Axelrod: Iran intel drama driven by Trump's ‘unquenchable thirst for credit'
Democratic political strategist David Axelrod said the drama over the U.S.'s recent strikes in Iran's nuclear facilities and the intel surrounding the outcome has been driven by President Trump's 'unquenchable thirst for credit.'
'The controversy over the facts around the Iran attack stems from the @POTUS 's unquenchable thirst for credit and praise that leads him to overclaim,' Axelrod said in a thread on the social platform X on Thursday.
'To say that the military performed splendidly and inflicted enormous damage would have been enough. But he needed to say it's over, one-and-done, problem solved,' he added.
Trump and his top national security brass have intensely pushed back on reporting that strikes on Iran, which occurred over the weekend, set the country's nuclear program back by only months. That conclusion that came from a preliminary intelligence report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that an investigation had begun into leaks of that classified preliminary report.
'Of course we're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now, because this information is for internal purposes, battle damage assessments,' Hegseth previously told reporters.
Trump and his Cabinet officials have been adamant that the Saturday strikes did more damage. On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said as much in a post on X: 'Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do.'
Axelrod said in his Thursday X thread that there was 'an urgent question as to what, if anything, is left–including the nearly 900 pounds of highly-enriched uranium that he [Trump] and the @VP claimed was buried in Fordo but the whereabouts of which Hegseth acknowledged today was still under review,' noting one of the sites the U.S. struck.
The Hill has reached out to the White House and the Pentagon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cringeworthy moment socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's rap video played during live interview: ‘Didn't think it would be on CNN'
Watch as #NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani watches his past performance as a rapper and responds to critics who say he's not ready to run New York. He speaks one-on-one with @ErinBurnett . "I didn't think it was going to be on CNN." That was not music to his ears. Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's 2019 rap video reached a national audience Thursday night — during an incredibly awkward moment on a live CNN interview that left the New York City mayoral hopeful visibly uncomfortable. Mamdani appeared on 'Erin Burnett OutFront' and the eponymous host used the C-grade hip-hop video as an introduction to the 33-year-old lefty pol who performed under the name 'Mr. Cardamom.' Advertisement 4 A shirtless Zohran Mamdani wears an apron during a 2019 rap video. The Queens assemblyman grimaced and flinched as the video began to play — attempting to laugh off the reminder of his blush-inducing attempt at a music career. 'Once you do it, it's out there,' Burnett said to Mamdani. Advertisement 'It's there. Didn't think it was going to be on CNN,' Mamdani said through a wincing smile. Burnett then pressed Mamdani, offering him a chance to respond to critics who suggest he is 'not ready now' to be mayor of the Big Apple. 'I would say a campaign offers a glimpse into what an administration would look like, and we built a campaign the likes of which the city has not seen in a long time,' Mamdani replied, eliding over Mr. Cardamom's performance entirely. 4 Mamdani dances to the song during a portion of the video. Advertisement 4 A group of children stand in the food truck during the rap video. Mamdani's vanilla rhetoric Thursday was a far cry from the spicy bars he would drop under his sobriquet — including some songs which gave outright endorsement of groups who supported the terror group Hamas. In the 2017 track 'Holy Land Five,' the presumptive Democratic mayoral candidate praised five men — known as the 'Holy Land Five' — from the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development who were convicted in 2008 of donating more than $12 million to Hamas. 'My love to the Holy Land Five. You better look 'em up,' Mamdani as Mr. Cardamom sang in a song called 'Salam.' Advertisement 4 The Queens assemblyman grimaced and flinched as the video began to play — attempting to laugh off the reminder of his blush-inducing attempt at a music career. Those five men — Shukri Abu Baker, Mohammad El-Mezain, Ghassan Elashi, Mufid Abdulqader and Abdulrahman Odeh — were convicted by the US Justice Department on 108 counts including supporting terrorism, tax fraud and money laundering. Mamdani and his paltry rapping chops got an ego-check from a real New York rapper — 50 Cent — who offered the Socialist $258,000 to drop out of the race and leave New York for good.
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship
The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. Advertisement These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Decisions also are expected in several other important cases. The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools. Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. Advertisement The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography. Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. Advertisement
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Democrats are trying to figure out what to do about John Fetterman. One of them is stepping up.
'I thought I was going to play Senator Fetterman,' Lamb joked as he sat down in front of a central Pennsylvania crowd last Sunday. Advertisement Democrats are frustrated with Fetterman Lamb's reemergence comes at an in-between moment, roughly halfway through Fetterman's six-year term, and is helping define the struggle facing Democrats in swing-state Pennsylvania. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up There, Democrats figure prominently in their national effort to push back on President Donald Trump, but also in their struggle to figure out what to do about Fetterman, who is under fire from rank-and-file Democrats for being willing to cooperate with Trump. Frustration with Fetterman has been on display on social media, at the massive " No Kings " rally in Philadelphia and among the Democratic Party's faithful. The steering committee of the progressive organization Indivisible PA last month asked Fetterman to resign. It's quite a turnabout for the hoodies-and-shorts-wearing Fetterman, elected in 2022 with an everyman persona and irreverent wit, who was unafraid to challenge convention. Advertisement For some progressives, frustration with Fetterman began with his staunch support for Israel's punishing war against Hamas in Gaza, an issue that divides Democrats. It's moved beyond that since Trump took office. Now, some are wondering why he's — as they see it — kissing up to Trump, why he's chastising fellow Democrats for their anti-Trump resistance and whether he's even committed to their causes at all. Most recently, they question his support for Trump's bombing of Iran. 'It hurts,' said John Abbott, who attended Sunday's event in suburban Harrisburg. Speaking at the flagship 'No Kings' rally in Philadelphia, Indivisible co-founder Leah Greenberg name-checked Fetterman. 'We're looking to the leaders who will fight for us, because even today there are folks among the Democratic Party who think we should roll over and play dead,' Greenberg said. 'Anyone seen John Fetterman here today?' The crowd booed. Why is Conor Lamb crisscrossing Pennsylvania again? In Pittsburgh, progressives trying to land an in-person town hall with Fetterman or first-term Republican Sen. David McCormick noticed when the two senators advertised an event together at a downtown restaurant to celebrate the release of McCormick's new book. Progressive groups organized to protest it and — after it got moved to a private location with a private invite list — went ahead with their own town hall. They invited Lamb and a local Democratic state representative instead. More invitations for Lamb started rolling in. By his count, he's now attended at least a dozen town halls and party events, easily clocking more than 2,000 miles to appear in small towns, small cities and suburbs, often in conservative areas. 'Showing up matters and it really does make a difference,' said Dana Kellerman, a Pittsburgh-based progressive organizer. 'Is that going to matter to John Fetterman? I really don't know. I don't know what he's thinking. I don't know if he's always been this person or if he's changed in the last two years.' Advertisement Fetterman has brushed off criticism, saying he's a committed Democrat, insisting he was elected to engage with Republicans and — perhaps hypocritically — questioning why Democrats would criticize fellow Democrats. At times, Fetterman has criticized Trump, questioning the move to 'punch our allies in the mouth' with tariffs or the need for cuts to social-safety net programs in the GOP's legislation to extend 2017's tax cuts. Fetterman's office didn't respond to an inquiry about Lamb. Is Conor Lamb running for Senate? For his part, Lamb — a former U.S. Marine and federal prosecutor — says he isn't running for anything right now, but he'll do whatever he can to 'stop this slide that we're on toward a less democratic country and try to create one in which there's more opportunity for people.' To some Democrats, he sounds like a candidate. 'That he's doing these town halls is a good indication that he'll be running for something, so it's a good thing,' said Janet Bargh, who attended the event in suburban Harrisburg. Aside from the town halls, he spoke at the Unite for Veterans event on the National Mall. He has also been active on social media, doing local radio appearances and appearing on MSNBC, where he recently criticized the June 14 military parade ordered up by Trump. Not long ago, it was hard to envision Lamb losing a race, ever. In 2018, he won a heavily Trump-friendly congressional district in southwestern Pennsylvania in a special election. It was the center of the political universe that spring, drawing campaign visits by Trump and then-presidential hopeful Joe Biden. Advertisement Suddenly, Lamb was ascendant. Then he ran for Senate and lost handily — by more than two-to-one — to Fetterman in 2022's primary. People often ask Lamb if he's going to challenge Fetterman again. Lamb said he reminds them that Fetterman has three years left in his term and pivots the conversation to what Democrats need to do to win elections in 2025 and 2026. Still, Lamb is unafraid to criticize Fetterman publicly. And, he said, he's a magnet for Democrats to air their unhappiness with Fetterman. What he hears, over and over, is frustration that Fetterman spends too much time attacking fellow Democrats and not enough time challenging Trump. 'And that is, I think, what's driving the frustration more than any one particular issue,' Lamb said. At the town hall, Lamb wasn't afraid to admit he'd lost to Fetterman. But he turned it into an attack line. 'When I watch the person who beat me give up on every important issue that he campaigned on ... the more I reasoned that the point of all of this in the first place is advocacy for what's right and wrong,' Lamb told the crowd. 'And advocacy for not just a particular party to win, but for the type of country where it matters if, when you stand up, you tell the truth.' The crowd cheered.
