FBI seeks additional victims after former DC teacher arrested on child sexual abuse material charge
FBI arrests former DC teacher for allegedly soliciting explicit images from a minor.
Investigators are searching for additional victims who may have been contacted.
Authorities are reviewing Brown's ties to a local youth sports program.
WASHINGTON - A former Washington, D.C. teacher has been arrested for allegedly soliciting explicit images from a minor online, according to the FBI. Investigators are now seeking information to determine whether there are additional victims.
Federal agents arrested 56-year-old Devonne Keith Brown, who they say used social media and payment apps, including CashApp, to send money to an underage girl in exchange for nude photos. Authorities allege Brown operated under the alias "Joseph," offering payments between $10 and $35.
Brown previously worked as a health teacher at IDEA Public Charter School in Northeast D.C., though the school confirms he is no longer employed there and that no current students appear to be involved in the case.
READ MORE: Former DC school worker arrested on child sexual assault material charges
What we know
Investigators also say Brown was affiliated with Project Impact Sports, a youth track club, and are looking into whether he had inappropriate contact with minors through that program.
According to court document, a victim reportedly told the FBI she met Brown at a grocery store before feeling uncomfortable when he messaged her that he was near her home and wanted to meet.
Steven Jensen, assistant director of the FBI's Washington Field Office, condemned the alleged crimes, saying in a statement, "Those who prey on minors to solicit the production of CSAM are morally reprehensible and will be held accountable for their heinous crimes."
"The FBI remains committed to protecting our children and ridding our communities of this grievous scourge," the statement continued.
Authorities have reached out to Project Impact Sports for comment but have yet to receive a response.
IDEA Public Charter School released the following statement:
"IDEA Public Charter School is deeply concerned by the serious allegations involving a former employee. This individual is no longer employed by the school. The safety and well-being of our students is our highest priority. We are fully cooperating with law enforcement and supporting their ongoing investigation. Based on the information currently available to us, there is no indication that any IDEA student was directly involved."
The FBI urges anyone with information regarding Brown to come forward. Anonymous tips can be submitted at DBVictims@fbi.gov or www.fbi.gov/DBVictims and fill out the form.
Tips can also be made anonymously by calling 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324).
The Source
Information in this article comes from The U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Columbia and FBI Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
FBI Warns Scam Victims To Be On The Lookout For Fake Law Firms Offering To Help Recover Losses
Beware of fake lawyers who promise to help scam victims. getty Bad actors can take on all kinds of guises—including pretending to be lawyers. The FBI has been warning the public about a new scam involving fraudsters posing as lawyers representing fictitious law firms. With the scam showing no signs of slowing down, the FBI has updated its warning to share more details about how these fraudsters hope to steal your money—and your crypto. Scams are increasingly becoming more sophisticated and widespread. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received 859,532 complaints in 2024, totaling $16.6 billion, a 33% increase from 2023—the lion's share of those complaints involved phishing and spoofing. In these common tricks, victims are tricked into providing personally identifying information or taking action. Increasingly, victims may be seeking to recover some of those losses. This is where a new scam comes in. Using social media or other messaging platforms, fraudsters may contact scam victims and offer their services, claiming to have the authority to investigate recovery cases. To verify the contact, the "lawyers" say they are working with, or have received information on, the scam victim's case from the FBI, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), or other government agency. In some cases, scam victims have reached out to fraudsters on fake websites, which look legitimate, in hopes of recovering their funds. As part of the scam, the fraudsters may request that victims verify their identities by providing personal identifying information or banking information to get their money back. They may also request that victims provide a judgment amount they are seeking from the initial fraudster or pay a portion of the initial fees up front, with the balance due when funds are recovered. Other traps may include asking victims to make payments for back taxes and other fees to recover their funds. As part of the scam, the fraudsters may reference actual financial institutions and money exchanges to build credibility and further their schemes. Between February 2023 and February 2024, cryptocurrency scam victims who were further exploited by fictitious law firms reported losses totaling over $9.9 million, according to the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). It's important to understand that once money has left your account, it's rare that it can be recovered if you don't act quickly. Law enforcement has indicated that the money may be gone forever if a claim isn't filed within 24 hours. Claims should generally be made through law enforcement. One red flag for scams is the claim that a law firm is an officially authorized partner with multiple U.S. and foreign government or regulatory agencies. No law firms are officially authorized partners of U.S. government agencies. Sometimes, fictitious law firms will make references to fake government or regulatory entities, such as the International Financial Trading Commission (INTFTC), to add credibility to their schemes. You should always double-check to see whether such an agency exists. Scammers may also request payment in cryptocurrency or prepaid gift cards. This should set off a few alarm bells. First, most legitimate law firms offer many ways to pay—I don't know any that accept gift cards. And, the federal government does not request payment for law enforcement services provided. Scammers who already know the exact amounts and dates of previous wire transfers where scammed funds were sent should also be a red flag, as is the suggestion that you were on a government-affiliated list of scam victims, which means that you can recover their money through "legal channels." (This doesn't exist.) Scammers may also suggest that previously scammed funds are in an account held at a foreign bank, requiring you to register an account at that bank. The scammers may even provide a domain or website for the bank that appears legitimate, but is actually a fraudulent platform to continue the scheme. Similarly, scammers may attempt to place you in a group chat on WhatsApp or other messaging applications (claiming it's necessary for secrecy and safety) and suggest that they are working with foreign bank processors and attorneys and need you to pay bank fees to be used to verify your identity and ownership before they can withdraw funds. And while law firms often work on referrals, a person who has offered to work with you but is only willing to engage with one particular law firm—especially one designated as a 'crypto recovery law firm,' should raise your suspicions. Due Diligence Measures If you've been a victim of a scam, and someone outside of the government reaches out to you to help you recover funds, you should assume they should not be trusted by default—every request should be verified. You should be cautious of law firms contacting you unexpectedly, especially if you have not reported the crime to any law enforcement or civil protection agencies. If in doubt, assume it's a scam. The fictitious law firms may also target victims who were previously scammed out of crypto. Be wary of advertisements for cryptocurrency recovery services. Research the advertised company and be cautious if it uses vague language, has a minimal online presence, or makes promises about recovering funds. Before you share any information, verify the person's legitimacy. Request information about credentials, including their law license (this information can be easily verified with your state bar association). If someone who purports to be a lawyer cannot or will not provide this information, assume they are not legitimate. You should also ask for verification of employment from anyone claiming to work for the U.S. Government or law enforcement. Contact your local office of the relevant government agency and request verification of the individual's identity with whom you are communicating. And finally, keep excellent records, including recordings of video chats of all interactions. Law Enforcement Remember that law enforcement does not charge victims a fee for investigating crimes. If someone claims an affiliation with the FBI, contact your local FBI field office to confirm. Additionally, the IC3 does not work with any non-law enforcement entity, such as law firms or crypto services, to recover lost funds or investigate cases. And, the IC3 will never directly contact you for information or money. If you are approached by someone impersonating or claiming to work with IC3 or find a website impersonating the IC3, consider filing a complaint with the information. Be sure to include the website link in your complaint. Reporting A Scam If you believe you have been a victim of a cryptocurrency scheme or other fraudulent scheme, please file a report with the FBI's IC3 at If possible, include the following: Information regarding how the individual initially contacted you and how they identified themselves. Include identifying information such as name, phone number, address, email address, and username. Financial transaction information such as the date, type of payment, amount, account numbers involved (including cryptocurrency addresses), the name and address of the receiving financial institution, and the receiving cryptocurrency addresses. Additionally, the FBI requests victims of fraudulent law firm scams, or those who suspect they may have been victimized, to report the suspicious activity to their local FBI field office and the FBI's IC3. Tax Rules For Losses While you may not be able to recover your losses, taxpayers who were tricked as a result of a traditional investment scam may be entitled to tax relief. Earlier this year, the IRS Office of Chief Counsel released a memo (Memorandum Number 202511015) providing clarification on the deductibility of theft losses for scam victims. Why was clarification needed? Casualty and theft losses have a long history in our tax system. In 1867, tax deductions were allowed for losses related to fire and shipwrecks. Three years later, the same year the Harpers Ferry Flood devastated parts of the Shenandoah, the definition was expanded to include floods. A few years later, the wording was changed to "storms." By the early 20th century, the deduction had changed again. In 1913, the first tax form under the new, modern tax system allowed a general deduction for "[l]osses actually sustained during the year incurred in trade or arising from fires, storms, or shipwreck, and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise." The definition was later expanded to include "other casualty, and from theft." However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made another tweak: from 2018 to 2025, personal casualty and theft losses are deductible only to the extent that the losses are attributable to a federally declared disaster. (The One Big Beautiful Bill Act generally maintained the limits on losses, with one exception: it has been expanded to include state-declared disasters.) The memo stresses that the theft loss deduction is still available for businesses and individuals who incur losses in transactions entered into for profit. There is no statutory definition of "a transaction entered into for profit." However, courts have determined that to meet the criteria, a primary profit motive is required. Forbes IRS Issues Warnings On Tax Scams Driven By Bad Advice Often Found On Social Media By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes How One Small Click Led To Big Headaches For A Tax And Accounting Firm By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes Some Scam Victims May Be Able To Deduct Related Losses On Their Tax Returns By Kelly Phillips Erb
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Patel: 18 more overnight arrests in DC; 120+ since Trump announcement
FBI Director Kash Patel said early Friday that agents and the agency's partner made 18 more arrests in Washington, D.C. overnight, bringing the total to 120 since President Trump announced federal officials were taking over the district's police force. '18 more arrests with federal partners last night in Washington DC. – 8 firearms recovered from criminals -Multiple seizures of illegal drugs -One arrest on warrant for murder -One arrests on warrant for rape. We're now over 120 arrests since President Trump's initiative began. The good cops are getting the job done,' Patel posted on X. The statistics come after Attorney General Pam Bondi late Thursday named a new D.C. 'emergency police commissioner,' Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Administrator Terry Cole. Local officials, such as D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D), have pushed back, saying the Home Rule Act, under which Trump put the city's police under federal control, does not allow the federal government to alter its chain of command. Under the Home Rule Act, Trump can only take federal control for 30 days, but he is now asking Congress to vote on extending that deadline. 'And again, we think the Democrats will not do anything to stop crime, but we think the Republicans will do it almost unanimously,' Trump told reporters at the Kennedy Center on Thursday. 'So we're going to need a crime bill. That we're going to be putting in, and it's going to pertain initially to D.C. We're going to use it as a very positive example.' Democrats, however, stress that D.C.'s crime statistics do not illustrate excessive violence in the district cited by Trump. Violent crime is down 26 percent when compared to 2024. Last year saw a 32 percent drop in homicides and a 35 percent drop in overall violent crime compared to 2023. The White House earlier this week said 1,600 personnel were involved in law enforcement operations, making 45 arrests on Wednesday. The Pentagon said 800 Army and Air National Guard troops would be mobilized and on the ground by Thursday. The National Guard cannot make arrests but will collaborate with local law enforcement. Moreover, the Metropolitan Police Department (MDP) will assist ICE in conducting mass deportations around the district.
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Critics say President Trump's push for fairness in college admissions is leaving out legacy preferences
Advertisement 'It's hard to think of a more flagrant way in which the system is rigged than legacy preferences,' Kahlenberg said. 'Rarely is a system of hereditary privilege so openly practiced without any sense of shame.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In recent weeks, Trump has taken several actions to scrub any vestiges of race from admissions decisions, suggesting that some schools are ignoring a 2023 Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action. His administration negotiated settlements with Brown and Columbia universities that included provisions to share admissions data. Last week, Trump issued a call for colleges nationwide to submit data to prove they do not consider race in admissions. Trump has taken several actions to scrub any vestiges of race from admissions decisions, suggesting that some schools are ignoring a 2023 Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action. Alex Brandon/Associated Press Some are urging Trump to go further. Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., applauded the settlement with Brown requiring the university to turn a blind eye toward race — even in application essays. But 'restoring meritocracy warrants more,' said Young, who cosponsored legislation in 2023 aiming to end legacy admissions. Advertisement 'Federally accredited institutions should eliminate ALL preferences grounded in arbitrary circumstances of ancestry that students have no control over, such as legacy status,' Young said on social media. Many selective colleges consider family ties Sometimes called 'affirmative action for the rich,' the practice of legacy admissions remains widespread among elite colleges even as it faces mounting bipartisan opposition. Virginia's Republican governor signed a bill last year barring legacy admissions at public institutions, following similar measures in Colorado, California and elsewhere. Some Republicans in Congress have worked with Democrats on proposals to end it nationwide. Roughly 500 universities consider legacy status when evaluating applicants, including more than half of the nation's 100 most selective U.S. schools, according to 2023 disclosures to the federal government. A few have abandoned the policy, but it remains in place at all eight Ivy League schools. Stanford University said in July it will continue considering legacy status, even after a California law barred it at institutions that receive state financial aid. Stanford opted to withdraw from the state's student financial aid program rather than end the practice. The university said it will replace the funding with internal money — even as it begins layoffs to close a $140 million budget deficit. Stanford officials declined to comment. Last year, as part of a state transparency law, the school reported that about 14% of its new students were relatives of alumni or donors. A push for merit, but no mention of legacy admissions The executive action signed by Trump last week requires universities to turn over more information about students who apply to and are accepted to their campuses. Taxpayers 'deserve confidence in the fairness and integrity' of decisions, his memorandum said, adding that more information is needed to ensure colleges are heeding the Supreme Court's decision. Advertisement A week earlier, the Justice Department issued a memo clarifying what it considers illegal discrimination in admissions. It takes issue not only with overt racial considerations but also 'proxies' for race, including 'geographic targeting' or personal essays asking about obstacles applicants have overcome. Similar language requiring 'merit-based' admissions policies was included in the government's resolutions with Brown and Columbia universities. None of the actions made any mention of legacy admissions. Trump's silence caught the attention of the nonprofit Lawyers for Civil Rights, which has an open complaint with the Education Department alleging that Harvard University's use of donor and alumni preferences amounts to illegal racial discrimination. The group's 2023 complaint says the practice overwhelmingly benefits white students. If the Trump administration wants to make admissions a meritocracy, it should start by ending legacy preferences, said Oren Sellstrom, litigation director for the group. 'These deeply unmeritocratic preferences simply reward students based on who their parents are. It's hard to imagine anything more unfair or contrary to basic merit principles,' he said. Few Americans support legacy or donor preferences Colleges defend the practice by saying it builds community and encourages families to become donors. Some backers say it increasingly helps nonwhite students as campuses become more diverse. Then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, urged colleges to rethink legacy preferences in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, saying it expanded 'privilege instead of opportunity.' Some feared it would drive up white enrollment as affirmative action ended. Georgetown University reviewed the policy but kept it in place this year after concluding the pool of legacy applicants had a similar makeup to the wider admissions pool. Advertisement An AP-NORC poll in 2023 found that most Americans have a dim view of legacy and donor preferences, with few saying either should play a strong role in decisions. Universities are required to tell the federal government whether they consider legacy status, but they don't have to divulge how far it tips the scale or how many legacy students they admit. Among the 20 most selective universities that say they employ the practice, none would tell The Associated Press what percentage of their incoming class has a family connection to alumni or donors. Trump's blitz to root out racial preferences has hinged on the argument that it undermines merit. New scrutiny is needed to ensure colleges are following the Supreme Court's order and 'recruiting and training capable future doctors, engineers, scientists' and other workers, he said in his executive action. That argument sends the message that minority students are 'intellectually suspect until proven otherwise,' said Justin Driver, a Yale law professor with a forthcoming book on affirmative action. He worries Trump's latest actions will intimidate colleges into limiting minority enrollment to avoid raising the suspicion of the government. 'I believe that the United States confronts a lot of problems today,' Driver said. 'Too many Black students on first-rate college campuses is not among them.'
