Webjet cops $9m over 'false or misleading' airfare ads
On Monday, the Federal Court ordered online travel agency Webjet to pay $9m in penalties for making 'false or misleading statements about the price of flights and booking confirmations'.
Webjet admitted that between 2018 and 2023 it made false or misleading statements on its website, promotional emails and social media posts when it advertised airfares that excluded compulsory fees.
Webjet also admitted that between 2019 and 2024 it provided false or misleading booking confirmations to 118 consumers for flight bookings which had not actually been confirmed.
Webjet then asked for additional payments of up to $2120, for these bookings, in order for consumers to be able to complete the booking.
Webjet has now refunded these consumers.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission began its investigation after a consumer complained about an airfare advertised as 'from $18', which cost almost three times that price after Webjet added its compulsory fees.
'We took this case because we considered that Webjet used misleading pricing by excluding or not adequately disclosing compulsory fees in its ads,' ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.
'Seeking to lure in customers with prices that don't tell the whole story is a serious breach of the Australian Consumer Law.'
The Webjet fees comprised the 'Webjet servicing fee' and 'booking price guarantee' fee which ranged from $34.90 to $54.90 per booking, depending on whether the flights were domestic, to New Zealand and the Pacific, or other international destinations.
While Webjet's website, app and most emails contained information about the additional fees, some users had to scroll to the fine print near the bottom of the screen to see them. In its social media posts, Webjet didn't disclose the additional fees at all.
In a statement from February, when the ACCC agreement was initially approved, Webjet said 'it is important to note that, since being advised of the issues of concern by the ACCC in November 2023, Webjet Marketing has voluntarily and proactively implemented improvements to its fee disclosures'.
'Webjet Group is confident that any customer concern with its offering, disclosure, service or pricing was limited,' the statement said.
'[Webjet] has always prided itself on its high levels of trust with all customers and stakeholders and has fully co-operated and positively engaged with the ACCC to resolve this matter.'
The ACCC found that in the relevant period of late 2018 to late 2023 the Webjet fees represented 36 per cent of the company's total revenue.
The matter was resolved outside of court when Webjet and the ACCC agreed to settle on the conditions that Webjet:
'pay a proposed total penalty of $9m; publish a corrective notice in a form agreed with the ACCC for a period of 60 days; review, maintain and continue to implement an Australian Consumer Law compliance program in an agreed form; and contribute $100,000 to the ACCC's costs'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Could a 4-day working week be coming to Australia?
The 5-day working week has been the norm for as long as most of us can remember but across the world more companies and governments are trying out a 4-day version. Jason Om finds out whether Australia could be moving in the same direction.

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
CSIRO report shows renewables still cheapest form of energy
Chris Bowen is the Minister for Climate Change and Energy and he speaks to Sarah Ferguson about the increased government support for clean energy projects.


SBS Australia
4 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Federal judge dismisses COVID cruise ship class action appeal but negligence ruling upheld
Federal judge dismisses COVID cruise ship class action appeal but negligence ruling upheld Published 29 July 2025, 6:46 am Federal judge dismisses COVID cruise ship class action appeal but negligence ruling upheld ABSTRACT: The Federal Court has dismissed two appeals related to the class action against Princess Cruise Lines over the Ruby Princess COVID-19 outbreak in 2020. One appeal sought to increase compensation for a passenger, while the other was filed by Carnival Cruises, challenging an earlier court finding of negligence.