this is the entire setup. The advisor clicks a button to rebalance a generic model, and that's it. No tax strategy. No estate coordination. No protection planning. And the client ends up paying tens of thousands a year for something they could have done themselves with low-cost ETFs.
One way to evaluate an advisory fee is by how it's applied across different investment types. Not all assets require the same level of management, yet many firms charge a flat fee regardless of what's in the portfolio.
For example, I don't think advisors should charge fees on principal-protected investments, such as money market accounts, CDs or fixed annuities, where there's little active management involved. In contrast, market-exposed assets (stocks, ETFs, mutual funds and private investments) often do require more strategy and oversight, making fees more justifiable.
This kind of tiered structure can increase transparency and lower overall costs for investors, especially if a significant portion of the portfolio is in lower-risk or fee-exempt vehicles. In some cases, the effective fee may fall well below the traditional 1%.
Beyond investment management, it's worth examining whether your advisor provides additional services, such as tax planning, estate coordination or performance-based fee adjustments. If your advisor suspends billing during periods of negative performance or covers the cost of estate planning services, for instance, these are important factors to consider when assessing overall value.
The first question to ask is: 'What am I paying my advisor?' It's surprising how many people don't know. That's a red flag. And once you know what you're paying, the next question is: 'What am I getting in return?'
Are you getting better returns than a passive ETF? Are you getting tax-efficient withdrawal strategies? Are they coordinating with your CPA or helping with estate planning? Or are you just getting handed a model portfolio and told to stay the course, no matter what?
If you're not getting more than what you are willing and able to do on your own, it may be time to ask what else your advisor is really doing for you.
Value looks different for everyone. Some people want tax support. Others want regular communication or help handling market stress. Ask yourself: 'What stresses me out the most financially? And is my advisor helping me with that?'
Peace of mind for you may be having your advisor walk you through which account to draw from each month in retirement or what happens to your house and other assets after your death. If your advisor isn't taking the most important weight off your shoulders, it's worth reevaluating your relationship.
Sometimes full-service advice doesn't make sense, especially for younger investors still building wealth. If you're 30 or 40, earning well and just need a few clear guidelines—max out your 401(k), diversify your portfolio, rebalance yearly—you probably don't need to pay a 1% fee.
That said, if you've got a complex tax situation or want help planning a big life decision, there's still room for advice. It just doesn't always have to cost 1% of your assets under management.
The best time to reevaluate your advisory relationship is when your life changes. Whether you're approaching retirement, receiving an inheritance, facing a health issue or selling a business, ask: 'Is my advisor equipped for this phase?'
My firm specializes in retirement planning, so our services are a great fit for someone in their 60s but probably not for someone in their 20s. We work with clients who share a common set of concerns, such as how to draw down their savings in a tax-efficient way and how to ensure their estate plans are in order. These needs tend to become more pressing as people approach retirement, and they often require a different kind of guidance than what's needed during the accumulation years.
If you've been working with someone for a while, take the time to look back. How has your portfolio done (after subtracting advisory fees) over the past five, 10, 20 years? Has your advisor made changes during periods of volatility, or did they just stick with the same playbook?
The market environment in 2022 is a useful example. As interest rates rose sharply, many investors with traditional 60/40 portfolios saw unexpected losses on the bond side, which is often assumed to provide stability. Some were surprised by how much they lost, raising questions about how well their risk exposure had been explained or managed. In hindsight, it wasn't just a matter of market performance; it highlighted the importance of communication and planning during periods of rapid change.
At the end of the day, you have to add it all up. Maybe your advisor isn't beating the market every year, but are they helping you make smart withdrawals? Are they reducing your stress? Are they saving you time and energy you'd rather spend elsewhere?
If you can say, 'I'd feel worse off doing this on my own,' then your advisor is probably worth the fee. But if not, if the value just isn't adding up, it might be time to ask for more or move on.
The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation.
Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Waymo Limits Service in San Francisco as Immigration Protests Spread
Waymo Limits Service in San Francisco as Immigration Protests Spread

New York Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Waymo Limits Service in San Francisco as Immigration Protests Spread

After protesters set fire to five Waymo robot taxis in Los Angeles on Sunday, the company on Monday began preemptively limiting rides to areas of San Francisco where people were expected to gather to show their opposition to President Trump's immigration policies. Waymo declined to say where in San Francisco it would suspend its service or for how long. Its robot taxis are popular in the city and have become a tourist attraction. The vehicles, which are electric Jaguar I-Paces and include dozens of cameras and sensors, cost around $100,000 each. 'We're aware of potential protests and will not be providing service in the areas protesters may be gathering out of abundance of caution,' a company spokeswoman said in a statement. The robot taxis have become a way for some protesters to display resistance to the tech industry's close ties to the Trump administration, said Elise Joshi, an activist in San Francisco who attended rallies on Monday. 'Waymos don't have human drivers, they're devoid of humanity,' she said. Destroyed robot taxis are 'symbolic of the attempts, throughout the history of this country, by the tech industry to strip us of community.' Waymo's actions in San Francisco followed the burning of its self-driving cars in Los Angeles on Sunday, where hundreds of people have demonstrated in recent days against the Trump administration's escalating immigration enforcement activity. Images of burned Waymos — including one protester with a Mexican flag posing for photos above the scorched cars — quickly spread online. Elon Musk and right-wing influencers then shared the image and others like it as emblems of the supposed dysfunction in Los Angeles. Waymo cut its service off in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday evening, in coordination with the Los Angeles Police Department, a company spokeswoman said. She said its vehicles were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time and added that the company did not know if the damaged vehicles were hailed by protesters with the intention of being destroyed, or if they were just dropping off riders in the area. Waymo announced in November that its service was 'open to all in Los Angeles.' In 2023, Mayor Karen Bass sent a letter to the California Public Utilities Commission highlighting several incidents with self-driving taxis and arguing that more testing was needed. Other groups, including disability rights organizations, have argued that autonomous taxis can help their constituents. In May, Waymo said it was providing more than 250,000 paid robot taxi rides a week in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Austin and Phoenix.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store