Qatar calls reports of upcoming jet gift to Trump 'inaccurate'
Qatar on Sunday denied reports that the Trump administration is preparing to accept a luxury jet from the country's royal family.
ABC News reported earlier Sunday that a super luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet would become available for President Donald Trump as Air Force One and then donated to his presidential library foundation so he could use it after leaving office.
But Ali Al-Ansari, Qatar's Media Attaché to the U.S., told POLITICO the reports are 'inaccurate.'
'The possible transfer of an aircraft for temporary use as Air Force One is currently under consideration between Qatar's Ministry of Defense and the U.S. Department of Defense, but the matter remains under review by the respective legal departments, and no decision has been made,' he said.
The aircraft in question is worth $400 million, ABC reported, and was set to be announced during Trump's upcoming visit to the Middle East. A person familiar with the situation said no announcement is planned for Trump's visit.
Trump will soon depart for a four-day trip to the Middle East, with stops in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
A U.S. official with direct knowledge of the plan confirmed there had been talks about the emir of Qatar gifting the plane to Trump to use as Air Force One. And a former U.S. official familiar with the situation said the talks involved the Qatari defense ministry and the Pentagon. Both were provided anonymity because they're not authorized to speak about the issue, which is sensitive.
Citing the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, some key Democrats pounced on the report Sunday, accusing Trump and his administration of engaging in corruption and bribery.
'Nothing says 'America First' like Air Force One, brought to you by Qatar,' wrote Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in a post on X. 'It's not just bribery, it's premium foreign influence with extra legroom.'
Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), a frequent target of the president's ire, accused Trump of violating that clause (in Article 1 of the Constitution), which bars any federal government office holders from accepting any 'present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state,' absent Congressional approval.
'Seems pretty clear that a $400 million 'air palace' from a foreign emir qualifies,' he wrote on X. 'The corruption is brazen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
10 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Top US general says roughly 15 years of planning to defeat Iran's most fortified nuclear site centered on this massive 30,000-pound bomb
The massive 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs dropped on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend were developed to attack these kinds of targets, the top US general said Wednesday, revealing that the military spent a decade and a half closely studying Tehran's most fortified site. Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the lengthy development of the heavy GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, offering a look into elements of the making of the US military's largest non-nuclear bomb. During Operation Midnight Hammer, US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bombers dropped 14 MOPs, a dozen of them on the Fordow enrichment site and two more on the one at Natanz. The strikes, part of a highly secretive and complex operation, were years in the making. Back in 2009, unidentified officers with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which specializes in deeply buried underground targets, were briefed on a major construction project in Iran — specifically Fordow, which Caine described as a "critical element" of Tehran's covert nuclear weapons program. The DTRA officers studied the Fordow site, which is built into a mountain, closely for years. Caine said they eventually realized that the US didn't have a weapon that could be used to attack the facility, so they started working with the defense industry partners like Boeing and Northrop Grumman to further develop the MOP. The bomb was part of a DTRA technology demonstration program until 2010, when the weapon became a part of the Air Force's Quick Reaction Capability Program, per the air service. The massive bomb was tested hundreds of times. Many full-scale munitions were dropped on "extremely" realistic targets with the goal of having a weapon that the US could use against Fordow at a time and place of its choosing, Caine explained. That day came just a few days ago, when President Donald Trump ordered the B-2s to bomb Fordow. Strikes on Iran The extremely heavy MOP is around 20.5 feet long and has a diameter of 31.5 inches. The warhead alone weighs 6,000 pounds, and it can penetrate deeply buried facilities up to around 200 feet deep. The B-2 is the only operational aircraft that can carry the weapon, storing two internally to preserve stealth. Caine said that the MOP is made of steel, explosives, and a fuse programmed to achieve a specific effect inside Fordow. Each bomb had a unique impact angle, arrival, final heading, and fuse setting, which determines when the weapon would explode. A longer fuse creates a delay, meaning the MOP can penetrate deeper into the target before it explodes. Fordow had sets of three holes — a main exhaust shaft and two additional ventilation shafts — visible on the surface. Caine said that in the days leading up to the attack, Iran attempted to cover the shafts with concrete. Talking about one target point, which was hit with six of the large GBU-57 bunker-busters, Caine said that the first MOP "forcibly removed" the concrete cap, exposing the main shaft. The next four MOPs entered that shaft, traveling toward critical Fordow facilities at speeds faster than 1,000 feet per second and exploding inside. The sixth bomb dropped was a flexible option if something didn't work the way it was intended. "Unlike a normal surface bomb, you won't see an impact crater, because they're designed to deeply bury and then function," he said. Satellite imagery showed the holes where the MOPs penetrated the surface at Fordow, but not a substantial impact crater at the site. Caine said all six weapons dropped on the vents went where they were meant to go. He shared that the "primary kill mechanism" at the site was a mixture of blast and overpressure, which would have ripped through the open tunnels and destroyed critical hardware. He said the US military does not really do battle damage assessments, noting that "by design, we don't grade our own homework — the intelligence community does." However, he did say that the big MOPs were built, tested, and loaded properly; released from the B-2s properly; navigated to their intended targets as intended, and functioned as designed, "meaning they exploded." "We know this through other means — intelligence means — that we have, that we were visibly able to see them," Caine explained. The Trump administration has touted the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — the latter being a third nuclear facility that US forces targeted over the weekend with Tomahawk cruise missiles — as a major success, with top officials asserting that Iran's ability to build a bomb was set back years. Israel's Atomic Energy Commission has offered a similar assessment. Rafael Grossi, the United Nations nuclear watchdog chief, said that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered significant damage, although he said using the term annihilation would be a step too far. He also said the whereabouts of Tehran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium — which is needed to make a weapon — is unknown. Reports suggest it was hidden ahead of the US strikes. An early US intelligence report indicated that the US strikes may have only set Iran's nuclear program back by months, not years. Some analysts have also questioned the effectiveness of the recent strikes, with some observers suggesting Tehran could quickly rebuild damaged infrastructure and enrich its highly enriched uranium stock to the weapons-grade levels needed to make a bomb.
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump, Hegseth reject suggestion Iran moved uranium before US strikes: ‘Nothing was taken out'
President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth were adamant Thursday that Iran wasn't able to move any highly enriched uranium prior to Saturday's US strikes on three nuclear facilities — with Trump insisting 'nothing was taken out' before the bombings. Trump, 79, dismissed suggestions Iran may have been able to spirit away its cache in the days prior to the attacks after satellite imagery emerged of cargo-style trucks lined up outside Fordow — one of the three targeted sites — late last week. 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 3 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was adamant Thursday that Iran wasn't able to move any highly enriched uranium prior to the US strikes on its nuclear facilities. Getty Images 'Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!' he added, echoing his earlier claims that the US acted too quickly for Iran to prepare in advance. Hegseth, too, doubled down on the extent of the US-caused destruction, telling a Pentagon press briefing that he saw no sign Tehran had managed to relocate any uranium ahead of the blasts. 'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise,' Hegseth said during the combative briefing. He noted that the Pentagon was 'looking at all aspects of intelligence and making sure we have a sense of what was where.' 3 The Pentagon released jaw-dropping footage showcasing the 30,000-pound heavy-duty bunker buster bombs used against Iran. Department of Defense Hegseth, who was joined by chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine, also accused lefty media outlets of downplaying the success of the strikes, which Trump has repeatedly insisted 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. The defense chief ripped the leak of a preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency that suggested the 14 30,000-pound heavy-duty bunker-buster bombs the US dropped may have only set back Iran by months. 'You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated — choose your word. This was an historically successful attack,' Hegseth declared. 3 Trump dismissed suggestions Iran may have been able to remove its cache of uranium in the days prior to the attacks after satellite imagery emerged of cargo-style trucks lined up outside Fordow. Getty Images He said the DIA assessment — which was initially leaked Tuesday to the likes of CNN and the New York Times — was low confidence and ripped reporters for focusing on the assessment in an apparent bid to undermine the administration. 'It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad,' Hegseth said. 'There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that … because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined.' With Post wires
CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
Details emerge of secret diplomatic efforts to restart Iran talks
The Trump administration has discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program, easing sanctions, and freeing up billions of dollars in restricted Iranian funds – all part of an intensifying attempt to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table, four sources familiar with the matter said. Key players from the US and the Middle East have talked with the Iranians behind the scenes even amid the flurry of military strikes in Iran and Israel over the past two weeks, the sources said. Those discussions have continued this week after a ceasefire deal was struck, the sources said. Trump administration officials emphasized that several proposals have been floated. They are preliminary and evolving with one consistent non-negotiable: zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently said it needs. But at least one preliminary draft proposal, described to CNN by two sources, includes several incentives for Iran. Some details were hashed out in a secret, hours-long meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Gulf partners at the White House last Friday, the day before US military strikes against Iran, two sources familiar with the meeting told CNN. Among the terms being discussed, which have not been previously reported, is an estimated $20-30 billion investment in a new Iranian non-enrichment nuclear program that would be used for civilian energy purposes, Trump administration officials and sources familiar with the proposal told CNN. One official insisted that money would not come directly from the US, which prefers its Arab partners foot the bill. Investment in Iran's nuclear energy facilities has been discussed in previous rounds of nuclear talks in recent months. 'The US is willing to lead these talks' with Iran, the Trump administration official told CNN. 'And someone is going to need to pay for the nuclear program to be built, but we will not make that commitment.' Other incentives include potentially removing some sanctions on Iran and allowing Tehran to access the $6 billion currently sitting in foreign bank accounts that it is restricted from freely using, according to the draft described to CNN. Another idea floated last week that is currently being considered is for US-backed allies in the Gulf to pay to replace the Fordow nuclear facility – which the US hit with bunker-buster bombs over the weekend – with the non-enrichment program, two sources familiar with the matter said. It was not immediately clear if Iran would be able to use the site itself, nor was it clear how seriously that proposal was being considered. 'There are a lot of ideas being thrown around by different people and a lot of them are trying to be creative,' one of the sources familiar with the discussions told CNN. 'I think it is entirely uncertain what will happen here,' said a separate source familiar with the first five rounds of talks between the US and Iran that occurred before the Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear program. Witkoff told CNBC Wednesday that the US is seeking a 'comprehensive peace agreement,' and a Trump administration official emphasized that all of the proposals are designed to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The US has said that Iran may have a nuclear program for peaceful civilian purposes, but that it cannot enrich the uranium for that program. Instead, the US has suggested Iran could import the enriched uranium. Witkoff likened the potential program to that of the United Arab Emirates. 'Now the issue and the conversation with Iran is going to be, how do we rebuild a better civil nuclear program for you that is non-enrichable?' he told CNBC. The administration may have an opportunity to present a term sheet to the Iranians. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the US and Iran would be sitting down next week – though Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said he was not aware of talks next week, and people involved in the planning said that details were still being worked out. Sources familiar with the discussions told CNN that no dates have been set yet. Despite the fervent diplomacy led by Witkoff behind the scenes, Trump this week publicly downplayed the necessity of a nuclear agreement, saying on Wednesday that he believed such an agreement was 'not necessary.' 'I don't care if I have an agreement or not,' he said. While the president seemed publicly indifferent to hashing out a new deal after clinching a ceasefire agreement, many of his advisers believe the pursuit of a longer-term deal will ensure the ceasefire has longevity. The terms that were developed in Witkoff's secret meeting have been the subject of continued discussion between the US and Iran through regional interlocutors – primarily the Qataris – in recent days. Qatar also played a key role in brokering the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran earlier this week, and will be working very closely with the US to ensure that fighting between them will not resume, one of the sources added. There is hope within the Trump administration that after the events of the past two weeks Iran is more likely to accede to the US conditions and halt efforts that could bring it closer to a developing a nuclear weapon. But Iranian experts cite the possible scenario that the Iranian regime may now decide that it needs a nuclear weapon. Earlier in the week the Iranian parliament approved legislation to end cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog, signaling a desire to further conceal their nuclear program. Prior to Israel's military operation against Iran roughly two weeks ago, the US and Iranians had held five rounds of negotiations to try to reach a framework for a new nuclear deal. The US had presented a proposal to Tehran, and Iran was expected to respond during a planned sixth round of negotiations in Oman. Those talks were scuttled by Israel's attacks on Iran. On Saturday, ahead of US strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites, the Trump administration communicated with Iran through intermediaries. Their message was twofold: forthcoming US strikes would be contained, but also that the US terms for a diplomatic deal with Iran were clear and simple: no uranium enrichment, sources said. Trump has been circumspect about the prospects of a deal, telling reporters after announcing talks with Iran next week: 'We may sign an agreement, I don't know.' 'I could get a statement that they're not going to go nuclear, we're probably going to ask for that,' Trump said at a NATO summit on Wednesday. The president added that his administration would be asking for the same type of commitments they sought in negotiations with Iran prior to the most recent conflict between Israel and Iran. 'The only thing we'd be asking for is what we were asking for before,' Trump said, adding that he wants 'no nuclear.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser, said Wednesday that any such deal would depend on Iran's willingness to negotiate directly with the US, not through intermediaries. 'We'd love to have peaceful relations with any country in the world. And so obviously that will depend on Iran's willingness not just to engage in peace, but to negotiate directly with the United States, not through a third-country or fourth-country process,' Rubio said at a press conference alongside Trump in The Hague. Witkoff on Wednesday said there are 'signs' that an agreement can be reached. 'We're having conversations with the Iranians. There are multiple interlocutors reaching out to us,' he told CNBC. 'I think that they're ready.'
