
How Rachel Reeves killed the private sector pay rise
Pay growth has flatlined as employers brace for Rachel Reeves's £25bn National Insurance raid, a leading jobs analyst has warned.
Figures from Employment Hero show that average pay growth in small and medium businesses collapsed to 0pc in the first three months following the Chancellor's October Budget.
The company said that employees were 'feeling the squeeze' as businesses sacrificed pay rises to prepare for Labour's 'jobs tax' from April.
Experts have already warned that Ms Reeves's changes have threatened national security, raised council tax and dragged 750,000 workers into National Insurance.
Employment Hero analysed real-time data from 90,000 workers in businesses with up to 500 workers. Its data shows that average pay for full time workers jumped by 1.1pc in the three months leading up to October last year.
However, this fell to 0pc in the three months to January following the Chancellor's sweeping changes to employer National Insurance contributions in her maiden Budget.
In the same period the previous year, average pay grew by 0.8pc.
Meanwhile, public sector workers will benefit from an above-inflation pay hike of at least 2.8pc from April after Ms Reeves approved proposals last year.
Currently, employers only pay National Insurance contributions when an employee earns more than £9,100, but Ms Reeves has decided this will fall to £5,000 from April 6. The rate payable will also increase from 13.8pc of salaries to 15pc.
Kevin Fitzgerald, of Employment Hero, said: 'Small and medium businesses are under increasing pressure as the looming jobs tax forces them to be cautious with wage bills.
'Rather than increasing pay, many are having to set aside funds to cover rising employment costs. While lower interest rates may offer some relief to overall business expenses, they don't necessarily translate to higher wages for staff.
'International research on jobs taxes makes one thing clear – it's workers who ultimately feel the squeeze.'
In November, consultants Barnett Waddingham warned that the changes could cost workers up to £2,000 a year in retirement.
The following month, a survey carried out by the Bank's Decision Maker Panel showed that more than half of businesses also expected to raise prices and cut jobs.
Employment Hero also said that growth in full-time employment had been 'weak' since the Budget.
It reported that while January saw a slight seasonal increase of 1.4pc, it followed falls of 1.7pc in November and 0.2pc in December.
Jeff Moody, of the British Independent Retailers Association, which represents small firms, said the figures painted a 'concerning picture' for small businesses.
He said: 'Stagnant wage growth among firms with fewer than 500 employees, coupled with unstable employment patterns, suggests that the Chancellor's National Insurance changes aren't delivering the boost that was promised.
'While we saw a modest seasonal uplift in employment of 1.4pc, this barely scratches the surface after previous months' losses.
'Our independent retailers are caught in a perfect storm – they want to reward their hard-working staff but are increasingly struggling to do so in the current climate.'
A HM Treasury spokesman said: 'For 14 years, politicians accepted a UK economy that failed working people, we won't. That's why at the Budget we protected people's payslips from higher taxes, froze fuel duty and increased the national living wage making three million people £1,400 a year better off from April.
'Official data shows that real pay growth increased to its highest rate in three years in the three months to November and in our Plan For Change we have been clear that we will go further and faster to kickstart economic growth so working people have more money in their pockets.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: Criticising Red China is a moreish activity. You try some and before long hanker for another plateful
China 's vice-premier He Lifeng, a big yam, is in London and spent his morning with Rachel Reeves. MPs, perhaps sensing that he (that is to say, He) might need a laugh after his ordeal, laid on a Chinese-related show in the afternoon: An urgent question attacking a 'nefarious' plan for a Chinese super-embassy in London. Sir Iain Duncan Smith (Con, Chingford & Woodford Green) led demands that planning minister Matthew Pennycook block the embassy. He and a surprising number of Labour backbenchers argued that the site was a security risk, being bang next to a telephone exchange that serves the City. 'Dark cabling' runs underneath the premises. These may be used for the transmission of delicate material. Our spooks are said to be uneasy about this, as are the Americans and, oddly, the Dutch. Much Beijing-bashing ensued. China operatives might cut those dark cables. National security was at risk. It would cost a fortune to police the site. Criticism of Red China is a moreish activity. You try some and before long you hanker for another plateful. Moreover, there is now an electoral consideration: Many British constituencies contain large numbers of Hong Kongers, some of whom worry that Chinese diplomats present a mortal threat to them. This is not a concept entirely easy to explain to President Xi, but these Hong Kongers may be swing voters. MPs therefore feel under pressure to deplore the Beijing regime. Comrade Pennycook was a credit to his profession. He stood there and repeatedly said nothing. It takes years in Communist-approved training camps to perfect this verbose art. Mr Pennycook's tongue was tied because this was a 'quasi-judicial matter' on which he, as planning supremo, would allegedly have to pass judgment. 'I cannot comment in any detail,' he regretfully told Sir James Cleverly, a former foreign secretary. 'I didn't ask for any detail!' yelped Sir James. Mr Pennycook shuffled his papers and regretted that that did not alter matters. He still could not dilate. What he possibly meant was that Sir Keir Starmer, diplomatic genius that he is, may already have given Premier Xi an undertaking that the super-embassy can proceed. Sir Iain suggested 'Project Kowtow' was under way – 'a walk of shame for the Government'. Mr Pennycook murmured: 'It would not be appropriate for me to comment.' Unhappy Labour MPs included Alex Sobel (Leeds C), burly Blair McDougall (East Renfrewshire) and even the House's leading Starmerite greaser, Mark Sewards (Leeds SW). It is almost unheard of for little Sewards to express anything but ravished delight at the Government's behaviour. Whips may need to check his circuit board to make sure a virus has not infected his central controls. We also had an eruption from Marie Rimmer, a magnificent old Labour pudding from St Helens who normally does as commanded by her party. Ms Rimmer, like a runaway truckle of cheese, proved hard to stop once she was rolling. 'China has a record of state-backed espionage,' she cried through some whistly-sounding teeth. 'There has been a massive under-estimation of the risk.' Deputy Speaker Nusrat Ghani tried to get her to shut up but Ms Rimmer did not notice. Bits of cheese-wheel, or at least her oratory, were by now flying here and there. Words were splintering. Sentences were disintegrating. A nearby MP took a shard of cheddar in the eye and went down like a fallen warrior. Even Beijing's most accomplished code-breakers might have struggled to understand what our Marie meant. At one point she seemed to talk of 'signals contraception'. Did she mean 'interception'? Or something else? Maybe the wheezy dinner-lady routine is a brilliant front. Maybe she is an MI6 ace under deep cover. In other news Torsten Bell, pensions minister, explained the Government's rethink on winter fuel payments. What a twerp! Arrogant young Bell's nose twitched as he pushed his excuses past a set of vegetarian-looking teeth. Rabbit with a quiff. Any pensioner would have been tempted to truncheon him with a furled brolly.

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Newscast Winter Fuel's Back, Back Again (For Most)
Today, Labour confirms 75% of pensioners will keep their winter fuel payments, reversing a widely criticised policy. Nine million pensioners in England and Wales with an annual income of £35,000 or less will now be eligible. The payment, worth up to £300 to help with energy bills during the coldest months, was paid only to those on pension credit last year. Alex and Chris discuss the chain of events that have led to this moment, and what it says about the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves. Also, a yacht carrying 12 pro-Palestinian activists, including Greta Thunberg, was intercepted by the Israeli navy while sailing toward Gaza with aid. Alex speaks to the BBC's Jeremy Bowen about what happened and the state of humanitarian aid in Gaza. You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Alex Forsyth. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Julia Webster and Adam Chowdhury. The technical producer was Hannah Montgomery and James Piper. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.