‘It has great benefits, but it's difficult for us to assess pupils' understanding': what teachers think of AI
Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland
(ASTI) in Killarney, Co Kerry, heard concerns that the potential use of generative
artificial intelligence
– which could write detailed essays on behalf of pupils, for example – could diminish the standard of education.
But what do teachers think?
Natalie Doyle Bradley, a special-education teacher at Chanel College, Coolock, north Dublin, said: 'I use AI for lots of things. I use it for planning. I use it for teaching and my students use it for learning.
'We don't really have any textbooks in special education.
READ MORE
'So I've developed an app called History Quest, and what I can do is use it if they're doing the Renaissance, for example, in their history class.
'I can write down Renaissance and the student's age. And we're actually brought on an interactive adventure in the Renaissance, where the students can choose their own adventure as well. So they can choose to be a painter, an apprentice, and the app actually will talk them through that.
'And also we can lower the age. So if they find it challenging, we can say, make that a reading age of 10 or make it a reading age of eight. We can also have the app read out the information so it's a story.
'The student is in charge. They are discovering the same key facts that they would through a textbook.
Natalie Doyle Bradley: 'For teachers, for planning, AI is absolutely brilliant.' Photograph: Don MacMonagle
'Sometimes students find it hard to visualise what is happening. But we can ask the app to show pictures of what we are talking about. And they will say, 'Now I get it'.
'We're still in the very early stages [of this technology]. And for teachers, for planning, it is absolutely brilliant.
'For bespoke apps like I'm making and I'm teaching other people to make, it's perfect, because it's a tool for learning. It can be an impetus, it can help.
'But for assessment, absolutely not. We have to be really careful on using it for assessment.'
Maria Markey Greene, of Rosmini Community School in Drumcondra, north Dublin, is a member of Asti standing committee
'I have concerns about the use of AI in education and especially in the area of assessment. Generative AI is working at a pace that is faster than the people who check these things can keep up to date with,' she said.
'I was asked in September to look at a piece of homework of a 12-year-old and to check whether the student had used AI or not. I could, at that stage in September 2024, check and find that verbatim she had used ChatGPT.
'I kept the piece of homework just for myself as a reference point and in March I went to look it up again. I could not find it because the technology, the algorithms had decided that the words I was putting in meant something else and it generated something else. This meant that I could not trace her [work] back to the original source.
Maria Markey Greene: 'AI can do an entire essay or assessment. And we can't check it.'
Photograph: Don MacMonagle
'A month later and I have AI embedded in my Google, in my Microsoft Edge, in my email and in my school email. AI is now directing me without me asking it to, to write down certain words and phrases and to give me counter arguments.
'So a student who was looking to put down a piece of work where they are critically analysing anything, and they need to find facts and put together their knowledge, the information and critically analyse that, AI has done that for it – for the entire essay or assessment. And we can't check it. '
Riain O'Cianaigh teaches history, CSP and law and politics at Magh Éne College in Bundoran, Co Donegal.
'AI has great benefits, but at the same time there are drawbacks. But at the end of the day AI will not replace the teacher in the classroom,' the teacher said.
'The benefits include personalised learning and teacher supports in terms of creating differentiated resources. You have engagement and accessibility so it is great for students with educational needs.
'You can create multimodal content, audio, video, et cetera, and real-time feedback that can help students before high-stakes examinations.'
'But then in terms of challenges, you have equity and access [issues]. Not all students have equal access to devices or internet.
'You have another challenge in terms of plagiarism and integrity. AI tools can write essays and solve problems, but it is more difficult for teachers to assess genuine student understanding.
'And then you have teacher training and confidence. Many teachers have not been trained in using AI, so you have a risk of relying on it too heavily or avoiding it altogether.'
'It is a tool, not a teacher.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Zuckerberg's ‘mercenary' AI binge is paying off on Wall Street
Meta 's gigantic AI spending is being handsomely rewarded by investors. The stock soared after its latest earnings beat and is now up 30 per cent in 2025, pushing Meta's market value close to $2 trillion. After being punished for Mark Zuckerberg 's extravagant bet on the metaverse – remember that? – investors are showing a more forgiving streak, perhaps because AI's pay-off looks more tangible. Meta is expected to spend up to $72 billion on AI infrastructure this year. Next year's bill may top $100 billion. Some engineers reportedly command salaries of more than $100 million, underscoring the scale of Meta's ambitions. Such lavish outlays have raised eyebrows – OpenAI's Sam Altman called Meta's conduct 'distasteful', telling staff that 'missionaries will beat mercenaries'. READ MORE Not that Zuckerberg is averse to missionary talk himself. He describes AI as a path to 'personal superintelligence' that will help users 'experience any adventure, be a better friend' and 'become the person you aspire to be' – presumably after clicking a few more ads. It's the ads investors care about. AI is seemingly juicing Meta's core business, driving user engagement and ad revenue through smarter targeting and tools. This enthusiasm isn't limited to Meta. Google and Microsoft shares have also rallied, as markets reward big AI bets. Sceptics see froth, but while Meta shares are up nearly 50 per cent year on year, the valuation – 27.5 times estimated earnings – remains relatively grounded. The rally looks driven more by fundamentals than hype. Memories of the metaverse linger, but this time, investors believe Zuckerberg's spending will deliver.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Horses for courses
Sir, – This week I employed AI to choose my horse racing bets for Galway. Strangely, I am happy to report that I lost more money than I usually do. The world can rest easy knowing that AI is just as stupid as humans. Well, this one human anyway. –Yours, etc, DAVID CURRAN, Knocknacarra, READ MORE Galway.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
OpenAI disables ChatGPT ‘experiment' that allowed users make exchanges available on search engines
OpenAI has pulled the plug on a short-lived change to the configuration of the ChatGPT app that allowed users to make their conversations accessible to search engines after it became apparent that some private or commercially sensitive material was inadvertently being made accessible on the internet. Barry Scannell, an AI law and policy partner at William Fry and a member of the Government appointed AI Advisory Council, said his 'jaw hit the floor' when he saw some of the material made accessible to routine Google searches on Thursday. Open AI's chief information security officer later said the feature that allowed users to make their conversations accessible for indexing by search engines would be disabled by Friday, with Dane Stuckey describing the original move as 'a short-lived experiment'. He said the company was working to ensure that all information that had been indexed was entirely removed. READ MORE Mr Scannell said there had been widespread confusion initially as to how the information was becoming publicly accessible and whether all prompts to ChatGPT were impacted. It appears users were clicking a check-box that had the effect of making shared chats discoverable by search engines without them realising the consequences. He said it was clear from much of the information that became accessible from the user prompts that this was being done unintentionally. 'Based on what I've seen, some of the stuff was so personally sensitive and commercially sensitive that people clearly didn't realise a random person could come along and do a simple search on Google and be able to find the chats.' He said the issue did not appear to be a technical issue but rather highlighted the need for greater AI literacy on the part of users to better understand the tech they are using. 'People seem to have clicked a box to make their chats discoverable on a search engine, or make them indexable, apparently without understanding what that meant. It's just people doing this without realising it. 'What this shows, I think, is just how important it is to have critical thinking and AI literacy as a really key component of any national strategy dealing with it.' He said the incident should also serve as a warning to those working business about the potential risks involved in using AI as there was the potential to expose commercially sensitive material. An extension of legal confidentiality protections might also be required, he suggested. Online, there was considerable discussion too of the potential for deeply personal information to be made available, including the contents of chats in which individuals were using ChatGPT for the purposes of therapy.
