logo
Top US general says roughly 15 years of planning to defeat Iran's most fortified nuclear site centered on this massive 30,000-pound bomb

Top US general says roughly 15 years of planning to defeat Iran's most fortified nuclear site centered on this massive 30,000-pound bomb

Business Insider4 hours ago

The massive 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs dropped on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend were developed to attack these kinds of targets, the top US general said Wednesday, revealing that the military spent a decade and a half closely studying Tehran's most fortified site.
Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the lengthy development of the heavy GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, offering a look into elements of the making of the US military's largest non-nuclear bomb.
During Operation Midnight Hammer, US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bombers dropped 14 MOPs, a dozen of them on the Fordow enrichment site and two more on the one at Natanz. The strikes, part of a highly secretive and complex operation, were years in the making.
Back in 2009, unidentified officers with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which specializes in deeply buried underground targets, were briefed on a major construction project in Iran — specifically Fordow, which Caine described as a "critical element" of Tehran's covert nuclear weapons program.
The DTRA officers studied the Fordow site, which is built into a mountain, closely for years. Caine said they eventually realized that the US didn't have a weapon that could be used to attack the facility, so they started working with the defense industry partners like Boeing and Northrop Grumman to further develop the MOP.
The bomb was part of a DTRA technology demonstration program until 2010, when the weapon became a part of the Air Force's Quick Reaction Capability Program, per the air service.
The massive bomb was tested hundreds of times. Many full-scale munitions were dropped on "extremely" realistic targets with the goal of having a weapon that the US could use against Fordow at a time and place of its choosing, Caine explained.
That day came just a few days ago, when President Donald Trump ordered the B-2s to bomb Fordow.
Strikes on Iran
The extremely heavy MOP is around 20.5 feet long and has a diameter of 31.5 inches. The warhead alone weighs 6,000 pounds, and it can penetrate deeply buried facilities up to around 200 feet deep. The B-2 is the only operational aircraft that can carry the weapon, storing two internally to preserve stealth.
Caine said that the MOP is made of steel, explosives, and a fuse programmed to achieve a specific effect inside Fordow. Each bomb had a unique impact angle, arrival, final heading, and fuse setting, which determines when the weapon would explode.
A longer fuse creates a delay, meaning the MOP can penetrate deeper into the target before it explodes.
Fordow had sets of three holes — a main exhaust shaft and two additional ventilation shafts — visible on the surface. Caine said that in the days leading up to the attack, Iran attempted to cover the shafts with concrete.
Talking about one target point, which was hit with six of the large GBU-57 bunker-busters, Caine said that the first MOP "forcibly removed" the concrete cap, exposing the main shaft. The next four MOPs entered that shaft, traveling toward critical Fordow facilities at speeds faster than 1,000 feet per second and exploding inside. The sixth bomb dropped was a flexible option if something didn't work the way it was intended.
"Unlike a normal surface bomb, you won't see an impact crater, because they're designed to deeply bury and then function," he said. Satellite imagery showed the holes where the MOPs penetrated the surface at Fordow, but not a substantial impact crater at the site.
Caine said all six weapons dropped on the vents went where they were meant to go. He shared that the "primary kill mechanism" at the site was a mixture of blast and overpressure, which would have ripped through the open tunnels and destroyed critical hardware.
He said the US military does not really do battle damage assessments, noting that "by design, we don't grade our own homework — the intelligence community does."
However, he did say that the big MOPs were built, tested, and loaded properly; released from the B-2s properly; navigated to their intended targets as intended, and functioned as designed, "meaning they exploded."
"We know this through other means — intelligence means — that we have, that we were visibly able to see them," Caine explained.
The Trump administration has touted the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — the latter being a third nuclear facility that US forces targeted over the weekend with Tomahawk cruise missiles — as a major success, with top officials asserting that Iran's ability to build a bomb was set back years. Israel's Atomic Energy Commission has offered a similar assessment.
Rafael Grossi, the United Nations nuclear watchdog chief, said that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered significant damage, although he said using the term annihilation would be a step too far. He also said the whereabouts of Tehran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium — which is needed to make a weapon — is unknown. Reports suggest it was hidden ahead of the US strikes.
An early US intelligence report indicated that the US strikes may have only set Iran's nuclear program back by months, not years. Some analysts have also questioned the effectiveness of the recent strikes, with some observers suggesting Tehran could quickly rebuild damaged infrastructure and enrich its highly enriched uranium stock to the weapons-grade levels needed to make a bomb.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Axelrod: Iran intel drama driven by Trump's ‘unquenchable thirst for credit'
Axelrod: Iran intel drama driven by Trump's ‘unquenchable thirst for credit'

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Axelrod: Iran intel drama driven by Trump's ‘unquenchable thirst for credit'

Democratic political strategist David Axelrod said the drama over the U.S.'s recent strikes in Iran's nuclear facilities and the intel surrounding the outcome has been driven by President Trump's 'unquenchable thirst for credit.' 'The controversy over the facts around the Iran attack stems from the @POTUS 's unquenchable thirst for credit and praise that leads him to overclaim,' Axelrod said in a thread on the social platform X on Thursday. 'To say that the military performed splendidly and inflicted enormous damage would have been enough. But he needed to say it's over, one-and-done, problem solved,' he added. Trump and his top national security brass have intensely pushed back on reporting that strikes on Iran, which occurred over the weekend, set the country's nuclear program back by only months. That conclusion that came from a preliminary intelligence report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that an investigation had begun into leaks of that classified preliminary report. 'Of course we're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now, because this information is for internal purposes, battle damage assessments,' Hegseth previously told reporters. Trump and his Cabinet officials have been adamant that the Saturday strikes did more damage. On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said as much in a post on X: 'Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do.' Axelrod said in his Thursday X thread that there was 'an urgent question as to what, if anything, is left–including the nearly 900 pounds of highly-enriched uranium that he [Trump] and the @VP claimed was buried in Fordo but the whereabouts of which Hegseth acknowledged today was still under review,' noting one of the sites the U.S. struck. The Hill has reached out to the White House and the Pentagon.

Trump attacks on CNN, Fox underscore effort to stifle questions, put media on backfoot
Trump attacks on CNN, Fox underscore effort to stifle questions, put media on backfoot

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump attacks on CNN, Fox underscore effort to stifle questions, put media on backfoot

The Trump administration is calling out reporters by name as it seeks to push its narrative about U.S. strikes on Iran, seeking to put the media on defense while stifling any talk about intelligence reports that fall short of saying Tehran's nuclear capabilities were obliterated. The attacks are targeting a broad swathe of the press that includes specific reporters cable news outlets as different as CNN and Fox News. Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News personality himself, from a Pentagon podium on Thursday morning said 'Jennifer, you've been about the worst' as part of a broad attack on the media. He was singling out Jennifer Griffin, a respected defense reporter who asked if the department was certain that all of Iran's highly enriched uranium was at the Fordow nuclear facility. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt from her own podium later on Thursday singled out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand, saying she had written 'a lie from the intelligence community to seek a narrative she wanted to prove.' The personal attacks are unusual and underscore the administration's determination to put the media on defense and win a public relations air war over success of the attacks on Iran. The administration is confident of its success because it has worked before, and because of general distrust of the media. 'These people are never going to lose any polling points attacking the media, we know that for sure,' one national political reporter told The Hill on Thursday. 'But this is getting pretty personal and feels like it's getting more intense each day.' Trump also called out Bertrand by name on Wednesday, demanding that the network fire her for her reporting on the intelligence and referencing her previous reporting relating to Hunter Biden, Russian influence in the 2016 election and the coronavirus pandemic. CNN issued a forceful statement hours later defending Bertrand. 'CNN's reporting made clear that this was an initial finding that could change with additional intelligence,' a spokesperson for the network said. 'We have extensively covered President Trump's own deep skepticism about it. However, we do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.' The network's top political anchor, Jake Tapper, called Trump's attack 'preposterous,' and said the president was 'going after, shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way.' The New York Times, another target of the administration's ire, also issued a statement on Wednesday defending its reporting on the leaked memo and vowing to 'continue to report fully on the administration's decision making, including his dispute with the Defense Intelligence Agency.' Hegseth, a former colleague of Griffin, suggested a personal beef during his press conference on Thursday. 'Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally,' the Defense secretary told Griffin after she asked if he was completely confident all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow mountain where the strikes had taken place. Griffing was quick to defend herself. 'In fact, I was the first to describe the B-2 bombers, the refueling, the entire mission with great accuracy,' she shot back at the secretary. 'So I take issue with that.' Minutes later, Brit Hume, one of Fox's longest serving political analyst, chastised Hegseth on the network's air over the outburst. 'Her professionalism, her knowledge, her experience at the Pentagon is unmatched,' Hume said. 'I have had and still have the greatest regard for her. The attack on her was unfair.' Trump and his allies have repeatedly sought to discredit the leaked intelligence, saying the Iranian nuclear program has been totally 'obliterated,' and vowing to investigate the intelligence that was leaked to media outlets. Leavitt suggested that whoever leaked the intelligence to media outlets 'should be in jail' while going after Bertrand. 'This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to push fake and false narratives,' she said. The intensifying rhetoric is raising concerns among press freedom groups, and calling to mind other moves the administration has taken to crack down on media coverage it views as unsupportive of its agenda. 'This is a familiar pattern by now: journalists report something Trump doesn't like, and he lashes out. He wants the press to parrot his talking points, and when they don't, he tries to bully them into submission,' said Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters with Borders. 'That's why he's suing CBS, the Des Moines Register, and the Pulitzer Board. It's why he banned the AP from the White House and wants to pad the White House briefing room and press pool with friendly right-wing voices.' Tim Richardson, program manager for journalism and disinformation at PEN America, told The Hill on Thursday the administration is trying to vilify journalists 'who accurately characterized that intelligence, rather than addressing the substance of his own administration's intelligence report.' 'These attacks erode public trust in fact-based reporting and embolden harassment against journalists who ask hard questions, especially in times of international conflict,' Richardson added. Former Defense Sec. Leon Panetta said Hegseth appears to disdain the media. 'There's no question that the way he has approached this reflects a lot of personal judgment and paranoia, very frankly, about the role of the press,' Panetta said. 'Rather than trying to paint the press as coming from one direction or the other, that's a trap. It's a trap because, frankly, we have press on all sides, on the left and the right, in the middle, all basically speaking to the truth.' Seth Stern, director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, added The White House's response to the leaked intelligence reporting 'shows that their crackdowns on journalists and whistleblowers have nothing to do with national security and everything to do with saving themselves from embarrassment.' Some argue that while Trump might be winning political points attacking the press over the intel leak episode, he could also be taking a risk if the Iranian nuclear facilities are proven to not be completely 'obliterated.' 'The irony is that Trump would get MORE credit if he weren't so relentlessly craven about claiming–and overclaiming–it,' David Axelrod, a longtime Democratic political operative and Trump critic wrote on the social platform X. 'It was cynical even by Trump's standards for him to suggest that to question the instant, conclusive analysis he offered Americans in the hours after the B-2 mission, was in any way an attack on the brave men and woman who carried it out. It was more than cynical. It was cowardly.'

Pete Hegseth attacks old Fox News colleague's reporting on Iran strikes intelligence evaluation
Pete Hegseth attacks old Fox News colleague's reporting on Iran strikes intelligence evaluation

Washington Post

time34 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Pete Hegseth attacks old Fox News colleague's reporting on Iran strikes intelligence evaluation

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth criticized his former Fox News colleague Jennifer Griffin as 'about the worst, the one who misrepresents the most intentionally what the president says' in a Pentagon news conference Thursday. Griffin, Fox's chief national security correspondent, said that 'I take issue with that' and defended her reporting on the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. Hegseth, a Fox News anchor before President Donald Trump appointed him defense secretary, repeatedly criticized the media and questioned its patriotism for its reporting on an initial assessment of the weekend's bombing that questioned how much damage was done to Iran's nuclear program. The attack on Griffin was notable because, less than a year ago, she and Hegseth shared the same employer — a news network that has seen its reputation in Trump's eyes rise and fall haphazardly over the past decade. Griffin had asked Hegseth about whether there was any certainty that highly enriched uranium was stored at the mountain bunker bombed by the U.S., given satellite photos that showed more than a dozen trucks were seen there two days in advance. 'Of course, we're watching every single aspect,' Hegseth said. 'But, Jennifer, you've been about the worst, the one who misrepresents the most intentionally what the president says.' Fox management had no immediate comment on what Hegseth said. Fox analyst Brit Hume called it an attack she did not deserve. 'Her professionalism, her knowledge and her experience are unmatched,' Hume said. Hume did seem to criticize, however, other news organizations for reporting on the initial assessment by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency. 'It is typical of the media in our age that any negative report that you can put your hands on in the aftermath of the United States military action is going to be highlighted, played up and so,' he said, saying it was disappointing. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the administration is investigating who is responsible for leaking a copy of the intelligence agency's report. The news reporting clearly angered Trump, since the report's initial conclusions contradicted the president's statements that the bombing resulted in 'total obliteration' of Iran's nuclear program. For a second day, the administration focused its anger on CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand who helped break the story. CNN, which said Wednesday that it stood 100% behind Bertrand's journalism, continued to defend her Thursday and said its reporting on the Trump administration's own report was in no way meant to diminish the military's efforts. ___ David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store